• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« “Common abuse of the conjunction” and other writing sins, as set forth in the century-old Kansas City Star style sheet
Enough! More and better signage and more police needed along I-435 on game days »

Quinton Lucas is arrested for D.U.I. — What might it mean for his mayoral campaign?

October 19, 2018 by jimmycsays

The 2019 Kansas City mayor turn took another sharp turn early this morning.

Oddly, the turn didn’t take place in Kansas City but in downtown Lawrence, KS, where Councilman Quinton Lucas, who teaches at the University of Kansas School of Law, was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence.

About 11:30 p.m. Thursday, a Lawrence police officer approached Lucas’ car, which was parked on Eighth Street, about a block from Massachusetts Street, Lawrence’s main drag.

Lucas may have been asleep at the wheel. I don’t know if the car was running, but I assume it was because if it wasn’t, he probably could not have been charged. Obviously, a vehicle that is running is more dangerous than one that is not.

This morning, Lucas issued a statement on Facebook, saying…

“Last evening, I attended a university event and a post event gathering. I consumed alcohol. At 10:45 p.m., I decided to leave. When I got to my car I decided that I was not prepared to safely drive home to Kansas City. I decided to behave responsibly and wait in my car until it was safe to drive. Apparently, while waiting, I dozed off. I never moved or attempted to drive my car.

“The car was legally parked in a metered parking spot. I never moved my car, never shifted a gear, never released my parking break, and never attempted to move the car in any manner.”

After being booked into the Douglas County Jail, Lucas was released on a $750 bond.

Lucas is one of nine candidates in the mayor’s race, but, obviously, this incident could dramatically change things.

“If he’s found guilty, I think it would doom his campaign,” Clinton Adams, an East Side civic and political activist told me in a phone conversation.

Quinton Lucas

Although Lucas had not established himself as a front runner in the mayor’s race, I wrote recently he was probably the most eloquent and charismatic candidate in the race and was “the kind of candidate who could make big strides in a short time.”

Indicative of his potential up-side, Lucas had been perhaps the candidate most likely to get the support of the black political organization Freedom Inc. With a large number of candidates dividing the vote citywide, Freedom’s endorsement could be crucial to getting a candidate past the April primary and into the June general election. Freedom will deliver thousands of votes for whomever it endorses. No other political organization can come close in terms of producing votes for a particular candidate.

If Lucas is found guilty of D.U.I., it would be very difficult for him to be competitive in the mayor’s race. He would be better off seeking a second term as councilman from the 3rd District at-large and using the next four years to repair the damage and restore his image.

I believe he would be able to bounce back from a D.U.I. conviction — maybe not in this election cycle, but certainly by 2023.

One of his strongest areas of qualification is his educational background. After graduating from the highly regarded Barstow School in south Kansas City, he got his undergraduate degree from Washington University in St. Louis. Then he went to Cornell Law School, in upstate New York, getting his degree in 2009.

If Lucas should withdraw from the race, it would seemingly bolster the prospects of City Council members Scott Taylor, the leading fund-raiser, and Jolie Justus, who got back in the race after Jason Kander bowed out recently because of depression and post traumatic stress disorder.

Clinton Adams, who has close ties to the Freedom Inc. board, said that if Lucas withdrew, it would improve Taylor’s chances of getting Freedom’s backing.

A major factor working in Taylor’s favor, as far as Adams is concerned, is his $13-million  “Revive the East Side” proposal, which the City Council is now considering.

The measure, which last week was advanced by a City Council committee, calls for establishment of a $10-million home improvement fund for repair and rehabilitation and $3 million to preserve or reconstruct dangerous buildings. It would also create a tax credit for employers who hire within the investment area.

Taylor’s plan also has drawn praise from another influential  East Side activist with close ties to Freedom. In a letter to the editor in Thursday’s Kansas City Star, Gwen Grant, president and CEO of the Urban League, said Taylor’s plan would be a big stop toward “creating one Kansas city where all communities thrive and everyone prospers.”

While he might have a good shot at Freedom’s endorsement, however, Taylor would not be assured of it. Like many other people, Adams is concerned about Taylor’s close alignment with developers and development-related entities. Developers and lawyers who represent them have contributed a significant amount of Taylor’s $350,000-plus campaign treasury.

“He’s never seen an (tax) incentive he didn’t like,” Adams said.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

10 Responses

  1. on October 19, 2018 at 1:32 pm Richard F Thomas Jr

    Unfortunately for Councilman Lucas, his statement didn’t also include these key words to describe his actions, “I had not yet placed the key in the ignition.”

    A key in the ignition constitutes an attempt to move the vehicle.

    Do you think he had the LPD deliver him back to his car to resume his slumber?

    All kidding aside, the councilman made a good decision. Stuff happens. He knew driving was not a good option.

    This won’t have any measurable effect on his campaign. It might even help. He followed a bad choice, with a reasoned, good one, he was honest in explaining it, and no one was harmed.


    • on October 19, 2018 at 1:59 pm jimmycsays

      Good point — about the good choice he made — Richard. But I think it will all come down to whether or not he’s convicted of D.U.I. If he is, it’s a field day for his opponents — and very difficult for him to explain it away by saying, “I chose not to drive.”


  2. on October 19, 2018 at 3:57 pm partimusmaximus

    Jimmy I enjoy your blogs especially when they cover the local political scene. My reaction is this. Councilman Lucas is still everything you said he was and more before and after said incident. But, ’tis the nature of politics today suffered by fools like you and me. We quickly adjust our handicapping of ones political future whenever a bad headline appears on said persons behalf. Yet in the new world of politics where we endure contemptible persons such as President Trump, Senator Cruz and so many others who spew venom and hate not to mention media types like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, we should never forget the good ones who are just getting started and need our encouragement if we want a better America. If he stays in or not he will always be a principled and honorable young man who gave up a far more lucrative job practicing law to serve the public. A public where he was raised and often chose to sleep in cars while still a young boy rather than sleep in the streets. Thanks, Quinton, for not drinking and driving. Best to you in the future.


    • on October 19, 2018 at 5:52 pm jimmycsays

      Excellent points, partimus. I’m sure he’s kicking himself for starting the car (if, indeed, that’s what he did) and for having a few too many at the party.

      I only came close to getting a D.U.I. once in my drinking days. It was in the early 70s, as I recall, and I was coming home from Westport, driving south on Brookside. I lived on Grand, a few doors south of 51st, and as I approached 51st, I saw the lights flashing behind me. I turned right on 51st, made an immediate left on Grand and stopped in front of my house. I got out of my car and, fumbling with my wallet, dropped my license on the ground. I told the officer, “I live right here,” pointing at my house. After verifying my address on the license, he looked at me, and in a slight tone of disgust, said “You’re drunk as a skunk, but since you made it home, I’m going to give you a break.”

      It was one of the luckiest breaks of my life. Several years later I quit drinking, and for decades I’ve been the permanent designated driver for my wife and friends who like their wine.


  3. on October 20, 2018 at 9:12 am Mark Peavy

    1) I was very sad to see this story. I have viewed Lucas as a bright, conscientious public servant. Also, he has been very open to thoughtfully communicating with me and others on his Twitter account.

    2) He is certainly entitled to the presumption of innocence until this matter is resolved in court.

    3) That said, I have to admit to being troubled by a few items. For openers, I wish he had forthrightly admitted that his car was running when the police approached him. (The officer’s audio was played on TV yesterday, and the officer states that the engine is running.)

    4) This is from the Star article: “(Lucas) said he had two beers before the event ended about 10 p.m.” “He said he had perhaps another half beer before getting in his car about 10:45 p.m.” In all candor, I have a hard time believing he only had 2.5 beers the entire evening.


    • on October 20, 2018 at 11:12 am jimmycsays

      You’ve put to rest a key issue, Mark — the fact that the engine was running. Thank you.

      Boy, how Quinton must be kicking himself for starting the car!

      …I did some online checking, and came across a website called Nolo, which publishes do-it-yourself legal books. According to Nolo, Kansas law appears to allow a charge even if the car is not running. Here’s what Nolo says…

      The statute defines DUI as “operating or attempting to operate” a vehicle while under the influence or with a prohibited BAC. Kansas courts have said this includes any “overt act to engage” and does not require movement of the vehicle. So while driving is sufficient for a conviction, it isn’t required.


    • on October 20, 2018 at 6:54 pm gayle

      He must watch “Cops.” That’s what the perps always say: “two beers.”


      • on October 20, 2018 at 11:15 pm jimmycsays

        Why doesn’t somebody just say, “I had two giant margaritas followed by a few Coronas”?


  4. on October 20, 2018 at 11:18 pm John D Altevogt

    I’m so sick of all the boy scout politics. What bullshit. Is there anyone here who hasn’t driven after having “2.5 beers”? And the hypocrisy surrounding the Kavanaugh hearings was simply unbelievable. How many young boys haven’t tried to cop a feel or drink too much at a party? If you’re claiming you didn’t you’re either a liar or you had one pathetic childhood.

    JFK was known as Mattress Jack as a senator. LBJ was a womanizer, a racist and a drunk. There’s a movie out about FDR’s infidelities and, of course, we’re all too familiar with Teddy, Bobby and Bill’s womanizing. Reverends King and Jackson were also known for being a little too randy with the opposite sex.

    Bottom line, if this guy is honest (a rarity in KC) who cares if he gets convicted, or not as long as he’s sober when he makes political decisions? Incidentally, The Star must not care about drinking since they endorsed a WYCO judge in a race where the only issue was the many allegations that the judge was drunk on the bench.


  5. on October 21, 2018 at 3:11 pm Mark Peavy

    It never fails to amaze me that so many people attempt to minimize the seriousness of impaired driving. We’re not talking about something trivial like tossing a candy wrapper on the sidewalk. In this particular case, we’re talking about getting in the driver’s seat and starting the engine even though Lucas admitted he was in no condition to safely drive.

    Lucas himself stated the bottom line pretty well: “I do want to make clear that I certainly think driving under the influence is a serious charge, lest anyone think I’m saying this is unimportant. I don’t,” he said. He could have added drunk drivers kill about 10,000 people each year.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: