• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The “blame-the-dead-guy” defense didn’t work
Hey, hey, hey, Fountain Day is approaching »

Give these perps their walk across the stage of their own making

April 21, 2021 by jimmycsays

It was quite an image yesterday — Derek Chauvin placing his hands behind his back in anticipation of being handcuffed and escorted out of the courtroom by a Hennepin County sheriff’s deputy.

We never did get to see him in a perp walk, however. When I was at The Star, we loved those perp walks. It was, generally, the only chance we had to view and photograph defendants charged with serious crimes before the long wait for their cases to be resolved.

So today, in honor of a now mostly faded tradition, I’ve assembled a perp walk of sorts of five politicians who deserve to be bathed in ignominy for either stupid things they said recently or long-term, disgraceful conduct.

Here we go…

:: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. At a Capitol Hill event Tuesday with the Congressional Black Caucus, she said of George Floyd: “Thank you for sacrificing your life for justice.” Later, after the blowback for that most awkward utterance, she went on Twitter and said, “George Floyd should be alive today.”

:: Former Missouri Health Director Randall Williams. Gov. Mike Parson apparently asked for Williams’ resignation Tuesday after four years of incompetent leadership of the department. Among other things, Williams once ordered up a spreadsheet to track the menstrual periods of women who had visited Planned Parenthood. The purpose? Try to identify those who had undergone failed abortions. 

:: State Sen. Amanda Chase, a Virginia Republican: After the Chauvin verdict, Chase (who describes herself as “Trump in heels”) met with supporters in King William County and said: “Today’s verdict makes me sick.”

:: U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. On Twitter, Greene asserted that the Black Lives Matter movement was “the strongest terrorist threat to our country.” Her reasoning? “D.C. is completely dead tonight (with the Chauvin verdict). People stayed in tonight and were scared to go out because of fear of riots.”

:: Former Missouri State Rep. Rick Roeber. This guy was even too much for his fellow conservative Republicans to tolerate. Credibly accused of of sexually and physically abusing his children, he was expelled from the House on a nearly unanimous vote, with one member abstaining. According to one report, Roeber accused his ex-wife and children of fabricating the claims because “all my children are Democrats.”

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

3 Responses

  1. on April 21, 2021 at 10:25 pm John Altevogt

    I predict that Chauvin’s conviction will be overturned on appeal on the following grounds. 1. It was held in Minneapolis where jurors knew the consequences of a not guilty verdict. @ The city gave the Floyd family 27 million dollars before the jury recessed for deliberations obviously indicating guilt. 3. Both Mayor Jacob Frey and moron Maxine Waters made comments suggesting Chauvin’s guilt and inciting violence. Waters (who demanded a police escort) comments were particularly bad and even the judge indicated would probably be grounds for an appeal. Many compared her comments to the tactics used by the KKK in years past. Given these flaws, it’s pretty clear that the verdict was more a function of mob inspired violence than the facts presented at trial. This is clearly not over.


  2. on April 22, 2021 at 10:54 am William "Bill" Stilley

    I agree with some comments by John, but disagree with others. No matter where in Minnesota the trial could have moved, I believe the outcome would be the same as the prosecution’s case was extremely strong and almost air-tight. Some potential jurors were released during voir dire (jury selection process) when they said they would be influenced by the $27 million settlement. This should not have been made until after the trial, but I believe the remaining jurors said they could be fair hearing only the evidence and reaching a verdict.
    The comments made by the politicians may be a basis to appeal, but I do not believe that the argument will succeed because by that time, either the jury was deliberating, or were ordered not to listen to news media or read any accounts of the trial.
    Who knows whether the fear of the consequences influenced some individual jurors–not likely they told the other jurors of their fear. It was not a function of mob inspired violence, that I am able to detect. It is true, however, that the rest of the country put a lot of pressure on the prosecution to charge Chauvin. Is that mob violence influence on the trial? only the appellate courts will be able to make the judgment.
    The prosecution questions in rebuttal of Dr. Martin Tobin about a carbon monoxide test could be grounds for a new trial, especially when the prosecutors were ordered not to ask about the text results and to advise Dr. Tobin not to mention it. However, if the defense did not preserve their objection, or it is deemed waived by the defense for apparently accepting the questions and testimony, then that point will not be sustained by the appellate courts.
    There are always some errors that occur in a trial. The question is whether the points that Chauvin’s appellate attorneys will be able to establish the errors violated certain rules of evidence, prosecutor comments, and the judge’s rulings rise to sufficient level of reversible error, causing a new trial.
    Chauvin will no doubt file a petition to claim he had ineffective assistance of counsel, but those cases infrequently are successful.


    • on April 22, 2021 at 11:53 pm John Altevogt

      Great points, Bill. One thing that might give an appellate court some concern is that the jurors seemed to spend so little time actually reviewing the charges that they convicted him of both intentionally and unintentionally killing the same man. Feedback from attorney friends suggested that that was highly unusual. Does that strike you as a possible flaw or will the judge just ignore the lesser charges during sentencing?

      I confess I didn’t watch enough of the trial to make an informed decision as to effectiveness of the prosecutions case, but I did see enough to determine that Chauvin had competent legal counsel.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 563 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 563 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: