• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« New City Hall reporter breaks through in a big way
In the Thomas Pickert murder case, police have gone “radio silent” while they pursue evidence »

Money aimed at getting Kansas City a new airport is flowing like a waterfall ($1.5 million!), and it’s beginning to look and sound like a winner

October 31, 2017 by jimmycsays

The final push toward getting voter approval of a new KCI terminal is on, and the big money is flowing freely.

With a week to go before the Nov. 7 election on Kansas City Question 1, the campaign committee working for passage has raised nearly $1.5 million and has spent all but about $80,000 of that.

(The official name of the campaign committee is KC Transportation, Transit and Tourism, but it is operating under the slogan “A Better KCI.”)

The campaign’s biggest expenses include nearly $250,000 for mailings and postage (I’m sure you’ve seen some of the mailers, if you live in the city) and more than $200,000 for polling, strategy and voter research.

A recent mailer

And if you watch a lot of TV but haven’t seen any TV ads, you soon will: The campaign has bought $630,000 worth of “media.”

Some of the biggest contributors so far include the Heavy Constructors Association, $135,000; Cerner Corp. and its political action committee, $125,000; Southwest Airlines, HNTB Corp., KCP&L Co., Pipe Fitters Local No. 533 and Western Missouri and Kansas Laborers District Council, $50,000 each; and Lockton Companies, $40,000.

A flock of companies and organizations have given $25,000 each. That group includes JE Dunn Construction, Black & Veatch, Operating Engineers Local 101, American Century Investments, Kansas City Southern, the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce, the Civic Council of Greater Kansas City, DST Systems Inc., Sprint and Hallmark Cards.

The two biggest individual contributors that I saw in campaign finance reports filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission were Paul DeBruce, former chairman and C.E.O. of DeBruce Grain, $15,000, and William Gautreaux, a former energy industry executive, $10,000.

Ten-thousand-dollar contributions of note came from Taxpayers Unlimited, the political arm of the International Association of Fire Fighters Local No. 42; the Kansas City Chiefs; Hunt Midwest; and Clarkson Construction, which would partner with Edgemoor, a Maryland firm, on construction of the terminal.

Edgemoor has contributed more than $70,000, including a $60,000 monetary contribution and more than $10,000 in “in-kind” services. In addition, The Star reported today that even Burns & McDonnell, which attempted early on to get a no-bid contract to build the terminal, gave $20,000 within the last few days.

…What to make of all this?

Well, as I said in a recent post, the sausage, once made, looks a lot better than it did in the making.

The process of getting the measure to a public vote bordered on being a certifiable disaster, with twists, turns and pivots that a serpent couldn’t manage. But somehow the City Council set an election date and weeks later designated a contractor, Edgemoor. And even without a decent design that shows what the new terminal would look like, it appears Question 1 has an excellent chance of gaining voter approval.

Why? Because what we’re seeing now is the unleashing of a tremendous amount of pent-up energy and cash from people and companies that have long wanted a new airport and have recognized, with eyes lasered on the future, that we desperately need one.

Some of those people and companies stand to make out handsomely from construction of a new airport, and some people — campaign consultants and strategists, in particular — are making a lot of money from the campaign itself.

But that’s OK. That’s the way it is in a lot of issue and candidate elections. People and companies put money into campaigns for a multitude of reasons, and sometimes the end result is good for everyone — even the public.

This is such a case!

From my perspective, there’s no reason to be cynical about the money cascading into the campaign…or the people who are making money directly off this campaign…or those who will make money if the new terminal proceeds. This is how the system works; this is what it takes to get a new airport. This is the winding, bumpy road that leads to real progress.

As I’ve said fairly consistently — with a couple of hiccups when it looked like the sausage was completely mangled — I’m all in.

I’ve said it many times: This is a first-class city that needs and deserves a first-class airport. What we’ve got now is a dump.

I say…screw the “convenience” of walking from curb to gate. Once you’re in the gate area, you might as well be in what Jackson County officials used to call the holding areas in the old jail on top of the courthouse: “tanks.”

I’m tired of being in those KCI tanks, and I’m tired of that dreary airport. I’m tired of looking at a crumbling Terminal A, and I’m tired of walking in an endless half-circle looking for someplace to buy an honest-to-God sandwich. (Can’t be had.)

I’m ready for some sunlight splashing down through curving glass ceilings onto the two concourses and the connecting walkway. I’m ready for nice selection of retail stores and restaurants and plenty of stations to charge mobile devices. And, yes, I’m ready for the MOVING WALKWAYS.

Now we’re talking convenience, goddamit!

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

11 Responses

  1. on October 31, 2017 at 8:33 am Tom Shrout

    Good post.


  2. on October 31, 2017 at 9:41 am Bill Hirt

    Amazingly, as Kansas City Platte County resident, I have not received one flyer, call or knock on the door about the airport proposal. As I said before in an earlier set of posts on the subject, everyone must assume that the KC part of Platte County will be a yes.


    • on October 31, 2017 at 10:55 am jimmycsays

      I doubt that — the assumption. What could be going on is an under-the-radar approach in the Northland to minimize turnout. It’s going to pass by large margins south of the river, especially in the all-important corridor. I’ve been somewhat amazed at the enthusiastic response I’ve seen in my area. Lots of yard signs and virtually no naysayers. The corridor should carry the day. Freedom Inc. has endorsed it, too, although I expect turnout to be low on the East Side.


  3. on October 31, 2017 at 9:45 am Pam Kingsley

    Ugh. So, it’s time to put decent governance principles aside in favor of so-called convenience and join the bandwagon?
    The only thing passage of a billion-dollar blank check will make Kansas City is “world class” dopes.


  4. on October 31, 2017 at 9:58 am John Altevogt

    One suspects that their eyes are far more laser-focused on their bank accounts. You can’t steal from it if you don’t build it. Particularly tasty were the postcards sent to the eastern part of KCMO promising thousands of jobs if they just vote for the new airport. I wonder if those are the same jobs the inner city of KCK was supposed to get when they built the NASCAR track that never materialized.


  5. on October 31, 2017 at 10:51 am John Altevogt

    Fitz, this is the same crew of usual suspects that has been paying homage to Dunn Construction and fleecing the taxpayers ever since I can remember. Much of the reason I always referred to Art as the lawn jockey at the River Club was his subservience to their goals and agenda. I remember vividly seeing the Civic Council’s goals for Kansas City posted on page one of The Star when he was the publisher without explaining who the Civic Council was, or why anyone would give a rat’s ass what they wanted.


  6. on October 31, 2017 at 2:12 pm Mike

    Can’t vote on it–not a resident, and I generally think the case for a new airport is reasonable, but the TV advertising that has inundated the airwaves strikes me as condescending and excessive. It also plays annoyingly on Kc’s inferiority complex–‘If we don’t have a new airport, the important people in New York and Los Angeles won’t think we’re also important…and we are! Really, we are!” But what do I know, maybe that kind of pitch works to bring people out to vote.


    • on October 31, 2017 at 5:42 pm jimmycsays

      I don’t watch much TV and didn’t know the ads were underway.


  7. on October 31, 2017 at 8:33 pm Les Weatherford

    I think a new airport is a good idea.


  8. on November 2, 2017 at 9:24 am Dan

    It will be interesting how the folks north of the river vote. What is Rep. Graves’ position now, is he still against it? Is he quiet so if it passes he’s able to jump on the bandwagon then?


    • on November 2, 2017 at 6:14 pm jimmycsays

      I’ve wondered about Graves, too, Dan, and need to call his office. Same with Teresa Loar, whose vote next Tuesday I’m not sure of, even though she voted for Edgemoor.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 562 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 562 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: