The Washington Post and The New York Times have been taking turns landing haymakers on President Donald Trump’s exposed chin the last two days.
For anyone who loves journalism, it’s a BU-ti-ful thing, as former KC Star editor Mark Zieman, used to say.
On Monday, Post reporters Greg Miller and Greg Jaffe broke the story about Trump revealing highly classified information about the Islamic state to Russia’s foreign minister and ambassador in a White House meeting. The killer quote from that meeting was Trump’s kid-in-a-candy-store exclamation: “I get great intel. I have people brief me on great intel every day.”
Yesterday, The Times dropped a blockbuster of its own when reporter Michael S. Schmidt reported that, at a private meeting in February, Trump had asked FBI director James Comey to shut down the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael T. Flynn.
In the meeting with Comey, Trump produced another jaw-dropping quote. Referring to Flynn, he said to Comey: “He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”
Whatever you think of Trump, you’ve gotta love this kind of reporting — and the fact that we in the United States place such high value on a free press. Imagine if this had happened in Turkey, a country spiraling down into autocracy. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan would have every journalist in the country locked up. In Russia? Wouldn’t have happened. Putin already has the press firmly under his heel. No one would dream of writing such a story.
Another thing to be thankful for is that the people working for and around Trump are obviously very willing to rat him out. If Trump and a majority of Republicans in Congress are not yet willing to put country ahead of politics, it appears that quite a few White House employees are.
The Times’ Frank Bruni has an excellent column on that subject today. In it, he says:
This much leaking this soon in an administration is a powerful indication of what kind of president we have. He is so unprepared, shows such bad judgment and has such an erratic temper that he’s not trusted by people who are paid to bolster him and who get the most intimate, unvarnished look at him. Some of them have decided that discretion isn’t always the keeping of secrets, not if it protects bad actors. They’re right. And they give me hope.
Later, Bruni added: “Aides will suck up a whole lot for proximity to power, and partisans will make enormous compromises in the name of the team. But at the end of the day, they’re human. They have limits, dignity and the mobile phone numbers of dozens of reporters.”
**
Here’s a closer look at the reporters who broke those big stories…
Greg Jaffe went to The Post in 2009 from the Wall Street Journal, where he shared a Pulitzer Prize in 2000 for a series on defense spending. In introducing him to readers, The Post called him “one of the nation’s top journalists covering military affairs.” He has co-authored at least one book, “The Fourth Star,” about the careers of four prominent Army generals from 1970 through the Iraq war. In 2012, he was honored by the University of Missouri School of Journalism for a series of stories about the growing divide between the American military and civilian society after a decade of war in Afghanistan.
Greg Miller has worked for The Post since 2010. His current title is national security correspondent. Last November, a few days after the election, he reported that the intelligence community had “a sense of dread” about Trump’s impending presidency. Before going to The Post, Miller was a reporter for The Los Angeles Times for more than 15 years. He was among several Post reporters awarded the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for coverage of U.S. surveillance programs revealed by Edward Snowden. He was a finalist for the 2013 Pulitzer Prize for a series of stories on the Obama administration’s counter-terrorism policies, and he co-authored of a book about Americans who interrogated prisoners captured in the war on terror. He has made reporting trips to countries including Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kuwait and Serbia.
Michael S. Schmidt is one of The Times’ lead reporters on the federal and Congressional investigations into connections between Trump’s associates and the Russians. In March 2015, he broke the story that Hillary Clinton had exclusively used a personal email account when she was secretary of state. As a Times correspondent in Iraq in 2011, he uncovered a series of classified documents in a junkyard in Baghdad. The documents were testimony from Marines about a 2005 massacre in which Marines had killed 26 Iraqi civilians. Schmidt began working for The Times as a news clerk in 2005. In December 2007, he was made a staff reporter. In 2009, he broke the stories that David Ortiz, Manny Ramirez and Sammy Sosa were among about 100 major league baseball players who tested positive for having used performance-enhancing drugs.
**
The Post, at least, has recorded tangible results from its big story. Glenn Kessler, the paper’s “fact checker,” said the paper’s story about Trump’s revelation of classified information broke the paper’s record for readers per second clicking on the article. Kessler said the newsroom broke into applause at the news of the new record.
I say The Post and The Times both deserve sustained applause from all Americans these days. Were it not for a free press, we would be no better than Russia or Turkey.
Glad to see journalism is back. As a profession, it’s been AWOL – absent WITH official leave.
Proud to be a subscriber to both
I think I’m going to have to break down and subscribe to the The Post, Tom. I find myself going there more and more — and getting shut out for too many free views!
I viewed our Post subscription as money that might otherwise be spent on political candidates. I worry about journalism and this is something I can do to help.
The Man is going down. The Times and The Post have their fangs in deep, and they will not let go.
I agree. Looks like a matter of months, not years.
Nobody has seen anything, yet the WPo is already being given the Pulitzer! To demonstrate whether objectivity or ideology is driving their reporting, we could back up and ask: when the DNC was hacked (revealing the DNC campaign to defeat Saunders), what evidence did the FBI find it was the Russians who did the hacking?
Tracy is right – something does stink.
Frequent commenter Tracy Thomas has been having troubling posting comments and asked me to post this for her…
Michael S. Schmidt has not SEEN the document from James Comey. This morning on Morning Joe, Mika asked him, and he admitted he has only had sections from it READ to him over the phone.
Now if the memo is true, shouldn’t Schmidt and his editors have demanded to have a PDF copy provided, AT THE VERY LEAST??
Since when do editors go with third party phone copy?
The who thing is troubling. But journalism rules should not be broken, in the wish to BREAK A STORY FIRST.
How do we know it’s not a leaked or manufactured memo? It would be real news if Comey released it, including providing PDF copies, and then speaking on camera to confirm it.
Something stinks, here.
I’m all for free press, but the glee that you and the reporters seem to exhibit reminds me of the jackals circling the wounded gazelle.
Sorry Fitz, but Trump’s not getting impeached. Not with a House and Senate that is filled with such a mix of fools (Gohmert), sociopaths (McConnell), zealots (Cruz), water boys (Ryan) and weaklings (Pelosi). And either he or Pence will be re-elected in 2020. Great journalism indeed. But only a small segment of the population believes the truth these days.
The fingers are in the dikes, but it looks like a wall of water is approaching.
Mike is right, we heard the same thing on our side through 16 years of the Clinton and Obama regimes. Every week we hear about how next week impeachment proceedings were sure to start the following week. Whether Trump is re-elected is up for debate, but the likelihood of any bad actor in the federal government being held accountable is virtually nil. (By the way, Obama revealed classified info on three separate occasions and the media slept through all three).
Here’s the downside, yes, we all applaud great acts of journalism, but Trump suckered the media into behaving so vindictively that their credibility has been severely damaged. Example, the other night CNN reported that Trump gets two scoops of ice cream and everyone else only gets one. Really? That’s newsworthy?
Had the media ignored his jibes at them and simply gone about reporting on his administration with ruthless objectivity these stories might have mattered. Instead, they’re buried in an avalanche of Orwellian daily hatred spewed at him that no one gives a hoot anymore. The partisans on the left jump for joy while his supporters shrug their shoulders at yet another volley of negativity.
A real story is that Trump has been virtually ignored in DC by the bureaucracy, still staffed with Obama’s people, because Trump assumes that all he has to do is pen an Executive Order and it will be carried out. Isn’t happening. Now there’s a story that simply gushes with cognitive dissonance for Trump supporters and the media is so busy whining about minutiae that they’re missing the essence that reinforces what you’ve claimed above about Trump’s inexperience.
Latest headlines…
Washington Post: “GOP Leaders Laughed About Trump Colluding With Russia Even Before WikiLeaks”
New York Times: “Trump’s Team Knew of Flynn Inquiry Before Hiring Him”
The good times are rolling, journalistically speaking…
And if the dead tree falls in the forest, will anyone hear it?
Hey, look over there…Why it’s a carp walking on the beach!