• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Attention Missouri voters: Get free ballot guidance HERE!
The Kansas City Star can still be good on a given day, but most readers have adjusted to the new, diminished normal »

Missouri voter guide: Part II

November 4, 2016 by jimmycsays

OK, class, smoke break is over; get back to those desks.

We’ve got a lot of reviewing to do before you go to the polls on Tuesday. (Hey, I’m talkin’ to you, Missouri voters; you Kansans are on your own!)

Yesterday, we covered the five Missouri constitutional amendments and Missouri Proposition A. Today we look at the three Jackson County questions, the three Kansas City, MO, questions and the Mid-Continent Public Library Proposition L.

Jackson County Question 1

p1060461With so many bogus and confusing proposals on the ballot, it’s no wonder Jackson County officials, including County Executive Frank White and Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker are pushing hard for renewal of the quarter-cent Community Backed Anti-Drug Tax, aka COMBAT. This tax has been in effect since 1984, and voters generally look favorably on renewing taxes that have not been marred by scandal. Although I’m a bit dubious about the effectiveness of COMBAT funds, it has been free of scandal, as far as I know. Among other things, COMBAT funds support 23 drug-treatment organizations, according to a Frank White letter to the editor in today’s Kansas City Star.

I see no good reason to vote against this renewal. Also, I trust Frank White and Jean Peters Baker.

My recommendation: Vote YES on Jackson County Question 1.

Jackson County Question 2

p1060471Despite the misleading yard signs you might have seen (RENEW with Question 2), this would be a NEW sales tax — always something to be leery about. An eighth of a cent, to be precise. The yard signs also play on people’s perceived empathy for child-related measures, with the words, “Hope for Children.” The ballot language says the revenue would establish “a Community Children’s Services Fund for the purpose of providing services to protect the well-being and safety of children and youth nineteen years of age or less and to strengthen families.”

Too vague for me. Sounds like the backers are promising a sinecure for all juvenile problems.

My recommendation: Vote NO on Jackson County Question 2. 

Jackson County Question 3

This one is going to have voters scratching their heads, partly because the ballot language is a challenging. Once you’ve figured it out, it’s appealing in one sense because it would end the collection of county sales taxes on cars, trucks, boats, trailers and motors purchased out of state. So, you could go to Kansas, buy a car and avoid paying the Jackson County sales tax when you register it in Missouri. Sounds good, but the down side is it would put Jackson County car and boat dealers at a competitive disadvantage with Kansas dealers.

Who among us want to do something to help Kansas at Jackson County’s expense? Raise your hands…I thought so.

My recommendation: Vote NO on Jackson County Question 3. 

Kansas City Question 1

This would “remove from the park system vacant property of about 1.2 acres located generally between E. 23rd Street and E. 24th Street west of Flora Avenue.”

In a ballot as long and difficult as this, it’s understandable if voters are looking for machine gunners behind every tree. Not to worry. This is hamburger stuff. 

My recommendation: Vote YES on Kansas City Question 1.

Kansas City Question 2

This would “remove from the park system vacant property of approximately 2.6016 acres located generally east of Lister Avenue and south of E. Linwood Boulevard.” (Note: approximately 2.6016 acres. I’m sure glad they didn’t try to measure it down to the last hundred-thousandth acre.)

No machine gunner behind this tree, either.

My recommendation: Vote YES on Kansas City Question 2. 

Kansas City Question 3

Let’s face it, Clay Chastain isn’t going away until he’s dead. (I hate to wish a premature death on anyone, but with Clay, it’s tempting.) This is his hundred-thousandth light rail plan, and I won’t dignify it with a recommendation.

Mid-Continent Public Library Proposition L

1585This library system has 31 branches and serves 800,000 people in Jackson, Clay and Platte counties. Some of those people are in Kansas City, although Mid-Continent does not overlap the Kansas City Public Library system. Proposition L would provide for a property tax increase of 8 cents for each hundred dollars of assessed valuation (for homeowners in the district boundaries). The current 32-cent levy has been the same since 1983.

It’s about time I quoted the late, great (actually still living and still kicking) KC Star editorial writer Yael Abouhalkah. Recently, on his blog, he said this about Proposition L. “If your house is worth $100,000, the tax increase would cost you an extra $15.20 a year. Got a $200,000 piece of property? That’s $30.40 extra a year. That’s a reasonable price to pay for improved public assets.”

My recommendation: Vote YES on Mid-Continent Public Library Proposition L  

**

There you have it, readers. You should be well armed now, at least as it pertains to most of the issues on the Missouri-side ballot…A frequent commenter asked yesterday if I had any candidate recommendations. I think most of you know your candidates and how you’re going to vote, but for the record my big three in Missouri are Kander (he can assemble an automatic rifle blindfolded!), Koster (bought and paid for by the special interests, but consider the alternative!) and Hensley (she cares for the kids!)

Go get ’em, voters.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 18 Comments

18 Responses

  1. on November 4, 2016 at 10:01 am Mike Rice

    Fitz, thank you for this tremendous public service. I just hope that people do not skip over these ballot issues which can affect people as much, if not more, than a president or governor can.
    Also, I truly wish that someone in Clay Chastain’s family would have that guy committed.


  2. on November 4, 2016 at 11:10 am tracyinkc

    Sinecure? Seriously, Fitz–are ya tryin’ to trump my use of synecdoche yesterday?

    And to you and Mike Rice–It is ALWAYS bad form and unChristian and marginally ethical and in fact DEPLORABLE to advocate for people to die or be committed. Just because you disagree with them. Period.

    Stop it, please. Pretend it’s Lent, and give that practice up.
    This post was useful, tho thin on facts. But too many ad hominem attacks.

    See how I saw your sinecure, and raised you one ad hominem? That’s what you get from a gal raised and educated in Iowa. A.State.Of.Minds….


    • on November 4, 2016 at 2:33 pm jimmycsays

      Actually, I really fucked up using the word “sinecure,” Tracy. It sounds good but apparently bears no relation to “panacea,” the word I should have used.
      (Again, though, I’m going to leave the word “sinecure” in place so people can see how our little word-usage tete-a-tete played out.)

      Dictionary.com defines “sinecure” as “an office or position requiring little or no work, especially one yielding profitable returns.”

      …For the record, on Chastain, I just said I was “tempted” to wish him a premature death. Long live the King of Futility!

      Good to hear from you, Iowa girl.


  3. on November 4, 2016 at 12:58 pm gayle

    Just curious: why do they want to remove vacant land from the park system?


    • on November 4, 2016 at 2:33 pm jimmycsays

      I dunno.


      • on November 4, 2016 at 2:42 pm gayle

        Soooo, you’re voting yes for something and you don’t know why? Am I missing something?


  4. on November 4, 2016 at 2:53 pm jimmycsays

    Sometimes I just go on trust…


    • on November 4, 2016 at 3:49 pm gayle

      Thank you, Lynn Horsley.


  5. on November 4, 2016 at 3:05 pm Vernon Scoville, III

    I begin to wonder about myself when I agree with a member of the fourth estate.


    • on November 4, 2016 at 3:33 pm jimmycsays

      Up and down the line, judge? Or just some? I think the readers would like to hear what a retired Associate Circuit Court judge has to say…


  6. on November 4, 2016 at 4:28 pm Mike Rice

    I don’t know this for certain but with the park land, it could be a piece of property that has been owned by the city/parks and rec department for years and is not big enough for any practical park use. A developer or someone might be interested in acquiring the property but I think the city has to put any ceding of park property to a public vote.


    • on November 4, 2016 at 4:41 pm jimmycsays

      That sounds right, Mike, and that’s not what’s being asked here.


    • on November 4, 2016 at 5:26 pm gayle

      There’s an article in yesterday’s Star that explains it.


      • on November 4, 2016 at 6:39 pm jimmycsays

        Well, please, then, Gayle, illuminate us!


  7. on November 4, 2016 at 9:11 pm John Altevogt

    Being familiar with the concomitant functions of the fiduciary system, I can fill in the blanks for Kansas.

    For all political offices vote Republican. Vote against the Fatuous Four Supreme Court Justices, supporting only Caleb Stegall. Vote Yes only for Appellate Court judges Gardner and Bruns and No on all the rest. Very simple

    If you have any further questions bring me your ballot and I will fill it out for you free of charge.


    • on November 4, 2016 at 9:50 pm jimmycsays

      Oh, God. You having come out with this, these poor judges are undoubtedly going down in a landslide…


      • on November 4, 2016 at 10:08 pm John Altevogt

        Only because it appeared on JimmyC’s do we have a snowball’s chance in hell of beating their Soviet style system. This is our only hope.


  8. on November 4, 2016 at 9:51 pm gayle

    It would behoove one to read Ms. Horsley’s article themselves — unless, of course, they prefer to go on trust.

    You’re on the right track, Mike; thank you.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: