• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Don’t bet on the dolphin (McClatchy) ingesting another whale (Tribune Publishing)
Within about 14 months, two big-name City Hall reporters have moved on to other assignments »

Need help deciphering Tuesday’s election ballot? Here you go…

November 5, 2018 by jimmycsays

Election Day is almost upon us, and although a lot of information has been put out, the Missouri ballot is going to confuse a lot of people going to the polls tomorrow.

In a phone call last week, Shawn Kieffer, a director at the Kansas City Election Board, described the 42-question Kansas City ballot as “horrifying” and said he expected some voters to spend 30 minutes or more poring over it.

But at least three sources of information can help you have a low-anxiety voting experience:

:: The League of Women Voters has an online voters guide that summarizes the issues and lets people print out their own “sample” ballots, which they can take to the polls and use to register votes on their official ballots.

:: I expect The Star to publish a list of its recommendations for both Missouri and Kansas at least by tomorrow morning…In my experience, The Star has the best interests of voters in mind, and I usually follow its recommendations.

:: Finally, you’ve got me. I’ve studied the ballot carefully and voted absentee last week, and I covered elections for most of my 36 year-career at The Star.

Here, then, are my recommendations on the major races and issues on the Kansas City ballot. (I believe the only place where my ballot and The Star’s will be at odds is on the proposed Jackson County Charter amendments. The Star is recommending some amendments be approved and some be rejected, but I’m recommending all seven be rejected.)

U.S. Senator — Claire McCaskill (God spare us from the dangerous geek running against her.)

State Auditor — Nicole Galloway (No reason I know of not to give her a second term.)

U.S. Rep. — Emanuel Cleaver II (He’s flawed, but he’s ours. Plus, never forget he snapped KC out of the inferiority complex that had settled in during the 12 years Dick Berkley was mayor.)

Jackson County Executive — Frank White (He’s bad but there’s no viable alternative.)

Jackson County Sheriff — Darryl Forte (Guess we’ve gotta give this guy a few more years in office so he can get two public pensions.)

Jackson County Circuit and Associate Circuit Court judges — “Yes” to retain every judge. (Judicial retentions always confuse people because they don’t know who the judges are and if they’re making the right move when they vote “yes.” Don’t worry; none of these judges has done anything remotely scandalous.) 

Constitutional Amendment No. 1 — “Yes” to placing limits on campaign contributions for state legislative candidates and to limit gifts that legislators and their employees can accept from individuals or entities. (It’s about time.)

Constitutional Amendment No. 2 — “Yes” to legalizing medical marijuana and imposing a 4-percent tax on sales, with the revenue to be used to provide care for military veterans and to administer and regulate marijuana retail facilities. (Of the three marijuana proposals on the ballot, this one has the backing of longtime legalization activists; trust them.)

Constitutional Amendment No. 3 — “No” to legalizing medical marijuana and imposing a 15-percent tax on sales to fund a cancer research institute headed by Brad Bradshaw, a Springfield lawyer and physician. (This is a power grab by Bradshaw, who likes to put up big billboards of himself.)  

Constitutional Amendment No. 4 — “Yes” to removing language from the Constitution that limits bingo-game advertising. A court has ruled the prohibition unenforceable. (If lottery advertising hasn’t killed us, we can live with bingo advertising.) 

Missouri Proposition B — “Yes” to raising the minimum wage to $8.60 an hour, with an 85-cent-per-hour increase each year to 2023, when the minimum wage would be $12 an hour. (Investment in low-end workers will lead to long-term economic growth.)  

Missouri Proposition C — “No” to legalizing medical marijuana and imposing a 2-percent tax on sales, with the proceeds going for veterans’ services, early childhood education and public safety in cities with medical marijuana stores. (Consider the source: This proposal is brought to you by the Missouri General Assembly.)

Missouri Proposition D — “Yes” to raising the 17-cent-per-gallon gas tax by 2 1/2 cents per year for four years — 10 cents over the four years — with most of the proceeds going for highway and road and bridge construction and maintenance. The ballot says $288 million a year would go for “Missouri state law enforcement” and $123 million a year would go for road construction, but that is misleading because the Missouri Transportation Department finances the Highway Patrol. Revenue from the higher gas tax would free up the money that has been going to the Highway Patrol and would redirect it to roads and bridges. (Finally, a road-improvement tax increase to be paid by those who use the roads, including those damned truckers.)

Jackson County Charter amendments (Questions 1 through 7) — “No” on all. (As you will see, the ballot language is maddeningly vague on proposed pay increases for county officials. In addition, several of the questions are aimed at increasing the County Legislature’s power and reducing that of the County Executive…I believe it is best to continue centralizing power with the County Executive so voters can ultimately hold one person accountable for the county’s overall direction.)

Kansas City Public Library question — “Yes” to increasing the property tax levy by eight cents, from about 47 cents to 55 cents per $100 of assessed valuation. It would be the first such increase in 22 years. (Not only is this a meritorious proposal, its backers came up with the best political yard sign of the 2018 general election campaign. Tilting one book against the others was a stroke of genius.)

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 16 Comments

16 Responses

  1. on November 5, 2018 at 5:34 am Michael Round

    League of Women Voters? KC Star? You? At least you openly acknowledge your bias, while these others expend considerable energy maintaining a nonpartisan veneer.

    I do appreciate the link to vote411.org. While the only recourse against the Star’s charade is economic, vote411.org can “neither support or oppose a candidate”, but that’s exactly what they’ve done for the Kansas Governor and US House of Representative races with their presentation of choices.

    I’ve made screen shots of both if you’d like.

    Mike


    • on November 5, 2018 at 8:29 am jimmycsays

      The League of Women voters is my third favorite — after the American and National.


  2. on November 5, 2018 at 7:17 am kansas karl

    Pretty half a**ed election predictions. Those west of the state line don’t deserve your analysis? The economic engine for this area is not worth your time? Pretty typical of big city reporter, ignore the suburbs only people live there.


    • on November 5, 2018 at 8:27 am jimmycsays

      Kansas? The economic engine? The only major attraction Kansas has helped the metro with — ever — was Union Station renovation. Otherwise, Missouri (mostly Kansas City and Jackson County) pays and Kansans come over and enjoy the fruits. If it weren’t for Kansas City, there wouldn’t be any suburbs.

      Also, I didn’t make predictions; I tried to offer explanations. I don’t know enough about the various Kansas ballots to offer explanations. But if I was living there I’d vote Democratic all the way, even nerdy Paul Davis.


      • on November 5, 2018 at 8:48 am Michael Round

        This is why “campaign finance reform” has zero effect on elections, and why the “It’s your duty to vote” movement is a sham.

        “Who do I vote for?”

        “It doesn’t matter who’s running or what the issue is, ‘vote Democrat all the way'” (or Republican).

        It doesn’t take a lot of money to communicate that message! It would be interesting to see election results if “Party” was not included on the ballot.


  3. on November 5, 2018 at 8:44 am Richard Freiburghouse

    Jim, thanks for the info, it was very helpful.


    • on November 5, 2018 at 9:05 am jimmycsays

      I’m glad it helped, Richard.


  4. on November 5, 2018 at 10:49 am Mark Peavy

    There is no way I can bring myself to vote for Constitutional Amendment No. 1. The language describing the redistricting process is so poorly worded that it is virtually impossible to understand the process being described.

    Specifically, I am referring to Subsection 3(c)(1)(b). More specifically, I am referring to the paragraph which begins “To this end, the non-partisan state demographer…”; this is the paragraph which attempts to explain the mathematical standards for redistricting.

    I challenge people to read that one paragraph before they vote. After reading it, if they think they understand the process being described, then by all means vote “yes.” But, if after reading it they are very confused, then they should vote “no” and insist that another attempt be made in a future election to develop better language.

    Click to access 2018-048.pdf


    • on November 5, 2018 at 11:53 am jimmycsays

      To your credit, Mark, you’re getting into that proposal much deeper than the average voter will. Regarding redistricting, the basic ballot language — which is all that 99.9 percent of voters will go by — simply says the amendment will “change process and criteria for redrawing state legislative districts during reapportionment.”

      That won’t set off an alarm with many people; it didn’t with me.


      • on November 5, 2018 at 12:11 pm Mark Peavy

        “To your credit, Mark, you’re getting into that proposal much deeper than the average voter will.”

        Even beyond the “average voter”, I wonder if the members of the Star editorial board read that one paragraph and thought it was clear. Frankly, I doubt they gave that language (as well as the rest of the amendment pertaining to redistricting, for that matter) much more attention than 99.9% of voters. And that’s disappointing.


  5. on November 5, 2018 at 11:16 am Tracy Thomas

    So you voted absentee??? When you know you will be in town? Even if you are substitute teaching, the polls will be open before and after work. Isn’t that out of integrity, Fitz?
    And your cynical endorsements or recommendations remind all of us in Kansas why we are so darn glad we left.


    • on November 5, 2018 at 11:46 am jimmycsays

      Border War rages…We love our respective “home” states.

      (I “retired” from substitute teaching last spring, Tracy. One of Jim Henson’s many stupid moves as SMSD superintendent was to contract the sub system out to Kelly Services, the temp agency. I had been a proud employee of SMSD and had no interest in being a Kelly employee.)


      • on November 5, 2018 at 1:10 pm Tracy Thomas

        KCK is hiring, and desperate.

        As for voting absentee in MO, it is illegal, and incredibly smart! Those lines will be insane.


  6. on November 5, 2018 at 1:20 pm jimmycsays

    When I told Patty I intended to vote absentee, she said, “What? Are you too important to wait in line like everyone else?”

    That left me without an answer, other than I just don’t want to wait in line while some people ahead of me take half an hour to vote!


  7. on November 8, 2018 at 8:49 am mikerice64

    God didn’t spare us.


    • on November 10, 2018 at 12:13 pm gayle

      It’s a test. P.S. We’re not doing very well.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 512 other followers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    <span>%d</span> bloggers like this: