• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Who’s on first? Who’s on second? Who’s way down the line? Websites and bloggers battle it out for top rankings
That sure is a “hansom” horse-drawn carriage, mister »

Sly James stakes out an unequivocal position on redistricting: Look at the forest, not the trees

December 12, 2011 by jimmycsays

All the hubbub over the drawing of new lines for the six city council districts in Kansas City culminated last Thursday in a debate that I couldn’t tear myself away from.

I wasn’t there, but I watched  a rerun of the legislative meeting on Channel 2, the Kansas City government channel. I’m an old government junkie, you know, having covered the Jackson County Courthouse for seven years (’71 to ’78) and City Hall for 10 (’85 to ’95).

The debate wasn’t compelling because it was heated; it really wasn’t. It was because council members spoke fervently and eloquently about their reasons for wanting to either keep the lines that a citizens advisory committee had drawn up or make minor alterations.

The highlight of the redistricting discussion, which lasted about 30 minutes, was an impassioned speech by Mayor Sly James, who exercised his option to speak last.

The Star’s Lynn Horsley covered the redistricting debate, but, because of space limitations, she wasn’t able to get much of James’ speech in the paper. Before I lay out for you what James said, let’s back up…

In the final days of the redistricting discussion, the biggest issue was whether the former Bannister Mall area should be in the 5th District, where the citizens advisory committee had moved it, or whether it should revert to the 6th District, where it has been all along.

That was one of several significant boundary changes that the advisory committee made as it attempted to equalize population, district to district, based on the 2010 U.S. Census.

Councilman John Sharp, who does his homework and almost always makes a reasoned case for what he favors or opposes, led the charge to bring the Bannister Mall area back into his 6th District. He spoke at length in favor of an amendment that would return the site to his district.

He said that 6th District residents, having suffered through the demise of the mall, had earned the right to see the area redeveloped, if and when a good plan comes along. Then, 6th District residents could take pride in that area once again.

After Sharp and a few other council members had spoken, it was clear that he didn’t have the votes to get the mall moved back to his district, but Sharp has always been good at making a strong case in the face of overwhelming opposition.

After everyone else had had their say, James exercised his right to have the last word, and he was impressive.

Following is his speech, edited for length…

“You know, the real problem here is twofold. No. 1, we wouldn’t even have to be going through this nonsense if we weren’t a segregated city. The Voting Rights Act wouldn’t apply. But none of us are talking about that. This concept that somehow changing a line on a map disenfranchises you from going somewhere, doing something, or (changes) who you are the day before is, in my opinion, total and utter nonsense.

“We have too many people sitting here saying, “My this, my project, my district, my line, my house.”

“Let me say this: This is my city. Everything in it is my city. So I guess I’ll just ask all of my colleagues: Do you love your council district more or your city more? Because if you love your city more, we’ll put this nonsense to bed, stop worrying about all these lines that we’re using to divide us, and we’ll move on.

“Nobody’s life will change because their district lines change. I would be willing to bet you that you can walk into any district in this city and ask the first 50 people you see what district they’re in and 40 of them won’t have a clue…and won’t care.

“This is the reason that we are still struggling to do the things in this city that need to be done…Because we systematically play one district against the other so that nobody gets what they need. We’re talking about 500 people here (moving them from one district to another). If it’s that big of a nothing, then why worry about it? If it doesn’t really change that much, then what’s the big deal about not doing it?

“Why are we spending so much time talking about two parcels of land…Geez, people. The only thing that matters is this city. That is the only thing, and until we start acting like that, we will continue to have these fights and arguments over pieces of property hither, thither and yon.

“I don’t understand it. This has gotten totally off track, totally out of whack…It is time for us to change our attitude and start believing in the entirety of this city. Each and every one of us took an oath to the city, not to our council district…

“If there’s no other discussion, will the clerk please call the roll?”

The clerk did not announce the vote after the roll call, but from what I could hear, it sounded like only Sharp and Councilman Ed Ford voted for the amendment and everyone else voted “No.”

The council then took up the redistricting ordinance itself, and Sharp cast the only “no” vote.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

6 Responses

  1. on December 12, 2011 at 5:48 am John Blakeney

    JFK’s writers actually made a mistake in his inaugural address. It was suppossed to read…”Think not what the district can do for you, but what you can do for Kansas City.”


  2. on December 12, 2011 at 8:00 am jimmycsays

    You did your part in the short time you lived here, John, by helping keep the beer flowing in Westport.


  3. on December 12, 2011 at 9:30 am Mike Rice

    Sly James is right when he says that most people who live in KC don’t know what district they live in. Aside from City Hall insiders, city employees and local political junkies, I am sure that most Kansas Citians don’t even know who their City Council representatives are or the number of council districts that make up the city.

    Still, I am not surprised that some council members, particularly the in-district ones, are sensitive about changes to their turf. In John Sharp’s case, he probably wants to be there if ground is ever broken on some redevelopment project in the Bannister Mall area and be able to take credit for it. If it’s in another council district, he may not be given the opportunity to speak.

    Personally, I have always been intrigued by KC Council re-districting which happens every 10 years_ after the US Census is completed. When I was a reporter for The Star, I covered the Northland sector of Kansas City for 10 years. But I have lived my entire life in Kansas City south of the river. I guess that puts me in a different category of people who know and/or care about the happenings at 12th and Oak.

    The most interesting dynamic of this most recent redistricting is that the Northland is now divided into three districts. Until 1990, I think it had only the 1st District. In 1991, the 2nd District stretched into the Northland. Ten years ago, the 2nd District’s southern boundary moved from the Westport area to the middle of downtown giving it a much stronger Northland presence. Now, it looks like the 2nd District is entirely in the Northland while the 4th crosses the river. The 4th loses the Waldo neighborhood and a huge chunk of Brookside but will get the Briarcliff and Crestview neighborhoods along North Oak Trafficway.

    This also means that in the 2015 city elections, Northlanders could make up half of the City Council’s representation. Despite what Mayor James says about us being part of one city and not six council districts, that would be a watershed moment in the city’s history. For years, Northlanders have complained about being under-represented by City Hall. It’s an attitude that has been ingrained in those folks ever since KC acquired the Northland in three annexations between 1950 and 1962. With this re-districting, however, that proverbial wall between the Missouri River has crumbled nearly to the point to where one can walk over it.

    I would not be surprised to see the 3rd District cross the river 10 years from now. At that point, you would have two districts each in the Northland(1st and 2nd) and south of the river(5th and 6th). The 3rd and 4th would be on both sides of the river. 3rd District representatives will resist such a move because of the difference in racial demographics. But truth by told, when taking a look at the 3rd District and some areas north of the river between North Oak and I-435, there is not much difference in economic demographics.


  4. on December 12, 2011 at 9:45 am jimmycsays

    Thank God for the foresight our leaders had during the mayoral administrations of William E. Kemp and H. Roe Bartle…If not for those annexations, Kansas City would be more like Louisville, Ky., or Omaha.


  5. on December 12, 2011 at 10:00 am Smartman

    Makes no difference where the lines are drawn, the east side will still be a killing zone; our streets and sewers will continue to fail; and the KCMOSD will continue to screw more children than all the pedophiles in the US.

    The demographic shift to the Northland will have the long-term effect of putting the city under the de-facto control of the police and fire departments, much like it is now.

    So for all of the mayors’ one-for-all and all-for-one talk, nothing will change to impact the livability of the city. All politics is local but none more local than ours.


  6. on December 13, 2011 at 9:25 am chuck

    The real curse on this area, the line that counts most, is State Line.

    That said, smartman is right, the East side cancer will kill what is left of the tax base in KC, south of the river.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 511 other followers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel
%d bloggers like this: