Ouch!
KC voters are giving Mayor Quinton Lucas, the City Council and Kansas City’s black ministers a good spanking…Well deserved, too.
With 99 percent of the votes in, the count on Question 5 was 31,274 “yes” (got back to The Paseo) and 13,909 “no.” That’s a percentage difference of 69 to 31.
The roots of this go back to 2018, when the black ministers began insisting on changing the name of The Paseo, one of our most beloved boulevards, to Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard.
A committee subsequently appointed by then-Mayor Sly James wasn’t too keen on the idea; the Kansas City Parks Department and the Board of Parks and Recreation Commissioners didn’t like it; and, most important, the vast majority of city residents who testified before the committee didn’t want it.
With the issue stalled, the ministers threatened to gather enough signatures to force the Council to put the issue on an election ballot. In the face of that threat — and with municipal elections on the horizon — the Council capitulated, and in January, the council approved the name change on an 8-4 vote.
But today it was the citizens who got the last word.
Hats off to the determined Save The Paseo group, which went out and got enough signatures to get the issue on the ballot and, with a fierce wind of voter discontentment at its back, charged to victory.
Look out for this group. They organized effectively, and, having proved to themselves that grassroots activism works, they might mobilize on other issues. You can check out their Facebook page here.
While voters and the Save The Paseo group are the big winners, the road is littered with big losers. Start with Lucas, who, in his first big issue election out of the box, suffered a humiliating defeat.
Move to the black ministers, who have too often gotten their way in Kansas City by screaming and howling.
Throw in the black political group Freedom Inc., which was reduced to milquetoast without the benefit of big bucks from candidates or special interest groups.
Finally, toss in The Kansas City Star editorial board, which lined up with the ministers mainly because, well, that’s where the board thought was the politically correct place to be.
…I could tell, and predicted in yesterday’s post, that this was going to be a big win for advocates of saving The Paseo. It was in the air, and the comments on my blog post foretold the outcome.
Wisely, for once, I wasn’t going to be left behind: I voted”yes” too.
Hey, hey, hey!
This was not a white vs black vote. The people who I thought were the most active seemed to be black people who live in that area and liked the prestige of living on “The Paseo”.
I confess I am most pleased by the poke in the eye given The Star’s carpetbagger led editorial board. One grows weary of their picking the person/position with the greatest intersectionality score.
How about replacing Emmanuel Cleaver Blvd, replacing the name of a corrupt car wash magnate with that of a real American hero and martyr.
“But today it was the citizens who got the last word.”
Well, 15.81% of the citizens got the last word; that was the voter turnout. Apparently, 84.19% of the citizens don’t give a damn what the street is called.
Click to access 2019_11_05_Final_Election_Summary_9pm.pdf
Excellent point. Johnson County, KS turnout was under 17%.
More important is what Quinton Lucas told Fox4 this morning…
“I learned from my mistakes. The process was one that was less than ideal. It didn’t reflect enough public engagement. I have regret; I know a lot of people did. I recall some of my friends who supported the MLK name said they would meet with people up and down the street. That never happened…What we make sure happens is that we have that level of engagement instead of just saying it’ll be this or that.”
It sounds like the Mayor doesn’t want to try to rename a street again:
“Lucas said Wednesday that one of the lessons he takes away is that no amount of community engagement is going to achieve consensus around renaming a civic asset like a major street.
‘Even after we’ve convened the best group, even after we’ve had 20 community meetings, if we pick a street again, if we pick something that actually exists, there will be frustration and some level of friction.’ ”
https://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article237066859.html