• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The state of local reporting: I had to go to three TV station websites and The Star to figure out what was behind the slaying of Sarah DeLeon
Thank you, Bobby Vee, for “Walkin’ With My Angel” (even if I didn’t have one myself) »

A seven-syllable word that in some ways trumpets a discomfiting future

October 25, 2016 by jimmycsays

A high-powered journalist, David Von Drehle, spoke Sunday at an educational forum at my church (Country Club Christian) and explained in a context I had not fully understood some of the ramifications of the digital age.

Von Drehle (pronounced Von Drai-ly) is a 55-year-old editor at large for Time magazine. In addition to having written scores of cover stories for Time since he joined the magazine in 2007, he has written three books, including his most recent one, Rise to Greatness: Abraham Lincoln and America’s Most Perilous Year. Before going to work for Time, he was an assistant managing editor at The Washington Post. Von Drehle and his wife, Karen Ball, also a journalist, live in Kansas City.

von-drehle

David Von Drehle

Von Drehle’s subject was the presidential election, and I was wondering how he was going to strike a balance, seeing as how Country Club is an old-line, traditional type of church that draws heavily from across the state line. (What am I getting at there is that the membership doesn’t look anything like The Kansas City Star newsroom; a goodly number of Country Club members probably will be voting for Donald Trump.)

As it turned out, being even handed was no problem for Von Drehle. Instead of assessing the two major candidates or trying to predict which of them would prevail in key states, he focused on how Trump has turned conventional campaigning on its head.

A key area in which Trump has vaulted ahead of Hillary Clinton — and ahead of almost all other politicians, for that matter, Von Drehle said — is disintermediation.

When Von Drehle introduced the word (wisely, he didn’t break it out until more than halfway through his talk), it left many heads in the room spinning, but he quickly explained it.

The gist of it is that in all presidential campaigns heretofore, the candidates went through intermediaries to get out their ideas and try to convince people to vote for them. Those intermediaries included the respective political parties, the candidates’ spokespersons, their consultants and pollsters, and, of course, journalists. But Trump has taken his campaign straight to the people, for the most part, thus waging a dis-intermediated campaign.

Trump planted the seeds for such a campaign on his hit TV show, The Apprentice, where viewers saw him unfiltered and felt like they got to know him. Two years ago, when he set out to attain the Republican nomination for President, he took the unfiltered approach to a higher level, using mainly his phone and his Twitter account to send his thoughts and ideas directly to millions of followers.

Von Drehle was quick to point out, however, that Trump doesn’t have a corner on disintermediation. There is an excellent local example, he said, citing the issue of whether Kansas City should build a new, single-terminal airport.

Before disintermediation, Von Drehle said, civic and political leaders — probably aided and abetted by The Kansas City Star — would have paved the way for a new airport by holding hearings, coming to a consensus and calling an election on whether to issue bonds to build a new airport.

The familiar script was followed to some extent…except that after a mayoral-appointed commission held hearings and determined a new, single terminal was the way to go, at least one City Council member, Teresa Loar, began squawking. It would be a big waste of money, she said, adding that the three-terminal facility that has served Kansas City for more than 40 years was convenient for passengers and did not need to be replaced.

By extending their electronic tentacles, like-minded people formed a wide circle around Loar’s position and effectively blunted not only the airport commission’s effort but the political push being led by Mayor Sly James. In the face of significant public opposition, James capitulated and put the onus on business leaders, saying if they wanted it, they needed to take the reins. Predictably, the initiative has languished.

The moral of that particular disintermediation story, as Von Drehle said, is this: In the disintermediation era, “no is easier than yes.” What that means is it’s easy to go online or onto Facebook and Twitter and grouse about the cost of a new, single terminal and assert that what we’ve got is adequate. And it’s much more difficult for a group of people, even influential people, to mount a strong case for a costly initiative that is vulnerable to simplistic opposition.

**

You probably already know how I feel about this, but here it is, for the record:

It’s a pathetic state of affairs when knee-jerking people decide they’re for or against something (or someone) on the basis of initial impressions formed and cemented in the absence of research and reflection that would cultivate a more reasoned, informed position.

And that’s where we are in regard to a badly needed new airport:

The status quo is held hostage by a bunch of people intimidated by a big price tag and grasping desperately at the notion that a new airport cannot possibly be as good as the 40-year-old one, which is as gloomy and lifeless as Donald Trump’s campaign.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments

14 Responses

  1. on October 25, 2016 at 8:48 am Mike Rice

    Building a new single-terminal airport does have a price tag to it. So does maintaining more than a dozen security checkpoints and multiple HVAC systems.


    • on October 25, 2016 at 10:06 am jimmycsays

      I will remind the readers the new terminal would be paid for with revenue bonds, which would be retired from airport revenue, including gate lease fees paid by the airlines. The project would not require a tax increase. It’s a no-brainer.


  2. on October 25, 2016 at 9:51 am Tracy Thomas

    Well, Fitz, the problem here is that until earlier this month, people like Yael Abouhalkah wrote biased editorials in The STAR and MISINFORMED the voters. The STAR lost its right to lead because they also refused to report both sides of MANY issues. I led the fight, working for free, when voters turned down $2.4 billion in largesse to support millionaires and hoity toighty Helzberg millionairesses, who backed BiState II and Big Soccer.

    The STAR never saw a tax increase they didn’t support. Shame on them. But I, like so many tens of thousands of smart voters, no longer take The STAR. Yes, we have moved toward “disintermediation,” Fitz. Great piece. Thanks. Now I know what to call it!


    • on October 25, 2016 at 10:03 am jimmycsays

      Thanks, Tracy…

      I will remind you, though, The Star has opposed tax proposals from time to time, including the goofy “translational medical research” sales tax, which I worked hard to block, in 2013. (It lost by a whopping 86-14 percent).

      And, yes, it is nice to have a name to put to a generational change that is having a profound effect worldwide…You and I and others who commit the word to memory will sound awfully smart when we break it out in casual political conversation!


  3. on October 25, 2016 at 10:19 am John Altevogt

    Here’s another concept that applies to this election that originated from one of my mentors in grad school, Svetozar Stojanovic. Professor Stojanovic was a visiting Serbian philosopher who wrote several books documenting the implosion of Communism in eastern Europe. The concept is called mendacious consciousness, a spin-off of the Marxian notion of false consciousness.

    Mendacious consciousness is the concept he used to describe the state media, in essence, they’re lying, you know they’re lying, they know they’re lying, but the fact that they still have the power to lie with impunity gave comfort to their supporters that they were still in power.

    If that doesn’t describe the behavior of CBS, ABC, NBC, PMSNBC, CNN, The NYT and WAPO, I don’t know what does.


  4. on October 25, 2016 at 10:20 am tracyinkc

    And at least it’s not antidisestablishmentarianism. Ha–I did it! Abracadabra.

    Yes, you did a GREAT job disintermediating on the “translational medical research” issue. The fact that you can point to the STAR opposing it demonstrates just how rare that was. And we can also be grateful to whoever the goofball was who named the ballot issue “translational” shot themselves in the foot right there. Didn’t make any sense, had to be explained, just an awful branding.

    Also reminded voters of how many doctors there are from other nations, with names we cannot pronounce, and thick accents we cannot understand. A reading of the intent also reminded voters that it translated into profiteering by certain research doctors and their backers. The voters would have paid for the public to be their guinea pigs –but when it came time to bring medical breakthroughs to market, we would have gotten bupkis.

    (yet another great word, this one Yiddish.)

    Glad that issue failed. Thanks for your hard work, Fitz. As you learned, it’s hard to stop a train. With a few pennies. And, nobody pays you to FIGHT a tax. It’s only the beneficiaries of taxes, the millionaires, who pay guys like Jeff Roe (and the late Pat Gray) to support getting their hands into the taxpayers’ pockets.


    • on October 25, 2016 at 10:40 am jimmycsays

      I thought about using antidisestablishmentarianism as my jumping off point on this post but decided it would have made for a forced transition and that very few people (you and I and Altevogt and a few others) would remember the answer to The $64,000 Question.


      • on October 25, 2016 at 10:45 am John Altevogt

        Ahh, the joy of sick minds sharing a moment in history.


  5. on October 25, 2016 at 3:00 pm tracyinkc

    And this blog!


  6. on October 25, 2016 at 3:53 pm Julius Karash

    Somebody needs to point out that the Kansas City TIMES always provided fair and balanced coverage of every issue, every time. Between the Kansas City Times and the Kansas City Star, I am confident that all right-thinking Americans would agree that the Times had the studliest reporters. Just sayin’.


  7. on October 26, 2016 at 10:13 am Les Weatherford

    Jim,

    I like the airport the way it is, Very convenient. BUT … I concede that it was built for a different time that no longer exists, and that it falls short of meeting the needs and demands of today’s travelers. So a new airport it is. But I’ll likely be dead by the time it’s built. And when are you going to drop by for a visit? I’m open 24 hours.


  8. on October 26, 2016 at 10:59 pm Karen Brown

    I am NOT intimidated by a big price tag nor, I suspect, are most of those who also oppose a single-terminal airport. Nor am I a “knee-jerking person,” and I will say that name-calling the opposition by anyone on any issue is one sure-fire way to get your opponents to dig in. Witness Mr. Trump, an ongoing case in point.

    I want an airport to be user-friendly and convenient. I do not care whether it has glitz, lots of overpriced restaurants and knick-knack souvenir shops for me to while away the time between flights. That is not what I consider in making my travel plans. I’ve spent plenty of time in O’Hare, Atlanta, Logan and LaGuardia, but only because there isn’t any other way to get where I want to go. And those cities are major hubs, which Kansas City is not and never will be. After the hassle of using one of the big-name airports, it is a huge relief to come home to the simplicity and convenience of KCI.

    From the beginning, the single-terminal airport has appeared to be to be one more ego project, backed by biased studies and pushed by a mayor, some council members and self-appointed civic leaders who care more about ribbon-cutting and chest-thumping than taking care of the basics that determine the quality of daily life for the people who live in Kansas City.


  9. on October 26, 2016 at 11:12 pm tracyinkc

    Amen. So it’s settled then: Karen Brown for Mayor.

    I especially resonate to the knock on the knick-knacks. And the craycray notion that folks would drive out and go to the restaurants there. Like my grandpa used to do in the 50’s in Cedar Rapids, Iowa–load the grandkids into the 53 Cadillac and drive out to the airport and park behind the four foot chain link security fence (!!!) and our big long-anticipated entertainment was… to watch the planes take off.

    The KC public has been so hodwinked by its elected officials. Remember the Union Station remodel? They honest to God put in the revenue projections that 800 people per day, 7 days a week/365, would drive there and pay $6 per car to park–for NO REASON. Not go into the station, not to stand under the clock or go to the Chamber offices or dine. Just PAY TO PARK. And that my friends is how you pad the budget.

    Which is why I refused as a PR exec to even solicit that campaign budget for BiState I. I was not willing to swindle the voters with false data.


  10. on October 26, 2016 at 11:18 pm tracyinkc

    Obviously, I meant to type HOODWINKED, rather than HODWINKED. But I like this new word. The voters were “hodwinked”, as in a hod carrier. Which is like a basket of bricks.

    hod carrier
    Also found in: Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
    hod carrier
    n
    (Building) a labourer who carries the materials in a hod for a plasterer, bricklayer, etc. Also called: hodman

    —-

    Because the truth behind ALL of these remodeling projects is job creation for the building trades. The unions and contractors who depend on taxpayer-supported edifices to stay in business.

    Relates back to Bill Clarkson. And now Dunn Construction and all the rest. Gotta feed the beast…



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: