• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Previous Post
For all the pain they have wrought, events in Ferguson have cast a welcome light on Missouri political leaders’ shortcomings »

Of white supremacists, serial killers and by-line stories meticulously maintained in gold envelopes

November 17, 2014 by jimmycsays

Every few months, I get together with Dan Margolies, a former KC Star reporter who now is health editor at KCUR-FM, and we talk about a wide array of subjects. Journalism is always among them.

Earlier this evening, we met at 75th Street Brewery, and at one point Dan asked me what I had thought about KC Star reporter Judy L. Thomas’ jailhouse interviews with F. Glenn Miller Jr., the avowed white supremacist who earlier this year killed three people outside the Jewish Community Center and Village Shalom care center.

Miller is in a Johnson County detention center, and Thomas interviewed him several times by phone. The conversations resulted in a lengthy story that led The Star’s front page on Sunday.

**

It was fortuitous that Dan brought up the Miller story because when I had opened the paper yesterday, I zeroed in on that story. I had instant misgivings about it but read most of it anyway. I even toyed with the idea of writing a post about it yesterday, but I let the thought pass.

But Dan’s question made me refocus and reflect on the story because it goes to the heart of an issue that journalists struggle with periodically. The issue is the news-worthiness of jailhouse interviews with screwball killers — often serial killers — whose depraved actions cannot be justified or rationalized in any sane way.

I told Dan that, in general, I did not see any significant value in such stories, and I said that was how I essentially felt about the Miller story. He agreed, saying that whatever Miller had to say would not serve any useful purpose or open any new window on the murders.

One reason that I am not unequivocally opposed to such stories, however, is that many years ago, I wrote a similar story myself after getting a jailhouse interview with a Kansas City serial killer. I don’t recall if I got any positive feedback on that story, but I remember that I was quite proud of it. More about that in a minute, but back to Thomas’ story…

The seminal quote that Thomas got from Miller also served as the main headline for the story: “Every Jew in the world knows my name now.”

Along with everything else Miller told Thomas, that statement serves just one purpose — to advance Miller’s goal of calling attention to himself and the “cause” that prompted him to kill three people, none of whom, as it turned out, was Jewish.

Reinforcing his worthlessness as a human being, Miller said that while he regretted killing 14-year-old Reat Underwood — “the young white boy,” as he called him — he had nothing to say to Reat’s family.

Now there’s a guy whose story you long to hear, huh?

**

I noted that I don’t believe stories like the one about Miller have value in general.

But there is another side of the issue. And that is that enterprising reporters, like Thomas, will always seek interviews with serial killers and other perpetrators of shocking crimes simply because the reporters want to know what was going on in the minds of the criminals and because they firmly believe that the interviews will help “advance” the story in some way, even if it is difficult to express exactly how.

The desire to get “the other side of the story” — that is, the perpetrator’s side — courses through reporters’ bloodstreams. It is hard to resist that pull, and that’s true not only for reporters. Most editors also want “the scoop,” even though it is incumbent on the editors to weigh very carefully whether such a story serves the public interest.

It is apparent that Thomas’ editor — and undoubtedly Thomas herself — struggled with that question. Thomas’ story devoted several paragraphs to rationalizing why the story merited publication.

The justifying began even before the “jump,” that is before the story left the front page and continued inside the “A” section. In the fourth paragraph, Thomas paraphrased Leonard Zeskind, president of the Kansas City-based Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights, as saying the public needed to pay attention to “those who promote racist and violent views to understand what motivates them and to prevent future tragedies.”

The justifying continued several paragraphs later, when Thomas quoted Zeskind as saying:

“Learning about them (white supremacists) is our responsibility so that we may be better equipped to tackle this ongoing problem. Ignoring it, quarantining it, shutting our eyes, closing our ears, hasn’t stopped any Nazi killers. Opening our eyes, joining with others, taking public stands against racism, anti-Semitism and bigotry of the type displayed by Glenn Miller for decades is the best guarantee of building a truly open, democratic society.”

Well, that is very eloquently stated, but I just don’t see how giving Glenn Miller a platform to express his twisted, ridiculous views — or to recount how he advanced on innocent people and shot them — helps advance a democratic society. I mean, how helpful is it to hear racists explain why they think black people are inferior to whites? Is there any additional insight to be gained by hearing from people like that? I’m pretty sure NOT!

**

And yet, as I said earlier, many years ago I interviewed a serial killer and wrote a story that was in the same vein as that of Judy Thomas.

The subject of my story was a guy named William Turney Stitt, who had fatally stabbed two women, for no apparent reason, a year apart. The story ran on the front page of The Kansas City Times (then the morning edition of The Star) on Thursday, June 21, 1973.

Stitt killed one woman, 19-year-old Gloria Schuler, after spotting her in a self-service laundry at 39th and Washington, a block west of Broadway. While Schuler’s husband was in the restroom, Stitt parked his car, ran inside and stabbed Schuler several times with a kitchen knife he was carrying. He fled, and, then, when Schuler’s husband got back to her, she said (and these words made a lifelong impression on me) “Some son of a bitch stabbed me.”

Those were her last words.

A year earlier, Stitt fatally stabbed a woman named Joan R. Merritt after running her car off Westport Road in Independence.

Clearly, William Turney Stitt was a no-good son of a bitch. But I wanted to know what was behind his impulse to kill those women and why he had done so. (He previously had served eight-plus years in a military disciplinary barracks for strangling a prostitute in Germany in 1956.)

He provided me with the answer to why he had done what he did: He had a “destructive fantasy” that was intertwined with thoughts of sexual aggression.  I also reported that a psychiatrist at Western Missouri Mental Health Center had diagnosed him with a “personality disorder of longstanding nature.”

…So, did my story serve the public interest more than Judy Thomas’ story? Hard to say, isn’t it? Certainly, the families of Stitt’s three victims didn’t give a shit what was going through Stitt’s mind when he stabbed, or strangled, the women. And I doubt that my story shed any light on the subject of longstanding personality disorder.

But, like Thomas, I was determined to find out what the hell that goofball was thinking.

And the editors turned me loose.

**

Before the advent of The Star’s electronic library, in the early ’90s, The Star maintained staff by-lined stories in distinctive, dull-gold, business-size envelopes that were stacked vertically in dozens of metal file drawers on the third floor of The Star building at 18th and Grand.

The librarians had a surgically precise method of folding those stories so that very long stories folded up like road maps and fit snugly into those gold envelopes.

I tell you all that because, as you can see below, the story about William Stitt is one that I kept (one of only about 20) when the librarians gave each of us our by-line files after the electronic library was in place.

So, you see, I have a hard time being extremely critical of Judy Thomas and her Glenn Miller story. Who knows? She might even clip that story out with a pair of scissors and put it in an envelope to show people decades from now.

 

P1040247

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

9 Responses

  1. on November 18, 2014 at 10:15 am John Altevogt

    As usual, Thomas’ story is a journalistic farce on several levels.

    First, she allows this coward to try and hold himself out as bravely standing there trying to kill as many Jews as possible without challenge. That is a flat out lie. The truth is that everyplace he went was a posted gun-free zone where he could expect to find no armed opposition. He then picked the most vulnerable targets he could find and fled rapidly before any response could be mounted. In the end he parked in another no-gun zone where he meekly surrendered to police.

    Secondly, Thomas is a poor choice to write any piece on hate given her own record of hateful “investigative” pieces that are basically ideological diatribes. One recalls one she did on a gathering of veterans in Missouri that was such a hatchet job that it got The Star sued.

    Third, many voices in the Kansas City area are working for interfaith harmony, but none were interviewed for this pathetic nightmare. Instead, Thomas picks two hateful, far-left, ideological soulmates, Lenny Zeskind and Mark Levin. Zeskind, like Thomas, sees anyone on the right as a potential Klan member, and Levin has long been active in the Mainstream Coalition, anti-evangelical hate group. Neither has any record whatsoever of working toward interfaith harmony

    Bottom line, Thomas allows a hateful coward to present, unchallenged, a distorted record of what actually occurred, leaning on the commentary of two of the metro area’s most hateful ideologues for filler material. In essence, it’s an article about a bigot, written by a bigot, with supporting testimony from two other bigots.


    • on November 18, 2014 at 10:48 am jimmycsays

      I got a laugh from your “bottom line,” John, although I’m sure Judy won’t find it humorous.

      Judy is an excellent reporter, but she definitely brings her personal tilts to her investigative stories. More often than not, I agree with her — as most current and former reporters at The Star would — as you well know. I can see where she drives conservatives absolutely crazy, as she did with you on this story.

      My bottom line is I think the editors should not have “commissioned” this piece. Margolies is right: The story was an overreach from the time the idea was hatched.


      • on November 18, 2014 at 11:20 am John Altevogt

        Exactly. What “knowledge” did we gain from this piece? None, zero, nada. The “gain” was that a bigoted, hateful coward was allowed to glorify the slaughter of three defenseless people and the irony is that he even failed In his goal to kill Jews because not one of his vulnerable victims was Jewish.

        PS My compliments to your copy editor.


  2. on November 18, 2014 at 11:48 am jimmycsays

    Our award-winning copy editing staff will be delighted to hear of your satisfaction.


  3. on November 18, 2014 at 7:31 pm Gayle

    My inquisitive nature made me wonder what became of Stitt. I googled William T. Stitt and found a very interesting account on a website, caselaw.findlaw. If you don’t know you may want to check it out.


    • on November 18, 2014 at 8:04 pm jimmycsays

      You’re doing some good reporting, Gayle. I read two case reports, one from 2003, the other from 2008. The result of both cases was that Stitt — who changed his name to William T. Barlow in the late 198s — remained legally confined at the Northwest Missouri Psychiatric Center. He was originally committed as a criminal sexual psychopath.

      However, a search of the Missouri Department of Corrections’ offenders website turned up nothing for either William T. Stitt or William T. Barlow. It’s possible he has died (he would be about 77 years old) or maybe he’s out now.

      …I saw something in the case law that I had not known: After he killed the prostitute in Germany, he had sex with her corpse. Whoa!!!

      P.S. I wanted to let you know what I found out about Roadrunner. The KC Pet Project didn’t return my calls from yesterday or today, so I went out there this afternoon. A counter clerk told me, as we already knew, that Roadrunner is doing well in foster care. She also told me, however, that he appears to have no psychological damage. I was very happy to hear that. Also, the clerk told me that a “hold” has been placed on him as far as potential adoption and that an animal shelter employee had expressed interest in adopting him. That might be the best thing that could happen. He’s obviously a “special needs” dog…I love him without ever having seen him and hope he has a great life from here on out. I’ll let you know if I found out anything more.


      • on November 19, 2014 at 5:21 am Gayle

        Must have missed that about the German prostitute — gross!

        On a happier note, I agree, a home with a shelter employee would be a good outcome for little Roadrunner (love the name!). Dogs are amazingly resilient, even to the extent that they will lick the hand that beats them. The thought of doing that harm turns my stomach. He deserves to live out his days happy and content.


  4. on November 18, 2014 at 11:44 pm John Altevogt

    There are so many wonderful pups that are available in these rescue shelters. We just filled out our legal limit with a “hard to place” pup and you couldn’t want a better pet. After spending four months in a kennel it was instantly house broken. It gets along famously with the rest of our pets and is months ahead of where we thought she would be when we got her. The biggest problem is that she occasionally surprises us when she does something the other pups are trained not to do.


    • on November 19, 2014 at 5:28 am Gayle

      Good for you, AND good for her! We knew some history on the dog we got last year at Wayside, and it wasn’t good, so we do all we can to make her life happy; and she reciprocates, as dogs will do.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: