• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« UMKC: This time it’s not the students who were caught cheating
Editorial Board mystery: Shelly and Diuguid lambast Amendment 7 but the full board decides to endorse »

Election notes: Amendment 7 campaign enriches consultant; Question A prospects looking dim

July 31, 2014 by jimmycsays

Lots going on with five days ’til the election. A few glimpses:

:: The campaign manager for the committee pushing Amendment 7 — the proposed 3/4 cent transportation sales tax — must be sitting in a bank vault, throwing $100 bills in the air and giddily saying, “It’s all mine; it’s all mine!”

jewellThat’s because two consulting companies run by the campaign manager, Jewell Patek, a former Republican state representative from Chillicothe, have been paid at least $160,175 by a campaign committee called Missourians for Safer Transportation and New Jobs.

 

That’s more than six times the $25,000 that our opposing campaign committee, Missourians for Better Transportation Solutions, has raised altogether.

To me, it just shows what a special interest slush fund Amendment 7 would be, if voters approved the new 3/4 cent sales tax next Tuesday. The “New Jobs” committee has raised more than $4 million, with much of it coming from the construction, heavy equipment and concrete and asphalt industries. The investment is chump change, however,  for industries that would reap hundreds of millions, or billions, of dollars from transportation projects throughout the state.

I have the strong feeling that the Missouri General Assembly and lobbyists for the “concrete cartel” got together over bourbons and big steaks, and somebody said, “Let’s just go for broke — throw out the biggest tax increase ever, put a few million bucks into TV ads and mailers and see if we can sneak it past the voters.”

And the first thing they did was to hire a former legislator — Patek — to be their front man. I heard the guy on the radio yesterday, and he’s not very impressive. Not a hint of passion in his voice. Of course, it’s pretty hard to sound convincing when you’re trying to sell a bag of horse turds at the farmer’s market.

::  I’ve been on the sidelines as far as Question A, the proposed streetcar-district expansion, is concerned, but it just doesn’t seem to be catching people’s imaginations. I think too many questions loom about funding.

A lot of people don’t understand the deal between the state and the city, which calls for $124 million of new state-sales-tax revenue to go for the streetcar expansion, if Missouri voters approve Amendment 7 and streetcar district voters approve broader streetcar district boundaries.

Under the terms of the deal, residents within the expanded district would pay only one cent per dollar more in sales taxes, instead of 1 and 3/4 cents more, if both the state and streetcar tax increases somehow passed.

There are two other complicating factors: 1) the actual vote on the sales-tax increase within the streetcar district wouldn’t take place until November, and 2) another tax proposal — the proposed 20-year extension of a half-cent-sales tax for firefighters — is also on Tuesday’s ballot.

I think many voters, when they start reading the various propositions, are going to feel like the sales-tax cavalry is charging at them. Then, they will do what confused voters always do: Vote “no.”

:: The Star did a great job on its “Voter’s Guide,” published in today’s “816” Missouri-side neighborhood section. It contained 14 full pages of election coverage — almost everything readers and prospective voters would need to be able to go into the polling places and understand the issues and know something about the various candidates.

But you know what was shocking? It contained only one political ad. That was a four-column, top-to-bottom ad against Question A, the streetcar proposition.

In years past, candidates and campaign committees working both sides of issues viewed the Election Guide as a golden opportunity to get the attention of frequent voters at reasonable ad rates.  But obviously the section seems to have lost its lustre as an advertising vehicle. Instead of making good money on the section, The Star almost surely lost money on it this time around.

Ah, my old paper…it just seems to be fadin’ into the gloaming.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

5 Responses

  1. on July 31, 2014 at 8:07 pm Mike Rice

    Jewell Patek is part of the conservative Northwest Missouri political mafia that includes Congressman Sam Graves, his advisor and political consultant Jeff Roe and numerous elected officials. They are known for playing dirty – really dirty. About a decade ago, The Pitch had an article about these guys. It led with an account of Patek showing up unannounced to the home of a guy who was considering a run of an elected seat held by one of their stooges and warning him of all the consequences that would ensue if he did run. I suspect that these guys not only have their hands in very deep on this campaign but the “Right-to-Farm” amendment which is as equally outrageous as Qt. 7. I’m thinking that voting no across the board on Tuesday might not be a bad idea.


    • on July 31, 2014 at 11:08 pm jimmycsays

      I’m working for the Election Board on Tuesday and voted absentee. I voted a “straight ticket:” “NO” on every issue. The Missouri General Assembly is a total disgrace and not even pretending to bring forth serious, sensible proposals.


  2. on July 31, 2014 at 8:17 pm Mike Rice

    Also, some of us_ myself included_ really poured our heart and soul into those Election Guides. Working in the bureaus, we reported on every single election _ even tax levy proposals in hinterland fire and water districts. I can’t imagine anything like that being done now with the downsizing that has cut at the bones and muscle of The Star. I haven’t seen the latest election guide but are the state house races being covered?


    • on July 31, 2014 at 11:05 pm jimmycsays

      Yes, indeed.


  3. on August 4, 2014 at 11:26 am John Altevogt

    People aren’t going to buy ads on a page no one reads, or cares about. For years the Star’s endorsements and commentary has been so predictable that many don’t even check to see what they say anymore.

    Worse yet, I understand that one of the unions took a poll and found that a Star endorsement was actually a negative. That also seems to hold for some of the candidates who unexpectedly receive a Star recommendation. I’ve seen several who instantly come out and repudiate the endorsement stating they don’t know why they would have received it in the first place.

    All of that’s understandable when you follow them and realize that they’ve endorsed convicted felons, drunken judges and slates of candidates that the Star’s own reporters tell me are corrupt.

    The editorial page at The Star is a disgrace and has been since Rich Hood left. Parrish could give the paper an instant boost in reputation simply by firing the lot and putting the money into solid reporting.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 511 other followers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    %d bloggers like this: