• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« More worrisome circulation figures for The Kansas City Star
The Star’s editorial page editor gets a promotion…but you wouldn’t know it by reading The Star »

David Jungerman’s attorney files motion to dismiss attempted burglary charge in southwest Missouri

February 14, 2018 by jimmycsays

I wrote last week that David Jungerman’s hiring of a lawyer to represent him in a southwest Missouri attempted burglary case would likely significantly complicate the state’s attempt to gain a conviction.

That has begun playing out. Last week, Jungerman’s attorney filed a motion to dismiss the felony charge on grounds that Jungerman owned the house he allegedly attempted to break into and, thus, could not be charged with attempting to enter it.

Judge David Munton has set a hearing on the motion for next Tuesday.

Although routine motions and hearings can be tedious and distracting for those of us who want to see justice served as expeditiously as possible, this is the way it is in our legal system. Moreover, every twist and turn of this particular case is worthy of being sliced and diced because — as we all know — it’s very possible that David Jungerman gunned down and murdered Kansas City lawyer Thomas Pickert outside his Brookside home last Oct. 25.

The Jackson County Prosecutor’s Office does not have adequate evidence to bring charges — at least in the opinion of prosecutors — and the southwest Missouri case appears to hold out the best chance of getting Jungerman convicted and behind bars.

…It’s important to say here that none of the mainstream media outlets, including The Star and the local TV stations, has been following the attempted burglary case. I firmly believe those media outlets have steered clear of the case because they are afraid of being sued for libel. But it is absolute nonsense to cower from this case: It is a fact that police interviewed Jungerman, who will turn 80 next month, and searched his white van, which is similar to a van two witnesses saw at the scene of the crime. One witness reported seeing an elderly white man with gray hair standing next to the truck, and another reported seeing an elderly white man with gray hair driving away from the scene.

The block where Thomas Pickert lived with his wife, Dr. Emily Riegel, and their two young sons is dotted with “Hate has no home here” signs.

Moreover, Jungerman had a powerful motive — Pickert had represented a client who won a $5.75 million verdict against Jungerman — and Jungerman has a history of solving problems his own way, that is, with gunfire and without summoning police. He has said several times, including in court, “I always carry a gun.”

So, “the media,” in my opinion, is doing the public, including Pickert’s widow and their two young sons, a terrible disservice with its “non-reporting.”

But that’s the way it is, and I assure you I am going to continue dogging this case until it is resolved.

That said, I do not intend, at this point, to cover the hearing next Tuesday. The main reason is the hearing is scheduled to take place in Greenfield, MO, which is northwest of Springfield, and a two-and-a-half-hour drive from Kansas City. (I have previously made trips to Lamar and Nevada for hearings, and both those cities are significantly closer to Kansas City.)

The case is scheduled to go to trial in Lamar on April 3, and I am definitely planning to attend, assuming the case is not dismissed and the current schedule holds.

**

Although I have no legal training, I do not expect the dismissal motion to be upheld. It is very likely that Judge Munton will take the motion under advisement after the hearing and will rule later. He would post his ruling into the public file on the case, which is available for viewing on Missouri Case Net. That is where I intend to get the result. (The case number is 16B4-CR00187, and it must be entered precisely that way.)

As I said above, Jungerman’s attorney, S. Dean Price Jr. of Springfield, contends it was not illegal for Jungerman to enter his own property.

The charge relates to Jungerman’s confrontation, on June 28, 2016, with a man who was renting a house Jungerman owns outside Nevada. The state alleges Jungerman kicked at the door, entered and, with a hand on a gun in his waistband, approached the tenant and demanded to know, “When are you getting out of here, you mother fucker?”

Two other people besides the tenant were in the house at the time, and they, like the tenant, are slated to testify at trial.

Besides being charged with attempted burglary, which could get Jungerman a prison sentence of up to seven years, he is also charged with misdemeanor harassment. (The maximum penalty for a misdemeanor is up to a year in jail.)

In his dismissal motion, Price says:

“As a matter of law, an owner cannot unlawfully enter his own property without some pre-existing order denying entry…There was no pre-existing order denying Jungerman entry into his property. Jungerman believed he had a right to enter the dwelling.”

…I could not find any Missouri case law pertaining to breaking and entering a house that one already owns. I’m sure there is some case law; I just don’t know how to access it.

However, the Criminal Defense Lawyer website offers some interesting background on the subject.

“You might be surprised to learn,” it says, “that in most states, in certain situations, people can be charged with trespassing or burglarizing their own property. Burglary is committed by going into a building without permission in order to commit a crime inside. The issue most often comes up in cases involving domestic violence or during landlord-tenant disputes.”

And this…

The law recognizes different kinds of property rights: a person can have an ownership right, or a possessory right, or both. For example, a landlord owns a house, but does not have the right to be there any time he or she pleases. The right of possession belongs to the tenant…In trespassing and burglary cases, a person who both owns and possesses a piece of property cannot be charged with these crimes because, absent unusual circumstances, the defendant always has permission to be on the property. However, a person who has an ownership interest in a property, but not a right of possession, can be charged with trespassing or burglarizing his or her own property in some states.

The core issue, then, will probably be whether Jungerman had “right of possession.”

That sounds different to me than a “pre-existing order denying entry.”

My prediction: Motion denied. Next!

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

11 Responses

  1. on February 14, 2018 at 2:17 pm John Altevogt

    I’m not a lawyer either, but as a Realtor I can tell you that I don’t consider a house that’s been rented out to really be on the market simply because the tenant is in control of the property. At a minimum, they can insist on a 24-hour notice before allowing a showing. And I question whether a landlord could willy nilly enter a property even if he feared some form of damage without notice. I can’t even conceive of a landlord being able to simply show up on your doorstep and demand immediate entry. If ever there was a right to privacy certainly it would exist for your home whether rented, or not.


  2. on February 14, 2018 at 2:18 pm John Altevogt

    PS Thanks for keeping on this. I keep saying that your best work has been done since you left The Star.


    • on February 14, 2018 at 2:35 pm jimmycsays

      Thanks, John…Jungerman wasn’t attempting to oust the tenant to rent to someone else; he just wanted the guy out, supposedly because he had damaged some of Jungerman’s farm equipment.


      • on February 14, 2018 at 2:49 pm John Altevogt

        But that’s the same as shooting people instead of calling the cops. If they damage your equipment you call the cops, it doesn’t give you the right to barge into someone’s home. And, if you want them gone, you file a notice of eviction and let the Sheriff kick them out. Actually, both this case and shooting the trespassers reinforces the probability of his guilt in shooting the lawyer because all three are the acts of a vigilante seeking revenge for an alleged personal offense.


  3. on February 14, 2018 at 3:51 pm Bob Kennedy

    To the extent resources are in short supply, do a GoFundMe and I’ll buy you a tank of gas. Or two or three.


    • on February 14, 2018 at 6:19 pm jimmycsays

      No help needed on any front, Bob. But thanks. (When I give, I try to go straight to the recipient to avoid the 8 percent, Go Fund Me lug.)


      • on February 14, 2018 at 6:36 pm Bob Kennedy

        OK, consider yourself entitled to go straight to me, if you want. In any event, I really appreciate you getting to the end of this affair.


  4. on February 14, 2018 at 4:38 pm William D Goetze

    Can one burgle without an intent to steal, in Missouri law?
    bg


    • on February 14, 2018 at 6:18 pm jimmycsays

      The applicable law is in Chapter 569 of Missouri statutes. A law firm’s website describes burglary like this:

      A person commits the crime of burglary in the second degree when he or she knowingly enters unlawfully or knowingly remains unlawfully in a building or inhabitable structure for the purpose of committing a crime therein. This is a class C felony in Missouri.

      I hadn’t thought about it, but I suppose a big question in Jungerman’s case could be if he entered the house with the intention of committing a crime. Note, however, that he is also charged with harassment, so it sounds like intent to harass, if that’s what a jury deemed it, would satisfy the burglary criterion.


      • on February 15, 2018 at 12:59 am John Altevogt

        The statute reads “enters unlawfully” OR remains for the purpose of committing a crime, two separate criteria. In this case, I would argue that he met both criteria for committing a violation. First, owner, or not, you can’t go barging into someone else’s home so I’m going to assume here that by that standard alone he had entered unlawfully and burglary had been committed. Then, once inside, he remained to commit the crime of harassment.

        If they invited him in, it becomes a different story.


  5. on February 15, 2018 at 9:01 pm Peg Nichols

    Aw, Jim, you’ll miss lunch at the Intermission Cafe, where the owners are renovating the old Opera Housel



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: