Archive for April, 2019

For a day or so a couple of weeks ago, I was briefly second-guessing my commitment to Jolie Justus for mayor.

I’ve heard several people, mostly from Midtown, say her responsiveness to constituents has faltered and that she’s too willing to go along with the developers and the development attorneys — big sources of campaign contributions.

My own feeling — overriding those legitimate concerns — has been that she would represent our city well at the state and national levels; that her eight years’ experience in the Republican-dominated Missouri Senate has given her a depth of political experience that her opponent Quinton Lucas lacks; and that she is very good at listening to people on all sides of issues and arriving at reasonable positions.

On the latter point, for example, some people are angry at her for supporting Quik Trip’s successful push to expand its store on Westport Road west of the Trafficway. But who’s to say that won’t turn out to be a positive for the area? Tons of people patronize that location, and it may well be a safer and smoother operation with the pumps on one side of Mercier and the store on the other.

Anyway, like I say, my equivocation was short lived.

About the time I was having second thoughts, The Star came out with an editorial asking, “Should City Manager Troy Schulte be replaced.”

In response to The Star, Justus was generally supportive, saying, “I happen to think Troy has been a strong city manager for Kansas City.”

Lucas, on the other hand, seemed to be open to the idea of replacing Schulte — which would require a majority vote of the 13-member City Council. He was quoted as saying…

“There have been several areas in which I have disagreed mightily with Mayor (Sly) James and by default, I have disagreed on those topics with what the city manager has been directed to do.”

Lucas — who teaches law classes at the University of Kansas — is a smart man, but that was a jaw-droppingly off base statement to make.

First, a city manager isn’t going to last long if he doesn’t keep the peace with the mayor, particularly a very strong mayor, like James has been.

Second, in my view Schulte has been the best city manager since “good government” advocates displaced the Pendergast machine in 1940 and installed L.P. (Perry) Cookingham in the city manager’s office. During his unmatched 19 years as city manager, the stage was set for development of Kansas City International Airport, and the city doubled in geographic size, from 60 to 130 square miles. (It’s now 319 square miles.)

Schulte has now been city manager for nearly a decade, and I don’t see why he couldn’t — and shouldn’t — go on another decade and surpass Cookingham. Under Schulte, city services have improved by leaps and bounds. Among other things, the 3-1-1 call-in and online complaint-and-request system used to be maddeningly bad, but it now runs flawlessly (at least in my experience).

In addition, Schulte is a friend of the fountains, which, as many of you know, are close to my heart. From the $800 million G.O. bond issue that voters approved in April 2017, Schulte allocated several hundred thousand dollars to renovate the Spirit of Freedom Fountain on Brush Creek and several hundred thousand to augment private funds to renovate Haff Circle Fountain at the Meyer Boulevard entrance to Swope Park.

Flashy projects or nuts and bolts, Schulte gets things done. Just a few weeks ago, for example, Ward Parkway from about 59th to Gregory was a demolition-derby area, with almost more potholes and gouges than flat surface. But the city repaved it just in time for the Rock the Parkway half marathon on April 13…I credit Schulte.

So, for Lucas to intimate that he would consider leading an effort to oust Schulte is out of bounds for me. What that sounds like is a guy who is getting ahead of himself and who might be prone to bad judgment on important matters. There’s absolutely no reason to consider removing Troy Schulte. We’re very fortunate to have him, and firing him would be a colossal mistake and could begin to undo a lot of progress the city has made the last 10 years on delivery of basic services.


Over and above the Schulte issue, a story in today’s KC Star further affirmed my commitment to Justus. City Hall reporter Allison Kite wrote about the problem of the city’s underfunded pension plans. While it’s not an issue that gets a lot of attention from the public, it is extremely important because it could mean the city will have to significantly reduce services in the future in order to live up to its pension obligations.

The story said that 10 years ago, pensions accounted for 8.5 percent of spending from the city’s general fund, but it now absorbs more than 13 percent and is expected to rise to 15 percent by 2024.

The city has four pension funds, covering police officers, civilian police employees, firefighters and non-public-safety city employees.

What aroused my political genes was the fact that Lucas was “nowhere to be found” on the pension issue.

Kite had no trouble getting a quote from Justus, who said she would defer for now to a task force that is studying the issue. But Lucas, Kite wrote, “did not respond to a voicemail or text messages requesting comment.”

That was not only surprising but worrisome — worrisome because Lucas has the backing of the police and fire fighter unions.

His reluctance to respond to Kite is attributable, in my view, to not wanting to say anything to upset the police or fire fighters. In other words, let that sleeping dog lie.

Those pension funds are sorely underfunded for one reason: Those two groups of employees have scratched and clawed for good salaries and great benefits for decades — they have routinely worn down the City Council — and the city, consequently, has postponed the day of reckoning.

If Lucas should get elected mayor, you can bet he will further postpone that day…Justus just might do that, too, but because she is running without the support of the police and fire fighters, we the citizens just might have a better chance of seeing her take on the issue. Someday fairly soon, some mayor is going to have to deal with it.

Read Full Post »

Joe Biden for the Democratic nomination for President?

No. No. No.

A thousand times…”NO.”

Biden might be an affable guy, and he’s endured a tremendous amount of tragedy in his life, having lost a wife and daughter to a car crash and a son to brain cancer, but he does not deserve to carry the Democratic banner against President Donald Trump in 2020.

For me, it all goes back to the 1991 confirmation hearings for U.S. Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas.

I watched on TV — horrified — as Biden, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, presided over the debacle that ended with him deferring to Missouri Sen. John C. Danforth, Thomas’ sponsor, during the confirmation hearings.

Clarence Thomas with former U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah (left) and Sen. John C. Danforth of Missouri in 1991

Biden truncated the hearings and let Thomas’ nomination go to the full Senate, where Thomas was approved 52-48. (Biden voted against confirmation on the Senate floor, but the damage was done in committee.)

So, for the ongoing spectacle of Thomas bumbling along out of his depth on the Supreme Court, we can thank Jack Danforth and Joe Biden.

The former senators — pals from different parties — put collegial deference above injustice to a classy and dignified woman, Anita Hill, who had the courage to go before the cameras and tell the story of Thomas’ outrageous treatment of her when she had worked for him at the Department of Education and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Who can ever forget the line he allegedly uttered in her presence: “Who has put pubic hair on my Coke?”


In November 2017, Hill, a professor at Brandeis University, sat down at The Washington Post with five current and former Democratic lawmakers who had sided with Hill in 1991.

One of those former lawmakers, Pat Schroeder, a Colorado Democrat, recalled that on the morning of Oct. 11, 1991, she and another of Hill’s allies in the House of Representatives, Louise Slaughter, a New York Democrat, went to see Biden because they felt the confirmation process was being rushed.

In the 2017 interview, Schroeder said…

We went to see Biden, because we were so frustrated by it. And he literally kind of pointed his finger and said, you don’t understand how important one’s word was in the Senate, that he had given his word to (Danforth) in the men’s gym that this would be a very quick hearing, and he had to get it out before Columbus Day (a few days later).

A specific change Biden made in the proceedings that benefitted Thomas was deciding, at the last minute, to let Thomas testify before Hill. In doing that, Hill said, Biden allowed Thomas “to do a preemptive strike against me.”

In a 1994 New York Times article, columnist Frank Rich called Biden “Mr. Danforth’s all-too-eager tool.”

“The chairman (Biden) rushed the hearings at the Republicans’ request,” Rich wrote, “suppressing crucial evidence and witnesses in the process. As the Hill-Thomas showdown neared, he had top aides tend to his own p.r. rather than prepare for the hearings. But even as Mr. Biden kept ugly testimony about the nominee’s private life off limits at Mr. Danforth’s urging, the chairman applied another standard to Ms. Hill, who was fair game for any character assassin with a hearing-room microphone.”

Rich said that rather than regretting his performance, Biden looked back on it, at least in 1994, as a publicity coup. In a book about the Thomas confirmation, Biden is quoted as saying: “Most voters can’t name their own senator. But now everywhere I go, I get recognized.”


Biden has never unequivocally apologized for his treatment of Hill or taken responsibility for it.

A few weeks ago, while laying the groundwork for yesterday’s announcement that he would seek the Democratic nomination, Biden called Hill and expressed “his regret for what she endured” 28 years ago.

In an interview Wednesday with The Times, Hill said…

“I cannot be satisfied by (him) simply saying, ‘I’m sorry for what happened to you.’ I will be satisfied when I know there is real change and real accountability and real purpose.”

Biden had his big chance to match Hill’s courage 28 years ago, when he should have gone to Danforth and told him he had changed his mind and would not rush the confirmation hearings.

So, Joe can go around kissing babies, smelling women’s hair and doing whatever he wants, but he won’t be getting my vote…ever.

Read Full Post »

Some of you will remember the incident, must have been at least 25 years ago now, when an 18-wheeler barreled down the 20th Street ramp off southbound I-35 and crashed into a small house situated at the bottom of the hill and squarely in line with the end of the ramp.

The truck smashed into the house, and a child who was sleeping — I believe in a second floor bedroom — was killed.

It was an incredible fluke — that lone house standing in the path of the truck and the truck plowing into it — and I remember that at The Star we played the story across the top of the front page the next day.

A big element of the story was the truck’s brakes. The driver claimed that the brakes failed. (I also remember we, the paper, made a big mistake, writing that the truck had air brakes, which it didn’t. That caused a lot of consternation and hand wringing in the newsroom, and we had to correct that on the front page the following day.)

Tests were run on the brakes, however, and they tested fine. So it was probably a case of the driver either not paying attention, speeding, underestimating the distance it would take him to stop at the bottom of the hill — or a combination of those factors.

Now, in another example of a driver claiming brake failure, we’ve got a horrible case of a driver going out of control, careening along a sidewalk at highway speeds, smashing into a 14-year-old middle-school student and killing her.

That story sounded bad enough when The Star first reported the April 12 crash. But it took on greater significance yesterday, when a police report came out saying that the out-of-control car barely missed three other children, whom a crossing guard had just ushered across the street at 124th.

The degree of incongruity is one element that raises or lowers the shock value of a story, and this one ranks very high because the incident occurred at 125th and Switzer Road, in far southwestern Johnson County — where many people go to live to escape the, uh, unpredictability of close-in living.

Two Blue Valley schools in the area — Oak Hill Elementary and Oxford Middle — were getting out, and children were walking, crossing streets and getting picked up by their parents. All hell broke loose when a 2006 Ford Taurus being driven by a 70-year-old man came careening north on Switzer, actually by that point on the sidewalk!

Besides hitting the 14-year-old girl — Alexandra Rumple, an Oxford student — the car hit a telephone cable box, a pole with a traffic light, a speed limit sign and a fence post. Then, the car plowed down about 80 feet of the fence before coming to a stop.

The fence

The Star’s story doesn’t say exactly how long the path of destruction was, but the middle school is at 125th Street, and the car came to a stop near 123rd Street.

The driver, Sudhir S. Gandhi of Lenexa told police he remembered driving near West 129th Street and Switzer and that someone was in the roadway. Quoting The Star’s story, “He said he tried to stop, but the brakes were not working and he continued north until he hit the fence.”

Police said they believed the car first went off the roadway near 127th Street. Gandhi was taken to a hospital because he may have lost consciousness while driving. (I don’t believe he was admitted.)

The Taurus

…Well, clearly, like the incident many years ago on the 20th Street ramp, this was not a case of brake failure. Tests will undoubtedly confirm that.

Gandhi had a valid driver’s license and showed no evidence of impairment. But something happened to him. And, obviously, he had his foot on the gas pedal while the chaos was unfolding. That car was not coasting when it traveled four blocks and took out property and a human life.

Trouble can come in a second. It can come at the bottom of a ramp in a poor section of town, or it can happen in well-to-do, normally serene Blue Valley.

Thank God more children were not struck on April 12.


I was sorry to read in The Star that Henry Bloch died today. What a blessing he was to Kansas City. What an institution he was. I met him once or twice, the first time when I was assigned to cover a Jewel Ball at the Nelson Art Gallery decades ago. I was fascinated to listen to his easy conversation and watch him move around in a high-society situation that was totally natural to him. One of the last times I saw him was more than 20 years ago at the Cinemark on the Plaza. He was having trouble getting around on one or more balky knees. It went through my mind that the famous Mr. Bloch was getting old…He pushed on nicely, though, and made it to age 96…I knew his brother, Richard, better. I was covering City Hall in the late ’80s and early ’90s, when Richard and his wife, Annette, gave $1 million to the Parks Department for creation of the Cancer Survivors Park on the west side of the Plaza. I remember he wanted the amount of the gift to be a secret, but I got a tip on it and put it in the paper. He was peeved. No matter; he and his wife deserved the credit. Richard died in 2004. I believe Annette might still be alive.

Read Full Post »

The sun was shining on Kansas City’s fountains Tuesday, and the waters flowing from them never looked more sparkling.

For those of you who don’t know much about Fountain Day, it’s an annual event in mid-April when all the working, city-maintained fountains are turned on.

Each year, the Parks and Recreation Department, in conjunction with the nonprofit City of Fountains Foundation, holds a Fountain Day event at a different fountain. Yesterday it was at the Haff Circle Fountain, at the east end of Meyer Boulevard, at the main entrance to Swope Park.

The scene yesterday at Haff Circle Fountain

I’ve always loved to see the fountains go on in the spring, but it meant more to me this year because it was my first Fountain Day as a board member of the City of Fountains Foundation. I was invited to be on the board late last year, primarily because two years ago I was a leader in the drive to raise funds to renovate and establish an endowment fund for the Sea Horse Fountain at Meyer Circle.

That fountain, one of the most iconic, along with the J.C. Nichols Fountain, was out of commission for more than a year because of a variety of serious problems. Our fund-raising drive was very successful, to the point that the fountains foundation now maintains an endowment fund of several hundred thousand dollars for use in case of major, unexpected problems.

During the time I was helping raise money for the Sea Horse Fountain, I became aware of and concerned about the plight of the Haff Circle Fountain, which, like the Sea Horse Fountain, had given way to time and the elements and was, so to speak, dead in the water.

Bust of Delbert Haff at the west end of Haff Circle Fountain

I felt confident we at the west end of Meyer Boulevard, adjacent to Mission Hills, could raise enough money to repair our fountain, but I knew the Haff Circle Fountain had very few wealthy benefactors in the immediate area. As a result, the prospects for renovating Haff Circle Fountain — named for Delbert Haff, a lawyer and park board member in the early 1900s — were not promising for many months.

The first major donor to step forward was mortgage banker James B. Nutter Sr., who several years ago pledged $300,000 toward the renovation. Before he died in July 2017, Nutter would badger Pat O’Neill, then president of the City of Fountains Foundation, asking him when restoration work was going to begin. O’Neill would tell Nutter — to his chagrin — that work could not start until all funding was in place and a contract could be awarded.

And so the fountain, which neighborhood children had used as a wading pool of sorts, sat dry.

But three months before Nutter died, Kansas City voters approved $800 million in general obligation bonds for a variety of uses, and later City Manager Troy Schulte earmarked several hundred thousand dollars each for renovation of the Haff Circle Fountain and the Spirit of Freedom Fountain adjacent to Brush Creek.

After plans were drawn up and the JE Dunn Co. offered to undertake the renovation at cost, serious work began last year at Haff Circle.

The final price tag was $1,445,572. Of that $462,784 was privately donated money, $636,021 came from general obligation bond funds, and $348,767 came from other city sources.

So yesterday, about 100 people gathered at the east end of the fountain for the culmination of several years of fund-raising and work. After a 10-second countdown, the jets were turned on, and water shot upward, triggering applause and cheers from the crowd.

Among those who spoke at the re-dedication were park board member Mary Jane Judy, City Council members Alissia Canaday and Lee Barnes, James B. Nutter Jr., former park board president Anita Gorman and two great-granddaughters of Delbert Haff.

Anita Gorman, at yesterday’s rededication of Haff Circle Fountain

One of the great-granddaughters, Anne Salisbury, talked about how it had been passed down to her how much her great-grandfather cherished open spaces and the nascent parks system. Nutter Jr. talked about his father’s love for Kansas City’s east side. Anita Gorman spoke about Haff’s successful efforts to clear a legal path for the park board to obtain thousands of acres that set the stage for development of the city’s extensive park system.

For parks officials, the City of Fountains Foundation, Kansas City’s east side and, truly, all of Kansas City, it was a grand and gratifying day.

Read Full Post »

If you haven’t read The New York Times’ special investigation into Donald Trump’s finances, which was published last October, you should: Its authors just won a Pulitzer Prize in the category of explanatory reporting.

The 13,000-word story — one of the longest investigative pieces ever published in The Times — made a mockery of the President’s long-held claim, “I built what I built myself.”

The story, which took reporters David Barstow, Susanne Craig and Russ Buettner 18 months to report and write, revealed that Trump received the equivalent, in today’s dollars, of at least $413 million from his father’s real estate empire. In addition, much of that money was realized through dubious tax schemes he participated in during the 1990s, including instances of outright fraud.

The Pulitzer was the fourth for Barstow, a record for a reporter.

Susanne Craig addressed The New York Times newsroom Monday after she, Russ Buettner, to her right, and David Barstow, to Buettner’s right, won the Pulitzer Prize for explanatory reporting.

The Pulitzer Prizes, journalism’s highest honor, were awarded yesterday. Among the winners was St. Louis Post-Dispatch metro columnist Tony Messenger, who won for a series of pieces that exposed how poor people convicted of misdemeanor crimes were charged fees for their time in jail, sometimes leading to years of debt and imprisonment. As a result of Messenger’s columns, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the practice was illegal.

Tony Messenger and his editor, Marcia L. Koenig, reacted to the announcement that he had won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary.

Messenger, 52, is an inspiring person in addition to being an accomplished journalist. In 2015, he was a Pulitzer finalist for the paper’s editorials on unrest in Ferguson. Late that same year he developed throat cancer and had to take a leave of absence while fighting it. When he returned to work, he came back as metro columnist.

The Star’s Melinda Henneberger was a finalist in the commentary category for a series of columns, including several on former Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens and the affair that led to his downfall. Caitlin Flanagan of The Atlantic was the other finalist in the commentary category.

The winner in the public service category was the South Florida Sun Sentinel for its coverage of the causes and consequences of the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla. The paper exposed a culture of leniency at Broward County schools, mistakes by the sheriff’s office in responding to the attack and attempts by officials to cover up their failures.

The Pulitzer for breaking news photography went to several staff members of the Reuters news service for a series of photos titled “On the Migrant Trail to America.” Here is one of the photos.


Here is the complete list of this year’s Pulitzer Prize winners.

Read Full Post »

If you live to be in your 60s and 70s (like many of us have) and you’re a newspaper reader (like some of us still are), mandatory stops in the Sunday Star are the “Final Chapters” segment and the “Remembrances,” better known as the obituaries.

It can be touching, satisfying or sad — or all of those — reading about people who are just a few steps ahead of us as we hurtle toward our ultimate mark on the horizon.

Here’s a sample of some of those who made the “Final Chapters” and “Remembrances” columns today…

Charles Van Doren

He was a college professor who got on the old TV quiz show “Twenty-One” and allowed himself to be talked into cheating his way to winning a then-record $129,000. He confessed before a congressional committee in 1959 and then lived much of the rest of his life in something self-banishment, refusing to grant interviews and even leaving the country for several weeks when the firm “Quiz Show,” about the rigged game, was released in 1994.

On Saturday’s Op-Ed page in The New York Times, columnist Bret Stephens tipped his hat to Van Doren for never trying to capitalize in any way on his name recognition. What a contrast, Stephens said, to the way many people deal now with cheating and lying after being exposed — and how differently society treats them.

As Stephens observed…

Had Van Doren come along a few decades later, there would have been no big scandal in fabricating reality and no great shame in participating in it. The lines between fame and infamy would have blurred, and both could be monetized.”

Stephens’ closed with these sentences: “Van Doren died redeemed. Rest in peace.”

He died April 9 in Canaan, CT, and was 93.

Marilynn Smith

She was a Topeka native who went on to become national golf champion at the University of Kansas and one of 13 founders of the LPGA Tour. She won 21 tournaments as a pro, including two majors. Smith’s obituary in The Times said that when the LPGA was founded in the 1950s, “the women also lacked the funds to fly, so they traveled to tournaments in caravans of four or five automobiles when the interstate highway system was in its infancy.”

Marilynn Smith at a 1965 tournament in New Jersey

The Times described Smith as “an exuberant woman who seemed just right for publicizing the tour” and quoted her as saying…

We would go to major league ball parks, St. Louis, Cincinnati, Washington, D.C., and hit golf balls from home plate out to center field, with a 9 or an 8 iron, and then we’d get on the microphone and ask those baseball fans to come out and see the LPGA play.”

Last year, the LPGA sponsored 32 events in 13 countries and awarded $65.35 million in prize money.

Smith died Tuesday in Goodyear, AZ; she was 89.

Salvatore A. Belfonte

From the nationally known, we move to local people…

Everyone in Kansas City recognizes the Belfonte name, and most have probably purchased Belfonte milk, cottage cheese or ice cream.


Sal Belfonte is the guy who got that dairy business started. Quoting the obit…

Sal’s career in the dairy business began in 1957 with Sealtest Dairy where he delivered milk door to door. In 1967 Sal went into business for himself when he purchased a small dairy distributor selling Meadow Gold dairy products…The young company, rooted in family values, was run by members of the Belfonte family. Sal’s wife handled accounting and his children loaded trucks and answered phones.”

When I go to Price Chopper or Brookside Market and need milk, I always pull a carton of Belfonte from the cooler.

Sal Belfonte died April 11 at age 84.

Michael Thomason

I have no connection with Thomason and had never heard of him. But his obit caught my eye partly because he was only 42 when he died.

The first paragraph of the obit said Thomason grew up in Raytown and graduated from Raytown South. He was employed by the Kiewit Engineering Group and liked to fish and play golf and was a Royals’ and Chiefs’ fan.

The second paragraph took a sharp turn…

After a lifetime of struggling, he was finally overwhelmed by the pain and despair of chronic major depression. His family is heartbroken…”


I can’t remember an obit that took on the issue of depression, and, by extension, suicide, so directly.

It took a lot of courage for the family to write that obit that way. My heart goes out to them, and I applaud them.

Michael died April 10. Survivors include his parents and a son and a daughter.


Read Full Post »

I was happy and a bit surprised to read in a Pete Grathoff column in The Star a couple of weeks ago that some concession prices were being lowered at Kauffman Stadium.

The column said the stadium was following the lead of several other stadiums around the country in reducing the public gouging that’s been going on for decades. Here’s what Pete wrote:

“A 16-ounce Pepsi will cost $3, hot dogs will sell for $4 and cans of Miller Lite will be $5. Also, popcorn and pretzels will be available for $3 each.”

Great, I thought, those prices are reasonable.

Today, I made my first trip this season to the stadium and, while waiting to meet family members, I went to the concession stand adjacent to Section 120 on the lower level, not far from the main entrance to the stadium.

In my hand, I held what remained of a 24-ounce bag of salted peanuts — a bag I had bought for about $5 at my Price Chopper a few days ago. (You can take snacks and unopened plastic bottles of water into the stadium.)

Big pretzels are about the only thing I ever buy at stadiums, and even though I had the peanuts, I thought that if I could get a pretzel for three bucks, I just might buy one.

But as I surveyed the concession stand menu and prices, I became disillusioned.

Here were the prices I jotted down for several items:

:: Peanuts (about a 12-ounce bag) — $5.75

:: Draft beer, $10.50 for domestic, $11.75 for premium

:: Small Pepsi, $6

:: Large hot dog, $8.75; small hot dog, $6.25

:: Pretzel, $6.75

…I thought maybe I hadn’t read Grathoff’s story carefully enough (I didn’t have it with me) and that the lower prices were only good at some remote concession stands.

But, no, after I got home, I re-read the story, which said:

“Concession stands will have signs indicating the cheaper prices and they will be located at sections 120, 135, 213, 242, 308, 417 and 422.” Like I said, I was at the section 120 concession stand.

I did not get in line and check with a concessionaire to see if perhaps the new prices were not reflected on the sign board. But I’m pretty sure that wasn’t the case. If the Royals had lowered the prices, I’m sure they’d have changed those signs right away.


After the other members of my group arrived, we sat down in some seats in section 120. We had gotten tickets, free of charge, from a friend, but those seats were way up in section 412. The crowd was small, though, and it was chilly, and the stadium attendants were basically letting people sit wherever they wanted.

So, that part of the afternoon was unequivocally a good deal — even though the Royals managed to pull defeat from the jaws of victory and lost their 10th straight game.

But back to those concession prices: Until somebody proves to me otherwise, I’m going to consider it a case of bait and switch.

Show me, then, Kansas City Royals: Just where can I get one of those $3 pretzels?

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »