• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Missouri voter guide: Part II
Missouri proving to be a bellwether once again? »

The Kansas City Star can still be good on a given day, but most readers have adjusted to the new, diminished normal

November 6, 2016 by jimmycsays

For the dwindling number of us who like to hold the daily Kansas City Star in our hands and go through the paper leisurely, Saturday’s paper was one that had a lot to offer.

The edition was a good example of why newspapers, beat down though they are, often deliver more intellectual stimulation than the Internet.

One reason I think the print edition is more satisfying than the Internet is the juxtaposition of illuminating photos with well-written stories. Of course, photos are all over the Internet, too, but for some reason, the photo-print combination is more compelling when you’re holding the newspaper and letting the words and images settle slowly.

The importance of the image-word linkage was most evident in Saturday’s lead stories — side-by-side reports by senior political reporter Dave Helling on the final days of campaigning by Roy Blunt and Jason Kander.

Kander, a Democrat, and Blunt, the Republican incumbent, are locked in an epic battle for one of Missouri’s two U.S. Senate seats. (The other seat, held by Democrat Claire McCaskill, is not up for election this year.) Helling spent a day or two with each of the candidates last week and provided readers with an intriguing look at the approaches the two men have been taking as they near the wire.

The contrast between the two was clearly evident in the side-by-side photos taken by Star photographer Allison Long. The photo of Kander shows him talking on the phone after stepping off his campaign bus in Warrensburg. Kander’s name is printed in huge letters on the side of the bus, and in the photo his head is centered beneath those big letters.

Kander is wearing distressed jeans, a long-sleeved dress shirt and casual shoes. His left hand is on his belt buckle. The picture reflects Helling’s story of a candidate who is focused but seemingly confident and at ease.

The photo of Blunt also depicts him as composed and confident. He is standing on a stage, in a warehouse in Springfield, speaking to and pointing toward a group we cannot see. He is wearing cuffed, gray slacks, a blue or gray dress shirt and what looks to me like tan cowboy boots. Large “Roy for Missouri” signs surround him.

The opening quotes in both stories reflect the candidates’ contrasting styles as Election Day hurtles toward them. Helling quotes Kander, 35, as saying: “There is a new generation stepping forward right now. It is a generation that is more focused on ideas than on ideology.”

The words make him sound like a political science teacher smoking a pipe and exchanging high-minded thoughts with colleagues.

Blunt, on the other hand, sounds like a colonel brandishing a sabre and preparing for battle.

“Religious liberty is at stake,” he tells the warehouse crowd. “The Second Amendment is at stake. Freedom of speech is at stake. Our rights and liberties are at stake.”

With those strong beginnings, Helling effectively grabbed the readers’ attention and set the stage for an additional half-page of text on an inside page.

…Good stuff. These are the types of stories that make newspapers very relevant, even in the electronic age. And stories like those are one reason I won’t be giving up my printed edition until it isn’t printed any longer.

**

While a good news story still gets me pumped up, I am strangely indifferent about the diminution of The Star’s editorial page.

On Facebook, former editorial page writer Barb Shelly has been hammering away at Publisher Tony Berg for decimating the editorial page and making a hard right political turn in recent weeks. (The paper has endorsed at least three Missouri Republicans — Blunt in the Senate race, Josh Hawley in the attorney general’s race and Jay Ashcroft in the secretary of state’s race — who probably would not have been endorsed if Berg had not fired longtime editorial writer Yael Abouhalkah a few weeks ago.

But this is how things can go when a big, once-stable organization — any organization, not just a major metropolitan daily — has become a shadow of its former self. The Star is down to probably fewer than 500 employees, where it once employed more than 2,000. The once-pulsating newsroom, I understand, now resembles the clubhouse of a baseball team that has lost 10 in a row.

I have watched this paper lose its verve over the last decade or so, and it just isn’t coming back. All momentum is gone. And, so, while I still love to read the paper, I’m through wringing my hands. And you know what? I think a lot of readers feel the same way. Among my circle of friends, I don’t hear a lot of complaining about The Star. I used to. But many of them have canceled their print subscriptions, either because of spiraling subscription prices or the downturn in quality, or both.

Many of those who haven’t abandoned the print edition are like me: They sit down with it, read and enjoy whatever good reporting and good photography remain, and then toss it aside and get on with their day.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments

14 Responses

  1. on November 6, 2016 at 6:24 pm John Altevogt

    I’m actually thinking of subscribing. I don’t expect a newspaper to toe my party line, but I do expect them to act like an honest broker in the process of conveying information. If I want propaganda, I’ll write it, thank you.

    Good journalism is worth its weight in gold. The only time journalists have ever swayed my opinion is when they have laid out the facts on both sides and left the decision up to me.

    Some people have a knack of setting aside their personal feelings when they write and those are the folks who make good journalists. People who try and hold themselves out as journalists while they push their own political agenda are worth nothing. They’re liars and frauds and I’m delighted to see them being called out this cycle.

    I always felt that Dave had a lot of potential, but never the adult supervision to bring it to its full fruition. Hopefully, Mr. Berg brings it out in him.

    As for Barb Shelly, pffft, who cares. She was nothing when she wrote for The Star and she’s nothing now.


  2. on November 6, 2016 at 6:30 pm jimmycsays

    Barb was a great asset to The Star…You’ve had your say on that, and now I’ve had mine.


  3. on November 6, 2016 at 8:08 pm Ghost of Col. Fox

    No writer has a bigger, unchecked ego…and blind-loyalty to an angry-right wing, scripted, point of view than John “Posts the same-old-rant-on-every Blog” V. There IS a thin line between our loves and hates…and J.V. is so hateful to his politically opposite doppelgängers, I wonder if giving and accepting RESPECT isn’t part of his issue.


  4. on November 6, 2016 at 9:20 pm Les Weatherford

    “Decimate”:To reduce by one-tenth.


  5. on November 6, 2016 at 9:24 pm Laura Hockaday

    Barb Shelly’s writing is–and always has been–brilliant and fearless. Newspaper reporters don’t come any better. Mr. Altevogt “knows nothing” and is “nothing now”.
    Laura Hockaday
    Reporter, Kansas City Star 1962-2000


  6. on November 7, 2016 at 8:48 am Mike Rice

    I don’t know Mr. Altevogt personally. But I will dispute the claim that he “knows nothing” and “is nothing”. Having an angry right-wing ideology doesn’t mean you lack knowledge. I’m guessing that he has plenty of it. Temperament? Well uh … let me just say that I strongly disagree with many of the things he has to say, especially his remarks about Barb Shelly.


  7. on November 7, 2016 at 9:33 am John Altevogt

    I would expect nothing less than those who worked with Barb to support her and I appreciate this blog precisely because it presents the opportunity for those with differing viewpoints to present them respectfully to one another.

    My only complaint is that there is often not enough dialog here. Thanks to Fitz once again for letting me express opinions here I know he disagrees with vigorously. Strongly held opposing viewpoints are what prevent us all from becoming Fascists.


  8. on November 7, 2016 at 10:53 am Gene Meyer

    But it’s not just the Star. Here’s another thought that probably has occurred to a lot of us….

    https://reassociated.press/2016/10/24/stop-just-blaming-the-internet-for-killing-newspapers-start-blaming-editors/


  9. on November 7, 2016 at 11:15 am Rick Thomas

    Yes, I will admit it. I am ink-stained daily and plan to stay that way — unless of course, I outlast my regular purveyors of ink. Holding and reading the print copies of the KC Star and the Wall Street Journal are ritually civilized activities (the NYT too, but only digitally) for moi. I even miss the Kansas City Times!

    I did have to laugh about Mr. Berg’s “hard turn to the right” on the editorial front. Good gracious people, the man has to try something different. And it’s easy to make the case that the Star’s editorial makeup — Abouhalkah, Shelly, Diuguid, et al, ouch! — were foot soldiers in the decline of the paper and its appeal and value to readers, and existing and potential advertisers; especially those with more traditional views of life and liberty in River City.


    • on November 7, 2016 at 12:18 pm jimmycsays

      I’m certainly not arguing with Berg’s license to turn the car in any direction he wants; he’s the boss. He reports only to McClatchy headquarters in Sacramento, and newspaper conglomerates typically don’t interfere with publishers on the editorial front. They just want to see a good ROI.


  10. on November 7, 2016 at 11:24 am Julius Karash

    Thought provoking article, Gene, thanks for sharing.


  11. on November 8, 2016 at 9:35 am John Altevogt

    The last time I subscribed to a newspaper was The Kansas City Kansan when Roy Teicher was editor and Rebecca Shelton was about his only reporter and they kicked ass. Dick Bond pulled Guarantee bank’s advertising and carol Marinovich threatened to “bury the Kansan” and did when even after firing Teicher and having Shelton go on an “I really didn’t mean it” tour of the UG she pulled the paper’s legals.

    Good journalism is an attitude and sitting around the office with your thumb up your ass reading press releases isn’t it. If Berg does anything it should be to have every reporter’s phone number listed on the web site again. Right now it’s almost impossible to feed them a breaking story, even if you wanted to.


    • on November 8, 2016 at 9:47 am jimmycsays

      I don’t know about listing the reporters’ phone numbers, but readers should certainly be able to call the paper and ring a reporter’s line, even if it goes to voice mail every time. The Star has the dial-by-last-name directory (which, you’ll recall, I goaded Berg to get fixed earlier this year), and that’s good. The reporters’ email addresses are also listed under their bylines, so readers should be able to reach reporters one way or another.

      Now, as to whether reporters respond, that’s another story. I think many big-city newspaper reporters, all over the country, have assumed a bunker mentality — reflecting the state of the industry — and tend to shun contact with readers and others. Many don’t want to spend hours every day listening to criticism, and I wouldn’t either.


  12. on November 8, 2016 at 1:34 pm Keenan

    Journalism is not dead. It’s just lost and a bit malnourished somewhere in the Internet forest. The newspaper industry, however, is dead. It has been for some time. Like Caesar, it was stabbed to death by its own ranks. The Star—like many large U.S. metropolitan dailies—became a repository for mediocrity, starting as far back as the mid-80s. Particularly when it came to newsroom management. The story link offered up by Gene (with whom I had the pleasure of working with on the Business Desk) is spot on. The Internet didn’t do newspapers in. The culprits were management—both upper and mid-level editors—who, through a combination of hubris and ignorance, chose to either disregard or outright dispel the delivery system of what has become The Information Age. The Internet. Instead of embracing the conflict, and helping to establish standards and positions in the new public information arena, those same editors—and I blame the newsroom side, not the business/advertising side—laughed it off. I distinctly remember having this same conversation with a former Star publisher back in late 90s. His response was to wave his hand in the air and say “It’ll (the Internet) never stick.” Well, it did, and he didn’t. Thus began the long exit march of Star publishers, editors, reporters, photographers, etc., etc., etc.
    As the Star’s parade of departures has relentlessly drudged on over the years I have tried to balance my feelings: despair for my former friends and compatriots; schadenfreude for the culprits. As of late, to be sure, my feelings have tilted more toward the latter than the former as the last tumors of mediocrity were excised from the body Star. No names, but to be fair some of the departed were good at what they did and deserve to be part of whatever journalism Phoenix rises from the ashes.
    Unfortunately, that ash pit is about to get a little bigger. There is widespread speculation in the industry that following the end of the 2016 election cycle (tonight) that many newspapers will begin a big push to reduce headcount by the end of the year. By this time next year, it’s very likely few newspapers will be publishing print editions every day. Dailies adieu!
    Jim plucked the chord when he wrote, “the dwindling number of us who like to hold the daily Kansas City Star in our hands and go through the paper leisurely.” I am one of those, though my tactile choice is The New York Times. We are Baby-boomers. And we are dwindling along with the demand for print newspapers.
    I have four, college-educated children who grew up in a household where it was common to have a half dozen different newspapers about the place. They don’t read newspapers. They will never subscribe to one. Yet, they voraciously scour the Internet for information, albeit sports, fashion and gossip are at the top of their searches. Still, they and their friends (generation I suspect) don’t balk at paying for content. Unfortunately, the content they are willing to shell out for tends to be HBO, Netflix and ESPN. This, however, is likely to change as they age and realize that there are better formats to get their political and social insights from than a comedian.
    Journalism isn’t dead, it’s just too focused on the trees. It’s time for it to get its collective shit together, find its compass and get the hell out of the forest.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • April 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 567 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 567 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: