• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Star delivers home-run coverage of two huge stories: the Royals and the tragic Independence Avenue fire
A New York Times writer strikes a vein — and pierces readers’ hearts — with the story of a man who died alone and unloved »

KC Star print subscription prices could hinge on haggling

October 18, 2015 by jimmycsays

The only place where I’m pretty good at haggling over prices is outside sporting events when negotiating for tickets.

My biggest coup was in 2000, when I bought a $500 face-value Kentucky Derby ticket for $200. It got me into the lofty, 4th-floor “Jockey Club Suites,” where I was among celebrities such as then-University of Kentucky basketball coach Rick Pitino and then-U.S. Defense Secretary William Cohen. (I was so lucky that day that I even had the Derby winner, Fusaichi Pegasus.)

Normally, however, I overpay for items and services that don’t carry non-negotiable prices.

Five years ago, for example, Patty and I paid at least 30 percent more than we should have for two rugs while we were on a trip to Turkey. I went into the negotiations uninformed and uninitiated and was hornswoggled by a charming salesman named Celal Belli, who also went by “Jelly Belly.”

So, it came as no surprise to me when I learned in recent days I was paying more than several other people I know for the print edition of The Star.

I had heard that because of the steep drop in circulation the last several years, subscription prices were somewhat negotiable. I’ve never tried to negotiate it, however — just paid what they said I owed and charged it automatically each month to my credit card.

At the start of this year, my subscription price rose from $27.51 to $34.51 per month, right at 25 percent more.

Within the last few days, a friend got a special, discounted price of about $16 a month for six months.

Told how much I was paying, my friend suggested I conduct an informal survey of several friends to find out what kind of disparity there was.

So, I sent emails to several former Star colleagues and asked what they were paying.

Here’s what I found:

— Former business reporter Julius Karash said he was paying $35.39 a month before he recently dropped the print subscription because of delivery problems at his downtown condo.

— Former Metro reporter Kevin Murphy said he was paying “about $30 a month.”

— At the other end were former architecture critic Donald Hoffmann and former society editor Laura Hockaday, both of whom are paying $14.83 per month. Laura didn’t know why her rate was as low as it is, but Don said it’s because former KC Star employees are entitled to a 50 percent discount.

I knew that many years ago, probably back in the 80s and 90s, I was getting The Star delivered to my home at a discounted price — probably the 50 percent Hoffmann alluded to. But I thought the Star had dropped that perk years ago, and I hadn’t inquired about it or thought about it in years.

Don said he had been getting the discounted rate since he retired in 1990.

If that’s the case, I say, good for Don and good for Laura and other former Star employees who are getting a great discount…And one more thing: I’ll be calling The Star this week to try to get the discounted rate.

**

On the haggling, my survey yielded a lively email thread among me, Julius and a another former reporter who declined to be identified.

20150521_131947

Julius Karash

Julius had suggested that I include the other reporter in the survey because “he says whenever they try to hit him with an increase, he tells them he wants to drop the paper and then they back off.”

When I sent that reporter an email telling him what Julius had been paying and asking what he was paying, he wrote back saying, “J (Julius) is being robbed.”

Conspicuously missing was how much he — the other reporter — was paying, so I pressed him, saying, “Out with the number!”

He wrote back, “They pay me!”

…I don’t think I’d want to be in a poker game with that guy. But then again, he probably doesn’t engage in games of chance because he’s obviously very good at holding onto his money.

**

If you’d like to get in on this survey, pray, tell us here at jimmycsays what you are paying for your print subscriptions…Even if you aren’t a former Star employee, if you are armed with enough “comps” — the term used in the real estate business to help set home prices and tax assessments — maybe some of you will be able to fight back and shave a few dollars off your monthly rates.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 16 Comments

16 Responses

  1. on October 18, 2015 at 1:43 pm kaler

    They want $475 for an annual subscription. We’ll drop if they won’t discount


    • on October 18, 2015 at 1:47 pm jimmycsays

      Almost $40 a month. That’s pushing the ceiling.


  2. on October 18, 2015 at 3:24 pm Joe Downs

    $96.00 for six months


    • on October 18, 2015 at 4:41 pm jimmycsays

      Same deal my Raytown friend got — $16 per month.


  3. on October 18, 2015 at 3:57 pm Julius Karash

    I can’t believe old what’s-his-name wouldn’t let you identify him by name, Jim! I guess he’s just too modest about his bargaining abilities.

    In the interest of total transparency, I actually live in a downtown apartment, not a condo. But with all the money I’ll be saving after dropping the print edition of The Star I hope to buy a downtown condo some day. Maybe in the future Hemingway Arms at 18th and Grand.


    • on October 18, 2015 at 4:43 pm jimmycsays

      I pleaded and cajoled, Julius, you know, for the sake of transparency. But he was adamant and said staying anonymous was strategic: “It helps me keep my options going forward!”


  4. on October 18, 2015 at 4:53 pm Julius Karash

    That’s interesting that he says he wants to keep his options going forward, Jim. Let’s keep a close watch on our old friend. With his bargaining acumen and the war chest he has built up over the years, he just might make a play to buy the Star. If he does, he’ll probably try to bring us in as silent partners.


  5. on October 18, 2015 at 11:46 pm altevogt

    I got all of you beat. When I came here in 1990 I moved into a farm out south of Eudora and took it over when another grad student from the department graduated. He cancelled his subscription, but they kept right on delivering it for over three years without ever sending a bill. They called a couple of times trying to collect from the previous guy and we told them he cancelled it. They also would periodically ask if we still wanted the paper and we always told them no, but they continued on. After three years they finally stopped delivering it on a daily basis, but we still got one occasionally when they had a sub delivering the route.

    Then when I wrote my column Rich wanted me to take the paper and agreed to reimburse me if I did. I think the annual then was $88 (maybe six months, don’t remember) and then after that ran out, once again we got the paper for over 6 months without a subscription. At least then they stopped delivery when they sent me a bill and I refused to pay it.

    Now, like anyone who understands web browsers, I still get the online version for free whenever I want to read it (which is rare).


  6. on October 18, 2015 at 11:47 pm altevogt

    That’s weird, Fitz. When I just posted that it usually has my full name and email listed. Now it just says “altevogt: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account.”


    • on October 19, 2015 at 8:39 am jimmycsays

      I’ll send the problem on to WordPress.


  7. on October 19, 2015 at 8:18 am Bob W

    $178.01 for 6 months. Print and web. No paper connections. Every time I find out someone (other than former employees) paid less I lose some of the little remaining respect for the Star. My wife seems to find these people and then point out my lack of negotiating savvy. I used to feel better by chalking it up to “community service”. But more and more it just feel like a chump.


    • on October 19, 2015 at 8:38 am jimmycsays

      Now I’m starting to see a trend…Your rate, Bob, is $29.66 per month, which is exactly twice as much as the former KC Star employees are paying — $14.83 per month…It seems to me, then, that the true going rate is what you’re paying — $29.66 — a month and the price for former employees, who get the 50 percent discount — is $14.83.

      I don’t think you need to feel like a chump. You could probably cancel your subscription and wait a couple of months and start the discounted special (if they’re still offering it then) at about $16 a month. But after that expires, my guess is they’d work you back up toward where you were. It takes a lot of time and energy to haggle with the sales people, and they know that; that’s one reason they make it difficult to get through.


  8. on October 19, 2015 at 10:10 am Keith Morantz

    Jim, I paid 147 in 2012, 186 in 2013, 191 in 2014 and 208 in 2015 all per year. I always negotiate the billed price although it gets a bit harder each year. I have heard, although I can’t confirm yet, that you can take the Wed thru Sunday plus print+ at a lower rate. We’ll see


    • on October 19, 2015 at 10:42 am jimmycsays

      $17.33 per month currently…That’s a good rate. You’re doing well, Keith.

      …I suspect The Star is going to start clamping down on these prices. When people know the price is negotiable, The Star can’t stand firm on its price. Now that it’s out, The Star might decide it’s time to draw the line and force the subscribers’ hands on long-term subscriptions…I think that’s what I would do if I were in Star management; it would make things more clear-cut.


  9. on October 19, 2015 at 4:10 pm John Altevogt

    They’re doing exactly what Time Warner does with your cable service. Want lower rates, call in every six months for the latest package deal. Fail to do that and watch your rates creep up month after month as the special deals go by the wayside.


  10. on October 19, 2015 at 5:34 pm jbwein5

    We used to get the paper. We dropped it for a short while then this auto-dialer system started calling us 5 times per day about paying our bill when we weren’t receiving the paper. It was ridiculous to get them to stop calling. Many phone calls after they said they would stop. I negotiated a new price for my mother. We got the price down to $185.41 per year. The auto dialer would call my mom 6 months into her service saying she owes them money. It drove her crazy and for 3 years I have threatened to stop her paper if they do not stop. This year was the first year they did not bother her. I have wanted to sign up again for the paper but I won’t because I don’t want to deal with that issue again with the 5 times a day phone calls!



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: