• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Newspapers from near and far dispatched reporters to cover the Table Rock Lake tragedy
While the murder case against David Jungerman still appears strong, other charges against him are ebbing »

On non-clarifying clarifications and uncorrected corrections

July 24, 2018 by jimmycsays

Another day and another tortured clarification/correction in The Star.

With good reason, The Star is promoting on its website its full coverage of last week’s “duck” disaster in Branson. As I said in my last post, The Star has done an excellent job on the story, throwing at least half of its metro staff at it. Today, however, it ran a clarification that can only be described as maddening.

For decades, The Star has had a stupid policy of not repeating, in corrections and clarifications, the original error or problematic wording.

What this does is leave readers scratching their heads and wondering exactly what the paper got wrong in the first place.

And maybe that’s what The Star wants: to plant seeds of confusion in order to airbrush the original sin.

…Let’s break this down by printing today’s clarification and then working backwards to the original sin.

Here goes…

“An article in the July 21 edition on a federal agency’s warnings about duck boats like the one that sank at Table Rock Lake should have clarified that Ripley Entertainment bought the Ride the Ducks operation in 2017.”

…Now, I’ll bet those of you who didn’t see this “clarification” earlier are wondering what impression the Saturday story left that warranted this.

Wouldn’t that be helpful to the reader?

And, hey, isn’t that part of what a newspaper is supposed to do — un-complicate things?

So, I went back to the Saturday story about warnings issued by the National Transportation Safety Board regarding duck boats, and I found the part that triggered the clarification. Here’s the key paragraph…

“Ride the Ducks would open in Philadelphia, and a year later, Herschend Family Entertainment would become Ride the Ducks’ sole owner. Herschend Family Entertainment was founded by Jack and Pete Herschend, the creators of Silver Dollar City in the Ozarks.”

The story does not mention Ripley.

Sooooo, what The Star is ostensibly clarifying today is the fact that Saturday’s story left the impression that Herschend Family Entertainment is the current owner of Ride the Ducks.

I guess it’s asking too much of The Star to clarify — really clarify — the point by simply saying…

“An article in the July 21 edition on a federal agency’s warnings about duck boats like the one that sank at Table Rock Lake left the impression that Herschend Family Entertainment owns the Ride the Ducks operation in Branson. However, another operator, Ripley Entertainment, bought the operation in 2017.”

Just like that, The Star could have explained the problem with the original story and, at the same time, set the record unequivocally straight. Instead, it chose, as it has for years, to tiptoe around the problem and, in the process, further cloud the skies.

This decades-old approach to clarifications and corrections is, simply, ridiculous. Common sense should dictate adopting a system that clarifies what needs to be clarified and corrects what needs to be corrected. All in all, the paper’s screwy policy seems, to me, to spring from the old adage, “If you can’t convince them, confuse them.”

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 23 Comments

23 Responses

  1. on July 24, 2018 at 4:25 pm Michael Round

    Well said!


    • on July 24, 2018 at 4:31 pm jimmycsays

      Thanks, Mike.


  2. on July 24, 2018 at 4:58 pm Bob Kennedy

    Thank you for saving the paper from itself. The Star ought to be paying you to this day.


  3. on July 24, 2018 at 4:58 pm Kevin Catalano

    On the mark as usual, Fitz. Reminds me of a little kid who cannot admit making a mistake. Time for The Star to put on its “big boy” pants with corrections.


    • on July 24, 2018 at 5:23 pm jimmycsays

      Thanks, Bob and Kevin…The truth is, though, the more I urge them to change, the less likely it is that constructive improvement will take place. The last thing they’re going to do is let themselves get “pushed around” by a pesky blogger. No, they’re going to keep plunging ahead into the darkness.


      • on July 25, 2018 at 3:31 pm Michael Round

        This clarification / correction answers one question I’ve had: why did Steve Paul, who appears in most every article, conduct private inspections on the Ducks in 2017? These were done on behalf of Ripley prior to their purchasing the Ducks. And though he apparently made note of the engine design flaw, nowhere in his official report to Ripley did he comment on the canopy – clearly the most dangerous element in the boat. And then the Coast Guard added their stamp of approval with a February inspection.


  4. on July 24, 2018 at 8:35 pm Michael Round

    “State officials said the Coast Guard regulates such craft; its officials did not immediately respond to requests for more information. Spokesmen said the Department of Transportation doesn’t regulate duck boats because they’re amphibious, and the Department of Public Safety doesn’t in this case because it’s a commercial vessel, as opposed to a recreational one.”

    Other sources claim the Coast Guard inspects these boats annually, and the one that sank had been inspected this past February – and passed. The captain also apparently held a Coast Guard Master’s License.


  5. on July 25, 2018 at 4:19 pm Bill Hirt

    On a different but related subject to the Star, I notice the 816 North section has gone missing from the Wednesday paper the past two weeks. Another, I suppose, of what they hope is another invisible cut.


  6. on July 25, 2018 at 10:44 pm gayle

    Jim, please tell me it wasn’t you who sent that fake Trump tweet about Bryant’s. :-)


  7. on July 25, 2018 at 10:55 pm jimmycsays

    Rest assured, I would never do anything like that, Gayle…Besides, I can’t; I’m not on Twitter. What a waste of time and energy…Hard to believe our President has made it his playground. You’d think Turnberry golf course would be sufficient.


    • on July 26, 2018 at 10:15 am gayle

      You do know that smiley symbol means I was kidding, right?


      • on July 26, 2018 at 10:44 am jimmycsays

        Yes, but I still wanted to address Twitter.


  8. on July 28, 2018 at 10:45 am gayle

    It really bugs me that, in both the on-line and electronic versions, The Star blatantly states the feds have “revealed” the on-board video from the duck, then clarify in the copy that we won’t actually be able to see it until after the investigation. Think it’s a very deceptive way to grab attention through a headline.


  9. on July 28, 2018 at 12:20 pm jimmycsays

    I didn’t understand the thrust of that story until I got well into it, Gayle. Like you, I didn’t understand for too long that the reporters were describing a timeline of a video, not the video itself.

    It’s unusual for a timeline, or description, of a video to be released, rather than the video itself. That was the source of the confusion, but the headline writer certainly compounded the situation with the words (as you pointed out), “Feds reveal video.” That sure sounds like they revealed video!

    The lead writer — I believe it was Eric Adler — got the lead right by saying that the duck entered the water when the water was calm, but he should have made it clear in the second paragraph that the National Transportation Safety Board had not released the actual video but had released a “detailed description” of what was in it. The story also should have mentioned early on that this video was not the same as the video that a bystander took — video that got a lot of attention…This is the first inkling many readers probably had that there was additional video from the duck itself.

    All in all, this was a story that required a lot of care and a lot of editing. It didn’t get enough of either.


    • on July 28, 2018 at 2:41 pm gayle

      I believe The Star has entered the clickbait realm. And whatever the print version of that would be called (shades of National Enquirer!).


      • on July 28, 2018 at 3:35 pm jimmycsays

        Just online, Gayle, not in the printed edition…yet.


  10. on July 28, 2018 at 4:35 pm gayle

    I haven’t seen our paper copy of The Star yet today but isn’t it always the same as the eEdition (referring to the “reveal video” headline)?


    • on July 28, 2018 at 4:54 pm jimmycsays

      Yes…My point, though, is the click-bait strategy is obvious in the website version (not “e,” just what you see when you go to kansascity.com), but they aren’t going after “clicks” in the print or digital replica (“e”) edition.

      I don’t think the intention was to mislead on the story we’re talking about — with the goal of getting more readers; it was just not presented as clearly as possible.


    • on July 28, 2018 at 6:21 pm Michael Round

      “Company policy would be to forego water entry if severe weather is approaching the area.”

      The problem with a policy like this is it’s impossible to put into practice. What constitutes “severe”? What is the definition of “approaching”? What is “our area”? How recent does the “alert” need to have been issued? And who is doing the alerting? Local weather? National? Eye-ball it from an I-phone app? How does “Probability” fit into the ultimate question: “Launch or Don’t Launch”?

      Mike


  11. on July 28, 2018 at 6:39 pm jimmycsays

    How about some common sense, like monitoring the forecast and not going in the water if a storm is in the offing?


  12. on July 28, 2018 at 10:22 pm Michael Round

    THE TIMELINE with a couple additional items:
    545: The NWS issues a severe thunderstorm warning for several MO counties NW of Springfield. Taney County (and Table Rock Lake) are not included in the warning. The warning expires at 630.

    628: “Person X”, while monitoring the weather, knows there is no warning for Taney County, and since the warning for surrounding counties will expire at
    630, tells the crew to take the water route first.

    629: The Ride-the-Duck captain makes a comment about looking at the radar map. Likely it was something to the effect, “Looks like we dodged one this time!” The boat begins loading passengers.

    630: The 545 NWS warning (for counties that did not include Taney County) expired. At this point, according to the NWS, THERE IS NO SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WARNING FOR ANY COUNTY IN MISSOURI.

    632: The NWS issues a severe thunderstorm warning for three counties in MO: Taney, Stone, and Barry. Table Rock Lack is specifically mentioned. The warning extends to 7:30.

    633: Probably unaware of this new warning, the boat leaves the terminal and heads toward the boat ramp.

    Likely in here, either “Person X” or the crew became aware of the new warning, and did not enter the water.

    HERE IS THE KEY ITEM:
    645: The NWS issues a severe thunderstorm warning for several counties in MO: included in these counties are specific regions of Stone County (northern) and Barry County (northeastern). Taney County is not included at all in this warning. This new warning is effective until 730. This new warning canceled the previous warning for Taney County.

    650: The Ride-the-Duck captain gives safety instructions at the boat ramp.

    655: The Ride-the-Duck boat enters calm waters. This makes sense, because there is no longer a warning for Table Rock Lake.

    Between 6:56 and 7 p.m. The captain allowed four different children to sit in the driver’s seat, while he observed and assisted.

    7 p.m. and 25 seconds. Whitecaps rapidly appeared on the water and winds increased.

    7 p.m. and 42 seconds. The captain returned to the driver’s seat. The driver lowered both the port and starboard clear plastic side curtains.

    7:01 p.m. The captain made a comment about the storm.

    7:03 p.m. and 15 seconds. The captain made a hand-held radio call, the content of which is currently unintelligible. Likely, his comments were: “What the hell is this – I thought the NWS cancelled the warning for us!”


  13. on July 29, 2018 at 1:19 pm Edward E Scott

    Journalists, eh, writers, ah, people that get into writing for money have always had egos out of proportion to their contributions…(political cartoonists and arts/music/restaurant/gossip critics, bless their heart, are at the top of the list.) You don’t get promoted to these cut throat positions with having a major blind spot.


  14. on July 29, 2018 at 1:32 pm Tom Shrout

    And thank God there are egotists writing and causing us to think.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: