• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« In the Thomas Pickert murder case, police have gone “radio silent” while they pursue evidence
Search warrant points decidedly toward David Jungerman in the Thomas Pickert murder »

David Jungerman’s legal troubles extend beyond Jackson County

November 2, 2017 by jimmycsays

It’s a new day and I’ve got more new information about David Jungerman, whom Kansas City police suspect — but aren’t saying so publicly — in the Wednesday, Oct. 25, murder of lawyer Thomas Pickert.

At the same time the 79-year-old Jungerman is facing foreclosure on his property to satisfy a multi-million-dollar civil judgment, he is also fighting a criminal charge stemming from allegedly threatening a tenant of his in June 2016.

As nearly I can tell from entries in case.net, which provides public access to Missouri court records, Jungerman is charged with misdemeanor harassment. Misdemeanors carry a penalty of up to a year in jail.

A most interesting development took place in that case on Tuesday of this week, when the Kansas City attorney who had been representing Jungerman, Brian Lee Palmer, was allowed to withdraw.

Even more interesting, Palmer had entered his appearance on behalf of Jungerman only 13 days earlier, on Oct. 18.

One more pertinent fact: On Oct. 25, the day Pickert was shot at close range while sitting on his front porch in Brookside, Palmer filed a motion with the court to take the deposition of a witness.

Here’s that time line:

:: Oct. 18, Palmer enters his appearance in the harassment case
:: Oct. 25, Pickert is shot and killed about 8:07 a.m.
:: Oct. 25, Palmer files a motion to depose a witness in the harassment case
:: Oct. 30, Palmer asks to be released from the case
:: Oct. 31, Palmer is allowed to withdraw

What does that look like to you?

My take is Palmer got involved with Jungerman innocently enough, but after the complexion of things changed dramatically in a matter of days…out the door he went.

Brian Lee Palmer

I was fortunate enough to have a brief chat with Palmer after he picked up the phone this evening in his Crown Center office. After I stated the reason for my call — wanting to know why he up and left as Jungerman’s attorney — he replied:

“Thank you for your call, and I have no comment on anything related to that. And good luck with your article.”

(Very gracious of him, I thought, to wish me luck — don’t get that too often — but it was completely unnecessary.)

…I alluded to the harassment case in yesterday’s post, having received from a friend last week a “probable cause” statement pertaining to an incident that occurred in a village not far from Nevada, MO, in Vernon County, about 100 miles south of Kansas City.

I didn’t have time to follow up on that case yesterday, but I began sorting through it late this afternoon on case.net.

Jungerman, who is listed in whitepages.com as living in Raytown, owns or owned a rental home in Vernon County. On June, 28, 2016, the probable cause statement says, Jungerman kicked in the door of the home and confronted the tenant, demanding to know, “When are you getting out of here you mother fucker?”

The tenant said Jungerman had a handgun in his waistband, and a witness said Jungerman placed his hand on the gun while “yelling and cussing” at the tenant.

A sheriff’s deputy responding to a 9-1-1 call from a witness spoke with Jungerman outside the house. The deputy said he told Jungerman that in order to remove the tenant “he had to go through the legal eviction process.” The deputy also asked Jungerman if he had a firearm, and Jungerman said he had one in the center console of his car.

The deputy then retrieved a .40 caliber Glock, semi-automatic handgun from the console. “There was (stet) a total of 10 hollow point rounds in the Glock,” the deputy wrote in the probably cause statement.

Hollow points. Wikipedia describes a hollow-point bullet as one having “a pit or hollowed-out shape in its tip often intended to cause the bullet to expand upon entering a target.”

…The probable cause statement alleges Jungerman committed two felonies — burglary and armed criminal action — and one misdemeanor — harassment– and case.net indicates it was originally filed as a felony case. Somewhere along the line, however, it appears to have been reduced to a misdemeanor.

The case was originally assigned to a judge in Vernon County but was transferred, for a reason not explained in case.net, to Barton County, immediately south of Vernon County. (The Barton County seat is Lamar, best known, perhaps, as the birthplace of President Harry S. Truman.)

At first, Jungerman didn’t have an attorney and was representing himself. In September 2016, a Joplin attorney, William Fleischaker, entered his appearance on behalf of Jungerman. Fleischaker was the attorney of record until last April, when he withdrew. Six months later, Palmer entered his appearance.

 

**

The last case.net entry was made Tuesday, the day Brian Palmer exited. The judge in the case, David R. Munton, said this:

“If defendant does hire counsel by 11/16/2017, then court will probably continue the trial (which is scheduled to start the last week of November). If not, it will confirm to the court that defendant is not serious about wanting counsel and is trying to manipulate the court to get his court date continued.”

In any event, the judge noted, the case is on hold until at least Nov. 16.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

10 Responses

  1. on November 2, 2017 at 8:10 pm Liselotte

    One question that keeps bothering me: Is his motive for murder really about the foreclosure of property? Why couldn’t he just have appealed and held everything up in the courts that way? I realize that he is pure evil and nuts, but have also never heard of property being seized this fast after a judgement.


    • on November 2, 2017 at 9:55 pm jimmycsays

      I went back to case.net and was able to sort this out a bit…

      The damage case in which Jungerman shot at least one homeless man was tried before a Jackson County Circuit Court jury from July 24 to July 27. the jury returned a unanimous verdict on July 28. Judge Joel Fahnestock entered judgment — $750,000 in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages — on Aug. 3.

      Jungerman’s attorneys filed a motion for a new trial on Sept. 1. An order denying Jungerman’s new-trial motion was entered Sept. 20. On Sept. 22, Jungerman’s attorneys filed a notice of appeal .

      Even though the case is under appeal, the court began the process of seizing two pieces of property Jungerman owns. (One is at 6000 Elm Street, Raytown, which appears to be a vacant lot; the other is a large building he owns at 123 S. Belmont Blvd. in northeast Kansas City.)

      So-called levy executions, or garnishments, were filed Oct. 15, and Jungerman’s attorneys were notified of the action on Oct. 24, the day before Pickert was murdered.

      On Oct. 26, the judge ordered juror records closed. On Oct. 31, one of Jungerman’s four listed attorneys, Ashlyn Lewis, withdrew her representation.


    • on November 2, 2017 at 9:57 pm jimmycsays

      I went back to case.net and was able to sort this out a bit…

      The damage case in which Jungerman shot at least one homeless man was tried before a Jackson County Circuit Court jury from July 24 to July 27. the jury returned a unanimous verdict on July 28. Judge Joel Fahnestock entered judgment — $750,000 in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages — on Aug. 3.

      Jungerman’s attorneys filed a motion for a new trial on Sept. 1. An order denying Jungerman’s new-trial motion was entered Sept. 20. On Sept. 22, Jungerman’s attorneys filed a notice of appeal.

      Notwithstanding the appeal, the court began the process of seizing two pieces of property Jungerman owns. (One is at 6000 Elm Street, Raytown, which appears to be a vacant lot; the other is a large building he owns at 123 S. Belmont Blvd. in northeast Kansas City.)

      So-called levy executions, or garnishments, were filed Oct. 15, and Jungerman’s attorneys were notified of the action on Oct. 24, the day before Pickert was murdered.

      On Oct. 26, the judge ordered juror records closed. On Oct. 31, one of Jungerman’s four listed attorneys, Ashlyn Lewis, withdrew her representation.


  2. on November 2, 2017 at 9:02 pm gayle

    Thanks for providing all this interesting detail, Jim. Media sources are certainly bereft of it.

    This guy is quite the pip — and, a very scary character. As for Patty’s intuition, had she known all this would probably have had a different sense; he’s too arrogant to kill himself. Who knows, though — if he feels the noose starting to tighten he may take the coward’s way out.


  3. on November 2, 2017 at 10:56 pm Mike Rice

    He’s probably waiting to be interviewed by his hero _ and fellow scumbag_ Sean Hannity who will tout him as a patriot who stood his ground.


    • on November 2, 2017 at 11:16 pm jimmycsays

      I know I started it with the “right-wing, gun-totin'” stuff, but I hate to see you take it back in that direction, Mike…I’m now focusing on this guy’s violent proclivities and other facets of his life. More to come…


  4. on November 3, 2017 at 8:48 am mikerice64

    I see your point, Fitz. But I do fear that he will try to portray himself as a “stand your ground” Cliven Bundy type. Great job with your reporting.


  5. on November 4, 2017 at 10:41 pm John Altevogt

    Probably the main reason Palmer bailed on him, if he’s a solo practitioner, is that he may have foreseen himself becoming entangled in Jungerman’s felony cases and may not have the resources to handle cases of that nature.

    Hollow point bullets are pretty standard issue for CCH use.The main reason is that they don’t penetrate as far and hence the likelihood of going through target #1 and hitting an innocent bystander is reduced.

    There are two old sayings that go “every bullet has an attorney attached to it” and “every bullet hits something”. For civilians, you may have a legitimate reason to shoot target #1, but if it goes through target #1 and hits an innocent bystander you may be held both civilly and criminally liable for the damage to the innocent bystander. That may also be the reason why civilians actually have a better record for accuracy than law enforcement in combat situations. They usually engage in the spray and pray technique of throwing as much lead down range as possible and are rarely held accountable for collateral damage.


    • on November 13, 2017 at 11:12 am joe

      Palmer a member of a firm that does the following types of law:
      ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION / MEDIATION
      BANKRUPTCY & CREDITORS RIGHTS
      COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS LITIGATION
      COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS & CORPORATE COUNSEL
      CONSTRUCTION / SURETY
      EMPLOYEE BENEFITS / ERISA
      ESTATE PLANNING / PROBATE
      INSURANCE COVERAGE / INSURANCE DEFENSE
      LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW
      PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
      REAL ESTATE
      TAXATION
      I am sure he was only there to get an appeal started and ran scared when the murder was linked to Jungerman who may have been an existing client. Other atty’s have done the same in other matters within the last 15 days.

      You are so wrong it is almost funny. Did you read something that implied safety? Yes they are safer because they kill better.

      “Hollow point bullets are pretty standard issue for CCH use.The main reason is that they don’t penetrate as far and hence the likelihood of going through target #1 and hitting an innocent bystander is reduced.

      There are two old sayings that go “every bullet has an attorney attached to it” and “every bullet hits something”. For civilians, you may have a legitimate reason to shoot target #1, but if it goes through target #1 and hits an innocent bystander you may be held both civilly and criminally liable for the damage to the innocent bystander. That may also be the reason why civilians actually have a better record for accuracy than law enforcement in combat situations. They usually engage in the spray and pray technique of throwing as much lead down range as possible and are rarely held accountable for collateral damage.”

      WRONG Hollowpoint bullets are designed to take down and kill over and above other bullets and are outlawed by Hague Convention.

      “As the hollowpoint bullet opens up, it makes a larger hole than a roundnose bullet of the same caliber would do. Hollowpoints that fragment produce extra wound channels to cause rapid blood loss. That’s where we get the idea that hollowpoints are more dangerous; each individual bullet does indeed create more damage than an individual roundnose bullet does. However, because each individual shot does more damage, hollowpoints are the safest option for use in self defense. How can this be? Three ways:

      1. Because each bullet does more damage, you can stop the attacker more quickly. When the attacker stops quickly, you are less likely to be injured. So hollowpoint bullets are safer for you.

      2. Because each bullet does more damage, you will probably need to shoot fewer times to stop the attack. Leaving fewer holes in the attacker makes it more likely that the attacker will survive to go to trial. So hollowpoint bullets are actually safer for the bad guy.

      3. The mushrooming or fragmenting activity of the bullet “puts the brakes on” inside the attacker’s body. That creates more damage. But it also makes the bullet far less likely to go through the attacker to strike a bystander or the loved ones you are trying to protect. Because of their shape, hollowpoint bullets that miss their intended target are also less likely to ricochet and hit innocent others. So hollowpoint bullets are safer for bystanders.”


  6. on November 13, 2017 at 11:38 am jimmycsays

    Joe — Please try to limit your comments to 200 words…Extremely lengthy comments often have the effect of chilling discussion.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: