• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« One-of-a-kind eclipse photos…
Former KC Star staffers weigh in on the redesigned paper and website »

When it meant something to be publisher…

September 28, 2015 by jimmycsays

Most of you know, I’m sure, that Mi-Ai Parrish, KC Star publisher the last four years, is headed to Phoenix to become president and publisher of The Arizona Republic.

It got big headlines on this blog last week. Where it didn’t get big headlines, interestingly, was in The Kansas City Star.

P1050395The Star announced the change on page A8, the business page, in a bland, one-column, nine-paragraph story.

Maybe Parrish is humble and instructed the newsroom not to make a big deal out of it. But probably not. The writer, Mark Davis, probably gave the story exactly what it deserved.

Here’s the important thing about that story: Its brevity and positioning weren’t as much reflections on Parrish as they were on the state of newspaper publishing.

Back in the 70s, 80s, and 90s — and earlier — it was almost always a big deal when the publisher of a major metropolitan daily resigned, retired or was fired. That was when a lot of papers were owned by families, the paper’s employees or newspaper barons, like William Rockhill Nelson.

These days, with so many metropolitan dailies owned by chains — such as Gannett (many dailies), McClatchy (The Star and several others) and Lee Enterprises (the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, among others) — most publishers are like cogs in wheels. That is, pretty interchangeable.

You might have read former Kansas City Star executive editor Mike Waller’s comment on last Thursday’s post. He said:

“It doesn’t matter today who the publisher is of any newspaper. It matters only who owns the paper. Only an enlightened ownership–there are few remaining–can assure quality journalism.”

He should know; he’s a former publisher of the Hartford Courant and The Sun of Baltimore. Both those papers were once owned by a good chain — Times-Mirror of Los Angeles — and, currently, a bad one — Tribune Co. of Chicago.

**

In contrast to the short story about Parrish’s departure for the desert, when the last great Kansas City Star publisher retired in 1992 –the late James H. Hale — he went off to a crescendo of tributes.

The Star ran the announcement story on the bottom of Page One on Thursday, Nov. 12. The story “jumped” inside and ran a total of 48 paragraphs.

hale retirement

hale jump

The story included laudatory quotes from Miller Nichols, former chairman of the J.C. Nichols Co.; Marion Kramer, a civic leader; former Kansas City Star editor Joe McGuff; and Phil Meek, senior vice president of Capital Cities Inc., which had purchased The Star in 1977 and shortly thereafter installed Hale, a Texan, as publisher.

During his 15-year run, Hale expanded the paper, approving the hiring of new employees and the addition of new sections; greatly increased the paper’s profitability — the profit margin soared to about 30 percent; and got the paper involved in the community in a big way, partly through sponsorships of major arts organizations. Plus, The Star won three Pulitzer prizes.

In short, he deserved every paragraph of that story.

He was succeeded by Robert Woodworth, another CapCities veteran.

Things started going downhill for The Star four years after Hale’s retirement, in 1996, when the Walt Disney Co. bought out CapCities (which had acquired the ABC-TV network). Disney owned the paper just one year before selling to KnightRidder. In 2006, KnightRidder folded its tent and sold out to McClatchy.

As the paper’s fortunes declined, the publisher’s post became less vital. The focus quickly shifted to McClatchy’s Sacramento headquarters, which delivered harsh marching orders in the face of rapidly falling advertising and circulation at all its papers.

The main job of KC Star publishers since 2008 — Mark Zieman and Parrish — has been to shrink-wrap the paper.

They’ve done a mighty fine job of it…It’s just not the kind of success that merits front-page headlines.

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

10 Responses

  1. on September 28, 2015 at 10:42 pm George

    Who is likely successor – please handicap the odds of an insider … is it time for Fannin to rise despite history…?


    • on September 28, 2015 at 11:31 pm jimmycsays

      Fannin…I wouldn’t think so. I would expect it to be a publisher from another McClatchy paper.


  2. on September 28, 2015 at 10:46 pm George

    I hear the new online re-do and format kicks off next week.


    • on September 28, 2015 at 11:34 pm jimmycsays

      Can’t be soon enough; the website sucks, don’t you think? A lot of the stories they put in the lead web position are ridiculous. Earlier today, the lead was a Lisa Gutierrez feature titled “Babies, Boehner and Brady: Some winners and losers of Pope Francis’ visit.”

      And in the middle column — “Latest News” — they intermingle local and national stories. I think most readers would like to know whether the stories or local…and where they’re from if they’re not local. It would be so easy to fix, but they insist on making the reader guess.


  3. on September 29, 2015 at 8:08 am John Altevogt

    When I first started reading The Star online it actually reduced the perception of bias caused by placement in the paper (although they’ve managed to overcome that benefit). Instead of searching back to page A8, everything was in a list on the opening page and you clicked on what interested you.

    That said, I don’t think a new website is going to help. As I’ve pointed out in other comments, the website is a collection of annoying pop-up ads that come through even with a good ad blocker. Easier to just go to the TV news stations websites and check the local news there.


    • on September 29, 2015 at 8:38 am jimmycsays

      Maybe the new website will have “new and improved” pop-ups…They are incredibly annoying, but that’s the price of transitioning from print to online ads. The advertisers will only pay if they think the ads will be placed so people see them — or have to deal with them. The NYT has pop-ups, too, but they just appear at the top of the page, not over the whole damn page, like a lot of The Star’s ads.


  4. on September 29, 2015 at 7:33 pm Ankaroid

    It’s actually tomorrow, George.


    • on September 29, 2015 at 7:34 pm jimmycsays

      Thanks, Andaroid.


  5. on September 30, 2015 at 6:00 pm Rick Nichols

    As far as I’m concerned, Mi-Ai Parrish has basically been a non-entity during her tenure at the helm of The Star. By some accounts, her appearance early on before members of the 40 Years Ago Club left something to be desired, and it has pretty much been one P.R. “disaster” after another ever since. In my book, she didn’t provide the leadership the paper desperately needed. But then again, it’s like Mr. Waller said, it’s who owns the paper that ultimately matters most. Publishers are very interchangeable.


    • on September 30, 2015 at 6:14 pm jimmycsays

      Thanks for weighing in, Rick.

      …I was at that 40 Years Ago Column Club meeting back in January 2012, and I wrote a post about it.

      My strongest advice to her — in that post — was to get out and “sell” the paper.

      Addressing her directly, I wrote:

      Get out there every chance you get; attend every luncheon you possibly can; do every TV and radio interview you’re asked to do; attend every major civic function you can weasel your way into; don’t miss an opportunity to mingle with members of the public and tell them who you are and what your vision is for the hometown paper.

      As far as I can tell, she did none of that. She didn’t become a player in the community; she didn’t address groups; and she didn’t mix with the public.

      She did not produce any “great results” here, as the McClatchy executive claimed in the story about her moving to Phoenix. What she did, as I said, was shrink-wrap the paper.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: