• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Payday-loan case rulings are hardly the end of the story, and newspapers should so inform their readers
You think Carnival in Rio de Janeiro is big? Wait ’til you hear about Mayor Sly James’ idea of an arts festival to end all arts festivals »

If I had it to do over…

October 4, 2016 by jimmycsays

I was too harsh in my criticism of two Kansas City Star reporters in my last post, and today I’m going to try to make amends.

I’m not going to steer away from warranted criticism of The Star and other papers in the future, but I am going to be more careful with my wording and also make a better effort to verify things I present as fact.

First, I related that a friend, a former KC Star colleague, told me that a young reporter named Ian Cummings wore a T-shirt and jeans when he went to interview R. Crosby Kemper III, Kansas City Public Library director, last week. My friend got that from a friend who is a top manager at the library.

I could easily have emailed or called Cummings and found out if that was true, but instead I went with my friend’s information. Bad move. Cummings sent me an email a several hours after the post was up, saying he had worn a Polo-type shirt and slacks.

I quickly posted a comment noting what Cummings had said — although I still questioned the propriety of wearing a Polo shirt to an interview with a person of Kemper’s stature.

Cummings was under the impression I was going to change the original paragraph in the blog, and from a later email he sent, I got the impression he was disappointed in the way I handled the “correction.”

I don’t shrink from corrections, but they often don’t look like the formal corrections you see in The Star and other papers. Most blogs have a personal, informal tone and that’s what I shoot for here.

In any event, my apologies to Ian Cummings, but, like I said in my follow-up comment yesterday, reporters should be ready to shift gears, sartorially and otherwise, depending on the nature of their assignments. Casual Fridays are not always observed in executive suites, and whatever Cummings wore to his interview with Crosby Kemper, he had library officials talking.

**

I also criticized reporter Steve Vockrodt for what I deemed to be “lazy” reporting on a weekend story about a Nevada U.S. District Court judge having ordered a former payday lender from our area to pay $1.3 billion to the Federal Trade Commission for cheating several million people out of their money.

My main objection to the story was it included no indication that the defendant, Scott Tucker, would probably never pay anything close to $1.3 billion. A lot of his profits are undoubtedly gone, and besides, first-level court judgments often get altered as the cases forward on appeal.

Vockrodt called and said he didn’t get the court ruling until Saturday (the story appeared in Sunday’s paper), when it would have been very difficult to identify and contact sources who might have offered comments tempering the prospect of Tucker ever making full restitution. He also made it clear he was unhappy with my assessment he was guilty of lazy reporting.

Vockrodt said he planned to do a follow-up story, and today he did so. Today’s story says, among other things, that The FTC has estimated Tucker’s liquid assets are $106 million. My guess is the FTC will get far less than that.

…If I had to write it again, I would not have used the word “lazy.” I would have said, simply, that Vockrodt, a veteran business reporter, should not have left readers with the impression that the FTC would be collecting anything close to $1.3 billion from Tucker. He wasn’t lazy; he just knew better.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

12 Responses

  1. on October 4, 2016 at 3:15 pm Olathe Reader

    FWIW and off-topic, we just received a letter from The Star saying our subscription will go up “slightly.” Actually, our 4-week payment for paper and digital access went from 30.99 to 37.96, which is a 22% increase. Gah! That is not a slight increase by any measure.


    • on October 4, 2016 at 4:52 pm jimmycsays

      Did the letter say what you were currently paying, or did you have to look that up? Most times when The Star levels a rate hike, the letter doesn’t compare the current and new rates; they’d rather you didn’t know it was 22 percent.


      • on October 4, 2016 at 5:31 pm Olathe Reader

        The letter did not state my current payment. I compared it on my own. The word “slight” burned my biscuits.


  2. on October 4, 2016 at 5:39 pm Lisa Round

    Jim….

    It’s YOUR blog, you have the right to use adjectives of your choice (such as “lazy”!). The Star disappoints me daily, but I can’t quite cut it out of my daily routine. It regularly has errors, lousy reporting, misguided information, and not much beef to most worthwhile topics and stories. Use of the word lazy is mild in comparison to some of the language I use after my daily journey through the pages!

    Lisa


    • on October 4, 2016 at 6:59 pm jimmycsays

      Those editorial employees are working in difficult circumstances, Lisa, presented to them by McClatchy and other forces beyond their control. I want to support their efforts all I can, and I also want to encourage them to give the readers their best effort. Sometimes that means being critical…I would like to think my criticism of Steve Vockrodt’s first story on the Nevada ruling helped set the stage for the excellent follow-up we saw today. It put the Sunday story in proper perspective.


  3. on October 4, 2016 at 8:29 pm Karen Brown

    This is minor, I know, but I’m curious about what Crosby was wearing when Ian interviewed him.


    • on October 4, 2016 at 9:08 pm jimmycsays

      That is funny, Karen…Leave it to you to turn the issue on its head!

      Maybe Ian would want to weigh in…


  4. on October 4, 2016 at 8:54 pm Jayson

    Dear Gentleman Jim,
    Nice of you to take consideration and follow up your comments with a correction. However I agree with your first go as I complement you on the follow thru. As society in general dumbs down in attire and critical observations we all are poorer for it. To not appreciate a potential sartorial dynamic that would/could facilitate an interview is lazy and lacking in creativity. Hell one of these days flip flops will be de rigueur I suppose but not now thank heavens. To not comment on the typical smallish punitive damages recovered from corporate thievery these days was an airball for sure.

    Thank heavens you stand in the breech. As an avid reader I always look forward to your opined musings as I read at my risk. Go you gadfly go ……..


    • on October 4, 2016 at 9:07 pm jimmycsays

      Jayson — I think The Star needs your wit, verve and unique writing style on the editorial page…Send me your resume and I’ll pass it on to Tony…


  5. on October 5, 2016 at 1:49 pm Mike Rice

    Two months ago, the law firm I work for filed on someone’s behalf a consumer fraud suit against the cable giant Comcast . A press release was sent out and Steve Vockrodt did a story on it. Steve did an excellent job. He didn’t just regurgitate the press release. He called the attorney and got a fresh quote from him. He took complicated subject matter and put it in a context that readers could understand. And they attorney he quoted even commented to me on what a great job he did!


  6. on October 6, 2016 at 12:37 pm John D Altevogt

    Fitz, it’s hard for them to ignore some one of your experience and stature. One wishes they were that responsive to other critiques.


    • on October 6, 2016 at 1:06 pm jimmycsays

      Thanks, John.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: