It was a tumultuous day at City Hall Thursday, with Mayor Quinton Lucas declaring war on the Police Department (finally) and pulling off one of the most brazen sneak attacks to ever occur at 12th and Oak.
It was a big victory for City Council members — and residents, by extension — who have chafed under state rule of the Police Department. But the victory could be short lived because the Missouri General Assembly relishes rubbing the city’s nose in the dirt and can dictate what percentage of the city’s operating budget must go toward police operations.
More about that in a minute, but there was another significant facet of yesterday’s upheaval:
The developments signaled the most significant breach ever between the Northland, which has long tilted Republican and conservative, and the southern part of the city, which is decidedly Democratic and liberal.
The backdrop for yesterday’s events was that for months civil rights groups and others had persistently criticized Lucas for failing to challenge Police Chief Rick Smith and the state-dominated Board of Police Commissioners.
Gradually, though, Lucas grew frustrated with the police board’s stonewalling and refusal to consider even relatively minor changes he requested.
By Thursday he’d had enough, and he had organized a raiding party.
First, Lucas held a press conference announcing the introduction of two ordinances that would give City Manager Brial Platt the authority to negotiate with the police board how the department would spend about $42.3 million — more than 15 percent — of the police department’s $239 million budget.
The city, presumably, would push for much of that $42 million to go toward social services and other alternative approaches to conventional law enforcement. At the press conference, Lucas said the ordinances would go to a council committee for consideration.
Instead, in a breathtaking, rope-a-dope move, Lucas went to that afternoon’s council legislative meeting and asked for immediate approval. Being a good politician, he had the votes lined up, and both measures sailed through on 9-4 votes.
The four dissenting votes is where the north-south breach enters the picture.
Lucas’ press conference was met with wails of protest from the four Northland council members: Teresa Loar and Dan Fowler, who live in the 2nd District, and Heather Hall and Kevin O’Neill, who live in the 1st District.
At a press conference of their own, they asserted the measures were not well thought out and would harm the Police Department. Making an argument that will echo with their constituents, they said the ordinances masqueraded as a police-funding cut that would result in fewer police officers patrolling the streets.
“This is absolutely the worst piece of legislation I’ve seen ever since I’ve been here at City Hall,” Loar said.
All the screeching and hair pulling in the world wasn’t going to derail the freight train that Lucas was engineering, however. It was in-your-face all the way, with the nine council members from south of the river lining up behind the ordinances. For the record, those joining Lucas in the pile-on were were Brandon Ellington and Melissa Robinson from the 3rd District; Katheryn Shields and Eric Bunch from the 4th District; Lee Barnes Jr. and Ryana Parks-Shaw from the 5th District; and Andrea Bough and Kevin McManus from the 6th District.
In the end, it was a very satisfying day for residents who favor police reform, but, as I said above, the City Council might hold the hill only temporarily.
Kansas City is one of just a few big cities where state government, not city government, controls the police department. It’s been that way for a long time and isn’t likely to change anytime soon.
The governor appoints four of five members of the police board, with the mayor being the fifth member. The appointed members serving now were all appointed by Republican governors — Eric Greitens or Mike Parson — and they are a veritable rubber stamp for Police Chief Rick Smith, who, if he was subject to City Council approval, would have been fired months ago.
In addition, a state law says the city must spend at least 20 percent of its general fund on police operations. The city has been exceeding that, but the significance of the $42.3 million figure is that it represents the most the city can reduce the police budget and still comply with the 20 percent requirement.
…What might happen, and relatively soon, is the General Assembly could raise that percentage to whatever it wanted, say 25 percent or even 30 percent. The legislature adjourned last Friday but will be coming back into special session later this year, and I fully expect the Republican majorities in the House and Senate to take the whip to what they view as their rebellious subjects in Kansas City.
There are other ways the General Assembly could counterattack, and don’t be surprised if the guy leading the spanking mission turns out to be Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer, a Parkville Republican.
In the just-expired session, Luetkemeyer sponsored the bill that lifted the longstanding city residency requirement for Kansas City officers. And like the Northland council members, he wasn’t at all happy yesterday about the prospect of fewer officers on Kansas City streets.
He told The Star, “I think it’s the worst thing the city could do at a time when we have record high crime.”
Yes, the nine council members won yesterday, and Lucas had one of his best days so far in office. But they’d better be ready, in the months ahead, for a barrage of legislative rockets that, for noise and upheaval, could rival the Israelis’ shelling of Gaza.
And the award for incredible stupidity goes to… Think about it, whose neighborhood do you suppose requires the most police activity? Then who do you suppose will suffer the most from a demoralized and understaffed police department? Which neighborhoods will lose businesses and jobs because of a lack of police protection and which neighborhoods will see the greatest increase in crime? Lucas’ next campaign slogan should be “Fuck the poor, I got this”.
Don’t get me wrong: I am no fan of Rick Smith and the KCPD Board of Commissioners. But, I’m also not confident that local control will be any more successful at controlling violent crime in Kansas City than it has been in St. Louis.
In any event, two points about yesterday: 1) Lucas totally abandoned transparency and public disclosure in this process. Whatever his motives, Lucas (and the eight council members) rammed thru this huge change with almost total secrecy and without public comment. In my opinion, that’s disgraceful.
2) Lucas said one reason for the secrecy and absurdly rushed process was the looming signing of MO SB 26. The language in the bill that Lucas is concerned about is this: “Any taxpayer of a political subdivision may
initiate an action for injunctive relief, which the court shall grant, if the governing body of such political subdivision decreases the budget for its law enforcement agency by an amount exceeding more than twelve percent relative to the proposed budgets of other departments of the political subdivision over a five year aggregate amount.”
Lucas implied (and the news media parroted him) that the language (if signed) would mean the council couldn’t reduce the police budget down to the state-mandated 20%. Who knows? That could be correct. But, in all honesty, I doubt that Lucas (and the eight council members) have really studied the actual language in SB 26 sufficiently to feel comfortable they know what it means. And, even if they are correct in their interpretation of the language, I haven’t heard Lucas or any member of the media state what dollar reduction in the budget SB 26 would permit. How much difference would there be between the SB 26 permitted amount and the 20% state mandate?
On a change in city/police relations this monumental, we really should have had more transparency, analysis, and public comment, and a lot less secrecy. I don’t think the proposed changes would have needed to be debated for months, but I do think the public debate should have lasted longer than a few hours.
You’re a thoughtful guy, Mark, and an advocate of good, orderly government. But here’s the deal, as our President would say: It hasn’t been a fair fight. Not at all. The General Assembly holds sway over the Police Department in a system that makes no sense. If this was Mayberry, it might, but not a first-class city (first class by state statutes) of 500,000 residents.
Then there’s the damn Republican-dominated police board, which never, ever challenges the administration.
So what this was — and I wish I’d expressed it this way in the post — was an outpouring of frustration. The Big Nine saw an opportunity to stick it to the Police Department, at least in the short term, and they did…I hope they all went our for drinks afterward and celebrated their smackdown of the General Assembly, the chief and the boot-licking police board.
So, you’re saying Lucas and the eight council members acted the way they did because they were frustrated. That sounds like how five-year-olds react to situations they don’t like.
I keep hoping for more from our mayor and council members. I probably should just give up hope.
Jim,
Thanks for your perspective on this issue. Just a quick correction for your post. Heather Hall and Kevin O’Neill live in the 1st District and Teresa Loar and Dan Fowler live in the 2nd District. As you noted, they are the four Northland council members, but you had their districts switched in your post.
Thanks, Lynn. Good to hear from you…I fixed it.
The ongoing battle of a conservative minority wanting to continue dominance of a more liberal majority because they know best what’s good for you undeserving radicals. How’s that status quo working? I guess just fine, as long as the body count isn’t piling up north of the river.
I agree with the accountability concept. With that said, Mayor Lucas could also have merit based compensation. The KC Star Seeking Solutions study on gun violence indicated a community mistrust of the KCPD as a big problem with solving crime. That is where the mayor should have made a major effort to resolve that issue and forge a better relationship between the PD and public. Being the “big guy,” it is his job to work with all departments and issues. The handling of the homeless situation, the sorry state of KCMO public schools and the low covid vaccine rate are all ultimately on him.
Yeah, and I guess he’s responsible for all the plastic in the oceans, too.