• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Star blows it on circumstances of V.P. Mike Pence casting the deciding vote on Sam Brownback
The 23rd Street ramp maniac: Why has this guy been free so long? »

Mike Sanders and Jim Hinson: Former public officials exposed as frauds

January 27, 2018 by jimmycsays

It’s no wonder many people are cynical about politics and the notion of public service.

This week we have seen two examples of once-respected public officials having given in to the temptation to line their own pockets.

The two I speak of are former Jackson County Executive Mike Sanders and former Shawnee Mission School District Superintendent Jim Hinson.

Let’s look at Sanders first…

Mike Sanders and wife Georgia, outside the federal courthouse

Once considered a “rising star in Missouri’s Democratic Party,” as The Star put it, Sanders — a lawyer, no less — pleaded guilty Friday to a federal corruption charge, admitting he misused tens of thousands of dollars for his personal gain and then lied about it on campaign finance records.

Specifically, he and his former chief of staff Calvin Williford, who also pleaded guilty to one felony count, acknowledged they used campaign cash for gambling trips to Las Vegas and other personal purposes.

What a couple of idiots. But Sanders more than Williford. My guess is Williford allowed himself to fall under Sanders’ misguided influence and felt honored and flattered to be asked to join the boss on junkets to the “Entertainment Capital of the World.”

The Star’s “killer team” of Mike Hendricks and Steve Vockrodt had a very telling paragraph in their story:

“While the 50-year-old Sanders was stoic during and after his hearing, Williford, 60, sobbed following his proceedings after greeting friends and family members in the audience. He could be heard telling his family, ‘I am such an idiot.’ ”

That certainly makes me more sympathetic to Williford, and I hope he can turn his life around and get a good job somewhere after prison — if, indeed, he and Sanders end up doing time.

But Sanders…Wow, what a turd. What a phony.

He took everybody by surprise on Dec. 21, 2015, when he called a press conference and dropped a bombshell: He would be leaving his elective position in 10 days, at the end of the year, with three years left in his third term. He had previously served a four-year term as county prosecutor.

At the news conference, his wife Georgia sat off to one side, smiling pleasantly, as Sanders explained he was leaving politics because the job was taking too big a toll on his family life.

He said:

“Now it’s time for me to really focus on my family and do what’s really necessary to raise my two sons, 9 and 12, and focus on that. For us, I think it’s a great time as a family…The thing about politics, the thing specifically about this job is it takes you away so much. It is truly a 24-hour-a-day, seven-day-a-week job. You never know when that phone call’s going to come…”

We know now that the FBI was onto him even then and that he was making his exit because of the nasty cloud that had formed over him.

How much his wife knew then we have no idea. I hope it was nothing, or not much. In any event, her words that day have a decidedly different ring to them in light of yesterday’s plea.

“I’m so thrilled,” she said back then. “It’s time. It’s time for him to move on and do something different. I’m so happy for him, and for us.”

Again yesterday, Georgia Sanders was with her husband. Again she was off to the side. But she was not smiling.

And what about those boys? They would now be 11 and 14…I wonder what they’re thinking about good ol’ Dad. How confused and disappointed they must be. I hope they were spared the images of their father on the steps of the federal courthouse, listening to his lawyer speak for him, professing how apologetic he was “not only to his family but the residents of Jackson County.”

Yes, Friday was a bad day for Jackson County residents. Once again we are left sorely disappointed by an elected official who seemed like an advocate of good government but turned out to be another crook trying to enrich himself.

**

Hinson

Hinson isn’t nearly as reprehensible as Sanders, but he’s another who left people wondering why his commitment to public service evaporated in a flash.

Hinson announced last April that he would retire at the end of the last school year, even though he was only 54 at the time and had only been on the job four years. In a statement, he played the same, tired song Sanders had played, saying he wanted to spend more time with his family and “pursue other lifelong goals.”

What was clear, though, was he just wanted to disappear. And no wonder: Rumors of romantic liaisons with one or more district officials swirled, and there was a rumor of a D.U.I.

So he did disappear, for a while, anyway. This week, though, he was back in the news.

The Shawnee Mission Post, which does a great job covering central and eastern Johnson County, reported that Hinson had taken a consulting job with the very law firm he had brought on, as superintendent, to handle most of the school district’s legal business.

It’s a classic case of the old revolving door, where a public official channels a lot of business to some firm or some “consultants” and then doubles back after leaving office and gets rewarded for his earlier beneficence.

The Post had the figures showing just how deep the beneficence was. The law firm, EdCounsel, billed SMSD $10,106 during the 2013-14 school year; $69,982 in 2014-15; $188,823 in 2015-16; and a whopping $405,111 last school year.

I’m sure EdCounsel very much appreciated Hinson’s patronage. But, like Jackson County residents with Sanders, what good did any of that do for the patrons of the Shawnee Mission School District? Hinson’s legacy, in my opinion — and I’m a substitute SMSD teacher — is having constructed a wide moat between parents and district governance on one hand, and between teachers and district administration on the other.

Under him, the district became insular and secretive, and teachers chafed under his autocratic rule. The district will be struggling for a long time to undo the damage Jim Hinson wrought. I’m sure he doesn’t care, though; he’s getting big payback for enriching a bunch of lawyers.

**

Note: A big thank-you to friend and regular reader Tracy Thomas for the tip on Hinson.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 19 Comments

19 Responses

  1. on January 27, 2018 at 7:51 am kaler

    The Sanders debacle makes no sense. How could he have fallen so far with a scheme that easy to investigate? I’m sure more will come out in the future as to what vice / bad habit fueled his downfall


    • on January 27, 2018 at 8:15 am jimmycsays

      Welcome back to the Comments Dept., Mr. Bole…We’ve missed you.

      I’m not so sure we will get a lot more information regarding vices, personal failings, etc.

      I have to admit, however, when I read about those Las Vegas trips, I wondered if Sanders and Williford indulged in any games of the flesh, a la Prince Philip when he was a young man — and husband of a young QE II — and sailing to various parts of the British Empire with his aide and right-hand man, Lt. Cmdr. Michael Parker.


      • on January 27, 2018 at 3:01 pm gayle

        Sanders? Games of the flesh? YUCK.


  2. on January 27, 2018 at 8:41 am Liselotte

    I went back and reread your previous article and followed your link to the original Hendricks and Company story. What is blowing my mind is he got off with one charge when that article indicates this goes back to at least 2006. Is one count normal or is he receiving special favor?

    When his original check casher committed suicide he quickly switched to the brother in the wheel chair. Was the suicide connected to the FBI investigation? My mind is spinning thinking about the parts of the story we haven’t heard, not to mention what was he doing before 2006. Will the public ever learn the truth? Or did the truth disappear when the plea bargain was signed?


    • on January 27, 2018 at 9:23 am jimmycsays

      You pose good questions, Liselotte, and I have no answers. First, I don’t understand why it took three years to bring this case forward, when it appears so clear cut. But I guess power and money (he wasn’t hurting after he left office, having been working for the McLain law firm in Independence) have a way of making the feds proceed cautiously.

      Also, he had the assistance of a very good defense attorney, J.R. Hobbs, and you can’t underestimate that.

      And, no, I don’t think we’ll ever get the back story. That lies with the individuals involved and those close to them…I’ll let you know if I hear anything I can pin down with sources.


      • on January 29, 2018 at 10:00 am Mike

        It’s pretty common for a plea agreement in white-collar cases to dangle the threat of many possible charges as an incentive for a plea; the plea itself is often only one charge (see Mike Flynn, George Papadopoulous). Even when a white-collar criminal is convicted of many counts, the sentence on counts typically is concurrent rather than consecutive. Getting the conviction is a greater priority than getting a long sentence.


  3. on January 27, 2018 at 9:48 am Another Brick...

    If you want to understand the #metoo movement and how harassment can lead to misery, just look at the Hinson playbook…it’s exactly the same. Hinson, and his administrative cronies, (principals, the A.D., department heads, etc.) came in with a massive, flim-flam plan to raise test scores by gaming the system with “magic pillow” vendors. District employees who accepted their “advances” were promoted and protected in the system. Employees that raised alarm to the fraud were separated from the herd and driven out through a systematic process outlined in “how to get rid of ‘non-team’ employees,” supported by a corrupt school board and high-priced defense teams. The most enlightening aspect of the whole grand game is how so few people, within the system failed to speak out in fear of losing income or their sacred health insurance. The damage to certain segments of the student population will never be repaired. Most of the Hinsonite carpetbaggers are still in the system, embedded. It will take years, if it is even possible, for the district to recover.


    • on January 27, 2018 at 10:57 am jimmycsays

      To quote myself, Bricklayer: “The district will be struggling for a long time to undo the damage Jim Hinson wrought.”


  4. on January 27, 2018 at 11:09 am John Altevogt

    Always beware the seemingly industrious, or powerful person who suddenly becomes interested in his family.

    As for the education establishment you have but to examine the case of Dale Dennis, the 80-year-old Educrook bureaucrat who pissed away over 400 million ta dollars inappropriately and when called on it by a legislative audit, the Educrook establishment callously formed ranks around him and refused to even suspend a man who should have retired 15 years ago. Indeed, they praised him for the wonderful job he did. I guarantee you that not one dollar of that money ever saw the inside of a classroom.

    Our world needs thousands of teams like Vockrodt and Hendricks and work like theirs is what can truly save the local newspaper if only they have the spine and the objectivity to do it. Witness also the success of the recent investigative work on transparency (although I have questions about The Star’s sincerity) as committee generated bills in the Kansas legislature are now a thing of the past.


    • on January 27, 2018 at 11:41 am jimmycsays

      How dare you question The Star’s sincerity…On behalf of all dead, former, current and future editorial staff members, I resemble that remark.


  5. on January 27, 2018 at 11:26 am Mark Peavy

    “How much (Mike Sanders’) wife knew then we have no idea.” It’s interesting that Steve Vockrodt’s online article briefly described Sanders’ wife as an unindicted conspirator, but has since just referred to “two other unidentified conspirators.” It would be interesting to find out why the article changed.


    • on January 27, 2018 at 11:38 am jimmycsays

      I didn’t pick up on that, Mark…It sounds pretty damning. Maybe she was going along on the Las Vegas trips and liked the high livin’ herself.


      • on January 27, 2018 at 12:05 pm Mark Peavy

        “It sounds pretty damning.” At this point, I don’t know whether it’s damning or not; I’m just puzzled. (Vockrodt also deleted a tweet that referenced her,)

        Given your connections at the Star, you might want to do a little digging on that. You never know what additional information might surface.


  6. on January 27, 2018 at 12:15 pm jimmycsays

    I just smile when people mention my connections at The Star, Mark. My connections are very, very limited. That’s partly because I’ve been gone nearly 12 years now and also because others who were working there when I was still there got laid off or left voluntarily.

    Also, it’s pretty hard to maintain sources at a place when you pop a post, like I did the other day, under the headline “Star Blows It…”

    What I would glean from the version changes regarding Georgia Sanders is that the editors decided if no charges were being brought against her, “Let’s take the safe route and not name her at all.”

    As has been abundantly clear from the Thomas Pickert murder case, The Star is scared to death to name anyone not officially declared a suspect, for fear of being sued. It’s too bad because the burden of proof in libel cases is overwhelmingly on the plaintiff. Meanwhile, the readers get short-changed and are often left scratching their heads because of the paper’s timidity.


    • on January 27, 2018 at 12:28 pm John Altevogt

      With all due respect, Fitz. I think your finest work has been the unfettered reporting you’ve done since leaving The Star.

      As you know, one of my favorite journalists was Roy Teicher at the now defunct Kansan and his approach to his editorial position was to hire inquisitive young reporters guide them into asking interesting questions and then let them report on what they saw in front of them.


  7. on January 27, 2018 at 6:47 pm jimmycsays

    Follow-up to Mark Peavy:

    I have come upon good information that discredits my earlier speculation about why The Star may have pulled the reference to Georgia Sanders as an unindicted co-conspirator. Apparently, it appeared from court documents that Georgia might have been an unindicted co-conspirator but the reporters soon discovered their deduction was incorrect, and they pulled it back. Making that change had nothing to do with tentativeness to associate her with a crime. My mistake…

    At the same time, I learned that Georgia did, indeed, accompany Mike and Calvin on the Las Vegas trips. So, my stated hope that she knew little or nothing about the illegality could well be off base, too.


  8. on January 28, 2018 at 1:32 pm John Altevogt

    Happy birthday to Julius Karash.


  9. on January 28, 2018 at 1:33 pm jimmycsays

    Same from me.


  10. on January 29, 2018 at 11:12 am Tom Shrout

    Did I miss it, or did the article not say who the judge was?



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: