• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Northwest Arkansas: A happening place and a great setting for a top-notch LPGA tournament
The plummeting value of major metropolitan newspapers from an insider’s perspective »

As part of The Star’s reorganization, the business desk is going away as a separate entity

June 30, 2015 by jimmycsays

A former Kansas City Star colleague, Joe Keenan, posted a comment this morning, saying that effective next month, The Star would no longer have a business desk, as such.

That got my attention, of course, and I put out some feelers.

Turns out Joe was right on the money: The Star’s three remaining business-desk reporters and its three editors are getting new assignments under the Metro umbrella.

The changes are part of a reorganization and redesign that editor Mike Fannin announced to the newsroom a few months ago. One of the main thrusts of the redesign is to push more readers to The Star’s website and wean them away from the printed edition, which has been flagging for years. (That’s true at nearly every major metropolitan newspaper in the country, by the way.)

We have already seen strong evidence of the push to the web. The printed edition of the sports section, for example, no longer carries the results and game stories for Royals’ games that end after about 10 p.m. A text box urges readers to go to the website.

Other changes, besides the business-desk demise — are probably in the works, but so far I’m not privy to them. I also want to emphasize that The Star will continue to report business stories; they just won’t be coming from a business desk. Anyway, here’s what I’ve got. (Thanks to Joe for the tip and to everyone who provided information.)

:: The Star will no longer have a managing editor. Steve Shirk, the last person to hold that title, retired a (when). Several years before that, The Star’s co-equal managing editor, Jeanne Meyer, was cut loose. (By the way, she is married to Keith Chrostowski, who has been the business editor.) As Metro editor, Greg Farmer will be the big dog in the newsroom, under Fannin.

keith

Keith Chrostowski

farmer

Greg Farmer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:: Business reporters Diane Stafford and Mark Davis are becoming part of a news team that Chrostowski apparently will head. Chrostowski will oversee several other current Metro reporters as well.

:: The third business reporter, Joyce Smith, who does a great job tracking restaurant and retail comings and goings, will take her portfolio to FYI, the features desk. (I don’t know if FYI will be under Metro or remain separate…Perhaps some of our commenters will clarify.)

stafford

Diane Stafford

:: Assistant business editor Steve Rosen will be a news-team editor, along with Donna McGuire, who has been an assignment editor for many years.

:: Assistant business editor Greg Hack will be a trouble-shooting, news-team assistant, producing graphics and suggesting “different ways of telling stories.”

 

 

ed eveld

Ed Eveld (Smile, Ed, you’re going back to news.)

::  Ed Eveld, a former Metro desk reporter who has been an FYI writer for many years, will return to Metro as the Kansas statehouse reporter…This is a key appointment because former statehouse reporter Brad Cooper left the paper recently, and some reporters feared that he would not be replaced. For the last few weeks of the recently concluded legislative session, The Star relied on the Wichita Eagle-Beacon for statehouse coverage. The Star would have bathed itself in ignominy had it continued to rely on Wichita, which, of course, is significantly farther from Topeka than Kansas City.

:: FYI reporter/gossip columnist Lisa Gutierrez will expand her sphere of writing to include, as one insider put it, “anything clickable.”

I’m told that all other current Metro reporters will continue doing what they have been doing — in other words, working their asses off to keep up with all significant developments in a metro area of 2.75 million people.

**

Several weeks ago, The Star was down to under 20 full-time Metro reporters. I would estimate that it had about 50 reporters in 2005, the year before I retired. That does not include Neighborhood News reporters, who were buzzing around everywhere, when the newspaper’s “center of gravity” appeared to be tilting toward Johnson County. (Fortunately for us all, The Star went back to its roots, covering KCMO relentlessly, as its bureau system disintegrated.)

With this change — along with what appears to be the recent hire of a couple of new hands (or maybe they’re summer interns) — Metro will be up to about 25 reporters, for the time being. All the editors, reporters and other hands left on this wayward but still-strong ship are doing great work, and we should be thankful for their dedication to bringing us the news.

parrish

Mi-Ai Parrish

Whether they are being ably guided by Fannin and Publisher Mi-Ai Parrish is another matter. The newsroom certainly isn’t getting much support from HQ in Sacramento…That would be the McClatchy Co., which paid way too much — $4.5 billion — for The Star and a couple dozen other Knight Ridder papers in 2006 and has been paying the price ever since.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 42 Comments

42 Responses

  1. on June 30, 2015 at 5:47 pm Thomas R Shrout Jr

    I was at a conference recently where one of the presenters was a former reporter for the Tampa Tribune and now works in public relations. Bottom line of his presentation, pr grows in importance because there are so few reporters that have the time to fully devote time and attention to researching and writing a great story. He spoke of hand-feeding reporters. There were no potential clients in the room for him, so I took his comments as being genuine.


    • on June 30, 2015 at 5:49 pm jimmycsays

      Good time to be in p.r….Of course, it’s always been a good field, as long as you can stand being told what to write.


  2. on June 30, 2015 at 6:14 pm Bob Mayer

    Damn shame. But the weaning of the KC Star on the business front reflects it’s lack of financially managing it’s resources: people, real estate (the big monument building), lack of business sense, etc. They should look to the Tampa Bay Times (former St. Petersburg Times) to see how a paper can survive, thrive and change in these times.

    Kansas City DESERVES BETTER. St. Pete is my other home. At least I get a paper that reflects the past quality that KC once had. (No offense to the reporters! It’s the management and company that is the PROBLEM.)


    • on June 30, 2015 at 6:28 pm jimmycsays

      Thanks, Bob…I know it’s frustrating but it’s not totally fair to blame management. In many other big cities, including Chicago, Louisville, Philadelphia and St. Louis, residents are bemoaning the diminution of their daily newspapers.

      The seminal problem was and is the Internet, which pulled the rug out from under print. Rare is the major metropolitan paper today that has adjusted and figured out a way to keep making a significant profit. That said, I sure don’t see Parrish trying to “sell” the newspaper or raise its profile. It would take dynamic leadership and an influx of money to revive The Star and bring it back to a semblance of what it once was.

      Should McClatchy decide to sell The Star, it would be a very dicey proposition to see who bought it and what their intentions were. If Warren Buffett bought it, for example, things could improve. But if Cerner bought it, it could become a house ad for the company and Sporting Kansas City.


  3. on June 30, 2015 at 9:44 pm Mike Rice

    I agree, Fitz, that management should not bear all the blame for The Star’s demise. But I would like to know how seriously Star management took the Internet 15 to 20 years ago when it became apparent that it was not just some fad.


  4. on June 30, 2015 at 11:18 pm Larry Luper

    Many will look back and miss what we had with The Star.


    • on June 30, 2015 at 11:22 pm jimmycsays

      Very true, Larry…The good times and the thick papers went away fast, didn’t they? Whoosh!


  5. on July 1, 2015 at 7:46 am Julius Karash

    Bob Mayer, as an expert on the re-use/redevelopment of old buildings, what are your thoughts concerning the future of the the iconic old KC Star building at 18th and Grand? Some of my former colleagues from the Star say the building is in very bad shape. I think the location of the building, in the middle of the ever-more bustling Crossroads, is the most important factor. Do you think the building is ripe for re-use, or is it more likely to be torn down and replaced? What do you think the future holds for 1729 Grand Blvd.?


  6. on July 1, 2015 at 10:27 am Bob Mayer

    Glad Julius asked this question. He has mentioned this to me before, and I have given it some serious thought this morn. First and foremost, I do think the HISTORICAL KC STAR building, under the William Rockhill Nelson era, is worthy of SAVING and that adaptive re-use is in order.

    Here is my vision:

    1. Appeal to McClatchy to sell for reasonable price, given the building is aged, no longer useful in its current interior state. Apply for historic tax credits. Maintain the facade for tax-credit purposes but GUT the interior. (I understand the old printing presses were in the basement, so the impact of that will have to be determined. There is the potential to apply for Brownfield tax credits.)

    2. Because it is in a key location in the Crossroads, the top floors could be marketed as writers’ lofts. (Any of you former reporters want a place to live, write, work?)

    3. The ground floor and basement could be converted into small, retail, incubator space, perhaps geared to writers, books, WordPress, a William Rockhill Nelson Pub, etc. (This concept is no different than what is already in business/design incubators
    already flourishing in the Crossroads.)

    4. This project will need former reporters who want to put skin in the game,
    matched by some seasoned developers who can collaborate on a specific plan. The legal structure could be an LLC, with shares being sold.

    So what you say Jim Fitzpatrick, Julius Karash, Kevin Collison, Laura Hockaday, Paul Wenske to just name a few that might want to get together
    over drinks and appetizers to EXPAND THE VISION ?

    I would be happy to invite a couple Developer types that may have some interest in brainstorming.

    Your thoughts??


  7. on July 1, 2015 at 12:50 pm Julius Karash

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this Bob! Those sound like great ideas that should be explored further. I’d love to meet with you, Jim Fitzpatrick, Kevin Collison, Laura Hockaday, Paul Wenske, Chris Lester and anyone else who’d like to brainstorm about this.


    • on July 1, 2015 at 1:48 pm jimmycsays

      …and we’ll each put in $1,500 toward the redevelopment cost.


      • on July 1, 2015 at 2:54 pm John Altevogt

        That’s not even what you budget for lunches, Fitz, surely you could buy the building outright and let others become tenants.


  8. on July 1, 2015 at 2:50 pm John Altevogt

    The flaw in The Star’s vision is that in order for the website to make money they have to have ads, lots of ads. Already the name should be changed to the Daily Pop-up. Trying to do anything on The Star’s site is just annoying.

    I predict the future of news gathering will be expanded newsrooms in already established TV news crews. Their websites only have to be synergistic with their main revenue source and can be (and usually are) far more pleasant to traverse than a site cluttered by continual pop up ads.

    The proof of this can be seen by examining the number of “likes” the local TV news broadcasts have on Facebook and The Star (I’ve published the actual figures on a previous column on this blog). The Star has roughly half the likes of the least popular news gathering station and roughly 20% of the top two stations.


  9. on July 1, 2015 at 2:52 pm John Altevogt

    Obviously, little of what I just posted has anything to do with management, or allegations of bias (the #1 station for likes is also the most liberal), it’s simply dictated by what The Star faces in the marketplace.


    • on July 1, 2015 at 3:05 pm jimmycsays

      Great point about TV, John…Check out this story, which ran on The Times’ website yesterday.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/29/opinion/how-television-won-the-internet.html?_r=0


  10. on July 1, 2015 at 3:04 pm Kevin Collison

    I’ll take Bob’s drinking money, but less optimistic about the near-term demand for that building–although it should be saved! The parking lot might be worth more than the building. I agree the web has been a major factor in the demise of The Star, but equally or more, it’s chain ownership that’s hurt papers with the insatiable demand for increasing profits. Throw in the heavy debt load of McClatchy pulling down its properties, and its a sad tale indeed.


    • on July 1, 2015 at 3:07 pm jimmycsays

      You just seconded my emotion, Kevin…Thanks for the comment.


      • on July 1, 2015 at 5:07 pm John Altevogt

        Isn’t The Star, as a stand alone operation, profitable? To hell with the building. Some of the reporters that have been shown the door need to do what a group of reporters in Kansas did — start their own newspaper. Rent reasonable office space or even work out of your homes and create a real newspaper.

        You’re not saddled with debt or an inverted triangle for a management structure. Write about what interests you and do so honestly, and you might have a winner.

        You might even partner with The Pitch for facilities, printing, etc. to keep both your costs down and share other resources like copy editing.


  11. on July 1, 2015 at 3:05 pm Kevin Collison

    One other thing, KC metro 2.75 million? That’s about 750,000 more people than the Census bureau thinks!


    • on July 1, 2015 at 3:09 pm jimmycsays

      I ran with the first number that popped up on Google…I don’t verify quite as carefully as I did when a printed correction was the price to pay.


      • on July 1, 2015 at 6:54 pm jimmycsays

        Kevin: Julius just gave me a pass on a correction. Here’s what he wrote:

        “I think the population statistical error Collison pointed out can be handled with a clarification rather than a correction, so don’t fret. I’m sure it will be forgotten by the time your next evaluation rolls around!”


  12. on July 1, 2015 at 7:03 pm Thomas R Shrout Jr

    I love reading all this Star banter from reporters. FYI my great, great Uncle was A.B. MacDonald. Never knew him.I live in St. Louis and am a subscriber.


  13. on July 1, 2015 at 7:11 pm Julius Karash

    Good to know, Thomas! A.B. was one of our shining lights.


    • on July 1, 2015 at 7:32 pm jimmycsays

      OK…Neither Tom nor Julius told us just who and what A.B. did — and I, frankly, didn’t remember specifically. So, I turned to my old Wiki friend.

      Here’s what Wiki says:

      A. B. MacDonald (born c. 1861, date of death unknown) was a journalist for the Kansas City Star who won a Pulitzer Prize for Reporting in 1931 for “his work in connection with a murder in Amarillo, Texas.” On that assignment, he “solved a murder mystery . . . and brought a guilty man to justice.”

      Earlier, he had been “sent to Oklahoma to cover the chase of Harry Starr, a bandit who rode safely through a surrounding posse because his sweetheart was on the horse with him and the posse men were too gallant to shoot.”

      After he was assigned to interview evangelist Billy Sunday, he took a leave from the Star to go to New York to work as Sunday’s publicity agent.

      …Even back then, you see, good reporters were being lured away by the p.r. biz.(A.B.’s capitulation wasn’t as bad, though, as Paula Barr dropping the notebook to marry death-row-inmate Dennis Skillicorn.)


  14. on July 2, 2015 at 9:29 am Jeff Kocen

    I am an 18-year subscriber to The Star, and over the last several years the content in the paper has dwindled to the point where it only takes minutes to read. If the goal is to force readers to the digital version they will lose me as I am still the type that enjoys taking the paper to the table or better yet to the outside table with a cup of coffee to read it.

    I read plenty of news on other websites, just not the Star’s website. Customer service is another issue as I experience continuing delivery problems, poor phone service both through the reps in Singapore and in the local management. I expect there will be no more Star in less than 10 years. Management seems to be doing all they can to ensure their demise. Such a shame.


    • on July 2, 2015 at 10:25 am jimmycsays

      Thanks, Jeff. Welcome to the Comments Dept…If I had to pick one mistake The Star has made that stands out above the others it would be the elimination of someone you can talk to, here in Kansas City, about delivery problems. There’s nothing like calling a company with a problem and getting someone on the line quickly whose goal is to set things right. But routing people to Singapore or wherever is just ridiculous. It sends this message: “Too bad; we really don’t want to be bothered.”

      With circulation as low as it is, I think one or maybe two full-time employees could handle the customer service job. It would cost the paper about $100,000 a year, including benefits, and it would cultivate immeasurable goodwill and keep hundreds of people a year from canceling their subscriptions.


      • on July 2, 2015 at 11:21 am gayle

        Jeff, you are wise beyond your years, and a definite anomaly for your demographic, I would imagine .

        The trouble with “one or maybe two full-time employees” is that may not be enough to handle the suspected dearth of c.s. complaints.


      • on July 2, 2015 at 2:09 pm Steve Byrd

        Fitz, you didn’t have to answer all those Sunday morning calls that I and my fellow newsroom clerks had to take on for lost and wet newspapers…*grin*…I WISHED we received $100,000/yr for our efforts…but I agree with you about having live, U.S.-based and most importantly, LOCAL customer service reps…


  15. on July 2, 2015 at 11:32 am Charles

    FWIW, there is no “Wichita Eagle-Beacon”. It’s now Kansas.com/The Wichita Eagle.


    • on July 2, 2015 at 11:52 am jimmycsays

      They only dropped the dash-Beacon part 26 years ago…I’m trying to catch up.


  16. on July 2, 2015 at 11:48 am jimmycsays

    Gayle — I think you read the first line of Jeff’s comment like I did — thinking he was 18 years old! No, he’s an 18-year-subscriber…Tehre’s probably not an 18-year-old in town who has a subscription to the print product.

    …As for the customer service department, if you have a good one, you generally reduce the number of complaints.


    • on July 2, 2015 at 12:53 pm gayle

      Ah! Weird what the mind does to the eye! My proofreading skills failed me.


  17. on July 2, 2015 at 1:48 pm Julius Karash

    Don’t be too hard on yourself, Jim. I still forget once in a while and ask the corner newsboy for the Kansas City Journal-Post. And besides, you always lead the pack when it’s time for last call.


  18. on July 2, 2015 at 4:23 pm Edward "Gomer" Moody

    Very interesting comments, as a long time reader and advertiser, I remember when The Star ran an x-tra and hawked it on the street. Perhaps the paper could survive with Buffett money and better management.


    • on July 2, 2015 at 4:45 pm jimmycsays

      Great to hear from you, Ed…Buffett is my savior of choice, too. Hell, we’re just down the road from his great city!


    • on July 2, 2015 at 6:24 pm gayle

      AND regular contributor to Letters to the Editor!


      • on July 2, 2015 at 6:50 pm jimmycsays

        That’s Gomer…not Warren.


  19. on July 2, 2015 at 9:03 pm gayle

    That’s who I meant. Was adding to his long-time reader and advertiser reference.


  20. on July 7, 2015 at 11:24 am Roch Thornton

    When faced with a challenge to its existence a business can choose one of two paths.
    1) The business can reinvest profits in itself until it achieves a level of excellence that makes it essential to its community.
    2) Or the shrinking business can keep profits up by cutting wages, benefits, staff and the overall quality of its product.
    The first path is risky, but the second is suicidal.
    The Star chose suicide.


    • on July 7, 2015 at 12:12 pm jimmycsays

      Great to hear from you, Roch…Thanks for the comment.

      I agree, except it’s not fair to put all the blame on The Star. McClatchy managers pointed the way.


  21. on July 7, 2015 at 2:05 pm Art Faucett

    KC still has a paper?


  22. on July 7, 2015 at 3:32 pm Julius Karash

    Yes, great to hear from you, Roch Thornton! I enjoyed that all too brief time when we were on the Star business desk together.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: