• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« R.I.P. Steve Glorioso: Quote dispenser, information trafficker and master political strategist
There’s a lot to be pissed off and dispirited about. Got a minute? »

No Burns and Mac contract. Not now, not ever. No way, Jose.

September 18, 2017 by jimmycsays

The guiding hand of Steve Glorioso is still with us, thank God. And all of us — particularly the Kansas City Council — should heed the advice he indirectly dispensed days before his death.

What he said, in an off-the-record-interview with me on Sept. 6, was that Burns & McDonnell had tried to pull the wool over city officials’ eyes when it made its play, in concert with Mayor Sly James, for a quick, no-bid contract to build a new KCI terminal.

Actually, he said it a hell of a lot stronger than that, which you know if you’ve been reading my posts. His exact words were that Burns and Mac had tried to engineer “the biggest scam in Kansas City history.”

The scam was of such an immense scale, he added, that “Tom Pendergast would have blushed.”

Tom Pendergast

I used that quote, but off the record at his request, in my Sept. 6 post. Off-the-record quotes carry far less weight than those on-the-record, but it’s not off the record anymore. It’s a damn shame Steve is gone, but the fact he is gone freed me to identify him as the author of the quotes.

And they say a lot, coming from a man who was at the epicenter of Kansas City/Jackson County politics for more than 40 years and who helped bring us the Sprint Center with a brilliantly run 2004 hotel-and-rental-car tax campaign.

What Steve was saying, although he didn’t say it explicitly in these words, was:

There is no way in hell that Burns & McDonnell can be awarded the airport job. Ever. It overplayed its hand; it tried to get the airport job at a tremendously bloated amount we airport users would have been paying off for decades.

When we do get a new airport (I think it will be a reality within 10 years), we, the flying public, will indeed be paying for the new terminal for a long time, but we probably won’t be paying nearly as much as we would have had Burns and Mac’s fast-break resulted in a slam dunk. It could have happened, but, fortunately, Councilwoman Katheryn Shields and a few other council members played defense.

So, here’s the deal that Burns and Mac tried to pull off, the rabbit it tried to produce from the hat:

:: The airlines are currently paying about $33 million a year to retire the city’s airport debt from a renovation some years back.

:: In its initial, proposed “memorandum of understanding,” Burns and Mac said it would build a new $1 billion terminal, but it wanted a payback of “approximately” $85.2 million a year to retire the debt and (although it didn’t say so) reward Burns and Mac with a handsome profit.

:: Look again at the two numbers in the preceding two sentences…The company wanted the airlines to pay more than $50 million per year more, for 30 to 35 years, than they are paying now!

:: From the get-go, the number seemed high on its face, and it would have involved a significant mark-up in air fares so the airlines could pass the additional expense on to their customers.

That’s all we knew until Burns and Mac was exposed. After the city opened the selection process to other firms, Los Angeles-based AECOM said it could build a $1 billion, 35-gate terminal for an annual payment of slightly less than $70 million a year.

Over 30 years, the saving — the difference between slightly more than $85 million and slightly less than $70) would be more than $450 million.

Game over!

Or at least it should be.

And yet, even now Burns and Mac contends it should still get the contract, that the airport selection committee unfairly eliminated it from consideration. What gall!

…I was relieved to read last week that City Manager Troy Schulte, a member of the selection committee, said the City Council cannot overturn the committee’s recommendation of Edgemoor Infrastructure and Real Estate and select one of the three other companies, including Burns and Mac, the committee eliminated from consideration.

He said attorneys had advised the council that the city’s procurement ordinance requires Edgemoor to get a “fair and equal” opportunity to negotiate a development agreement with the city. If the council dumped Edgemoor and selected one of the other firms, he added, Edgemoor would almost surely file a lawsuit.

That’s all we need, right, a lawsuit?

This Thursday the council will probably take up the selection committee’s recommendation of Edgemoor. Edgemoor hasn’t made much of its proposal public, and we need to see their numbers and whatever tentative design they’ve come up with. (They’ve got to have some sort of design, right? How could they possibly come up with a reliable estimate without having some idea representation of what they propose to build?)

I’m not too concerned about the prospect of the council rejecting Edgemoor’s bid. As I’ve said many times before, I think the city needs to start over — under a new mayoral administration — first commissioning a design, then putting the construction contract out to competitive bids that can be compared side by side, element by element, figure by figure.

What we absolutely cannot have, though, is a shell game that hands the contract to the former “Hometown Team.” It has forfeited its right to play.

We should all remember the words my good friend Steve said on one of the last days he was upright in this world: “Tom Pendergast would have blushed.”

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments

14 Responses

  1. on September 18, 2017 at 4:55 am Don Hoffmann

    Thanks for hitting them hard, Jim.

    It’s sad that Kansas City strives so hard to be a major city and then hits the mark insofar as big-city corruption.

    Maybe our mayor emulates Rahm Emanuel ?


    • on September 18, 2017 at 8:42 am jimmycsays

      The bywords here, Don, should be corruption avoided. The play was made (with the mayor’s blessing); it was stopped; and everyone should have learned a lesson: “never again.”


  2. on September 18, 2017 at 9:33 am Richard F Thomas Jr

    Jim:

    Your umbrage for Burns and Mac and their aggressive business development tactics is now well documented. And the new ammunition you were gifted from Steve Glorioso should only serve to bring an end to your diatribe.

    I can understand and appreciate your position on this, but it’s also important that your comments and opinions don’t paint Burns and Mac in the negative light that you’ve consistently cast them in.

    Burns and Mac is a private, for-profit corporation and world-class engineering firm. Their growth is dependent on their ability to identify opportunities that complement and match their corporate skill set with profitable, mega-projects. Whoever leads that effort at the company saw a tremendous opportunity on the home sod…and assembled a team to go “all-in” to capture it.

    Their efforts in the airport quest were focused, aggressive, and innovative to say the least. But at the end of the game, I guess you could say that market forces balanced the playing field since it appears “best price” swung the deal for Edgemoor. (That’s a little sketchy, too, since they didn’t even show what they planned to build for the dollars they presented.)

    Let’s not continue to excoriate them for advancing a much-needed project for Kansas City. We should be giving them a measure of thanks for getting the issue teed-up for action. Without this whirlwind of airport mania, we’d still be in the talking and whining stage ten years from now.

    Heck, you can even say some positive things about Boss Tom.


    • on September 18, 2017 at 10:08 am jimmycsays

      Thanks for the reasoned comment, Richard, and the stout defense of Burns and Mac, which, indeed, has done a lot for Kansas City.

      An equal measure of responsibility here lies with the mayor, who essentially fired the starting gun and declared it open season on the city treasury. His legacy — and his prospective effectiveness — have suffered greatly because of this debacle. (Jolie Justus and Scott Wagner, who got roped in, also lost some credibility.)

      That said, Burns and Mac officials should have known better than to push a blank-check, 12-page memorandum of understanding on a $1 billion deal.

      Twelve pages? Are you kidding me? From what I understand, memoranda on deals like this sometimes often run into the hundreds of pages. This would have been akin to buying a house on Ward Parkway on the basis of a couple of signatures scribbled on the back of a paper napkin!

      I was in the council chamber the day Burns and Mac made its big play, and it was a “Ball of Confusion,” to borrow the title of one of the The Temptations’ great songs.

      I want to like and admire Burns and Mac, but in retrospect they really tried to pull a fast one, and it was such a blatant money grab they do not deserve another chance. I would feel better about the company if their leaders, at this point, would drop out, release their bid partners to sign up with Edgemoor and promise to do everything they can to win voter approval a new airport whenever the vote takes place.


    • on September 19, 2017 at 9:24 am Bill Hirt

      Richard,

      Unfortunately after reading today’s Star article about Burns and Mac continued complaints about the selection process, I am getting the feeling it’s either their proposal or they will fight to kill any other movement on the terminal issue. If they truly did this for the greater good of the city, now would be the time to step away and support whatever proposal the full council approves.

      Continued attacks and confusion means a terminal proposal going down in a November vote. I’m beginning to think this is what Burns and Mac now wants.


      • on September 19, 2017 at 9:46 am Richard F Thomas Jr

        Bill, I agree. It’s time for Burns & Mac to let go. They got beat. The game is over and it makes no sense to continue to pad the lawyers’ pockets. Behind every marketing campaign is a story. The “we’re hometown, we’re doing this for the good of the city” was a big part of their story, but let’s be honest — first, the project — any project — has to be good for the company. The altruistic part of their pitch was icing, not the cake.


  3. on September 19, 2017 at 6:59 am Larry Luper

    Fitz, I agree with you. I would like KCI renovated soon. Or the design and competition and bids submitted.
    If this can be done, Kansas City could enter the bidding for the $5 billion Amazon (HQ2).
    It is to operate as a headquarters independently from (HQ1) in Seattle.
    Landing this over presumed front runners Toronto and Denver. Once operating 50,000 jobs will be created.
    Amazon likes the Kansas City enough to have built four or five facilities.
    The Kansa City, KS warehouse has 1.5 million square feet of usable space. And they are still hiring.


    • on September 19, 2017 at 7:11 am Larry Luper

      Prayers and condolences to the Glorioso family, friends and colleagues of Steve.
      He deserves a lot credit.
      I didn’t always agree with his views, but I knew I wanted to hear them!
      I Pray to see Steve again in Heaven. 🙏🏽✝️


  4. on September 19, 2017 at 9:54 am jimmycsays

    Bill and Richard: The prospects for consensus selection of a company and a successful November election continue to dim…Today’s news is more reason that Burns and Mac can never have this job. Even if, in Round II, they come back with the lowest bid, they can be excluded because city ordinances call for selection of the “lowest and best” bid. Too bad they blew it so badly, but they did.


  5. on September 19, 2017 at 10:23 am Mike Rice

    Excuse me for straying from the topic of the KCI rebuild, but can someone explain how in the hell their security folks went nine months without noticing a pickup truck in one of their parking lots with a decomposing body.


    • on September 19, 2017 at 2:53 pm gayle

      Mike, I followed this tragic situation from first report of his disappearance. Additionally extraordinary to me is the fact that his wife and niece went out there (to KCI) within the first week and were told by authorities that they would look for his truck.


      • on September 19, 2017 at 3:14 pm jimmycsays

        Isn’t it all part of the homogenization of America? Same big box stores, same restaurant chains, newspaper chains, office supply chains, parking chains all across the country?

        There are advantages to rampant consolidation but the service becomes less personal and attention to detail falters. The KCI bus drivers can’t be faulted for this; they just pick up and drop off passengers. They don’t pay any attention to the parked cars. It’s the parking company’s security people who are asleep, just tooling around, I suppose. But the security people owe their allegiance to a company, SP+, based in Chicago. Out of sight, out of mind.


  6. on September 19, 2017 at 3:27 pm Richard F Thomas Jr

    I’m wondering if the parking people, SP+, use a Big Chief tablet for their business enterprise software. When a vehicle enters the yard, it is electronically timed-in for obvious reasons; when it leaves, they’ll know what is owed for the parking service. It would seem likely that the office IT people could query the data to see which parked cars had not left the lot at any given interval and how much “the meter” had recorded for the car’s stay. Wouldn’t it seem logical to investigate outstanding (still parked) cars after 30 days or more and then take a look at those vehicles?


    • on September 19, 2017 at 3:48 pm jimmycsays

      I hope they’re not using Big Chief writing tablets.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: