• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The true test of the new pope: What he does about priest sexual abuse and what he does about the cancer embodied by Bishop Robert W. Finn
Break out the hats and hooters: Fred Phelps is dead! »

Longtime KC reporter, editor and promotions director Steve Nicely says: Look to the past for a guide on how The Star can promote itself now

February 27, 2014 by jimmycsays

A few days ago, after seeing a two-page Kansas City Star  “house ad,” which contained the photos of 164 Star staff members, I produced a post urging The Star to initiate a major promotional and advertising campaign to try to resuscitate circulation and revive its “brand name.”

In that post, I referred to a friend and former KC Star colleague, Steve Nicely, who had called my attention to the “double-truck” house ad. The post prompted Steve, who has been retired more than 10 years, to write about a 1970s KC Star marketing campaign in which he was intimately involved. He kept thorough records from that campaign and this week dug them out of his basement.

Today, in a guest post, Steve looks at The Star retrospectively but with an eye on the present and future. The entire staff at JimmyCSays (yes, the whole dang staff!) is deeply appreciative for this insightful piece. Now, here’s Steve…

(I would have included a photo of Steve, but I’m out of town and don’t have download capacity on this Webster Groves, MO, library computer.)

**

I  can’t tell you how happy I was to see the double-truck house ad in Sunday’s paper featuring the photos of 164 KC Star staff members, surrounding the central message, “Kansas City’s Largest news force.”  It has been such a long time since we’ve seen anything like that.  Dang, 164 people look like a huge staff, and it is.  Never mind that back in the day we were blessed with twice that number.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard, “We no longer take The Star.  There’s nothing in it.”  Sure, it’s smaller than it was, maybe half the size.  Pick it up on Monday and it’s pretty light.  But open it up and there’s news to read and quite a bit of it.  Definitely worth  the price.  I beg to differ with the vacuous, prejudicial statement that nothing is in it.  I also marvel at the amazing production that the reduced staff is turning out.  The survivors are performing two or three jobs by former standards.

The newspaper has functioned in its hunkered-down posture far too long.  Kansas City needs to be reminded of the value of the communications asset it has and what it would be like without it.  The newspaper itself — all its employees — also should be reminded.  The same goes for advertisers.  Maybe the print version of the newspaper is destined for extinction, especially in terms of home delivery.  I thought it would have happened a long time before this.  I formed that opinion around 1978 when I witnessed something called teletext — the scrolling printed news across a television screen in a retail store window.  My God, I thought, we’re doomed.  They’re delivering the news electronically at the speed of light.  We’re still doing it with paper and ink, printing presses and vehicles driving every street in the city twice a day.

Well, 36 years later, the newspaper is still going. And my day would still be incomplete without the newspaper. I know the newspaper must find a way to successfully transition to the new media forms.  I also know it could do so much more to promote itself to its various target audiences.  With the proper promotions, it can extend its life and profitability until it finds a solid footing in the murky future.

I know these things because I was involved in a multi-media advertising and promotions campaign The Star conducted from 1974 to 1977.  It involved radio, TV, billboards and house ads, like last Sunday’s  double truck.  The cost during its most intensive year was some $250,000, as I recall.  Do the math on that.  How much is it in today’s dollars?

We had three target audiences:  The public (both subscribers and non-subscribers), the advertisers and our own people.  It was triggered by the afternoon paper’s circulation dipping below 300,000.  What’s the circulation now? Well below 200,000.

The ad agency, Travis, Walz, Lane, pitched it to the board and sold them.  I saw it as an opportunity to escape my assistant city editor’s job because I had become painfully aware that I wasn’t cut out for management.  They named me the Editorial Promotions Director, representing the newsroom on a committee of managers who worked with the ad agency.

The theme was, Sharing The World with You Twice a Day, Mornings in The Kansas City Times, Evenings and Sundays in The Kansas City Star.

You can imagine how that went over in the newsroom.  Journalists don’t consider themselves sharing the world with anybody.  They are focused on gathering and reporting the news, which often involves matters of life and death.  But the staff had no choice.  I think most came to accept it once the campaign got rolling.  It ended with The Star back over 300,000, with increased ad revenue and with the sale of our employee-owned company to Capital Cities Communications Inc. in 1977.  No doubt, the campaign was an excellent investment for the stockholders.

The TV commercials featured key staffers on camera explaining what they do.  I recall that society editor Laura Hockaday (a regular reader of this blog) delivered one of the best performances.   The radio spots were more generic at first, then acquired tag lines promoting news stories in the next day’s newspaper.  The house ads were less structured, more varied.  One full-page, color ad compared the news content of a typical 30-minute TV newscast with the amount of news in the newspaper.  Translated into inches, the newscast occupied about half a page.  How many people do you suppose were aware of that?

Another featured the extensive assignment sheet for coverage of the 1976 Republican National Convention in Kansas City.  The convention was not only a coup for Kansas City but an opportunity for The Star to shine in front of an extra-large audience.

Another full pager was a letter from ad director Wally Meyer sharing “such good news for our advertisers” and “with everyone.”  Circulation figures for August (1976) set all-time highs for The Times and Sunday Star.  The gains in the metro area:

The Times (the morning paper), up 9,675; The Star, up 7,598; Sunday, up 11,453.  (I don’t know why Wally didn’t report circulation totals, as well as the gains.)

**

The campaign included profiles of employees in all department of the paper. Producing those profiles was my responsibility. We had some interesting staff members, as I was reminded recently when I dug out a box of the profiles. Each one began with the words, “Share a Moment with…”  Then, for example, “J. J. Maloney,” then his picture as an inmate in the Missouri State Penitentiary. The headline was, “An uncommon criminal.”  Joe had murdered a man in an attempted robbery in St. Louis at age 19.  He spent the next 17 years in prison, where he changed his life, became a book reviewer, writer, poet and painter.  He joined The Star’s staff in 1972.  Two years later, Joe and Harry Jones Jr. won the American Bar Association Gavel Award for the newspaper with a series on prisons. (Joe also was the best mob reporter the newspaper ever had.)

The profile continued: “His co-workers in the newsroom today do not think of him as a former convict.  They think of him as Joe, one of the hardest-working and most gifted reporters on the staff.”

Joe is now deceased.

Another profile featured a man named Paul J. Haskins under the headline, “Dropout digs in.”  The copy began like this:

“Some of the best human interest stories year after year are about kids who drop out of school, bum around pool halls and seem to have everything going against them, yet somehow manage to beat the system.  They end up as millionaires or power brokers or both.  To the best of our knowledge, Paul J. Haskins is no millionaire, but at age 35 it is too soon to count him out… Whether he is a power broker today is a relative question.  Haskins is city editor of The Kansas City Times.”

Haskins, a high school dropout, is also deceased.

Another featured my mug above the headline, Pro File, written by Darryl Durham of the newspaper’s promotions department.  It quoted me as saying:

“Think of my job in terms of ‘coming attractions’…It means promoting news and features in advance, giving readers something to look forward to.  It also means introducing readers to news department staff members in profiles such as this one… In  the past, people tended to think of The Star and Times primarily in terms of the papers they found on their lawns.  There was little thought of the human element involved in turning them out.  We’re not trying to glorify our staff members or make them public figures.  We merely want to establish their membership in the human race.”

And that’s what the double-truck in Sunday’s newspaper sought to do — once again.  It’s probably unrealistic to expect the newspaper to launch a multi-media ad campaign in today’s circumstances, but it certainly could do a lot more in terms of self-promotion.  When there are holes to fill, it doesn’t always have to be  with a wire story of little local significance or interest.  Plug them with house ads and boost reader confidence and attitudes and help them appreciate the impressive work still being done.  Boost circulation and advertising.  Maybe even rehire some terminated staff members.  The cost for that type of promotion is practically zip.

I’ve still got those 35-year-old, yellowing house ads — fresh out of my basement.  If anybody at the newspaper wants to see them — perhaps to get some ideas about how they might continue the renewed in-house promotion of the newspaper — just call me. I’m still here and still a cheerleader for my beloved Kansas City Star.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

4 Responses

  1. on February 27, 2014 at 11:37 am Laura Hockaday

    Jim:
    This is great tribute to you and to Steve. Wonderful comments and memories from Steve. But I don’t remember participating in the ad campaign at all. There are no Star retirees more loyal than you and Steve.
    I want to forward your column today to Harry Jones and Charley Hammer but am having trouble doing so. I am sending you their e-mail addresses on another
    e-mail. Could you get the column to them?
    Many thanks, Jim
    Laura


  2. on February 27, 2014 at 3:35 pm John Altevogt

    I think when people say “There’s nothing in there” what they really mean is that “There’s nothing in there that I’m interested in.”

    If newspapers are to remain relevant what they need are stories that contain information that cannot be found elsewhere.

    I don’t how many times I’ve clicked on a headline for a story only to find a four graph summary of the event that was available in an even more detailed form hours before from one of the TV websites.

    The best self promotion they could do (an affliction that was commented on recently about even the NYT) is get rid of editorial and then take that money and hire the kind of first rate reporters that they got rid of (and who are now working for the better TV stations) to write in-depth pieces on significant local issues.

    The last article of value to me in The Star was Mike Hendricks’ piece on the UG buying the T-Bones ballpark. Ny initial reaction to that was very negative, but after reading Mike’s very well-balanced and thorough story I wasn’t quite so sure anymore. Even with the warts and blundering manner of doing the deal, it made sense and what convinced me was that he didn’t appear to pull any punches on either side.

    Basic acts of journalism like Ryan Kath’s report Tuesday on the UG commissioner and Tim Carpenter’s story on Milt Wolf are real content, a 4 graph summary of old news isn’t.

    The second thing that seems to be working is sports. Any sports, but certainly, local sports with the box scores from every high school game and pictures of the kids that the parents can clip out and post on the rerigerator and send to Grandma.

    A third is local happenings. There’s a lot going on in town. I think they’re doing this now, but a pull out section of all the events in town, and maybe some pictures from last week’s events of the kind that normally don’t get in the paper like the gang from the garden club, etc. That seems to be working in the smaller community newspapers. Why wouldn’t it work here?


  3. on March 5, 2014 at 11:43 pm Jason Schneider

    Maybe something as simple as changing the layout of the paper could make a difference. I mean no offense by saying that reading the paper can be like folding laundry sometimes, but when I am sitting at a small table for lunch or in a waiting room with a stranger sitting next to me it can be a bit bothersome going from A1 to A8 of a 12 page section. I know it’s trivial and not necessarily a deal breaker for me, but I wouldn’t mind a change in that regard.

    Some of the free publications around here (ink, the Pitch, etc.) use a magazine style layout, which is in my opinion, easier to navigate. The Star could do the same and I think they could even package it in such a way that each section is a separate magazine/booklet.

    Of course I have no idea of the costs involved in making a change like that. I’m simply throwing out a suggestion on this based on the belief that for some people, the newspaper is not as convenient a tool as some of their other resources.

    Jim, hope you and your family are all doing well. Give me a call sometime when your not too busy and I’ll take you to lunch at this little dive down in the West Bottoms. Home-style cooking and oldies on the radio!

    Cheers!
    Jason


    • on March 6, 2014 at 8:15 am jimmycsays

      Hey, Jason…At one time, I would have dismissed the “tabloid” style configuration out of hand. But now, with the product having grown (??) so thin, that makes more sense. And, as you suggest, these people are looking for convenience with everything, especially electronics. So, if newspapers are to work their way back into people’s awareness, they have to be easy to carry and use.

      …I think you’re on to something: They could build a marketing campaign — and it would need to be a big, continuing one — around the redo.

      I don’t know what it would cost, either, but The Star already does some tabloid-type sections, like Tuesday business, so I would think it wouldn’t be too expensive. Maybe it would even save money in the long run.

      I’ll call you.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 548 other followers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 548 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: