• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Latest outrage: The Tulsa police shooting of an unarmed black man
Look for QuikTrip to get its way with a big new store — and lots of pumps — at Westport Road and Mercier »

The germination of the Wells Fargo story: A 12-paragraph story by a Los Angeles Times reporter who bothered to follow up a tip

September 21, 2016 by jimmycsays

It was big news earlier this month when headlines in papers across the country announced that Wells Fargo had agreed to pay $185 million in fines because its employees, under extreme pressure from management, had opened more than a million bank accounts, some of which were opened without customers’ knowledge.

This huge story continues to make headlines: On Tuesday members of the Senate Banking Committee grilled Wells Fargo C.E.O. John G. Stumpf for more than two hours.

The occasion gave Banking Committee members an opportunity to grandstand and expel their wrath at Stumpf for firing more than 5,000 employees — although not a single one in senior management, where the pressure originated and was maintained.

reckard

Scott Reckard

One thing I think is important for people to know — although relatively few people ever will — is this snowball ball started rolling because, three years ago, an editor at the Los Angeles Times sent an email to the paper’s banking reporter, E. Scott Reckard, about something that had been called to his attention.

Here’s how Reckard, who retired last year, explained it to the Columbia Journalism Review in an article published Sept. 12.

“I got an email from one of the editors, Pat McMahon, saying there was this weird story. I talked to this [Wells Fargo employee] who claimed he had signed people up for accounts and services they didn’t need, but never without them knowing it—he would just talk them into it. Anyway, he told a story about these incredible pressures to make sales numbers and about how the branch had basically been setting records and getting kudos for doing this, but then people started complaining, and some trouble came down. Before too long, all these people got fired, these front line workers. He said all they were doing was responding to pressure from above and coaching from above about how to get the numbers up.”

If he wasn’t conscientious, Reckard probably could have blown off the editor, saying it was an aberration. Instead he jumped right into it, and on Oct. 3, 2013, the paper ran a 12-paragraph story saying Wells Fargo had fired about 30 branch employees in the Los Angeles region for opening accounts that were never used and attempting to manipulate customer satisfaction surveys.

What happened next took Reckard by surprise:

“(T)he phones started ringing off the hook and the emails started landing from people all over the place. Mainly current and former Wells Fargo employees, but customers too. They wanted to tell stories about what had happened to them.”

With the help of another editor, Brian Thevenot, Reckard dug deeper, and what he found was “the scope was really big” and not just limited to Southern California.

On Dec. 23, 2013, the Times published a much more comprehensive story, which Reckard began with an anecdote from a former Florida branch manager. Reckard quoted the former manager, Rita Murillo, as saying: “If we did not make the sales quotas…we had to stay for what felt like after-school detention, or report to a call session on Saturdays.”

From there, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and state regulators got involved, and early this month the story exploded when the CFPB announced the $185 million settlement.

A Sept. 8 New York Times story quoted CFPB director Richard Cordray as saying, “Unchecked incentives can lead to serious consumer harm, and that is what happened here.”

I’m not taking anything away from the CFPB. I’m glad its investigators got in there and cracked open the pineapple. But there wouldn’t have been any pineapple if it hadn’t been for Scott Reckard and the Los Angeles Times. 

**

As I mentioned, Reckard retired last year, after 18 years with the Times and 14 before that with the Associated Press. He told the CJR he retired “because it wasn’t as much fun…working for newspapers these days.”

Almost any veteran newspaper reporter would say the same thing. Yet the work remains as important as ever, and let’s hope many in the new generation of reporters are as dedicated, resourceful and enthusiastic as Reckard. The dividends can be great, not just for the individual but, as the Wells Fargo story clearly demonstrated, for the public at large.

Reckard acknowledged the personal and professional satisfaction when he told the CJR:

“It’d be easy to look back and say, ‘Why the hell did I spend my life doing something?’ But when you get a chance to actually see that there was some action that resulted on something important you covered, it sort of restores your faith in the whole process.”

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

11 Responses

  1. on September 21, 2016 at 3:14 pm Rick Thomas

    I have followed this story for a couple of different reasons…but without finding so far, the information I was seeking.

    I can understand compensating a sales associate for getting a customer to sign-up for a credit card … that’s obviously based on the future value of the customer and his/her use of the card — but no money has changed hands.

    Were there other types of accounts set-up? And if so, how would they be considered accounts if no money was involved in the transactions?

    How much real money was involved in the non-credit card accounts that were set-up? What was the total monetary damage to the customers involved?

    And finally, where does the $185 million dollar fine go? To whom and how is it paid? What is it used for? Does it pay any bonuses to the CFPB execs instrumental in its capture?

    So I guess John Stumpf knows what it feels like to be a fish in a barrel now. Maybe he should have made a contribution to the Clinton Foundation’s mea culpa fund to ward off Senator Warren’s onslaught.


    • on September 21, 2016 at 6:19 pm jimmycsays

      I will try to answer…

      — The managers wanted any types of accounts opened, checking, savings whatever, as I understand it. I think they didn’t know that many employees were opening accounts and then quickly closing them, maybe by moving nominal amounts into the new accounts and then out as they closed them. The employees apparently were able to get managers off their backs (and meet quotas) simply by opening new accounts. I know it doesn’t make a lot of sense because there was so much churn, but the name of the game was opening accounts, issuing credit cards and selling other bank products. Sell, sell, sell!

      — According to a Bloomberg story, $100 million goes to the CFPB, $35 million to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and $50 million to the Los Angeles city attorney.

      — Wells Fargo also agreed to compensate customers who incurred fees or charges, and it has set aside $5 million for “customer remediation.”


  2. on September 21, 2016 at 5:43 pm Margaret Nichols

    So, Wells Fargo will pay a fine of 185million. Which leads to my burning question: What happens to the fine money? Who gets it? Where does it go? Who benefits from the imposed fine?


    • on September 21, 2016 at 6:19 pm jimmycsays

      Peg — See answer above.


  3. on September 21, 2016 at 5:51 pm John Altevogt

    If memory serves, one of the huge fines levied against another corporation wound up being given to the city of Detroit by the Obama administration.

    That said, there is nothing worth more to the citizens of this country than solid acts of journalism that simply lay out the facts and let the people decide what to do with them.

    Stuff like this is absolutely fascinating and opportunities abound to do stories like this and instead reporters lay around regurgitating press releases (and getting punked by the likes of Melissa Rooker), or manufacture news stories that fit their ideological view of the world (like the moron at the Cap-Journal who reported on 8 people protesting Chamber endorsements that hadn’t even been made yet).

    PS your photo spells the reporter’s name differently than the article.


    • on September 21, 2016 at 6:21 pm jimmycsays

      Spellings reconciled…Thanks, John.

      …I doubt the name Melissa Rooker means anything to the vast majority of our readers, but, please, don’t feel obliged to go into detail! (Just an advisory.)


      • on September 21, 2016 at 9:40 pm gayle

        If Mr. Altevogt doesn’t wish to expound there’s always Google!


      • on September 21, 2016 at 10:33 pm John Altevogt

        You underestimate your readers. This is a very knowledgeable crowd, so I’m good that they, like you, know what I’m talking about and will leave it at that.


  4. on September 21, 2016 at 8:07 pm N. Beige Onley

    Not a story you will find in the Shawnee Mission Post. The C of C would not approve.


  5. on September 21, 2016 at 10:09 pm jimmycsays

    Gayle — Google won’t help; this is strictly hip-pocket stuff.


    • on September 21, 2016 at 10:51 pm gayle

      Apparently I’m not in the “hip pocket,” ’cause I have no idea what he’s talking about, but that’s ok.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: