• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Historic Kansas City calls QuikTrip’s proposal “a menace to historic neighborhoods,” and Councilwoman Katheryn Shields asks, “How many QuikTrips do you need?”
Recording captures police union president Brad Lemon threatening a tow truck operator if he doesn’t give preferential treatment »

A jolting and disturbing package of “apology” stories from The Star about its failings on racial coverage

December 21, 2020 by jimmycsays

When I got up Sunday and checked my email, first up was one from a friend who, with his wife, divides his time between his home in the Kansas City area and one in the Florida panhandle.

It read: “Good morning, Jim. The KC Star theme today is a powerful statement. What do you think of the apology articles?”

I was completely flummoxed…Apology articles? Apology for what? Had there been a massive error in a big story?

I immediately went to The Star’s website and saw plastered across the top of the page the words, “The truth in Black and white: An apology from The Kansas City Star.”

Then I knew what it was all about. Nevertheless, it was the most jolting and unexpected series of stories I’ve ever seen in The Star in my 50 years in Kansas City, including 36-plus years as a reporter and editor at The Kansas City Times and The Star.

It was disturbing, too, partly because it made me ask myself if I, who joined the paper in 1969, may have contributed to the paper’s failure to cover much of anything emanating from east of Troost Avenue or anyone living east of the longtime dividing line between white and Black Kansas City.

(I couldn’t think of anything I did overtly to contribute to the appalling situation, but, like nearly everyone else at the paper, I was definitely focused almost exclusively on the white community and white power structure.)

The Sunday package was a remarkable undertaking and a sincere mea culpa. It consisted of…

  • A formal apology from Editor Mike Fannin
  • Six separate “news” stories about different areas in which The Star had failed miserably, since its founding in 1880, to cover racial matters adequately
  • An editorial vowing that the editorial board would chart a new course on social justice
  • A separate story about The Star having formed an advisory group “to ensure fair, inclusive coverage of communities of color”

One of the most admirable aspects of this series is that The Star is not attempting to profit off it, at least directly. I believe the entire package of stories can be accessed without a subscription at http://www.kansascity.com. The Star rarely drops the pay wall, but this was an appropriate time to do so.

Mara Rose Williams

The person who pushed for the series was Mará Rose Williams, an education reporter who has been with The Star for 22 years. Williams followed her late husband, Ceasar Williams, to the paper after he was hired as an assignment editor in the late 1990s. Ceasar Williams died in 2010 at age 61.

The other reporters on the team were longtime employees Eric Adler and Mike Hendricks and relative newcomer Cortlynn Stark. Visuals were produced by Shelly Yang, Tammy Ljungblad and Neil Nakahodo. Chris Ochsner edited the photos and graphics, and Bill Turque and Sharon Hoffmann edited the stories.

**

I will not rehash the stories, but a couple of sources the reporters tapped seemed to capture the crux of The Star’s longtime failure regarding proportional racial coverage.

:: Gerald Jordan, a former editorial writer who has been a journalism professor at the University of Arkansas for many years, said that while he did not believe The Star was guilty of intentional racism, the paper did not assign reporters to cover specific neighborhoods, and that “put us at a disadvantage.” That effectively left minorities and poor people out of the paper because they weren’t running the institutions or setting the policies The Star and Times focused their coverage on.

Chuck Haddix

:: Chuck Haddix, host of KCUR’s “The Fish Fry,” and curator of the Marr Sound Archives at UMKC, said: “They covered the African American community just a little bit. The Kansas City Star always kind of covered classical music and opera and the fine arts, because that was their audience. They also covered country music, too. But they didn’t cover 18th and Vine because of segregation. I think it caused that community to be invisible to white people in Kansas City. You know, people who read The Star didn’t get a sense of what was happening at 18th and Vine or other African American communities.”

**

Because of the startling nature of this package of stories, I sought out reaction from several friends and neighbors.

One neighbor called it a “breakthrough.” Another said simply, “Long time overdue.”

A former Star reporter and friend, a colleague at the paper, said: “The Star has been dumping a lot of criticism on folks such as J.C. Nichols and Andrew Jackson for their racism. And I often have thought, ‘What about the racism that William Rockhill Nelson and other Star execs practiced? Should we take Nelson’s name off the Nelson-Atkins Museum?’ I admire the Star for airing its dirty laundry and acknowledging that it was just as guilty as J.C. Nichols in the promotion of racism in Kansas City.”

Clinton Adams Jr.

Another friend, Clinton Adams Jr., a lawyer and longtime civic activist who was quoted in the Sunday package, said:

“The chatter in the Black community today has been positive. A general refrain has been, ‘What now’? There is skepticism as to how they (The Star) will follow up and fulfill the commitments made.” Adams said he believed the package “could have some impact if other institutions and media outlets will also take an introspective look at their racial history and address their transgressions.”

**

Everything those people said is true.

The only thing I would add is that where Adams’ wonders how The Star will follow up, I wonder how much impact the package will have and how many people will see it or hear about it.

The problem is this: Where The Star once spoke with a bullhorn, its strong voice echoing far and wide, it now speaks with a crackling, dimming microphone.

The Star, like most major metropolitan dailies, has been slaughtered by the internet and the exponential proliferation of platforms and information outlets, many of which spew misinformation, disinformation and just plain junk.

The five-county metro area has about 1.8 million people, only about 90,000 of whom subscribe to the print edition of the Sunday paper. About 50,000 take the print edition of the weekday paper, and, as far as I can tell, a paltry 9,000 people have stand-alone, digital subscriptions.

…The apology package was remarkable. Congratulations to everyone involved, from Mike Fannin on down. I just hope a lot of people heard the cracking and felt the reverberations this redwood made when it fell, and I hope the cracking sound isn’t limited to an echo chamber.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

12 Responses

  1. on December 21, 2020 at 5:47 am Don Hoffmann

    The Star is very good at telling people what they already know. When I moved here in 1956 the only person in town that I had met was Arthur Duncan, the night managing editor, who hired me. It didn’t take long to figure out that Kansas City was a deeply prejudiced place and so was the paper.

    After being assigned to police headquarters, I heard reports one night of a triple murder and called Jim Turnbaugh, the night managing editor, to say I was starting to work on the story. “Are they niggers?” he asked. “Then forget it.”


    • on December 21, 2020 at 9:15 am jimmycsays

      Readers: Don started working at The Star in 1956. He went on to become The Star’s architecture critic — and, in my opinion, was the best newspaper architecture writer in the country.


  2. on December 21, 2020 at 8:30 am Vern Barnet

    A Black editor at The Star told me that when the Star and Times started publishing wedding announcements for Black couples, a white colleague on the staff said with surprise, “I didn’t know you people got married.”


    • on December 21, 2020 at 9:17 am jimmycsays

      Sorry, I don’t believe that.


  3. on December 21, 2020 at 9:16 am Mark D Peavy

    One of the stories in the Star was about how J.C. Nichols and William Rockhill Nelson perpetuated segregation in Kansas City. Given that, when is the Star going to remove Nelson’s picture from its editorial page?


    • on December 21, 2020 at 9:22 am jimmycsays

      I’ve been wondering the same thing since I read the series, Mark…They should have at least scrubbed that photo a long time ago. In it, he looks haughty and extremely satisfied with his fat self — the kind of guy just generous enough to offer “a paper for the people,” the lowly people.


      • on December 21, 2020 at 9:47 am Mark D Peavy

        The KCMO Parks and Recreation Commissioners are charged with creating a plan to remove city-owned memorials and monuments of people who promoted racism. It would really look insensitive and negligent in comparison if the Star didn’t even bother to remove Nelson’s picture.


  4. on December 21, 2020 at 7:49 pm Edward E Scott

    Please, don’t make me get out Dad’s clip files.


    • on December 21, 2020 at 7:59 pm jimmycsays

      Get to the basement, Ned…Now!


  5. on December 21, 2020 at 9:54 pm Rick Nichols

    I suggested to Mr. Fannin in a long email last night that the time of the reporters who worked on this story would have been much better spent had they focused their efforts on identifying and promoting both Black people and White people who are working across racial and ethnic lines to make Kansas City a better place for everyone to live, work and play. I also pointed out to him that the story failed to mention Laura Hockaday, who, over a 38-year career at The Times/Star (1962-2000), made a real effort as a White woman of privilege to include men and women from the Black community in the papers’ society pages.
    No, to me it appears that the paper purposely engaged in a real beatdown of itself in order to try to enhance its overall standing with the Black community as much as possible, like that was going to somehow suddenly bring in a bunch of new subscribers and advertisers.
    When Jesus encountered the Samaritan woman at the well who had already had five husbands and was living with another man, He didn’t tell her, “I want you to put on sackcloth, cover yourself with ashes and publicly apologize to the people of this village for your multitude of sins.” No, He simply told her, “Sin no more.”
    The Star would do well to lay off the theatrics and just do its job, recognizing that mistakes were made in the past and that they need to be avoided in the future.
    So did everyone who works for The Star sleep better last night knowing that Mr. Fannin had publicly apologized for 140 years’ worth of sins of commission and sins of omission?


  6. on December 22, 2020 at 1:30 pm John Altevogt

    Mixed feelings…Great respect for Mara Williams and her work but agree with Mr. Nichols that, for Fannin, it’s simply insincere virtual signaling…Hence, confession without repentance and the desire to “sin no more” makes it all meaningless.


    • on December 22, 2020 at 3:39 pm jimmycsays

      I don’t see it that way at all…It’s no secret that Fannin is prize focused — he really wants a Pulitzer — but I don’t see that as the motivation here. For one thing, although this is a better and more complete apology (six accompanying stories prove that) than most other papers have offered, it’s probably not going to win a big prize precisely because other papers have acted in similar fashion. How could, say, the Pulitzer board pick one paper’s apology over another’s?

      No, I think this comes from genuine motivation to set the record straight and do a proper mea culpa. And, as you pointed out, this series sprang from the paper’s ranks — not the executive suite, such as it is.

      This is not the time or place to be cynical about The Star. This package came from staff that was well aware of the paper’s shortcomings and wanted to acknowledge that in a big way. The staff’s emotional involvement shows up in the breadth of the reporting and the beauty of the writing.

      Now, will The Star follow up with actions and more inclusive reporting? I believe it will, but only time will tell. As I said in the post, I think the advisory group is going to be very helpful by holding management’s feet to the fire.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 544 other followers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 544 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: