• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Close associate of Jungerman must be looking over his shoulder
The first indication that Mike Sharp was ill fit to be Jackson County sheriff surfaced a decade ago »

How The Star, with a poorly framed story, may have helped solve the Pickert murder case

April 16, 2018 by jimmycsays

It’s unusual for a non-investigative news story to help solve a murder, but that could well be the case with a story The Star published early in the wake of the Thomas Pickert murder case.

Most of you will remember the front-page story — from Friday, Nov. 10 — which featured a four-column photo of David Jungerman above a big headline that said, “Van owner never suspect in slaying of lawyer, police say.”

Like a lot of people, I was amazed at that headline and story because it flew in the face of logic: Jungerman not only had to be a suspect in Pickert’s murder, he was, in all probability, the only suspect. He was the only person who had motive, opportunity and a known propensity for settling disputes with gunfire.

I thought — and still do — that The Star’s editors were naive in letting the reporters emphasize the police assertion that Jungerman was not a suspect. Moreover, the headline was incorrect. Police had never used the word “never” in relation to Jungerman’s status as a suspect. They were extremely careful in their language…The official position, which The Star quoted, was: “We do not consider him a suspect at this time. Nor did we consider him a suspect at that time.”

That is a clear hedge in both cases — “at this time” and “at that time.”

It was also outright untrue. As I wrote back in November, two sources — both defense attorneys — told me Jungerman was the one and only suspect. They also speculated that police were putting out the “not a suspect” line to lull Jungerman into a false sense of security while they continued digging up evidence and trying to develop a chargeable case.

In fact, that’s exactly what was going on, and the strategy worked.

The investigators knew — as most of us watching the case and learning about Jungerman suspected — Jungerman is only capable of thinking in short bursts, and not very far ahead. In fact, he usually acts before he thinks, which is why he was charged with a gun-related felony in southwest Missouri long before Pickert was murdered and why he was charged with additional gun-related felonies in Jackson County before police solved the Pickert murder.

The exception to his act-first, think-later approach was the Pickert murder. He did have a plan there, although it was a poor one. After all, he drove his own van to the scene in broad daylight; was seen well enough by one witness that the witness was able to provide a good description of him; and afterward, while he apparently got rid of the gun, he failed to get rid of a live bullet that matched the caliber of the relatively uncommon weapon he had used — a .17-caliber rifle.

Now, back to my premise…The Star’s story, with Jungerman’s picture plastered atop the front page, almost surely eased his apprehensions about being caught. Told by the reporters that police did not consider him a suspect, he replied, “That’s nice, though I think it’s a day late and a dollar short.”

He also regaled the reporters with stories of his gun-related adventures, including two 2012 incidents, about a month apart, in which he shot a total of four people.

After the interview, he went on bragging and running his mouth for another five months, during which time detectives were painstakingly developing evidence and waiting for him to slip up.

That was almost inevitable, and it happened, and now he’s behind bars, with plenty of time to reflect on his greatly shortened horizon and the many occasions he should have thought more and acted less.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

11 Responses

  1. on April 16, 2018 at 1:46 pm Patrick

    I read in the star that Jungermann’s net worth is believed to be around $33 million. Surely there will be a civil suit coming from Pickert’s family for wrongful death. I really hope they get every last dollar Jungerman has, although i’m sure a lot of it is potentially protected by trusts.


    • on April 16, 2018 at 2:25 pm jimmycsays

      Yes, he moved a lot of that money around and removed himself as executor of the trust…That’s where he did most of his forward thinking.


    • on April 16, 2018 at 2:30 pm John Altevogt

      I would think that it would depend on when the trusts were established. If they were established after his legal troubles began I would suspect that there would be little difficulty setting them aside. For phony corporations, I believe the process is referred to as “piercing the veil” and I assume there’s a similar process for setting aside trusts that are established simply to avoid legitimate legal obligations.


  2. on April 16, 2018 at 2:42 pm jimmycsays

    I just saw that The Star’s “Why so secret, Kansas?” was a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize in the public service category.

    It apparently finished second to The New York Times and The New Yorker for their coverage of the sexual abuse of women in Hollywood and elsewhere.

    Congratulations to The Star for that strong showing…

    The closest midwestern paper that won a Pulitzer was the Des Moines Register, for examining the consequences of Iowa’s privatization of Medicaid.

    Here’s a link to the list of winners…

    https://www.poynter.org/news/here-are-winners-2018-pulitzer-prizes


    • on April 16, 2018 at 4:18 pm John Altevogt

      Investigative journalism, go figure. How many Pulitzers has the new editorial board won?


  3. on April 16, 2018 at 5:12 pm jimmycsays

    Pulitzers are extremely hard to win. Two of the new editorial writers have won significant awards, however.

    In March, Melinda Henneberger won a Scripps Howard Award for a range of opinion writing with what the judges called “a portfolio of work that is a revealing look at the people and political issues driving conversations in the heartland.”

    The same month, Dave Helling was named the winner of The American Society of News Editors’ 2018 Burl Osborne Award for Editorial Leadership. The award recognized writings that called into question the way Kansas City’s government handled contract negotiations for a $1 billion air terminal being planned at Kansas City International Airport.

    I know that doesn’t impress you, John, but I don’t think the editorial page won any comparable honors when they were down to one editorial writer.


    • on April 17, 2018 at 10:38 am John Altevogt

      True, you know my biases. I believe that editorial writers are an anachronism, good, bad, conservative, or liberal, that most papers can no longer afford. Far better to hire more journalists to do what us peons can’t do and that’s create original news stories. I applaud The Star’s team for their work on governmental transparency.


  4. on April 16, 2018 at 8:20 pm Mark Peavy

    The KCPD could do the public a big favor: Provide us with clear, concise definitions of “suspect” and “person of interest.” By any common-sense definitions, Jungerman had to fit at least one of those words.


    • on April 16, 2018 at 8:48 pm jimmycsays

      We’ll never see that, Mark; they want to keep it loosey-goosey and be able to adjust case by case. As you know, they did the same thing with the Indian Creek killer. They had video of a guy walking in the area about the time of the Darby murder, and they said they wanted to talk to him because he might have information. They said he was not a suspect. Turned out, of course, he was the guy.


      • on April 16, 2018 at 9:07 pm Mark Peavy

        You may be right. But, the more loosey-goosey they are, the harder it is for the public to believe what the KCPD says. (For that matter, the bad guys may be a little skeptical, too.)


  5. on April 19, 2018 at 9:39 pm John Altevogt

    Mark, Bad guys are bad guys because they think they’re smart enough to get away with it. Jungerman is the perfect example. He couldn’t wait to run his mouth once they said he wasn’t a suspect. Thanks for the tape, David.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: