• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Star bulks up its editorial page, mostly with internal job shifts
Colleen McCain Nelson promises a stout editorial page and a return to staff-written editorials this Sunday »

Is the daily newspaper thin? Yes. Does it contain significantly less space for news, photos and other editorial content? No.

January 13, 2017 by jimmycsays

I hear a lot of people say, when referring to the print edition of The Star: “There’s no news in there anymore,” or, “It’s getting thinner and thinner.”

Both statements are true to a degree, but only one — “it’s getting thinner” — is substantially correct.

Many readers are under the mistaken impression that, because the paper is significantly thinner and lighter (every day except Sunday, that is) it contains a lot less news.

Not so. The paper has definitely shrunk in size, but that’s mainly because so many advertisers have gone away. At the same time, what we in the business call the “news hole” — the space allotted to text, photos and graphics — has not shrunk nearly as much.

In fact, The Star’s news hole has grown appreciably within the last year, since Publisher Tony Berg added the “In Depth” pullout section, which effectively added two full pages to the paper Tuesday through Saturday. (It’s a four-page section, but one of the four is the editorial page and one is the Op-Ed page.)

What has happened in Kansas City has been mirrored around the country. If you haven’t seen the figures, they are jaw dropping…Over the last 15 years, annual newspaper advertising revenue has dropped from $67 billion nationwide to about $16.4 billion, according to the Newspaper Association of America. With that kind of over-the-cliff performance, newspapers could not possibly continue publishing the hefty, healthy products of past years.

newspaper-ad-rev-to-2014

For nearly all newspapers, even the great national papers like The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, prosperity is a thing of the past. Now, a newspaper is considered to be doing pretty well if it is just treading water.

**

As a reporter and later an assignment editor, I never had to concern myself much with the balance between ads and news hole. I remember that we in the newsroom would complain frequently about the relatively small size of the news hole, due mainly to the large number of ads. If we could have peered into the future, we surely would not have complained.

As I recall, the ratio of advertising space to news hole used to run about 60-40. Now, for many papers, those numbers have flipped, or worse.

In an effort to illustrate this phenomenon, I pulled out my green eyeshade and crunched some numbers relating to two sections of today’s newspaper.

The “A” section — which houses the international, national and local news and the editorial and Op-Ed pages — consists of 14 pages. Each page contains about 200 square inches of space, not counting the margins at top, bottom, left and right.

By my calculations, the A section had 2,065 square inches of news and other editorial material, while advertising (including obituaries, which are paid for) accounted for 735 square inches.

That’s a ratio of 74-26 percent, or nearly three square inches of news hole for every square inch of advertising!!

The story is a little brighter in the sports section, which traditionally has had the highest ratio of advertising. There, the ratio of news hole to advertising was only 2 to 1 (1,350 square inches of news and 650 square inches of advertising).

In a way, we here in Kansas City are lucky that the McClatchy Co., The Star’s owner, is allowing The Star this many print pages per day. There’s an expense associated with each page, and that’s the price McClatchy must pay for the newsprint — the actual paper that runs through the presses.

**

The news/advertising ratio greatly influences another major factor in newspapers — story lengths.

When The Star was flush and prosperous, as was the case until about the mid-2000s, dozens of reporters were covering all facets of the community, and all were agitating to get their stories in the paper. As a result, editors had to be ever-vigilant about story lengths. I remember a relatively brief period, back around 2000, when the edict came down that no story could exceed 30 column inches.

That is not very much for an important story requiring substantial explanation. The 30-inch limit generated a firestorm of criticism and squawking from reporters — and rightly so, because big stories often require 50 inches or more. That’s especially true of investigative pieces that have been weeks or months in the making. (I recall one former reporter, Rick Alm, demanding that his byline be taken off a story that editors cut down by more than half.)

With The Star now down to fewer than 25 reporters — and having necessarily reduced its coverage area — there’s less need to keep stories short. In fact, the pendulum has swung wildly in the other direction: Stories are often way too long. Today, for example, on Page 2, The Star ran a nearly 50-inch long story by Judy Thomas on the Catholic Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph banning a certain person from diocesan property because he had violated “safe boundaries” in his interactions with children.

It struck me as awfully long before I started it, but I kept reading, thinking it must contain something explosive or the diocese’s action was controversial. But no; there was nothing explosive and no controversy. The man, whom The Star did not identify because he is not charged with any crime, blandly accepted the ban.

Now, Judy Thomas is an excellent reporter, but her editors should have reined her in on that story; it deserved no more than 10 to 12 inches, in my opinion.

Elsewhere in the paper, examples of swollen verbiage can be found almost every day on the editorial page. On the left side, where The Star used to (and presumably will again) run relatively short editorials expressing the paper’s official viewpoint on a variety of issues, The Star has been running 30-inch wire-service pieces that take up two full columns. For the most part, it’s been “filler,” rather than meaningful, relevant commentary.

**

All this is to show how the newspaper business has been turned upside down, at least as far as the print product is concerned. As I’ve said before, I’m very grateful The Star still publishes a printed edition every day. With each passing day, though, The Star is shifting its emphasis from print to digital, and I’m girding myself for the day when Tony Berg breaks the news that The Star will no longer be publishing on Monday and Tuesday. Those are the days on which the paper is in danger of flying a couple of houses away after leaving the delivery agent’s hand.

I ask you, 20 years ago who could have foreseen the era of the winged paper?

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments

14 Responses

  1. on January 13, 2017 at 4:59 pm Laura Hockaday

    Good analysis, Jim. Am forwarding to others.


  2. on January 13, 2017 at 5:01 pm jimmycsays

    Thanks, Laura…


  3. on January 13, 2017 at 7:05 pm Bob Kennedy

    Gosh, you are quite a quant these days. I agree with Ms. Hockaday, nice analysis. I do have a question about ads and content. My current read, the Financial Times, has almost zero advertising but has glorious content on just about every page. Almost NO features with too many words. At a subscriber cost of no more than the Star. (Well, maybe, if one could ever figure out the Star actual costs.) Does this mean the FT reporters and columnists live in poverty? How do they do it, and why can’t it be done in the US? Maybe the FT owners don’t require a profit? (Let me caution potential subscribers, delivery is notoriously unreliable, totally unacceptable. But a great read when, if ever, it comes to your doorstep. No local coverage, I hasten to add.)


    • on January 13, 2017 at 7:36 pm gayle

      Reading phrases like “quite a quant” just adds to the enjoyment of this blog. :-)


    • on January 13, 2017 at 11:04 pm jimmycsays

      Thanks for the compliment, Bob…(To Gayle’s point, I’d never heard the word quant, as in quantitative analyst.)

      Now “How do they do it?” you ask of the Financial Times. I would have thought that as a subscriber you might have done some research and figured that out….Below is a link to a 2010 article that addresses your question.

      Essentially, it’s a “mixture of online paywalls, increasing subscriptions and cover prices.” FT also has a 50 percent ownership share (or at least did back then) in another successful financial publication, the Economist.

      Here’s that link…

      https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/apr/05/financial-times-digital-model


      • on January 14, 2017 at 5:05 pm Bob Kennedy

        I hadn’t wondered how they do it until I read your post, so it didn’t occur to me to investigate further. But thank you for finding that very good piece. I did some additional investigating, properly chastened. FT is now owned by Nikkei, a giant Japanese conglomerate. (Nikkei alone has a circulation of 3 million.) The Economist is owned by The Economist Group so its profits no longer support FT. So FT presumably exists by virtue of its content, and people who will pay the price (and who likely have higher incomes than Star subscribers). I shouldn’t have asked about this so quickly, as the mountain of debt McClatchy has didn’t enter my consciousness until late this morning. I should have realized right away that the Star has to pay for that in addition to paying its staff and printing costs. So jeez, it is a steep hill to climb, even with paywalls and higher subscription prices. I’m really fascinated by your analysis, though. I wish there was a way to sort out quality of content from inches of print. You made a nice start with your post. I gotta think about this.


      • on January 18, 2017 at 9:03 pm Will Notb

        Late to the article and comment thread, however…I work for a large Federal Department (upward of 50K employees) and every employee can access the Financial Times online, courtesy of our employer.

        I’m sure the Department got a “good” rate, but still, one expects a pretty penny was spent. And if other Federal Departments, or NGOs for that matter, have similar arrangements…


  4. on January 14, 2017 at 12:02 am John Altevogt

    We were in the process of taking over the state party when I moved to WYCO in 1996 and a few months after I got there I became chair of the county party. Since I knew virtually nothing about the county I got into the Star’s library (free at the time) and read everything Rick Alm ever wrote about the place. To this day if someone were to ask me what my ideal reporter would look like it would be Rick.


  5. on January 14, 2017 at 12:44 pm Mighty M.C. Remuda

    …You gotta get her all down
    ‘cause she’s bound to go.”

    The Gift (lyrics from 1987 song by Ian Tyson)

    In old St. Louis over in Missouri
    The mighty Mississippi, well, it rolls and flows.
    A son was born to Mary Russell
    And it starts the legend every cowboy knows.

    Young kid Russell was born to wander.
    Ever westward he was bound to roam,
    Just a kid of sixteen in 1880.
    Up in wild Montana he found his home.

    God made Montana for the wild man,
    For the Piegan and the Sioux and Crow,
    Saved His greatest gift for Charlie,
    Said, “Get her all down before she goes.
    You gotta get her all down
    ‘cause she’s bound to go.”

    God hung the stars over Judith Basin.
    God put the magic in young Charlie’s hands.
    And all was seen and all remembered,
    Every shining mountain, every longhorn brand.

    He could paint the light on horsehide shining,
    The great passing herds of the buffalo,
    And a cow camp cold on a rainy morning,
    And the twisting wrist of the Houlihan throw.

    God made Montana for the wild man,
    For the Piegan and the Sioux and Crow,
    Saved His greatest gift for Charlie,
    Said, “Get her all down before she goes.
    You gotta get her all down
    ‘cause she’s bound to go.”

    When the Lord called Charlie to his home up yonder
    He said, “Kid Russell, I got a job for you.
    You’re in charge of sunsets up in old Montana
    ‘Cause I can’t paint them quite as good as you,
    And when you’re done, we’ll go out and have a few,
    And Nancy Russell will make sure it’s just two.”

    God made Montana for the wild man,
    For the Piegan and the Sioux and Crow,
    Saved His greatest gift for Charlie,
    Said, “Get her all down before she goes.
    You gotta get her all down
    ‘cause she’s bound to go.”


    • on January 14, 2017 at 2:39 pm jimmycsays

      Now we know where “the Houlihan throw” came from…


      • on January 14, 2017 at 3:22 pm gayle

        Now I think you and Mr. Remuda have been drinking.


  6. on January 14, 2017 at 8:32 pm John Altevogt

    That’s what he said about my post on the last column. Serves him right, karma’s a bitch.


    • on January 14, 2017 at 9:14 pm gayle

      I know, I was paying him back for you.


  7. on January 14, 2017 at 11:07 pm jimmycsays

    Gotta watch my back…Conspirators all around.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 562 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 562 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: