• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Catherine Hanaway on the way to the governor’s mansion
A Kansas City journalistic detective calls it quits »

Pope Francis: All hat and no cowboy?

March 20, 2015 by jimmycsays

I’m starting to think Pope Francis, who began his tenure in such promising fashion, is not going to remove Kansas City-St. Joseph Bishop Robert Finn from his post.

Perhaps even worse, I’m starting to think the pope is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, insofar as taking meaningful action on the clergy child-sexual-abuse scandal.

feel good pope

Maybe a smile and a wave are the most we’re going to see out of Francis

Last September, as many of you will recall, the pope sent a Canadian archbishop to Kansas City to investigate Finn’s leadership. The pope’s emissary asked several people he interviewed if they thought Finn was “fit to be a leader.” I can’t imagine that many of the respondents answered affirmatively.

Four months before that, in May of last year, the pope told reporters that three bishops were “under investigation” for their roles in the clergy sexual abuse scandal. One of the three, the pope said, had already been found guilty “and we are now considering the penalty to be imposed.”

From that, I concluded that Finn, the only American bishop to be convicted in the sex-abuse scandal, had a target on his back.

In the wake of Francis’ statement and the visit by the Canadian bishop, I confidently predicted that Finn would be out by at least Lent.

Well, Lent is almost over, and it looks like nothing is going to happen.

Furthermore, like a golfer frozen over the ball at address, the pope has fiddled and diddled with a commission he announced in December 2013.

The commission has an impressive name — the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors. But it took three months for the pope to make the first appointments to the commission, and then nothing happened for another nine months, until last December, when the pope assigned some more members to it.

The group had its first meeting last month and came out of the meeting saying it would hold bishops accountable for abuse cases that occurred on their watch. But there wasn’t a word about disciplinary action for any bishops who heretofore had dropped the ball on accountability, like Finn so obviously did by failing to report the crimes of onetime priest Shawn Ratigan, who’s now doing 50 years in prison.

In a March 2 letter, Pope Francis said he had created the commission “for the purpose of offering proposals and initiatives meant to improve the norms and procedures for protecting children and vulnerable adults.”

To me, it sounds like the commission and everything else that the pope is doing in regard to the scandal is pointed toward the future — not past despicable deeds and administrative inaction.  

Again, “offering proposals and initiatives” sounds nice, but we’ve heard that before. Pope Francis’ predecessor, Pope Benedict, sounded the same alarm, and look what ensued — more crimes and cover-up.

**

I’m not alone in being disgusted by the pope’s failure to take action regarding Finn.

Yesterday, the Survivors Network for those Abused by Priests (SNAP) also harshly criticized the pope for twiddling his thumbs:

“It’s a travesty that Francis has done nothing to discipline or even denounce Finn…(W)ith glacial speed, Francis ignores a bishop who was convicted of endangering children.”

Sorry to say, at this p0int it appears to me Francis is quite content having established himself as a “feel-good,” popular pope.

It’s just dandy that he’s humble, but does he have any backbone? Is he “fit to lead,” as the Canadian archbishop asked about Finn?

Maybe not. Maybe he’ll be remembered as a pope who talked a good game and attracted rock-concert-type crowds around the world but didn’t have the stomach to look a crooked cleric in the eye and say, “You’re fired.”

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 22 Comments

22 Responses

  1. on March 21, 2015 at 12:07 am John Altevogt

    Was there not just a news story criticizing one of the members of the Commission for their role in the scandal?


  2. on March 21, 2015 at 12:12 am John Altevogt

    From HuffPo

    ‘The commission is working on developing a system that will hold bishops accountable if they covered up for sexually abusive priests. But nothing has been announced yet, and it doesn’t appear that much has changed in recent months. Moreover, in January, Francis sent mixed signals by appointing a bishop who has been accused of protecting an abusive priest as the new leader of a Chilean diocese. Catholics in the region were upset with the pope’s choice, and have launched protests against the appointment.”


    • on March 21, 2015 at 7:43 am jimmycsays

      Both the Huffington Post and the Pitch (whose Thursday story got me thinking the pope was diddling and fiddling) were unclear about the Chilean bishop.

      I researched it further and sorted it out. Francis did not appoint the Chilean fellow to the commission; he simply elevated him from priest to bishop. It was the use of the word “appointed” in the context of news about the commission that was misleading. The issue was whether the Chilean priest, given his questionable background, should have been made a bishop.

      Here’s a story that clarifies it..http://cathnews.co.nz/2015/02/24/new-bishop-in-chile-under-fire-for-alleged-abuser-cover-up/


      • on March 27, 2015 at 4:22 pm jimmycsays

        I just found out, while reading some articles about the papal commission, that the Chilean appointee was already a bishop before his recent installation as bishop in a different region of Chile. He has been a bishop for quite a few years. The outrage is that the pope saw fit to give him another big assignment, with questions swirling about his ties to an abusive priest.


  3. on March 21, 2015 at 1:02 am Larry Luper

    The situation is sad.


    • on March 21, 2015 at 7:48 am jimmycsays

      It’s not sad to me, Larry…but maddening and disappointing.


  4. on March 21, 2015 at 9:39 am tracyinkc

    I believe the expression is “all hat, no cattle.”

    Wow, two of those whatchamacallits in one lead, the other being rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. I hardly think the RC church will sink over this, tho I am glad you are weighing in.

    Mixed metaphors? Perhaps it was early, and you are “All golf cap, no coffee?”” !! Do you imagine the Pope is “shaking in his boots” over this post? And come to think of it, weren’t those red $4000 shoes of his retired? Fendi? Finito?


    • on March 21, 2015 at 10:41 am jimmycsays

      The problem was it was late (11:37 p.m.) not early, Tracy, and you caught me falling back into hackneyed expressions, although I thought the “all hat, no cowboy/cattle” was kind of cute…You know, conjuring up the image of a cowboy pope.


      • on March 22, 2015 at 7:26 pm John Altevogt

        Or Brokeback Mountain.


  5. on March 21, 2015 at 10:17 am Jayson

    Good post as I’ve been wondering the same. As I age it’s fascinating to watch events ebb and flow with the tides, especially from a distance. I continue to be bemused and confounded by the lack of sustained and progressive outrage from the “herd” toward their leaders who talk change but just can’t get it up for the common good.. As a student of the ’70s, protest seemed sustained and everywhere. This latest poop er Pope has seemingly evolved into a polished corporate marketing campaign. All hat and no cattle indeed! Just another NGB (nice guy but). Where is the sustained outrage from the Vox Populi in this era of social media? But I was raised a Presbyterian so all that incense stuff is a mystery to me anyway. I did like those custom red shoes though.


  6. on March 21, 2015 at 10:23 am tracyinkc

    Amen, Jayson! Looks like we got in just under the wire, to post any critical thoughts before Holy Week, which starts tomorrow!


    • on March 21, 2015 at 1:26 pm Gayle

      You’re jumping the gun a week, tracyinkc.

      And if I may be so bold as to say, there is our time and there is God’s time. Inexplicable, perhaps, but again, not ours to question.


      • on March 24, 2015 at 6:04 am Will Notb

        …and right there is the problem: too many people regard the putative feelings/musings of a imaginary deity more important than the horrendous depredations inflicted upon their children. Gayle’s stance –certainly reflecting the majority of practicing catholic’s, n’est-ce pas? — deftly limns the drawbacks and dangers of the historically unfettered power of the catholic church.

        As I opined at the time, had it been my kid(s) for which Finn cared nothing, the matter would already be concluded, Finn long gone.


      • on March 24, 2015 at 9:22 am tracyinkc

        No reply link available for Will Notb, so here will have to do. Wowsers, Jimmy–give that elegant man an award! He went “out on a limb” and worked in the little used word “limn”!!!! Or give him a light for his Noel Coward cigaretto.

        Possible prize:
        engraved silver lighter?
        Incense purloined from the church? (Noted he refused to capitalize Catholic. Altho the church certainly does, upon their flock.)

        Tell me, Jimmy, had you ever even considered using “limn” in any story for the Star, or would Casey Jones have talked you out of it, whilst Paul Haskins was laughing his ass off?? Now John Dauner would have appreciated it, I feel sure. Our secret “Mission Hills” correspondent.


      • on March 24, 2015 at 10:11 am Gayle

        I was equally impressed with putative and the French (albeit common) phrase, while quietly sighing and smh. Finn will be dealt with, Will, but not by you.


      • on March 24, 2015 at 11:22 am Will Notb

        Gayle:

        …regarding the link; I try not to spam other people’s comments section, but since you asked, here it is.

        Once there do a search for ‘H. monastic’ or ‘Finn’ or even ‘catholics’; there will be plenty of substance there for you to avoid commenting on as well.


      • on March 24, 2015 at 11:34 am tracyinkc

        Meow, Will Notb. A learned man such as yourself might be happier to just embrace your own basket of beliefs, and stop goadingGayle. Go eat a peep.


      • on March 24, 2015 at 11:53 am Gayle

        I have no idea what you’re talking about; re-read Tracy’s comment regarding links. I have no interest in getting into a Holy War with you and refuse to be goaded into it; sorry to disappoint you.

        Jim, quick — new subject!


  7. on March 22, 2015 at 10:06 am tracyinkc

    Good catch, Gayle–yes I figured out when Holy Week begins, last night. So glad I hadn’t scheduled my visit to Costco…for Easter fixin’s.

    And then this morning I found three more clocks that had not been reset on Daylight Savings time. So in the US, there is God’s time, our time, and then–those reluctant little clocks on their own time…


    • on March 22, 2015 at 11:19 am Gayle

      It’s never too early for Peeps — gotta get that “drying out” time in!


      • on March 22, 2015 at 11:30 am tracyinkc

        Amen to that, Gayle. Now here is another question of deep spiritual portent. Throughout the year now, at Joanns fabric and etc. and Michaels stores, they sell Peeps for other seasons. Halloween ghosts, Santas, leprechauns, etc.

        So Popess Gayle, is that a sacrilege?

        I haven’t checked Hobby Lobby, figuring they, being uber-Christian store owners, (with “Testamints” for sale at each cash register, oh get over yourselves) would say yes. Hobby Lobby doctrine: only yellow chick Peeps. And if you buy any other seasonal Peeps, then one must pay an indulgence and do penance.

        I must confess (irony intended) that I too, think Peeps ripen to new heights of sugary greatness, when air-dried.

        We may be now turning Jimmy C says into a foody blog. But at this point, it’s just you and me writing. All the boys are either out fertilizing their lawns or already watching March Madness.


  8. on March 22, 2015 at 3:16 pm Gayle

    Sacrilege? Yes. They are as Springtime as the living, breathing ones, and daffodils.

    And at the risk of starting another Holy War: Go Shockers!



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 562 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 562 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: