• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Bishop Robert Finn: Miserable but probably not going anyplace soon
McClatchy appointment at The Star: Looking to the future through youthful eyes »

Bishop Finn’s defenders: “He has made one mistake” and “He has been a great bishop.”

June 13, 2011 by jimmycsays

The lemmings are on the loose.

I was wondering how long it would take for the knee-jerk defenders of the Catholic hierarchy to rise in defense of Bishop Robert Finn of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph.

At first — after the shocking news of the diocese’s five-month-or-more cover-up of Father Shawn Ratigan’s child-porn propensities — the lemmings were quiet, for the most part. They were so taken aback at the gravity of the diocese’s action (or inaction) that they really didn’t know what to say or how to respond.

But now, after several weeks of the diocese coming under heavy bombardment from every direction, they’ve circled the wagons and launched a counterattack:

Call it the “good and holy man” defense.

Here are three examples:

Daniel G. Obermeier of Olathe, in a June 10 letter to the editor of The Star:

“Bishop Robert Finn made one mistake…Bishop Finn has lived and taught the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic faith. For this he should definitely not resign.”

Mark S. Robertson of Independence, in a June 11 letter to the editor:

“I have met Bishop Finn, but don’t know him personally It is quite obvious, though, that he is a good and holy man, and I think he has been a great bishop. He has launched many strong Catholic initiatives, and there are now over 25 seminarians, according to the Catholic Key 2011 diocesan directory.”

Kelly Roper of Platte City, in a June 12 letter to the editor:

“Bishop Finn is a true example of Christ in accepting the cross now being presented to him. He continues to talk to groups of people who are hurting, enduring persecution with the hope of correcting wrongs and bringing healing to his flock.”

As you know, Finn unleashed his own counter punch last Thursday, when he appointed former U.S. attorney Todd Graves to investigate the diocese’s handling of sex-crimes cases, including that of Ratigan, who is in the Clay County Jail on three felony counts of possessing child pornography.

“These are initial steps,” Finn said, regarding the appointment of Graves. “Other actions are forthcoming.”

So, Finn has decided to fight back, and unlike the sexting case of Rep. Anthony Weiner of New York, there’s no Nancy Pelosi or other higher-up to say to him:

“Robert, you’re embarrassing us. It’s time to get out from under the harsh spotlight.”

Finn may be a good and holy man, but he’s also shown his true stripes. He has done that by working, from Day One, to establish a set of priorities that puts the church hierarchy and Pope John Paul II’s vision of a very conservative church at the top of the list, with the laity — especially the welfare of children — at the bottom.

Bishops everywhere are trying to stack the deck with conservative priests, and I have heard enough to convince me that Ratigan is of that ilk. The conservative priests are going to get more rope than the liberals, it’s as simple as that.

If you look at this episode, then, within the context of the overall direction of the Catholic Church — and not as “one mistake” — it’s clear that it’s the product of a wayward philosophy, a philosophy that starts at the top.

I remember when my wife Patty and I had decided to join a Disciples of Christ Church in Olathe, and we were talking to the senior pastor, Rev. Holly McKissick, about our decision to leave the Catholic Church.

Something that Holly said that day stuck with me because it went right to the heart of our concerns.

“The Catholic Church has made a lot of good contributions over the centuries,” she said, “but there’s something wrong when one person at the top has all the answers and nobody else has any.”

The Catholic Church is strictly a vertical operation. Finn and the 5,000 other bishops are accountable to no one except the Pope. And Pope Benedict XVI, I feel sure, believes that Finn and almost every other conservative bishop is doing a fine job.

To me, the people who are putting up “the good and holy man” defense are, for the most part, moving in lockstep with church philosophy. To them, I think, the children who are victims of priestly perversion are collateral damage as the church plows ahead into the iceberg of conservatism.

I know that that’s a harsh opinion, but I just don’t see any other explanation for what happened in the Kansas City-St. Joseph Diocese. It’s a scandal, not “a mistake.”

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 13 Comments

13 Responses

  1. on June 13, 2011 at 7:10 pm MattG

    Finn has tried to revive the bygone days when a bishop’s word in his diocese was never challenged, when his pronouncements were accepted without question and his actions not examined. It doesn’t seem as though he revived those days soon enough.


    • on June 16, 2011 at 9:21 am Mo Rage

      And the longer this drags out, the more likely it is that he’ll get his way, too, and it will be swept under a figurative rug and he’ll remain “untouchable.” Sad. Pitiful. Pathetic. Tragic. Sick.


  2. on June 13, 2011 at 10:40 pm Mike Rice

    I don’t know the three supporters that you cited in your posting, but I think it’s a safe bet that they are staunch pro-lifers. There are many people so consumed by the abortion issue that they would support Charles Manson if he were to speak about the so-called plight of the unborn. That is a big reason why there are so many scoundrels holding elected office these days. Many of these staunch Catholic pro-lifers love Finn. And I think you are right, Fitz, in that children sexually abused by priests are collateral damage to them.


  3. on June 13, 2011 at 10:45 pm jimmycsays

    Funny line about Charles Manson, Mike…and great point about choice and right-to-life being the seminal wedge issue in the church.


  4. on June 14, 2011 at 7:18 am chuck

    Mike Rice.

    Dead on the money.


  5. on June 14, 2011 at 9:20 am Mike Rice

    Thank you. I will add that while I and my family were in church at St. Elizabeth’s on the Sunday before the 2008 presidential election, someone put a flier on every car in the church parking lot and the adjacent streets. Those fliers encouraged voters not to vote for Obama because of his pro-choice views. I’m sure that Bishop Finn was behind this and I have had nothing but contempt for him ever since. As I have said before in these posts, I am convinced that he looked the other way on Fr. Ratigan because they share the same pro-life mission.


  6. on June 14, 2011 at 9:42 am Concerned Catholic 2

    And what is so mentally ill about the “pro-life” movement is that their concern stops at birth. How will the mothers support those babies you want them to have? Don’t care, not my problem. What IS that?
    Or, my other favorite, they can just be adopted. Listen folks, the opposite of abortion is NOT adoption, mmkay?


  7. on June 14, 2011 at 10:39 am Harwood Benjamin

    More than most religions, Roman Catholics are immersed in a religion-centric world because of the church’s education mission. Millions have attended Catholic schools from kindergarten through college. It’s more a matter of culture than theology, and for many, it is the dominant element of their lives until they become adults. There are those who find comfort in the certainty and direction provided by a top-down church structure….there are those who find it troubling, but believe the Christian message buried beneath the institutional bureaucracy and hypocrisy outweighs the sins of the human priests and bishops, so they remain part of the church (This is my church, not their church, they say). But an equally valid response is to conclude that because of the misguided and sinful actions of those who are responsible for providing leadership in the Catholic Church, it is no longer possible to trust and support the institution, even if one finds its theology superior and its liturgy more powerful. The easy thing is to stay and not say anything. It’s far more difficult to break those deep-seated ties and walk away, but many of us, guided by the moral teachings of Jesus, have found it necessary.


  8. on June 14, 2011 at 11:07 am jimmycsays

    Tremendous insight there, Harwood, and beautifully expressed. I think that’s one reason this has raised such a firestorm — many cultural Catholics are pounding their fists against the wall in frustration…Your comment hits home with me on several fronts, including my belief that the Catholic liturgy is superior to that of most Protestant churches. Specifically, I think the Catholic music is by far the best, and as for sending loved ones to rest, nothing else approaches the Mass of Christian Burial. You can cry your eyes out and know you’ve given your loved one the best possible send-off.


  9. on June 14, 2011 at 11:14 am Mo Rage

    When you combine the lemming qualities and capabilities with the co-dependence, you get a very sad and dangerous result. These apologists are just maddening.


  10. on June 14, 2011 at 11:22 am jimmycsays

    So true, Mo.


  11. on June 14, 2011 at 4:41 pm Don Lake, Ruskin UofMisery

    Rome of the 1500s and 1600s where church leaders fell upon pre Christian Greek PAGANs to harass and even burn good hearted CHRISTIAN scientists, including Galileo, Newton and Bruno ……….


  12. on June 17, 2011 at 9:45 am Patrick O’Malley

    OJ only made one mistake.

    We have laws in this country because we don’t want children to get raped, but the Catholic church doesn’t care. Put Finn in jail, then do a grand jury investigation. See what they found when Philly did a grand jury investigation. Just read the first 6 pages at http://www.philadelphiadistrictattorney.com/images/Grand_Jury_Report.pdf

    The pedophiles and pedophile protectors in the Catholic church are sick, and the congregation that supports them is almost as sick.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 566 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 566 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: