• Home
  • About me

JimmyCsays

At the juncture of journalism and daily life in Kansas City

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« This series is a big, big winner
Next Post »

A new hero in town?

August 27, 2010 by jimmycsays

From the avalanche of criticism that greeted last week’s announcement about Polsinelli Shughart’s plan to build a high-rise on the Plaza, one published comment struck a chord with a lot of people. 

A woman said the law firm’s leaders would have been “heroes” if they had committed the firm to resurrecting the West Edge project on the southwest part of the Plaza.  

Well, Polsinelli Shughart bypassed its chance to be the hero, and in the process it may have tarnished its reputation forever. 

On Thursday, however, a new prospective hero stepped forward. And it’s none other than AMC Entertainment, one of the nation’s largest movie theater companies. 

Kansas City-based AMC emerged as the primary tenant after a group associated with RED Development submitted the apparent high bid of $10 million for the long-stalled office and hotel project, according to The Kansas City Star. 

To me, it is fitting that AMC become the hero because the man who took AMC big-time, the late Stan Durwood, probably would have wanted to help clean up the West Edge mess that advertising mogul Bob Bernstein and snake-oil salesman Ray Braswell left us. 

In a way, Durwood, who died at age 78 in 1999, saved downtown, where AMC company currently has its offices. It was Durwood who conceived of, pushed for, and named the Power & Light District. It took his former girlfriend — a woman by the name of Kay Barnes — and a Baltimore outfit – Cordish Companies – to make it happen. But it’s still very much a part of Durwood’s legacy. 

Durwood

His main legacy, in case you didn’t know it, is the multiplex theater. He opened the first one, side-by-side theaters at the Ward Parkway Shopping Center, on July 12, 1963. 

In a 1999 article about Durwood’s death, the Associated Press wrote: “It was clear he didn’t have the multiplex figured out yet: Both screens played the same movie — “The Great Escape,” starring Steve McQueen and James Garner. But the idea was born, and according to AMC, Durwood coined the multiplex name at that time, too.” 

Durwood never sought the limelight and didn’t promote himself; he just stuck to business and pushed the ideas he thought would work. It was in the same low-key vein that AMC spokesman Justin Scott commented in The Star on AMC’s possible interest in the West Edge: 

“Currently, we are making some preliminary inquiries into some locations in Kansas City, yet no decisions are being made at this time.” 

To me, it’s playing out as a picture of two companies. The picture I have of one – Polsinelli, Shughart – is of a brash, boastful and back-slapping group congratulating each other on their initial Plaza plan, which they thought was a done deal…before the public weighed in. 

The picture I have of the other is of a group of no-nonsense folks who keep their heads down and try to figure out what is best for their company and the city in which they operate. 

And when those folks get together in the boardroom, I have no doubt that they talk business below a portrait of Stanley H. Durwood.

About these ads

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

3 Responses

  1. on August 28, 2010 at 12:44 pm Jim Gottsch

    Good blog Jim. I’d like to add another thought about the Polsinelli, et al. brouhaha. I heard a caller raise the idea, and I’m tempted to agree, that this is an orchestrated controversy, at least on the part of the law firm. They deliberately proposed an outrageous plan at first so that the almost-as-hideous plan B compromise would be seen as a victory by the gullible powers that be, if not the historic cognoscenti squealing so loudly about the original “plan.” Add to that the pathological need for attention by arrogant & narcissistic attorneys (redundant) and you have a very plausible subplot. I don’t know whether to be sad, mad or both. It’s the same story in Kansas City, over and over again. For years the developers and their money have always won and the city leaders roll over. “Give us what we want or we’ll take our money & jobs to Kansas.”


    • on August 31, 2010 at 1:28 pm jfitzpatr

      Might be different this time, Jim. I get the sense that the alternative is going over about as well as the original plan. If there’s a crowd at the Oct. 9 Plan Commission meeting and at the ensuing City Council Plans and Zoning Committee meeting (date not set), the council probably will not side with the lawyers and developers. Call or e-mail your council members. I think you’re in the 2nd District but I’m not sure. Jim


  2. on August 28, 2010 at 12:45 pm Jim Gottsch

    Oops, meant to say the caller was on the Steve Kraske radio show.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me
  • Archives

    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 115 other followers

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 115 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: