After a couple of days of intense coverage of the Thomas Pickert murder last week, the story has basically gone quiet. One reason for the news vacuum is simple: KCPD has clammed up. (Another reason, unfortunately, is many reporters are too focused on “what new story have you got for me today?”)
When I called Officer Darin Snapp of the media department this morning, he had a quick and short answer to my question about the Pickert case: “Nothing new on that.”
…But don’t be fooled into thinking the case has gone “cold” after a week. This is all by design.
A lawyer friend of mine who has more than a passing knowledge of the case gave me some insight into the strategy today.
Here’s what’s going on, according to my source:
First, although police have not named a suspect, they have one. And guess who it is? Why, you’re right. It’s 79-year-old David Jungerman, whom police questioned the day after the slaying and whose 1997 Chevy van — with plates registered to him — they went looking for immediately after Pickert, 39, was shot at close range on his front porch in Brookside.
Second, Jungerman may well have contacted a local criminal defense attorney.
I called the attorney, John Picerno, this morning, and he was eager to talk about the case — other than the specific point about whether Jungerman had contacted him.
“I couldn’t comment on that one way or the other,” Picerno said, adding that he was “not involved in the case.”
When I told my source about Picerno’s no comment, my source responded by saying: “Ha! I knew it. I guarantee he will enter his appearance,” if and when Jungerman is charged.
My source’s theory is that police have gone quiet in hopes of lulling Jungerman into a false sense of security while they try to dig up evidence and develop a solid case.
“They don’t want to rattle this guy,” my source said. “They’ve gone radio silent to get him to come out of the woodwork.”
The source said it is not particularly noteworthy that police have not named Jungerman a suspect. The lawyer pointed out this investigation is following the same pattern police utilized in the case of suspected serial killer Fredrick Scott, 23, who is charged with three murders and suspected in three others.
In that case, you’ll recall, police released surveillance video of a man who had been walking in the Indian Creek Trail area where Mike Darby, one of the victims, was murdered. In releasing the video, police advised the media that the person in the video was not considered a suspect but someone who “may have vital information.”
It turned out the person in the video was, indeed, Scott.
**
We all know about the circumstances surrounding the Pickert murder. He was one of the lead lawyers in a civil case in which a homeless man sued Jungerman for shooting him in 2012 while he was on Jungerman’s property. During the summer, a jury awarded the victim $5.75 million, and the day before Pickert was murdered Jackson County Circuit Court officials sent Jungerman’s attorney notice that the court would begin the process of seizing Jungerman’s real estate to satisfy the judgment.
In 1990, in Raytown, Jungerman detained at gunpoint four teenagers he and his daughter came across on property he owns (or owned). When police arrived, however, they turned the tables on Jungerman, charging him with a gun violation. Jungerman was later convicted of a misdemeanor in that case.We also know Jungerman was a gun nut.
Last year, in Vernon County, Missouri, he threatened a tenant while displaying a gun in his belt. A probably cause statement says Jungerman got in the tenant’s face and said, “When are you getting out of here you mother fucker?”
Jungerman is also a braggart. In a video from a deposition taken in the case of the homeless man who got shot, Pickert noted in questioning Jungerman that Jungerman fired five times and struck the man with three bullets.
Jungerman replied: “That’s pretty good from the hip isn’t it? That’s lucky shooting, isn’t it?”
Undoubtedly, Jungerman is hoping luck was with him last Wednesday, the day Pickert was killed, and he’s hoping he won’t end up like Fredrick Scott, sitting in a Jackson County Jail cell awaiting trial on a murder charge.
On the other hand, police are hoping Jungerman, with his loud-mouth, reckless ways, will either have left incriminating evidence or he’ll be bragging to someone about a dastardly deed he might have been involved in a week ago today.
Fox 4 news has an excellent story on its website this morning.
http://fox4kc.com/2017/11/01/just-excessive-man-recalls-encounter-with-man-who-has-connection-to-murdered-kc-attorney/
Reporter Shannon O’Brien spoke with one of two men Jungerman shot after Jungerman caught the men inside a building he owns at 123 Belmont Blvd. in northeast Kansas City in 2012. O’Brien’s report says that shooting came a month after Jungerman shot two different intruders. One of the men in the latter case won a $5.75 million judgment against Jungerman this summer. Thomas Pickert represented that victim.
Let’s be honest: most of us thought an arrest would have been made by now. The fact that no arrest has been made means at least two things: 1) a murderer is at large, and 2) the murderer exercised some degree of skill at hiding the physical evidence, e.g., the murder weapon. One can only wonder how long the investigation will last.
Exactly.
The police need to drag that pond by his house.
Good to know we’ll have at least one source for news on this story, Fitz. This guy is anathema to responsible gun nuts since this kind of misconduct makes him the poster child for restrictive gun control measures.
Great reporting Jim-I’d been looking for updates the past week and haven’t seen any. Even though he’s “not a suspect” I hope the evidence they do have is enough for Pickert’s family as well as others involved in the case to get a restraining order against Jungerman while he remains a free man. Given his volatile and arrogant nature I hope he gets pissed off as they continue to seize his assets to settle the lawsuit and gives away some sort of damning evidence. I also hope the people who are involved in that are protected with security detail.
Thank you, John and Patrick…I, too, would like to know what the police are doing to protect the rest of the Pickert family and the other lawyers involved in that $5.75 million case. I trust they have their homes under watch. Also, I trust the police are doing some old-fashioned leg work and tailing Jungerman until they have enough to close in.
I hope you are right that the people who were associated with Pickert are receiving police protection, but how realistic is that hope? Look at the homicide table in the link below. Only 48% of the 2017 homicides have been cleared or solved.
I interpret that to mean there are a lot of murderers still at large in Kansas City. Can police really provide protection for all the families/associates/witnesses connected to murder victims?
(As a side note, it’s a little frustrating that there is an obvious mistake in the table. The total of 2017 homicides shown at the top is 122 (which is the number the Star is reporting), while the “race/sex” table only shows 121. This is an important enough report that the KCPD needs to make the effort to avoid obvious mistakes.)
Click to access DailyHomicideAnalysis2017-11-02.pdf
Jim,
Jungermann was happy to talk to the Star and the KCPD are saying “he’s not a suspect.” This guy loves attention.
http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article183713501.html
Here’s the exact quote from the police media officer Sgt. Kari Thompson:
“We do not consider him a suspect at this time. Nor did we consider him a suspect at that time.”
That’s by no means definitive or final.