• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Lobsterfest 2013
Committee to Stop a Bad Cure: It’s registered, it’s rocking, it’s rolling »

It’s now officially open season on the proposed Civic Council Sales Tax

August 27, 2013 by jimmycsays

Let the battle begin.

In the wake of the Jackson County Legislature’s action Monday to put a proposed half-cent, Civic Council Sales Tax on the Nov. 5 ballot, the civic bigwigs are now going to be under tremendous pressure to make a case for a $40-million-dollar-a-year sales-tax increase to benefit something called “translational medical research.”

As I said last week, I think this is not a timely idea, and I will actively oppose it.

red, white, blueThis will be the only issue on the ballot in all parts of Jackson County, and it will cost county taxpayers about $1 million to conduct what amounts to a special, one-issue election. On Monday, as a concession to the county, the proponents agreed to reimburse the county for the $1 million — but ONLY IF THE MEASURE PASSES. If it loses — which I think is very likely to happen — taxpayers will be stuck with the bill.

Are you angry yet?

Here’s something else to consider: The Civic Council, consisting of the c.e.o.’s of the areas largest companies, plunked this proposal on the Legislature just three weeks ago and pushed the Legislature to act by today’s deadline for placing issues on the Nov. 5 ballot. Yesterday afternoon, I ran into a well-respected, high-profile lawyer who is very attuned to political issues, and he called the measure “a rush to madness.”   

My main objections to the tax proposal are that it:

:: Is not well thought out.

:: Is based entirely on the speculative premise that “rock star researchers” will come up with pharmaceutical and other medical advances that can quickly be turned into money-generating businesses and ventures.

:: Comes at a time when many people, particularly lower-income folks, already are suffering financial distress.

:: Is a regressive tax, that is, it disproportionately hits those with lower incomes.  (Example: If a person with an annual income of $20,000 pays $2,000 in sales taxes per year, the tax amounts to 10 percent of his or her income. If a person with an annual income of $100,000 pays $2,000 in sales taxes, the tax amounts to 2 percent of his or her income.)

:: Comes at a time we need to rein in health-care costs, not fuel the fire.

***

Under a Memorandum of Understanding among the parties involved in the tax agreement, here’s how the proceeds would be divvied up:

:: 1 percent of the money — about $400,000 a year — would be paid to the state to collect the tax.

:: About $1 million a year (up to 2.5 percent of $39.6 million — the amount left after deducting the state’s fee) —  would be allocated for annual performance and fiscal audits.

:: The remaining $38.6 million in annual proceeds would be distributed as follows: 50 percent for Children’s Mercy Hospitals and clinics; 20 percent for the St. Luke’s Health System; 20 percent for UMKC; and 10 percent would go “to further economic development initiatives” of a newly created Translational Medicine Institute of Jackson County.

The last category — economic development initiatives — is particularly hazy and troublesome. What kind of economic development issues? How would those initiatives be monitored?

***  

About 75 people attended Monday’s meeting at the courthouse annex. Although the outcome was a foregone conclusion, an air of anticipation and excitement pervaded the ground-floor legislative chamber.

That’s because everyone knows that this is a dicey issue that is sure to be hotly contested.

Before the vote, the Legislature approved some amendments to the two-page Memorandum of Understanding.

One change would add the county as a party to the memorandum. Previously, the signatories were Children’s Mercy Hospital, UMKC, Saint Luke’s Health System and the Kansas City Area Life Sciences Institute.

The non-profit life sciences institute was founded primarily by the Civic Council in 2000. Its goal, according to its web site, is to “lead the recognized transformation of the Kansas City region into a nationally recognized center of excellence in life sciences research, development and commercialization.”

In its initial business plan the life sciences institute set a goal of raising $500 million in annual research expenditures at the end of ten years. $500 million a year?

I don’t know if that’s a mistake or not, but I’m pretty sure the institute has had a lot of difficulty attaining lift-off. (I had never heard of it until yesterday.) Facing that reality, someone at the Civic Council probably came up with the bright idea of trying to foist it on taxpayers.

As proposed, the tax would be levied for 20 years and would generate, with inflation, probably about $1 billion. And, of course, in about 2033, it would be back up for renewal.

Hello, grandkids (God willing). How do you like the lug we left you?

***

The Legislature voted 7-2 to proceed with the ballot issue. The legislators who voted “yes” were Fred Arbanas, Scott Burnett, Theresa Garza-Ruiz, Dan Tarwater, James Tindall, Dennis Waits and Crystal Williams.

Fred_Arbanas

Arbanas

Scott_Burnett

Burnett

Dan_Tarwater

Tarwater

James_Tindall

Tindall

Theresa_Garza_Ruiz

Garza Ruiz

Dennis_Waits

Waits

Crystal_Williams

Williams

Exhibiting a distinct lack of enthusiasm, none of the seven made a stirring speech or offered inspiring words about why this tax would be good for Jackson County.

Two legislators voted “no.”

Bob Spence cast one of the “no” votes. Spence said he thought county government already had enough on its plate, including providing law enforcement, maintaining roads and bridges and tending to the parks in unincorporated Jackson County.

Greg_Grounds

Grounds

The other dissenter, oddly, was legislative chairman Greg Grounds, of Blue Springs, an original sponsor of the enabling legislation.

Grounds told the audience that his main objection was that county taxpayers would be stuck with the election tab, if the measure failed at the polls.

Bob_Spence

Spence

Another factor in his capitulation, almost surely, is that Blue Springs residents will vote in November on a proposed half-cent sales tax for city parks.

I think I can say this with great assurance: The Civic Council Sales Tax will go down in flames in Blue Springs.

***

After the meeting, I had a nice chat with Arbanas, who has been on the Legislature since the old three-judge administrative court system went by the wayside in 1973. I got to know Arbanas, a former Kansas City Chiefs tight end, in 1972 because I covered Jackson County for The Star from 1971 to 1978. It was my first “beat” assignment during my 35-year-plus career with the paper.

It was easy to tell that Arbanas was skeptical about the tax, even though he voted to put it on the ballot.

“We’ve got a big hurdle,” he told Pete Levi, former president of the Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City, when Levi walked up to thank him for his vote. “It’s going to be extremely tough,”

I asked Arbanas if he thought voter resistance to the proposal would be significant.

“Resistance to any tax at all at this point is tremendous,” he said.

Like I said, let the battle begin.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in politics, Uncategorized | 10 Comments

10 Responses

  1. on August 27, 2013 at 9:40 am Donovan D. Mouton

    Key question for the reporter in you Š did this sales tax proposal have anything to do with Sanders abandoning his light rail crusade?


    • on August 27, 2013 at 10:57 am jimmycsays

      A legislator who will go unnamed called this “Transit II.”

      …For those not entirely in the know, Sanders’ proposed one-cent sales tax to build a commuter rail line was headed for the Nov. 5 ballot until Sanders pulled the plug earlier this year.


  2. on August 27, 2013 at 10:03 am Wille

    So, is this the beginning of the anti-tax crusade of JimmyC? I’ll be calling Ted Cruz and the rest of the tea party to register their support….(;-o


    • on August 27, 2013 at 10:58 am jimmycsays

      No, no, Willie…I am not an anti-tax crusader. I am against this particular sales tax at this time for translational medical research. Very specific.


  3. on August 27, 2013 at 10:32 am Rex Everhart

    The ruling elite of KC will never sleep until some way, some how, they push the tax rate to 10% or above. They simply can’t stand it below that level. No thought whatever given to the average person who will feel the pain.

    The voters were conned into a three eighths windfall tax for the freakin’ zoo, and got one free day of admission in return for millions of bucks rained down on the zoo to use for out of the country junkets to “view” possible purchases of exotic animals. The zoo is accountable to no one for this money and will waste most of it on power lunches and advertising.

    What a scam.


  4. on August 27, 2013 at 11:06 am Rick Nichols

    Memo to the Jackson County Legislature: something’s quite likely to get “lost in the translation” (e.g., the Translational Medicine Institute) before all is said and done, so don’t be surprised if this proposed new sales tax is dead on arrival (pun intended) come November 5. And one more thing – these days it’s getting harder and harder to tell the difference between the mobsters and the politicians.


  5. on August 27, 2013 at 11:49 am jimmycsays

    Love the first pun — lost in translation. As for the second, it’s a little too cozy with death panels.


  6. on August 27, 2013 at 3:00 pm Larry Luper

    Fitz,

    I think research, which is subsidized, should remain privately funded. Some will claim a cure for this disease or that ailment will be prevented without this funding. It is insane (no pun intended) to think the medical world (on their own and with the kind donations of charity) cannot afford research.

    I agree with you, I am against this tax. I only have one vote, but it will ne no. Anytime you assess a pile of money, politicians and the entities that helped their elections get some of it. Audits my *ss. They are all thieves (almost all).


  7. on August 28, 2013 at 10:13 am John Altevogt

    I disagree that the project hasn’t been well thought out. While certain aspects of the actual project may not be realistic (since they’re there only for the purpose of generating votes) I guarantee you the actual implementation of the project, from timing, to methods of getting it passed have been in the works, probably for years.

    During the push for the previous project of this nature, which I mentioned below your last entry, I discovered a committee that had been formed of the usual suspects a full three years before they made their play. The committee had been created to address local opposition, if there had been any, but since they were able to get Sebeljevich on board to try and cram it through they didn’t need it. But what i learned from that was just how far ahead of the game they were over any potential opponent and also the depth of the planning.

    This is not a bunch of docs who just came up with this idea last week so they could do research.


    • on August 28, 2013 at 10:46 am jimmycsays

      Excellent point, John. I should have phrased it differently, and I will in the future.

      The people behind the proposal, the Civic Council and the Chamber of Commerce, have it well planned out, as you say. What was lacking was a thorough public airing and discussion of the issue and proposal long before the Civic Council dropped it on the County Legislature three weeks before the deadline for putting it on the ballot.

      To me, that suggests an ambush…Yes, that’s exactly what it was.

      (Thanks for making me think about that more carefully.)



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 511 other followers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    %d bloggers like this: