It’s been a long time since a local politician stood up to Local 42 of the International Association of Fire Fighters, and I wasn’t surprised, reading this morning’s KC Star, to see the person standing up to them now is Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker.
Peters Baker is one of the few Kansas City or Jackson County elected officials with a spine stiff enough to challenge the firefighters.
The issue is a new contract between the county and Local 42, which represents the assistant prosecutors working under Baker. The assistant prosecutors are one of a dozen bargaining units represented by Local 42, whose largest constituency, of course, is the 1,000-plus staff of the Kansas City, MO, Fire Department.
Two main issues are on the table. First, Local 42 wants to raise starting prosecuting attorneys pay to more than $61,000 — up from the current $50,000.
Second, Local 42 wants the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service to handle disputes that go to arbitration, while Peters Baker wants to continue with retired judges doing the job.
Local 42 officials don’t think retired judges can be impartial because of their connection with the county, and Peters Baker, on the other hand, said the federal mediation service would be too costly.
I don’t think Local 42 is off base in asking for salaries of $61,000 or more for prosecutors — assuming, that is, we’re talking about full-time prosecutors. But her position that using the mediation service would be much more expensive than retired judges strikes me as very logical, and I hope she prevails on that point.
As usual, however, Local 42 officials are making outrageous statements and figuratively frothing at the mouth.
For example, Local 42 president Tim Dupin alleges Peters Baker is trying to “bust the union.”
What balderdash. (And how irresponsible for The Star to put such hyperventilation in its headline).
Overall, Local 42 might represent a couple of thousand union workers. The prosecutor’s office probably doesn’t have more than 30 assistant prosecutors. So, how in the world could a contract involving a few dozen workers “bust” a union the size of Local 42?
In its skirmish with Peters Baker, Local 42 is getting help from its umbrella organization, the Greater Kansas City AFL-CIO, which has about 50 affiliated unions. In support of Local 42, the AFL-CIO has taken the step of voting to stop contributing money to the Missouri Democratic Party, which Peters Baker has headed since last month.
According to The Star, nearly 14 percent of the state party’s contributions last year came from unions, so if the labor stalemate continues very long, it could set the party’s fund-raising back significantly.
This could also have political ramifications for Peters Baker, who probably has statewide political aspirations. The fact that she appears to be putting the county’s interests before her own is another reason to applaud her pluck in this matter.
**
Local 42 has long been used to getting its way.
Going back to Local 42 president Louie Wright, who served as union president for about 30 years before retiring in 2012, the firefighters have always played hardball, holding in their back pocket the ultimate threat of a firefighter strike in Kansas City. They went on strike in 1975 and four years later engaged in a work slowdown, and both events threw residents into a state of anxiety.
Here’s why Local 42 almost invariably prevails:
:: Their leaders are relentless. Every benefit they can extract and every dollar in pay they can get for their members benefits all current firefighters and the legions of firefighter “brothers” who come after them. One big benefit of pay raises is higher pensions, which are tied to salary levels.
:: They are a powerful political force. They vote, and they campaign hard for their candidates. More than 25 years ago the union filed and won a lawsuit that gave it and its members the right to be active politically, including contributing to candidates. (Before that, firefighters hid behind the skirts of an organization called Taxpayers Unlimited, which they contended was populated by their wives and other relatives.)
:: Most elected officials don’t want to tangle with them because…well, see above…Candidates who have the backing of Local 42 generally have better chances of winning than those who don’t. As a result, when push comes to shove, elected officials — primarily City Council members — usually back down quickly, sometimes after initially declaring they will fight tooth and nail to defend taxpayers’ interests.
:: Finally, the vast majority of bureaucrats charged with negotiating with Local 42 (such as personnel directors) don’t have much incentive to engage in a protracted fight. In most cases, the bureaucrats aren’t going to get pay or pension increases regardless of how disputes are resolved. Most bureaucrats are putting in their time and trying to keep their powder dry until they can retire and start drawing their own pensions.
**
Thus, it’s rare to see a prominent elected official go to the mat with Local 42.
But it sure is refreshing, and it warms my heart.
We Jackson County taxpayers can be grateful for Jean Peters Baker’s display of guts. She is the kind of politician who deserves our unconditional support now and going forward. I hope some day she’ll carry the title of governor or U.S. Senator.
I hope she prevails. Few people have the wherewithal to do it, but I think she can. They will cause her untold grief in the process.
“Untold grief.” Perfect description, Regina. (Hope you’re warm in Oaxaca. It’s a mess here.)
Huh? Dupin wants to cripple the state Democratic party to teach Peters Baker a lesson? And, who or which party benefits from that?
Quick, somebody give that man a gun so he can shoot himself in the foot!
Very good, BB.
“When push comes to shove, elected officials — primarily City Council members — usually back down quickly, sometimes after initially declaring they will fight tooth and nail to defend taxpayers’ interests.”
That certainly seems to be true. It would be nice if the wages, pension benefits, and work rules for the firefighters and police would generate some serious discussion among the mayor and city council candidates prior to the election. We’ll see how many candidates are willing to directly confront those issues.
You’re onto something there, Mark…Recently I spoke with Russ Welch, managing director of the Polsinelli law firm, and he said principals in his firm were concerned about the city’s long-term pension obligations. In deciding which candidates the firm would back in the primary (and he said it would be a few), he said he and his partners would want to hear what the candidates had to say about that.
To me, that’s a good sign. With its political and contributory muscle, his firm can help set the campaign agenda. I imagine very few, if any, of the candidates would seek to wade into the pension morass if they weren’t pushed by people with the ability to force their hands.
That’s good to hear about Polsinelli’s efforts; I hope they are successful in getting the candidates to talk about pensions. In the meantime, if you find any candidates that have put their positions about such matters on their websites, let us know. I haven’t found any, but maybe I missed it.
I’m glad to hear you’re checking; I haven’t been.