• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Guns to our heads, we are marching down the aisle with Edgemoor
Star blows it on circumstances of V.P. Mike Pence casting the deciding vote on Sam Brownback »

New KC Star editorial board member bares his inexperience

January 24, 2018 by jimmycsays

The newest member of The Star’s editorial board offered his first by-lined commentary today, and one thing is clear: He’s got a lot to learn.

Just last week, Editorial Page Editor Colleen McCain Nelson introduced Toriano Porter as eighth member of the editorial board that Publisher Tony Berg reconstructed after blowing up what was left of the former board in late 2016.

Toriano Porter

In Porter — who is African-American — Nelson is giving a young, relatively inexperienced reporter a great opportunity to make a mark at a major metropolitan daily. Although I certainly applaud the appointment of a second minority member to the board (Mary Sanchez being the other), I was concerned when I read that Porter’s major qualification was having been a general assignment reporter at The Star the last two years.

Before that, he worked at a suburban St. Louis paper and the The Independence Examiner and The Lee’s Summit Journal.

Suffice it to say, Toriano Porter is very “green” as a journalist, and the fact is there’s absolutely no way he would have been appointed to the editorial board, with such limited experience, during The Star’s glory days.

**

His column today was about the thoroughly discredited and about to-be ex-president of the Kansas City convention and visitors bureau, which is formally named Visit KC.

My objection to Toriano’s column is he was naively sympathetic to the executive in question.

But first, here’s the backdrop…

Ronnie Burt

The C.E.O., 49-year-old Ronnie Burt, submitted his resignation two weeks ago in the wake of formal, internal allegations that he had harassed and bullied three bureau employees. In addition — and perhaps more important — his firing of another bureau executive led to a discrimination lawsuit that resulted in a settlement that cost the bureau $250,000.

The plaintiff in that case was former human resources manager Janette Barron, who contended Burt fired her last year after she sought an investigation into the harassment and bullying allegations.

It’s pretty clear, this was a big mess and the bureau was in chaos under Burt, who came to Kansas City from a similar organization in Washington D.C. in 2014.

Janette Barron

Under the settlement, which resourceful reporter Steve Vockrodt got under a Sunshine Law request, the visitors bureau agreed to pay Barron $137,500 and her attorney $112.500. Burt tendered his resignation, effective Jan, 31, after the bureau’s executive committee met three times to discuss the situation.

Burt was present at the first of the three meetings but not at the last two, so it’s clear the executive committee decided Burt needed to go. This was not a voluntary resignation.

**

Porter’s column got off to an alarming start:

“I don’t know if Ronnie Burt is guilty of the harassment and the bullying behavior he’s been accused of. But what if the allegations aren’t true, as the outgoing C.E.O of Visit KC contends?”

Wow…Talk about rushing to a guy’s defense! He might was well have written, “Did Ronnie Burt get screwed???”

Porter went on to quote Burt as saying, “I was deeply hurt by the allegations,” and, “This is my character. This is my integrity, who I am as a person.”

Holy cow…To be sure, it is all about character. The problem is all the evidence — not the least of which is a $250,000 bureau payout — is Burt’s character and temperament are sorely wanting.

Porter’s naivete boiled over when he said, “Burt seemed sincere in his response.”

Well, hell yes he sounds sincere! He’s a trained salesman, for Christ’s sake…a pitchman, a glad-hander whose main job has been to convince people (sincerely) they will have a great experience if they bring their convention to Kansas City.

Porter concludes his column on a syrupy, sentimental note:

“A contrite Ronnie Burt still could rebound and learn from his time in Kansas City. This is his chance.”

Sorry, Toriano, you got it wrong: Ronnie Burt had his chance here. But he fucked up, and now his prospects of becoming C.E.O. at another convention and visitors bureau are very dim…unless some other bureau falls for his phony sincerity.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments

14 Responses

  1. on January 24, 2018 at 9:18 pm John Altevogt

    “Ronnie Burt had his chance here. But he fucked up, and now his prospects of becoming C.E.O. at another convention and visitors bureau are very dim…unless”… he finds a C&V bureau as desperate to hire a token minority as The Star was.

    In The Star’s defense by hiring someone totally unqualified they probably figured he’d be easier to control (always a plus for white liberals). Unfortunately for them, most people don’t sit around thinking “I’m totally unqualified for this gig so I better kiss some ass to get along.”


    • on January 24, 2018 at 9:26 pm jimmycsays

      Too harsh, John…Ever since Colleen Nelson said early last year that she had one more spot to fill on the board, it was clear it was going to be an African-American. And that was a necessary step.

      I just hope Toriano will grow into the job. But I’m a bit worried that Colleen, instead of choosing him because she, as you suggest, could “control” him, now will have to spend a lot of time working with him on his ideas and copy.


      • on January 24, 2018 at 9:47 pm John Altevogt

        Is womansplaining a word?


  2. on January 24, 2018 at 9:33 pm Vern Barnet

    Yes, I was astounded by the sympathy given to Mr Burt, from the beginning to the end of the column. One wonders why. But how can the new, inexperienced member of the editorial board learn if he is not mentored, which surely could not have happened in this case, could it?

    This column also calls into question his reporting if he can be seduced so easily by a salesman. What the writer calls the “high road” looks to me to be a road of smoke down which the columnist was blinded, unable to see.


    • on January 24, 2018 at 9:37 pm jimmycsays

      Good points, Vern. I do hope Toriano will come around. In the meantime, it’s clear Colleen needs to take a stronger hold on the reins.


  3. on January 24, 2018 at 9:49 pm jimmycsays

    John: Very good…”womansplaining.”


  4. on January 25, 2018 at 12:30 am John Altevogt

    Keep in mind, this kid is replacing Lewis. My favorite Lewisism was “negative diversity yields negative productivity” operationalized by using Lewis as an excuse for the former and his columns as an example of the latter. I’ll quit now.


  5. on January 25, 2018 at 7:54 am Michael Round

    An alternative line Mr. Porter could have used, instead of “But what if the allegations aren’t true?” is: “What if three women are liars and one woman incompetent?” That’s the premise of his first opinion piece.

    According to Steve Vockrodt’s 12/21/2017 KCStar article:
    Sometime in 2016, three women reported being harassed, bullied, and retaliated against by Burt. These days, we call coming forward like this bravery.

    The head of HR who received the reports, Janelle Barron, consulted with company lawyers, and was told to meet with both Burt and Board Chairman Kevin Pistilli. She did, and requested an investigation.

    It’s unclear (to me) what happened in that meeting. “Request” suggests permission – was the request denied?

    Later in the article, Burt is quoted as saying “He knew what she (Barron) had done and who she had spoken to about it.”

    Afterwards, Barron was placed on administrative leave for two weeks, and then fired.

    And Mr. Porter, after knowing all of this, concludes his article by quoting Burt:
    “Overseeing an agency with 45 employees and a yearly operating budget around $13 million isn’t easy. Someone is bound to be unhappy. But when multiple people make serious allegations and a lawsuit follows, it has a way of humbling you.”

    It’s cases like this – and articles like this – that have prevented women from coming forward in the first place.

    Mike Round


    • on January 25, 2018 at 10:16 am jimmycsays

      You’re rambling, Mike…Suggest you get Lisa to review before you push “post comment.”


      • on January 25, 2018 at 10:27 am Michael Round

        Maybe I should apply for a position on the editorial board.

        Now, instead of saying Burt “fucked up”, how about an update on what happened with the investigation regarding the three female employees.


  6. on January 25, 2018 at 10:35 am jimmycsays

    I’ll get on that with all deliberate speed…


  7. on January 25, 2018 at 11:11 am Mike

    As a tangential point, why does The Star feel it necessary to have 8 members on the editorial board when the reporting and copy editing ranks have been shrunken so severely?

    Beats that used to be monitored full-time are now ignored or checked on only sporadically and lots of news falls through the cracks or is left to online outlets or TV newscasts.

    If Tony Berg thinks a strong editorial page is more valuable than having more reporters (I disagree), then he should at least have chosen people who are more willing to speak truth to power. Instead, with rare exceptions, we get a lot of mealy-mouthed good-people-on-both-sides type opinion pieces that add nothing to civic discourse.


    • on January 25, 2018 at 12:23 pm jimmycsays

      You and Altevogt are of like mind on The Star’s decision to beef up the editorial page at the expense of the news side. It frustrates me, too, to see the news side languish, but I am very glad Berg is allocating a lot of money to the editorial side. The Star’s editorial voice is essential to helping the public sort out complex situations, such as the fucked-up new-terminal process. It really helps readers, especially casual readers not familiar with the twists and turns of government, arrive at informed opinions. It’s hard to overemphasize the importance of that service.

      Now, on your point about who is hired to help people form those opinions, I agree with your completely: It takes knowledgeable, experienced journalists with outstanding writing skills. Fortunately, most of The Star’s editorial-page writers have deep experience and excellent writing skills.

      For the most part, the Star’s editorials are lively, informative and far superior to the lecturing tone we were getting with Yael Abouhalkah before Berg canned him in late 2016. He was incredibly well informed and well intentioned, but his voice had become too strident, and he was effectively a one-man show, which is never good in an editorial operation.

      (Just to clarify, “Mike” is not Michael Round, who posted a couple of comments earlier.)


  8. on January 25, 2018 at 6:35 pm Mike Rice

    And it’s not me.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 511 other followers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    %d bloggers like this: