• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« “I jumped back into bed it was the middle of the ni-i-ight!” — and other great Oldies
Table Rock Lake and Kimberling City »

The push for local control loses more momentum with Lucas’ call for a preferential election

June 26, 2020 by jimmycsays

I hope Mayor Quinton Lucas’ proposal Thursday for a preferential election on local control of the Kansas City Police Department didn’t get any of you thinking he might be trying his hand at leadership.

If anyone fell for that misdirection play, I’m here to set the record straight: What he wants to do is lead from behind.

In proposing a preferential vote on the November ballot, Lucas said people have been talking about local control for decades and that they are “tired of waiting.”

Well, he’s sure right about the tired-of-waiting part: Many of us are also tired of waiting for HIM to pick up the flag and get out front.

Lucas says if voters indicate in November they want local control, he will make it a legislative priority with the General Assembly next year.

Well, big deal. That’s just kicking the ball diagonally, instead of straight ahead.

Gwen Grant, president of the Urban League of Greater Kansas City, put the matter of a preferential election in perspective when she told The Star…

“Quite frankly, the ballot language in this ordinance is superfluous. A referendum to determine the alternative governance structure would make better sense.”

**

I assure you Lucas doesn’t want to pick up the flag and be at the point of any wedge that might develop regarding local control. He wants to be tucked back inside, where he thinks it’s much safer politically and where he can occasionally holler, “I’m still here! Still with you!”

The thing about a wedge is it doesn’t develop without someone very strong out front, someone whom the voters overwhelmingly approve of, which is where Lucas finds himself after last year’s mayoral election.

He soundly defeated the favorite, Jolie Justus (maybe he’s still surprised about that), and he has just barely sipped from the deep trough of goodwill that almost every elected official starts out with.

So, this is the time to lead. This is the time to go to Local 99 of the F.O.P., which supported him in the 2019 election, and say: “Hey, I know I told you before the election I was against local control, but, as you can see, the public mood has suddenly and decisively changed. People are demanding a change, and this might be our best, real chance to get local control. The way things are, I’ve got to go back on my word to you and look out for the best interests of the city as a whole. Sorry.”

That’s what a strong leader would do. But as I’ve said before, I doubt Lucas has the stomach to get out front. He’s already thinking about a second term and how in the world he he would get it if Local 99 and its even stronger counterpart, Local 42 of the fire fighters union, turned on him.

**

But here’s the rub. The public has been watching closely as police overreacted during the recent protests and to the predictable performance of hidebound police Chief Rick Smith. And I feel sure a large majority didn’t like what they saw and now want genuine reform.

For the first time, maybe ever, I think many people realize what folly it is to have local taxpayers picking up the bill for police department operations while the department is effectively being run out of Jefferson City. Jefferson City…part-time home to the biggest troglodytes the state has to offer!

And so, if Lucas continues to equivocate, continues to try to play both sides (as I feel sure he will), a majority of voters will sooner or later recognize him as just a smooth talker with little conviction or substance. And when voters conclude a politician is weak, they often turn their backs. In the long run, his equivocating and demurring could cost him a second term, or a chance for higher office down the road.

…For all his strutting and chest swelling, former Mayor Sly James never exhibited signs of weakness. I didn’t agree with how he did it, but he was up to the biggest challenge of his two terms: getting a new KCI under construction.

Quinton Lucas is now confronted with what may well be the biggest challenge of his time as mayor, and what is he doing? Running for cover behind an election that carries no real weight and won’t move the needle an inch in Jefferson City.

**

Here’s the proposed ballot language for what would be Question 1 on the Nov. 3 ballot, if a City Council majority approves…

Shall the City of Kansas City, Missouri establish as a City legislative priority in the Missouri General Assembly the pursuit of a state legislative or referendum action that will return Mayor and City Council-led local control to the Kansas City Police Department rather than the current control of the Kansas City Police Department by a committee comprised of four members appointed by the Governor of Missouri and an additional position held by the Mayor of Kansas City?

YES [ ] NO [ ]

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

7 Responses

  1. on June 26, 2020 at 6:32 am Vern Barnet

    I favor local control. But the argument for the status quo is that the Gov appoints local people to be on the Commission, so, they say, it is not run out of Jeff City. How do we respond effectively?


    • on June 26, 2020 at 9:14 am jimmycsays

      Doesn’t governmental responsibility always go back, ultimately, to the people whom the voters elected?

      The four members of the Commission appointed by Parson are in no way accountable to the voters of Kansas City. On pivotal issues, they look eastward, not to City Hall across Oak Street for guidance. Parson can pick up the phone, call each of them and say, “No on local control” or “No, don’t fire the chief,” and they follow his lead or find themselves replaced.

      By extension, the police board is responsible for Kansas City’s soaring murder rate, which is on a pace to hit 180 for the year. But does the board fear repercussion from Kansas City voters? Not in the least. They are under no pressure from anyone in Kansas City to come up with a plan, or even to push Rick Smith to come up with a plan to counter it.

      That’s why we see Lucas putting on himself the responsibility for coming up with a plan to reduce violence. In a guest commentary in The Star in January he said, “We…can’t waste time yelling at officials in Jefferson City or Washington, blaming our own inaction on them. Instead, my office continues to work as quickly, strategically and creatively as possible to curb this epidemic.”

      But his hands are tied. Smith, the Commission and the officers can basically ignore him because he’s outnumbered 4 to 1.

      If more Kansas Citians understood this situation and understood that Parson’s four appointees are responsible for the high murder rate, more of them would say, “This isn’t right; let’s get the accountability right here in our city.”


  2. on June 26, 2020 at 10:52 am Bill Stilley

    Jim, I am beginning to see your position on Mayor Lucas not taking the lead because of his commitment to police union. However, someone can start a referendum petition drive and by-pass the legislature. Of course it takes a state-wide vote. St. Louis was able to achieve local control. Local control will not solve all the problems of the police department, but it does not make any sense anymore for the board to mandate the city to budget $ for the department. The Mayor can argue for more, but that’s all he can do.

    I am baffled by your statement that the police board is responsible for the high murder rate in Kansas City. There are gangs and other criminals committing these crimes that no police chief or board can control the situation and keep the killings from happening. Police shootings are a different matter of course.


    • on June 26, 2020 at 1:56 pm jimmycsays

      What I said was the police board is responsible for the murder rate by extension, because it is they who are in charge of departmental policy. They could and should demand that the chief come up with a strategy for reducing violence; they haven’t. So far, the department has been strictly responsive; that’s the policy at this point.

      If I had to write that earlier reply again, I’d put it more in the vein of the board being responsible for policy, with the current policy falling way short of adequately addressing the level of violence and murders in KC.


  3. on June 26, 2020 at 1:29 pm Gina G

    I have to disagree with you regarding the Mayor’s action to put it to a local vote. St. Louis did the same thing before going to the legislature to put it on the statewide ballot. If the residents of Kansas City support this (I think they do) and vote for local control, it will make it easier to get the issue on the ballot. Doing an initiative petition for a statewide issue would be daunting. Mayor Lucas is doing the right thing!


    • on June 26, 2020 at 1:48 pm jimmycsays

      I didn’t know St. Louis held a local vote before they moved forward, Regina…That changes the complexion of things somewhat, but I still don’t know why Lucas is lurking back. The way Sly got voter approval for a new airport was by pushing hard for it and calling for a vote at a time when public surveys were showing strong disfavor. Either public sentiment changed fast or the surveys were off. Again, for me, it comes back to courage to get out front. A lot of people still don’t understand the nuances of state vs. local, and he’s the guy who should clarify and point the way.


  4. on June 27, 2020 at 10:16 pm norma dell smith

    I am strongly opposed to local control of our police department. I hope it remains the way it is. Who in their right mind would want our mayor and city council to be over them. Look at the way they run our city. In my opinion it is not run in the best interest of law abiding citizens. I am sure many people will disagree with me, but I have lived here since 1946. I have lived here with many different mayors and councils and I do not think we have the most competent leaders at the present time. I do not want them over the people that protect me.

    I support Chief Smith totally. He is better than our last chief. Police can do the best they can, but NOONE can control and stop people from killing each other. If it were possible, someone would have stopped it by now. Too many variables involved. They have the most dangerous job in the city. I appreciate and thank them for all they do for all of us.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: