• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Trust me, the Trump tide will subside, and the cacophony will go away
Historic Kansas City calls QuikTrip’s proposal “a menace to historic neighborhoods,” and Councilwoman Katheryn Shields asks, “How many QuikTrips do you need?” »

QuikTrip aims to bull its way onto 39th and Southwest Trafficway; neighbors prepare to fight back

December 15, 2020 by jimmycsays

QuikTrip’s proposal to build at 39th and Southwest Trafficway and disrupt the surrounding neighborhoods erupted into public view last week, and both sides are digging in for an extended battle.

From two days of reporting, here’s what I’ve learned:

  • QuikTrip has a contract to purchase the UBC building, which would be razed, on the northwest corner of the intersection.
  • QuikTrip is refusing to answer specific questions about the project and probably will refuse to meet with large groups of neighbors.
  • The project will require City Council approval, which is where the neighborhood will have its best chance of prevailing.

Experience has demonstrated that QuikTrip is a determined and wily company. In Kansas City, they always use the politically connected law firm of Rouse Frets White Goss Gentile Rhodes (located, coincidentally, just south of the Trafficway on Belleview). It is home to such notable attorneys as Mike White, former Jackson County executive, and Jim Bowers, a former assistant city attorney.

Patricia Jensen

Handling the Southwest Trafficway project is another former assistant city attorney with Rouse Frets, Patricia Jensen, whom I reached by phone but was unwilling to comment.

Jensen has already stiff armed the neighborhood once. She helped set up an outdoor meeting Dec. 1, a meeting at which she and the QT project manager, Eric Eckhart, planned to meet with people whose homes back up to the site.

After word of the meeting got out, more than 70 people showed up in the UBC parking lot. Just a few minutes into the meeting, Jensen and Eckhart abruptly ended it on grounds it violated the provisions of the city’s latest ordinance pertaining to Covid-19 gatherings.

The ordinance prohibits indoor gatherings of more than 10 people but, to my reading, does not set a limit on outdoor gatherings. Two Roanoke Homes Association board members told me the people who had come out for the meeting were masked and were socially distancing.

Cancellation of the meeting gave lie to a statement made by a QuikTrip spokesman that appeared in The Star two days after the meeting. The QT spokesperson, Aisha Jefferson-Smith, said, “Our goal is to meet with the community and listen.”

The events of Dec. 1 made perfectly clear, however, that what she really meant was QT would be willing to meet with a very limited number of people and wanted to avoid contentious situations as much as possible.

Naturally, cancellation of the meeting riled the neighbors. The next day — Dec. 2 — the Roanoke Homes Association board adopted a resolution saying it “strongly opposes the proposed QuikTrip development at or near 39th Street and Summit Street.” (Summit runs parallel to Southwest Trafficway, just a few yards from the trafficway at that point.)

The resolution says, among other things…

:: The intersection already is “plagued by congestion and accidents” and a QuikTrip store would worsen that.

:: Traffic “cutting through” Roanoke on east-west streets, such as 38th, would significantly increase.

:: Roanoke was designated a Local Historic District in 1985, and the proposed development “would violate the architectural integrity of Roanoke and surrounding community.”

**

Yesterday and today, I got a first-hand taste of just how maddening it is to deal with QuikTrip.

First, I put in a call to Mike Thornburg, QT’s manager of public and government affairs. A person in his office said he was retiring in a matter of days and transferred me to Aisha Jefferson-Smith, the woman who was quoted in The Star’s story.

When I told Jefferson-Smith I had some questions, she immediately asked me to put them in writing in an email.

I sent an email in which I asked several specific questions, including how many square feet the store would encompass and how many gas pumps there would be; if any meetings were scheduled with neighbors; and when construction might start, assuming the company got approval from the city.

This morning, I called back and got Jefferson-Smith’s voice mail. I told her I’d like to get the answers to my questions today. An hour or so later, I got this email back: “First and foremost, thank you for contacting QuikTrip. Anytime we consider a new site we will always do our due diligence.”

She put those two sentences in quotation marks, just to emphasize, I suppose, there would be no misunderstanding about what she said.

I wrote back: “That’s it?? If so, why couldn’t you have said that yesterday?”

**

Today, Tosha Lathrom, president of the Roanoke Homes Association, said her group was teaming up with the Volker, Coleman Highlands and Valentine neighborhood associations — all of which are within several blocks of the site — to fight the proposal. (The site itself, oddly, is not within the boundaries of any particular neighborhood association.)

She said she also had also been in contact with the West Plaza Neighborhood Association, which jousted with QT on the expansion of its Westport Road store a couple of years ago. West Plaza won some concessions, but QT ultimately got a much larger complex, which straddles Mercier Street.

Lathrom said a QuikTrip store at 39th and the Trafficway would run counter to the urban movement of encouraging more walking, biking and use of public transportation. “I can’t imagine anyone thinking that’s a good location for a QuikTrip,” she said. “I can’t imagine the city letting a QT go there.”

This is the proposed site of a new QuikTrip. QT intends to buy the building and raze it.

To get final approval, the project would have to wind its way through a standard, deliberate process. First, a development plan would be submitted to the city. The plan would first go to the City Plan Commission, and then, regardless of how the commission voted, it would go to the City Council’s Planning, Zoning and Economic Development Committee. The committee could send it to the full Council with a “‘do-pass” or “do-not pass” recommendation.

The proposed site is in the city’s Fourth Council District. Councilwoman Katheryn Shields, the at-large 4th District representative, told me yesterday she hadn’t taken a position on the issue. I haven’t heard back from in-district Councilman Eric Bunch, but Lathrom said she believed Bunch, too, has not taken a position.

**

This project is a loser for Kansas City. QuikTrip should call off its high-paid attorneys and pull back. But that’s extremely unlikely.

Everybody loves QT when you need gas or want an iced tea and a hot dog or piece of pizza. But when it comes to building a monstrosity at one of KC’s busiest intersections, and plopping it down amid several of the city’s most outstanding neighborhoods, it’s another matter.

So, QuikTrip must be stopped.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

12 Responses

  1. on December 15, 2020 at 3:35 pm Mike Rice

    I truly cannot understand the logic behind building a Quik Trip that is less than a mile from another one (the Westport Road location.) Also, I’m pretty sure that left-hand turns onto both 39th and 38th streets from northbound Southwest Trafficway are prohibited. And making a left-hand turn into that facility from 39th Street? Good luck! There are better midtown locations for a Quik Trip — Gillham Road, Linwood or Armour, Broadway, 31st Street. Southwest Trafficway is not one of them.


  2. on December 15, 2020 at 6:21 pm Tom Shrout

    What’s the problem the UBC Building? No one goes to the office these days? Some kind of adaptive reuse would seem to be a better idea.


    • on December 15, 2020 at 6:29 pm jimmycsays

      Tosha Lathrom told me UBC, which, I think, largely tests drugs for safety, still has some employees in the building. You’re right, though, many of these types of hulks probably will be going away. It could be difficult to find an adaptive reuse, and besides QT has its checkbook out, now.


      • on December 15, 2020 at 6:37 pm Tom Shrout

        I hate to see a QT in a fairly dense urban area, parking in front etc. more concrete and traffic. Do you know Kite Singleton? Great KC architect who lives nearby. Mostly retired these days. I would be curious to hear his opinion.


  3. on December 15, 2020 at 6:46 pm jimmycsays

    I do know him, Tom…If he’s still living in the neighborhood, he could be an influential voice in opposition.


  4. on December 16, 2020 at 10:04 am Kurt Vonnegut

    I love it. A ton of the residents there are the same kinds of MARC-loving loonies who say density is what’s needed to “save” the core. Density for thee, but not …


  5. on December 16, 2020 at 2:04 pm Authorized User

    Gosh, this is a tough one. What will win – the desire of the citizens or sales tax revenue for City Hall?


  6. on December 17, 2020 at 8:43 am Greg Patterson

    They will also need a liquor license, which will require consents of nearby property owners.


    • on December 17, 2020 at 10:29 am jimmycsays

      Thanks, Greg…That explains why Jensen and Eckhart wanted to meet just with the neighbors whose homes back up to the site…The consent of the neighbors is an interesting wrinkle….I wonder if people ever put a price on their consent.


  7. on December 17, 2020 at 12:00 pm Gina

    QuikTrip has used these tactics for over twenty years. They act like they are making concessions and dangle lawsuit over the council. And every site creates traffic congestion I.e. 43rd/44th and Main. Hard to believe traffic planners think this isn’t going to add congestion at a already congested intersection. At some point the city council needs to listen to residents and say NO! This one is a no brainer!


    • on December 17, 2020 at 12:28 pm jimmycsays

      I think the neighborhoods have a very good chance to prevail. Opposition is virtually unanimous. This has got the full attention of 4th District Council members Katheryn Shields and Erick Bunch.


  8. on December 18, 2020 at 1:08 am Edward E Scott

    Let’s see…QT adds many new jobs to the district… QT hires 18 year olds….QT is on the bus line, so it has access for employees without their own means of transportation…. QuikTrip helps employees with college tuition. Full-time employees can be reimbursed up to $2,200 per semester, and part-timers can receive up to $1,200 or $2,200 per semester, depending on the number of hours worked… QuikTrip Corporation pays its employees an average of $12.82 an hour. Hourly pay at QuikTrip Corporation ranges from an average of $9.67 to $20.67 an hour.

    QTs are clean, well maintained, diversified, well lit, secure. They provide opportunity.

    But you know what’s more important? Keeping 39th and SW Trafficway dark, and that bus stop scary, and that old corner building deteriorating. And for what purpose? Oh yeah. Those stately old homes with their old people who need to keep things the way they are because, you know, they don’t need THOSE kind of jobs for THEIR kind of people…maybe we can get get that nice old architect to lead us in opposition…oh wait, he spends his winters in Vail. How about that young couple who are doctors? No wait, they moved to south JOCO. That lawyer? No, now at Bishop Sullivan.

    Wait! I think Missie B’s is always hiring and putting on talent contests for young people. Maybe, we can get Ray’s Playpen to redevelop the UBC property.

    Come on folks…jobs, opportunities, youth, diversity, positive environment, good services, security, taxes, renewal. These are the values you PUSH with your politics… now stand back, and let’s get this deal done.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 567 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 567 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: