• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Another guy, this time a cop, driving like there’s no tomorrow for the rest of us
The Miami Herald’s Julie K. Brown sticks a knife in Twitter and Facebook »

The proposed GateHouse/Gannett merger does not bode well for quality journalism

August 10, 2019 by jimmycsays

I presume most of you are aware of the recent announcement that GateHouse Media and Gannett are seeking to merge, with the lesser-known GateHouse being the majority owner and the new entity operating under the highly identifiable Gannett name.

If shareholders approve the deal, the new Gannett would have more than 260 daily papers in the U.S. along with more than 300 weeklies.

By comparison, McClatchy, owner of The Kansas City Star since 2006, owns 29 daily papers.

Analysts, as well as leaders of GateHouse and Gannett, say the main motivation for the merger is for the combined companies to save hundreds of millions of dollars a year by reducing overlapping costs and buying time to implement the long-sought plan of a “digital transformation.”

(GateHouse C.E.O. Mike Reed said he expected the bulk of the savings to come from reducing business-side headcount and buying out duplicative vendor contracts, but with all the editorial-side layoffs that have taken place the last 15 years, it would not be surprising to see many more reporters, editors, photographers and graphic artists getting axed.)

All the big chains, including McClatchy, have been banking on “digital transformation,” but it is really working for only three papers — The New York Times, The Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal. It’s no coincidence that those papers are dedicated primarily to national (and, in the case of The Times, international) news and business. I know of only one major metropolitan paper, The Boston Globe, that has had any significant success in the realm of “digital only” sales.

Chain executives’ dreams of “going digital” are now going on 20 years old, and yet all the chains have been losing more and more money. As leading newspaper industry analyst Ken Doctor said in a story on the Newsonomics website, “In a deal that is all about cash flow, the merger partners face the fact that, on an operating basis, too much cash is flowing… backward.”

It’s been my contention that while chasing the elusive, and perhaps apparitional, dream of digital transformation, some chains — with McClatchy being the ignominious industry leader on this front– have let their print products go to seed.

The Star is a prime example. The print edition is treated almost as an afterthought, even though it probably continues to generate a majority of revenue. With a few exceptions, the reporting is now more superficial than ever; weekday papers are embarrassingly thin and unstructured; and virtually no effort is being made to augment stories with photos and graphics. (A Star photographer who got laid off last year wrote on this website recently that the paper is down to four photographers, from a peak of more than 20.)

**

I believe turning its back on print has been a big mistake by McClatchy. The hoped-for digital transformation at the local level is looking more and more like a pipe dream, not just here but in almost every metro area. There are simply too many other ways for people to get whatever information — not necessarily news — they are interested in.

Is McClatchy too far down the “digital transformation” road to turn back now? Maybe. But I wish McClatchy or some other chain would re-dedicate itself to putting out quality print products. I believe McClatchy, or whatever chain it might be, would find that tens of thousands of people in a given community — maybe hundreds of thousands, even — would pay premium rates for high-quality print products.

Of course, that also means McClatchy (or whatever chain it might be) would have to commit itself to reconnecting with the communities it serves. That’s the biggest tragedy of corporate journalism — the loss of the proprietary feeling that people used to have about their local papers.

As Bernie Lunzer, president of the national union that represents journalists, told The Washington Post, “Creating real ties to the community — that’s the only way these things (local papers) are going to work.”

So, let me put the question I wrote above a different way:

Is McClatchy too far down the “digital transformation” road to double back and recommit itself to publishing quality print products?

The answer is “no.” But it won’t happen for two reasons. First, McClatchy leadership is rigidly flailing at the digital transformation that is not happening, and, second, McClatchy executives are not the least bit interested in reconnecting with the communities they serve. (And “serve” is putting it loosely.)

**

So, looking into the crystal ball, I see McClatchy being acquired by another chain headed down the road of false hopes and idle dreams, with its print products dribbling to a halt and its websites focusing on crime, weather and sports (more Kansas City Chiefs news!) leading the way.

Oh, my, what a mess.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments

15 Responses

  1. on August 10, 2019 at 6:55 pm Michael Waller

    Jim: your predictions are right on target. McClatchy is too far on down the digital road to invest millions in a quality print product. By the way, the Gateway/Gannett deal adds $1.78 billion in debt, with interest payments at 13%.


    • on August 10, 2019 at 7:28 pm jimmycsays

      It’s always reassuring when your former editor thinks you’re on target!

      I sure wish there were more active newspaper-industry leaders like you today — leaders focused on the basics: Quality journalism and strong community ties.

      (Ken Doctor says that gargantuan loan carries an 11.5 percent interest rate. Sky high, in any event.)


  2. on August 10, 2019 at 11:42 pm John Altevogt

    Today we learned that McClatchy asked the IRS to give it some relief on pension payments and folks with knowledge of this kind of thing tell me that they give McClatchy 18 months to burn through the money from the sale of their properties (maybe another week for the yard sale of the desks, etc.)>

    The issue here is that the only people doing news profitably are those with a synergistic means of making money, i.e TV stations and cable providers. As I’ve pointed out before, check Facebook to see where people are getting their stories and who has the most followers and The Star is buried by even the lowest rated local TV station. So there is no way they can even compete on the digital level.

    Personally, I find this very sad since I grew up in a home that took both the morning and the evening papers.


    • on August 11, 2019 at 7:38 am Gayla Hattaway

      I grew up in a home where my parents were contract Times/Star carriers and, as an adult, have started and canceled more KC Star subscriptions than I care to say. The Star’s insane sliding scale of subscription prices drives away even their most loyal subscribers. They make it nearly impossible to support them.


      • on August 11, 2019 at 9:11 am jimmycsays

        That is so true, Gayla…People will pay a premium price for a product — any product — that they like and is consistently good. But only a few will pay premium prices for products that have deteriorated to shadows of what they once were. Most people who now have print subscriptions have them because they can’t envision getting up in the morning without being able to hold the morning paper in their hands.

        As I’ve said before, the only reason we take the print edition is because I get a $14-a-month retiree rate. (Personnel did not inform me of that rate when I retired, and for several years I paid the retail price.)

        As far as I know, there’s no “sliding scale,” as such, just arbitrary rates based on consumers’ persistence and negotiating skills. It’s a prescription for failure.


  3. on August 11, 2019 at 12:49 pm kansas karl

    The change happening in media/news delivery/social interaction is much like the change in music mid-century. The Star and old-school print-delivery systems are much like the old big band/variety show promoters, caught with an affluent older demographic still willing to pay some price for hard copy news. But the young — the next consumers of media/news delivery/social interaction — would rather consult the $1,000 computer/phone/media player in their own pocket than wait for a waste of valuable natural resources to show up on the front stoop.

    Rock ‘n Roll won, and the cultural landscape changed. To survive, I think The Star has to separate into a print division and over-serve those who want the printed product and a digital side, emphasizing primarily local news, to serve the young, streaming consumers. There are two distinct audiences. Trying to serve both waters down and delivers a product no one is satisfied to use.


    • on August 11, 2019 at 1:57 pm jimmycsays

      I think that’s a good analysis, Karl, and that you’re onto something with your proposed two-pronged solution. I doubt, however, that McClatchy executives have spent significant time reflecting on this; they are hell-bent on the digital transformation, which has a nice ring to it but isn’t playing out well at all.

      Generally, leaders in the newspaper industry are a bunch of lemmings, following the latest trends with blinders firmly in place and no looking back or re-evaluating.

      Maybe some chain will see the value in a two-pronged approach and digress from the pack. If such a movement produced even limited success, it could start a new and better trend the other chains would quickly jump to join.


  4. on August 11, 2019 at 8:27 pm John Altevogt

    My own bias is for a newspaper that is strongly oriented towards investigative pieces however, The Kansan under Roy Teicher tried that approach and only wound up alienating the local powers that be and in the end didn’t effect their readership at all. If anything, it hastened the paper’s demise.

    So the question arises, how in a city JFK Jr called a top 10 corrupt city, who covers the corruption? Stories of that nature are not suited to local news broadcasts where a minute is considered a lengthy piece. Indeed, I was interviewed by KSHB about two weeks ago on a property tax story (good story, Missouri corporation given ludicrous tax breaks by the WYCO assessors office) and it just appeared. The reporter has it nailed, solid research and covered his bases and yet no air time available for over a week for the story to run.

    https://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/investigations/just-not-fair-developers-get-tax-break-at-kck-subdivison


    • on August 12, 2019 at 5:27 pm Julius Karash

      That is a good story, John.


      • on August 12, 2019 at 5:30 pm jimmycsays

        I fully agree…And, John, don’t worry about it taking a couple of weeks for KSHB to run the story: It’s what we call an “evergreen”; it didn’t have to run immediately to have impact.


  5. on August 11, 2019 at 8:47 pm Peg Nichols

    Maybe there is some comparison here with the book industry in the past 15-20 years. Despite audio books (which are great for long car trips), and electronic “books” such as Kindle and Nook (did I read recently that Barnes and Noble are giving up on Nook?) a fair percentage of people still want something solid to hold in their hands, even carry around with them? Something you don’t have to keep charging the battery for?


    • on August 12, 2019 at 5:18 pm Steve Porter

      John, the agricultural deferment that is at the heart of Kansas’ tax inequity goes back decades. I spent months compiling data for a story I wrote for the Olathe Daily News back in late summer of 1996. The focus then was on ag deferments for undeveloped property in commercially zoned areas, but now the development lobby in Kansas has extended that to residentially zoned properties. Back then it cost the rest of Johnson County’s taxpayers more than $6 million in taxes that individual property owners had to make up through the shortage. One enterprising former Olathe mayor and his sons were planting pine trees on small vacant lots in the heart of Olathe’s commercial area to reap tax advantages of pennies on the dollar. I also pointed out that a property nearby was so small you couldn’t park a wheat combine on it, yet it reaped a hefty break. The Star did virtually the same story – even using the former mayor and his sons as an example – a few years later. The reporter didn’t do the research, however, as all of it had been done by me.


  6. on August 12, 2019 at 3:56 pm jimmycsays

    Gayla — A former carrier sent an email saying there is a sliding scale on subscription prices. It is based essentially on two factors — zip code (for income level) and how long you’ve been a subscriber. The idea on the latter is that the longer you’ve been taking the paper, the more you’ll be willing to pay and the less likely you’ll be to cancel.


    • on August 12, 2019 at 8:51 pm Gayla

      Jim, thanks for that info. Too bad The Star’s algorithms identified me as someone who in March was willing to pay $165.46 a year for Wed & Sun delivery and by June, apparently, I’d come into some serious cash because my bill was $507.80 a year for the same two papers a week. That’s just insulting and predatory, in my opinion. They should also have known that I have a long history of canceling my subscriptions when they piss me off.


      • on August 12, 2019 at 9:51 pm jimmycsays

        It all goes back to your original point: “They make it nearly impossible to support them.”

        They’re so dumb. They ought to set a price and stick to it. They could establish categories, like The Times does, for subscriber discounts, such as teachers.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 562 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 562 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: