I’m about as liberal as people get, as most of you know, but there’s a particular aspect of the shooting of Philando Castile outside St. Paul Wednesday that casts a cloud over the actions and judgment of 32-year-old Castile.
This morning, the officer who shot Castile at point-blank range has been identified as Jeronimo Yanez, who has worked for the St. Anthony, Minnesota, police department for four years. (I have not been able to find his age, but he appears young in a photo from 2014.)
Yanez and his partner, Officer Joseph Kauser, have been placed on administrative leave.
Much attention has been focused — and rightly so — on the live Facebook video that his Castile’s girlfriend Diamond Reynolds posted in the minutes after the shooting, when Castile was apparently drawing his last breaths.
But let’s take a closer look at some of the factors working on both sides of this tragedy.
:: Castile was not some punk, thug or dangerous person. He was a 14-year employee of the St. Paul public school system. He worked in nutrition services and had been promoted to supervisor two years ago. The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported that Castile had only misdemeanors on his criminal record.
:: As far as policing goes, this was as podunk as it gets. The stop occurred in the town of Falcon Heights, just northwest of St. Paul. But Falcon Heights, a town of 5,500, is so small it relies on neighboring St. Anthony — population 8,200 — for police services. It’s understandable that cops in towns like those are so bored that they have all the time in the world to deal with people driving around with broken tail lights (as was the case with Castile).
:: And, let’s face it, Yanez might be the type of cop who was always looking to swing into action — particularly if some “suspicious” black people are seen driving in a white suburb. There’s a lot of truth to what Castile’s mother, Valerie Castile, told CNN: “I think he was just black in the wrong place.”
On the other hand:
:: The precise circumstances make me wonder why Castile acted as he did and said what he said when he said it.
The New York Times’ news account, which is based on what the girlfriend said at a news conference on Thursday, goes like this:
As he’s reaching for his back pocket wallet, to produce his license and registration, “he lets the officer know, ‘Officer, I have a firearm on me,’ ” she (Diamond Reynolds) said. “I began to yell, ‘But he’s licensed to carry.’ After that, he (Yanez) began to take off shots — bah, bah, bah, bah.”
About those particular few seconds…I am anxious to know if Yanez already had his gun out. I tend to suspect he did, otherwise how could he have fired off three or four rounds so quickly? But why would he have his gun out — for a broken tail light stop — unless he was “primed for action” as I suggested earlier.
Nevertheless — and this is the most significant defense of the officer’s action…Why in the hell would a guy say “Officer, I have a firearm on me” at the very moment he’s reaching into a pocket????
That was, frankly, dumb, but is apparently exactly what happened — not according to police but the victim’s girlfriend, who was right there.
Putting myself in Castile’s shoes — and presuming I had a gun on me — I would have kept my hands in front or me, or up, and told the officer I had a gun on my person, and I would have told him exactly where it was — pocket, waistband, whatever — and that I had a license to carry it.
I would not have announced I had a firearm and, at the same time, reached for my wallet.
…Another mitigating element, in my view, is Diamond Reynolds — as calm as she was in the moments after the shooting, when she was streaming the video — was shouting something when Castile announced he had a gun. So…you’ve got a guy reaching toward a pocket after saying he has a gun, plus a woman shouting something. It had to be chaotic.
Yanez, I’m convinced, was young, inexperienced and overly anticipative of trouble. And yet, Philando Castile and Diamond Reynolds made the simultaneous mistakes of reaching and shouting when they should have been thinking, talking quietly and remaining perfectly still.
You make valid points, but I wonder when it became incumbent on the “average citizen” to be the professional when encountering an officer of the law? If you’re in Mr. Castile’s shoes, and you are a black man in a predominantly white suburb being pulled over by a police officer, are you not naturally nervous? And isn’t that the real problem here? Is it fair to expect Mr. Castile to act exactly in the way that would be best for the situation with such heightened tensions? He was following the officer’s instructions. Did he do it in the best way, and did his girlfriend act in his best interests? Absolutely not. But does that provide ANY excuse for the officer? ABSOLUTELY NOT. If the officer was young and inexperienced and acted rashly, he should not have been allowed to carry a gun.
When I was younger, we respected the police because we believed they were on our side–not because we were afraid of being shot. (Sure, we might have been afraid of getting in trouble with our parents too.) As long as there is a constant stream of stories about black men being shot by the police, respect will continue to be lost and the vicious circle will continue.
And then you have this guy who is still alive after firing a weapon at a police officer. Are you surprised to find out that he’s white? Does a black man survive such an encounter? A doubt it. http://wncn.com/2016/07/06/raleigh-man-fires-handgun-at-wake-county-deputy/
I am eager to find out more about Officer Yanez and his background. I wonder if we will find, like we did with the officer in Cleveland who last year shot and killed the 12-year-old boy with the fake gun, that he was drummed out of another force before catching on with St. Anthony.
+1, Maneesh.
Jim, couldn’t disagree with you more. This man was responding to the cop’s command to show ID. He and his girlfriend volunteered the gun info. Why was this family stopped anyway? Driving while black in a white suburb. Now dead while driving in a white suburb.
America, what a country. Wow. This past weeks events will define us all for some time. Glad you started this conversation now as the topics, chains of events, responsibilities and accountabilities need to be aired and discussed in conversations with everyone. Not, as I imagine will happen, force fed thru technology outlets. Hope conversation happens as I hope I come to appreciate other perspectives whether I agree or not. Keep throwing those hard pitches Jim.
Info that I found interesting is that Castile had 50+ (some sources say 80) traffic related citations. More than half of those were dismissed. That is a lot of experience with police on traffic stops. A lot.
We still haven’t heard in detail the cop’s side of the story, and probably won’t for some considerable time. That should help with perspective.
Yep. His attorney has dropped a few comments. Said it is all about the gun and Castile’s actions.