• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Public records evaporate in a misdemeanor criminal case against David Jungerman
With the Chiefs in the tank, this is a good time to take the plunge and give football the boot in Kansas City »

Trial transcript reveals a lot about David Jungerman

November 24, 2017 by jimmycsays

Among the people I thought about yesterday — people whose Thanksgivings did not match up to the stereotypical “perfect day” — were Dr. Emily Riegel and her two young sons.

Dr. Riegel was recently widowed, and her children de-fathered, by a cruel, calloused individual who shot and killed 39-year-old lawyer Thomas Pickert — outside the Pickert/Riegel home the morning of Oct. 25.

It is for Dr. Riegel and those boys that public pressure must be brought to bear on the Kansas City Police Department and Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker, until charges are filed and a conviction is achieved.

In that vein, I obtained the transcript of the last day of the five-day trial that resulted in Pickert winning a $5.75 million civil judgment against the man who seemingly had the strongest motive — combined with a propensity for gun violence — to kill Pickert.

Police have said that man, 79-year-old David Jungerman of Raytown, is “not a suspect at this time.” I don’t believe it. A lawyer with close ties to the prosecutor’s office has told me Jungerman is, indeed, the prime suspect, and a second well-connected lawyer told me earlier this week that the police department’s careful public statements about Jungerman “could be some very skillful misinformation just to get him comfortable.”

There’s a lot of interesting material in the 109 pages of proceedings from that last day of trial, July 28, and I will be bringing the highlights to you today and in days to come.

One of the main reasons I wanted that transcript is that police said in a warrant application for Jungerman’s white van — similar to one spotted at the murder scene on Oct. 25 — that after the verdict was announced in the civil case, “Jungerman had an outburst in the courtroom where he cursed and yelled in a loud voice at court personnel, including the victim.”

Obviously, that could be a very strong piece of circumstantial evidence, particularly if Jungerman threatened Pickert.

I’m sure the police know exactly what Jungerman said in court that day, but, unfortunately, the outburst occurred after the judge had dismissed the jury and after the judge and other key court personnel, including the court reporter, had left the room.

The last words uttered by the judge and recorded by the court reporter were:

“Now, I’m going to release the jury…If there’s nothing further, we will be adjourned…All right. Thank you.”

So much for my hopes of hearing exactly what Jungerman said to Pickert a few minutes later.

**

Another thing I was looking for in the transcript, particularly, was any indication of ill-will and tension between Pickert and Jungerman.

Stupidly, Jungerman, a multi-millionaire who could have afforded a top-notch lawyer, chose to represent himself. (He did go half-in, however, hiring a lawyer named Brian Gepford to advise and assist him.)

His decision to represent himself insured that there’d be plenty of interaction between himself and Pickert, the main attorney representing a homeless man, Jeffrey Harris, whom Jungerman had shot with an assault rifle after he caught Harris and another man trespassing on his property on Sept. 25, 2012. (While the two men were standing on a loading dock outside a building Jungerman owns, Jungerman shot them with an assault rifle. Harris was hit in the leg, which later had to be removed above the knee.)

Tension and tone often don’t come through in a transcript, and I could not detect a high level of tension between Pickert and Jungerman from Pickert’s questioning of the defendant on Day 5 of the trial. At only one point in that last day’s testimony was there an indication of a possible history of friction between Pickert and Jungerman.

That point came when Gepford questioned the defendant about hiring him to help with advice. The following exchange took place before the jury:

Gepford: You asked me as a lawyer to assist you in representing yourself in this case?

Jungerman: Yes, I did.

Gepford: But there’s been a long, and number of periods of time when you were…

Jungerman: And I would like to give the reason. The reason I contacted Mr. Gepford was the plaintiffs…

At this point, Pickert interrupted: Your honor…

The judge: Hang on just a moment. Let’s approach (the bench). You can come on up, Mr. Jungerman.

A conference was then held at the bench outside the jury’s hearing.

Pickert: I have no idea what he is going to say, but he’s started to accuse me and this has nothing to do with — this is totally irrelevant to this stage of why he chose to hire him as an attorney.

The judge upheld Pickert’s objection, and when questioning before the jury resumed, Gepford went in a completely different direction.

**

As I said earlier, testimony from that last day in court reveals much interesting information, including Jungerman’s propensity to resolve problems with guns…like a rogue sheriff without commission, training or concern for the safety of others.

Another interesting aspect of the case is that Jungerman never expressed remorse about shooting Harris and the other man on Sept. 25, 2012. Not only that; more than once on Day 5 he insisted he — not Harris or his companion — was the real victim.

…More to come.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 17 Comments

17 Responses

  1. on November 24, 2017 at 3:46 pm Bill G

    Lynch him?


    • on November 24, 2017 at 3:49 pm jimmycsays

      That’s his style of justice, not mine.


  2. on November 24, 2017 at 7:25 pm Liselotte

    I sincerely hope that Dr. Riegel sues this arrogant, sociopathic POS, or his estate, in civil court for every penny he has left after the first judgement which led to the murder of her husband and father of her children.


    • on November 24, 2017 at 9:19 pm jimmycsays

      Interesting you should mention that, Liselotte…That prospect smacks of the O.J. Simpson/Ron Goldman case, in which Goldman’s parents won a $19.5 million civil award against Simpson after Simpson was acquitted in the murders of Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson.

      The bar is not as high in a civil trial, and I guess that would be possible. We need to be patient in regard to criminal charges, however. It can take a long time for key pieces of evidence to surface.


  3. on November 25, 2017 at 3:48 pm Michael Round

    In OJ’s case, there was a protracted criminal trial and he was found not guilty. He was then taken to “Civil Court” with a lower threshold, and lost.
    In this case, the police apparently investigated and did not find enough evidence to even bring it to Criminal Court.

    I don’t know the origins or rationale of “Civil Court”, but in these two instances, it seems absurd.


    • on November 25, 2017 at 9:08 pm John Altevogt

      The standard in civil trials is usually a “preponderance of the evidence”, a much lower standard than the standard in criminal trials of “beyond a reasonable doubt”. The beauty of criminal trials is that once sentence is passed the defendant pays the penalty assigned by the judge. In civil cases (such as the OJ case) the plaintiffs may never collect a dime of what seems like a huge award.


      • on November 25, 2017 at 10:39 pm jimmycsays

        The Goldmans really did it to O.J…Since Simpson wasn’t able to pay the $19.5 million, Goldman’s parents obtained the rights to Simpson’s book, “If I Did It,” a first-person account of how he would have committed the murders had he committed them.

        Wikipedia says: “They were granted the proceeds from the book in 2007 as part of the…jury award against him they had been trying to collect for over a decade. They own the copyright, media rights, and movie rights. They also acquired Simpson’s name, likeness, life story, and right of publicity in connection with the book, according to court documents, ensuring he would not be able to profit from the book. After renaming the book ‘If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer,’ the Goldman family published it in September 2007 through Beaufort Books.”

        Pinned his ass to the wall financially.


  4. on November 25, 2017 at 9:11 pm John Altevogt

    Fitz, had Jungerman uttered his outburst in hearing of the judge he would have been hit with a contempt citation and probably done some jail time.


  5. on November 26, 2017 at 1:03 pm John Altevogt

    Under the heading you heard it here first, the Costco shooter was stopped by an off duty KCK cop in yet another example of a good guy with a gun…


    • on November 26, 2017 at 1:57 pm John Altevogt

      Fox 4 now reporting that the Costoco shooter was shot by an off duty cop, but they don’t know from where (KCK).


  6. on November 26, 2017 at 2:18 pm jimmycsays

    It’s a good thing he was there and knew what to do and how to handle it.


    • on November 26, 2017 at 3:18 pm John Altevogt

      I seem to have a lot of friends around who seem to shop a lot and witness these things. That would seem to be yet another argument for institutional memory and for keeping older reporters around instead of trying to cut corners.


      • on November 26, 2017 at 5:24 pm Bob Kennedy

        Am is misreading your comment? Are you saying you have a lot of friends who witnessed shootings by perps or police while shopping? If so, I must say our experiences differ. Not to minimize the risks of violent crime in public places, but none of this has happened to me and I don’t recall anything similar happening to my acquaintances…thank God. Anyway, I’m grateful the officer was at the scene and took appropriate action to protect others.


  7. on November 26, 2017 at 7:32 pm jimmycsays

    Bob — John walks on the wild side.


    • on November 26, 2017 at 10:27 pm John Altevogt

      Fitz may remember after the shooting at Walmart on Shawnee that a friend sent me pictures of the scene (which I shared here). In this case, I had three different sources tell me (long before the TV stations got it and with more specificity than they have even now) that the good guy was an off-duty KCK cop. I get this because I, like Fitz with his lawyer friends above, know a lot of people who share these things with me because they know I care. I mentioned that as an analogy to The Star laying off seasoned reporters who have developed contacts over the years and replacing them with people who aren’t even sure where the bathroom is.


      • on November 27, 2017 at 11:07 am gayle

        Have your sources told you who the shooter was? I understand next of kin notification but seems like they’ve had time for that.


  8. on November 27, 2017 at 3:28 pm gayle

    I see they’ve identified him, but no details.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • April 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 567 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 567 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: