Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The Star recently lost an exceptional amount of journalistic talent with the retirements, via buyout, of reporter/editor Darryl Levings, assistant metro editor Elaine Adams and sports reporter Randy Covitz.

But the most painful loss to me, as a reader, was that of investigative and courts reporter – and periodic columnist — Mark Morris.

Morris, a friend for many years, was one of those reporters who, when you saw his byline, you knew you were in for a good read. There aren’t a lot of reporters about whom that can be said, and with Mark, KC Star readers were privileged to be on receiving end of bushels full of thoroughly reported, felicitously written stories.

But at 61 years of age and with 31 years of service behind him, Morris said goodbye to The Star last week. You might have read his last column, which appeared in Monday’s paper under the headline “Hear ye, Hear ye, court is now adjourned.” (In case you didn’t, here it is.) In the column Mark reflected on his 17 years of courts coverage. One of his seminal pieces of advice was to defendants in criminal cases: “Never represent yourself in court…You’ll be convicted.”

P1040681

Mark and the family Black Lab, Booner, outside the home in Liberty

Mark is rightly proud of his career at The Star, and while talking about it at his Liberty home on Thursday, he emphasized that he had left the paper voluntarily and with a sense of satisfaction.

“I had a great run at The Star,” he said. “The people (managers, in particular) have been good to me…I left at a good time.”

My association with Mark

I intend to recount some of the highlights of Mark’s career here — including his brief ascension to “bestselling author” and examples of his resourcefulness and powers of observation — but first I want to tell you how he and I came to be friends.

I had already been at The Star for 15 years when Mark arrived at the paper in 1984 (I arrived in 1969, to spare you the math) as assistant night city editor. Prior to that, he had worked at smaller papers in Fulton and Centralia, Missouri.

He advanced to night city editor, but then, after a decade as an editor, made the somewhat unusual switch of becoming a reporter. (The customary path of upward progression in journalism is reporter first, then editor.)

In 1994, then, he joined me at City Hall, which I had been covering since 1985. We had a good time at City Hall, working out of the 26th-floor press room, yards away from the City Council Chamber. We also became friends and turned out a lot of good stories. At one point in the mid-90s, federal and state authorities were investigating four council members – Michael Hernandez, Chuck Weber, Jeanne Robinson and Carol Coe — and three ended up being convicted of felonies – all except Coe.

In 1995, I became an assistant metro editor and took charge of the Wyandotte County bureau, where I spent the next nine years. Mark stayed at City Hall until 1998, when he was named federal courts reporter, the post he held for the last 17 years of his career.

…Here I want to inject a note that is important to both Mark and me. Since I began blogging in 2010, Mark has never provided me with any inside information about developments at The Star. In fact, because people at The Star knew that we were friends, he was careful to maintain arm’s-length distance. So, any “scoops” you have read in this blog about The Star did not come from Mark, directly or indirectly. 

Some career highlights

Mark gathered about 20 first-place honors and awards during his years at The Star. Those include:

:: The 2010 Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Award for “A New Slavery,” a five-part series he and two other reporters, Laura Bauer and Mike McGraw, did on human trafficking.

:: The 2010 Investigative Reporting award from the Associated Press Sports Editors for 2011 for “Trouble in Jayhawk Nation,” a series of stories on a ticket-skimming scandal by employees in the University of Kansas ticket office. (Other staff members shared the award.)

:: The 2012 Best News Story award from the Kansas Press Association for “Bishop, KC diocese indicted.” Reporters Judy Thomas and Glenn Rice shared the award.

In 2001 and 2002, Mark and a Michigan reporter, Paul Janczewski, collaborated on a book titled “Fatal Error,” about a Michigan housewife who convinced her lover, a former Cass County deputy sheriff, to murder her husband. For one week – the first week of March 2003 — the book was on The New York Times Extended Bestseller List, ranking 30th in the “paperback nonfiction” category.

Talking excitedly while moving around his kitchen yesterday, Mark said: “Do you know what that does (having reached “bestseller” status) to my obituary? That’s awesome!

A bonus – in more ways than one – was the Lifetime cable channel’s decision to exercise an option to make a movie out of the book. It aired in 2006 under the title “Fatal Desire.”

Although “Fatal Error” is Mark’s only book so far, it probably won’t be his last. He has “two or three ideas” for writing projects and plans to move forward in due time.

Before any work-related retirement projects get underway, however, Mark has a couple of other important engagements. In the days ahead, he and his wife Carolyn will spend a week together in France, where Carolyn is headed on a business trip for Nestle Purina PetCare Co., with which she is a manager.

After that, both will pour much of their free time into helping prepare for the scheduled July wedding of their 28-year-old daughter Sarah. Sarah, an optometrist, lives and works in California. Their other child, 25-year-old Will, is a medical student in Arizona.

Journalistic resourcefulness (Example No. 1) 

– The Lonnie Moore case

 On Tuesday, March 29, 2011, an Independence police officer shot and killed a 41-year-old drifter named Lonnie Moore after Moore began shooting at the officer on a patch of Interstate 70 overlooking the Bass Pro Shop.

As best Mark can recall, he was on vacation when Moore was killed. The reporters who were working the story didn’t get Moore’s identification for two days and were unable, despite their best efforts, to find out much about him.

The only visual evidence reporters had to go on was a photo that a camera at a local bank had captured of Moore when he was robbing the bank. (That’s why police were after him.) When Mark returned to work the following Monday, an editor dropped the Moore story in Mark’s lap. The assignment: “Find out who this guy is and give us a profile.”

Before jumping into electronic records, Mark began to study the photograph. He noticed that Moore was wearing a baseball cap with the letter “T” superimposed on the letter “C” and immediately recognized it as a Minnesota Twins cap.

With that, Mark began combing through online Minnesota law enforcement records and, bingo, up popped the name of Lonnie Moore, above a lengthy criminal record. A few weeks later, under Mark’s byline, The Star published a fascinating front-page profile on Moore.

Journalistic resourcefulness (Example No. 2)

– Kansas City Council members convicted of bribery

I mentioned earlier that, at one time in the mid-90s, four former Kansas City Council members were being investigated for possible public corruption.

Mark knew that council members Michael Hernandez and Chuck Weber were the targets of one investigation, and he was trying to find out exactly what the investigation revolved around. He homed in on a proposed residential development being pushed by the Frank Morgan group.

For several weeks a council committee was holding hearings and taking testimony on the development proposal, which needed City Council approval. As part of the deal, officials in the City Development Department were requiring the developer to pay $521,400 to for construction of part of an access road, Line Creek Parkway, in the Northland.

The City Clerk’s office routinely publishes reports from City Council and council committee meetings, and it also tapes those meetings. Mark spent hours and hours poring over the written reports and the audio tapes, looking for any suspicious developments.

Finally, one day while going over the paperwork at home, it struck Mark that between one hearing and the next, the requirement for the developer’s participation in Line Creek Parkway had vanished without explanation. Like Hercule Poirot’s “little gray cells” churning into action, the disappearance of a few words produced an epiphany for Mark. And from there the story took off.

It turned out that Hernandez had agreed to drop the road-construction requirement in return for a $20,000 bribe. On another development project, he was taking a bribe of $50,000. In both instances, the idea was for the money to go to one or more nebulous Hispanic development groups and then be funneled back to Hernandez.

Weber’s role was more limited: At one committee meeting, at Hernandez’ request, Weber left the council chamber and reminded Walker LaBrunerie, a member of the Morgan development group, that the $70,000 in “contributions” had not yet been made.

Ultimately, Weber and Hernandez were convicted of felonies and left the council in disgrace. Hernandez was sentenced to 15 months, and Weber to five months, with a recommendation for home confinement.

LaBrunerie and another member of the development group, Mark Morgan, also were charged and convicted. LaBrunerie was sentenced to a year and a day, and Morgan, a son of the late banker and developer Frank Morgan, got an 18-month sentence.

Moral? Crime doesn’t pay, but the stories can be priceless…Sorry to see you leave The Star, Mark, but many of your friends and followers will be looking for you under the arc lights in the months and years to come.

 

I’m starting to think Pope Francis, who began his tenure in such promising fashion, is not going to remove Kansas City-St. Joseph Bishop Robert Finn from his post.

Perhaps even worse, I’m starting to think the pope is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, insofar as taking meaningful action on the clergy child-sexual-abuse scandal.

feel good pope

Maybe a smile and a wave are the most we’re going to see out of Francis

Last September, as many of you will recall, the pope sent a Canadian archbishop to Kansas City to investigate Finn’s leadership. The pope’s emissary asked several people he interviewed if they thought Finn was “fit to be a leader.” I can’t imagine that many of the respondents answered affirmatively.

Four months before that, in May of last year, the pope told reporters that three bishops were “under investigation” for their roles in the clergy sexual abuse scandal. One of the three, the pope said, had already been found guilty “and we are now considering the penalty to be imposed.”

From that, I concluded that Finn, the only American bishop to be convicted in the sex-abuse scandal, had a target on his back.

In the wake of Francis’ statement and the visit by the Canadian bishop, I confidently predicted that Finn would be out by at least Lent.

Well, Lent is almost over, and it looks like nothing is going to happen.

Furthermore, like a golfer frozen over the ball at address, the pope has fiddled and diddled with a commission he announced in December 2013.

The commission has an impressive name — the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors. But it took three months for the pope to make the first appointments to the commission, and then nothing happened for another nine months, until last December, when the pope assigned some more members to it.

The group had its first meeting last month and came out of the meeting saying it would hold bishops accountable for abuse cases that occurred on their watch. But there wasn’t a word about disciplinary action for any bishops who heretofore had dropped the ball on accountability, like Finn so obviously did by failing to report the crimes of onetime priest Shawn Ratigan, who’s now doing 50 years in prison.

In a March 2 letter, Pope Francis said he had created the commission “for the purpose of offering proposals and initiatives meant to improve the norms and procedures for protecting children and vulnerable adults.”

To me, it sounds like the commission and everything else that the pope is doing in regard to the scandal is pointed toward the future — not past despicable deeds and administrative inaction.  

Again, “offering proposals and initiatives” sounds nice, but we’ve heard that before. Pope Francis’ predecessor, Pope Benedict, sounded the same alarm, and look what ensued — more crimes and cover-up.

**

I’m not alone in being disgusted by the pope’s failure to take action regarding Finn.

Yesterday, the Survivors Network for those Abused by Priests (SNAP) also harshly criticized the pope for twiddling his thumbs:

“It’s a travesty that Francis has done nothing to discipline or even denounce Finn…(W)ith glacial speed, Francis ignores a bishop who was convicted of endangering children.”

Sorry to say, at this p0int it appears to me Francis is quite content having established himself as a “feel-good,” popular pope.

It’s just dandy that he’s humble, but does he have any backbone? Is he “fit to lead,” as the Canadian archbishop asked about Finn?

Maybe not. Maybe he’ll be remembered as a pope who talked a good game and attracted rock-concert-type crowds around the world but didn’t have the stomach to look a crooked cleric in the eye and say, “You’re fired.”

A new wind that blew in today has once again kicked up dust around Missouri Republican Chairman John Hancock.

David Humphreys, a leading Republican donor from Joplin, released an affidavit alleging that Hancock had been conducting a “whispering campaign” against the last State Auditor Tom Schweich.

In Schweich’s eyes, the alleged whispering campaign was intended to plant seeds that he was Jewish and thereby discourage some big Republican donors from supporting him. Schweich, of course, committed suicide late last month while trying to pin the whispering campaign on Hancock, who has close ties to Catherine Hanaway, the likely 2016 Republican nominee for governor.

At first I thought Hancock would be relieved of duty as Republican chairman, but it now appears he will survive. KC Star political columnist Steve Kraske wrote earlier this week that Hancock would have trouble hanging onto the post only if Sen. Roy Blunt, former Sen. Kit Bond or Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder called for Hancock to step down. And none of them has.

Hanaway

Hanaway

The larger picture here, though, is that if Las Vegas was taking bets on the governor’s race, Hanaway would probably be an even-money favorite to win.

There are three main reasons I think Hanaway is going to be Missouri’s next governor.

1) She’s got name identity and significant political experience.

She was elected to the Missouri House in 1998 from suburban St. Louis and in the early 2000s became the first woman Speaker of the House. She presided over the Republican takeover of the House in the 2002 elections. In 2004, she was the Republican nominee for secretary of state and narrowly lost to Democrat Robin Carnahan.

In 2005, President George W. Bush appointed her U.S. attorney for eastern Missouri. She resigned in April 2009 and entered private practice. She is currently a partner at Husch Blackwell law firm in Clayton. (Husch Blackwell also has a Kansas City office.)

2) Her likely Democratic opponent, Attorney General Chris Koster, is extremely vulnerable to an attack on his integrity.

Koster, a former Cass County prosecutor, was the lead figure in a New York Times expose last October. That front-page story recounted how a lawyer for 5-Hour-Energy buttonholed Koster at a convention of state attorneys general and prevailed on him to pull Missouri out of a multi-state investigation of 5-Hour-Energy.

Koster was so eager to please that he pulled out his cell phone on the spot, called his office and in short order had his staff remove Missouri from the inquiry.

Right now, a very small percentage of voters knows about the New York Times story. But you can be sure that when Hanaway and her major campaign consultant, Jeff Roe, and her million-dollar campaign donor, Rex Sinquefield, get through, just about every voter in the state will be aware that Koster is not “a  man of the people.”

At a meeting of Republicans in Kansas City last month, Hanaway gave an indication of how she’s going to handle Koster: She passed out bottles of 5-Hour Energy drink with joke labels that showed a cartoon image of Koster under the name “24-Hour Corruption.”

If Schweich thought he had it bad with the “whispering campaign,” Koster better seek out his tailor and get fitted for a suit of armor.

3) Finally, over the space of less than 10 years, Missouri has gone from pale red to fire-truck red.

To me, this says it all: In 2008, Barack Obama lost to John McCain by less than 4,000 votes statewide. Four years later, Mitt Romney beat Obama by 250,000 votes in Missouri.

Now, some of that can certainly be attributed to disenchantment with Obama initiatives like the Affordable Care Act, but I think it’s also a strong indication that the state has become much more conservative.

…And here’s one more thing to think about: How do you think Hillary Clinton is going to fare in Missouri — at the top of the Democratic ticket?

Early on St. Patrick’s Day 27 years ago, our daughter Brooks entered the world at Overland Park Regional Medical Center. It was a cold, wet-snowy day, and Patty and I watched the St. Patrick’s Day Parade on TV from the hospital room, with Brooks close by.

Naturally, Brooks loves St. Patrick’s Day, and sometimes we take in the parade. We did so today, and although there was a stiff breeze from the northeast, it was pleasant, for the most part.

As usual, it was a great spectacle and one of those Kansas City traditions — like the lighting of the Plaza lights — that distinguishes Kansas City from other cities.

Our vantage point was 43rd and Broadway. Here are the photos…

 

P1040648

P1040650

P1040651

P1040653

P1040654

P1040655

P1040658

P1040673

P1040666

P1040659

P1040652

P1040663

P1040669

P1040674

P1040676

 

P1040680

THE END

Patty and I began going to Hot Springs about the time we married. We used to go almost every year — occasionally in January when the racing season begins anew at the city’s thoroughbred racetrack, Oaklawn Jockey Club.

One year, I distinctly remember, we started out with decent weather in Kansas City but hit snow and ice in Arkansas. We had to turn back when we reached the Boston Mountains, south of Ft. Smith. We stopped at a convenience store at the base of the mountain, where a convenience store clerk told me: “The mountain is closed. A couple of semis went off the road overnight.”

As it turned out, we wouldn’t have seen any racing even if we’d made it over the mountain because the ice had caused electrical problems at the track, and the starting gate — from which the horses break — was rendered inoperative.

For one reason or another, we haven’t made it to Hot Springs in recent years, but, as some of you will recall, last month we went to Bentonville, in northwest Arkansas, to visit the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art.

That trip whetted my appetite to get back to Hot Springs, and over the weekend I made a wonderful solo trip.

On the way south, I stopped at Crystal Bridges for lunch. On the way back I stopped for lunch in Fayetteville and played golf in Springdale, before completing the final leg of the journey last night.

…I know, I just know, you’re dying to see the photos. Here they are:

P1040545

The nexus of Hot Springs is gently curving Central Avenue, which offers a wide variety of shops and restaurants.

P1040484

The Arlington Hotel, with several hundred rooms, dominates the intersection of Central Avenue and Fountain Street. To the right of the hotel, across Fountain, is the base of Hot Springs Mountain.

P1040487

The Pancake Shop is the main dining destination along Central. It and a couple of companion stores run the length of the green awning.

P1040497

Past Fountain Street, at the base of the mountain, is a string of buildings that once were bath houses, with their supposed “therapeutic” waters. Water pushes up from deep underground and emerges from several “springs” at an average temperature of 143 degrees. The bath houses tapped the springs and cooled the water to about 100 degrees for bathing. Only two of the buildings now operate as bath houses, but the others have been preserved. P1040528

It’s always steamy around Hot Springs Mountain.

P1040546

Lest you think Hot Springs is a veritable dreamland, some parts of town have seen better, livelier days. This is the former Majestic Hotel, just a block away from the Arlington, gone to wrack and ruin.

P1040552

P1040553

At the end of Fountain Street, across from Hot Springs Mountain, sits the motel where we have long stayed. A Polish man named Emil Wencil and his brother built it decades ago. Mr. and Mrs. Wencil owned and operated it for many years, but both are now dead. A new owner is renovating it.

P1040559

A crowd of about 30,000 attended the races on Saturday. Early on, when it was misting, people gathered trackside to socialize, enjoy the air and see the horses close up.

P1040562

Part of the glass-enclosed grandstand.

P1040565

The horses neared the starting gate for one of the early races…In the background you can see the Hot Springs Mountain Tower, which you can go up in for $7. (Oaklawn is 2 1/2 miles south of downtown.)

P1040583

There were several big races Saturday, including a Kentucky Derby prep race, the Rebel Stakes, for 3-year-olds…These ladies must have thought they were at Churchill Downs in Louisville, KY, where the Derby is run the first Saturday of May.

P1040563

…but this is most assuredly cowboy country.

P1040595

Then came the rain. The track condition went from “good” to “sloppy.” The ladies with the hats, along with just about everybody else, went inside. And the mood ebbed.

P1040603

Looking a little soiled, three jockeys returned to their quarters after a race.

P1040615

Back on the road yesterday, I bypassed Interstate 540 for a while and meandered up U.S., which used to be the only way you could traverse the Boston Mountains…The old way takes longer, but you get the benefit of “local color.”

P1040623

This is why it’s called “The Natural State.”P1040620

The

P1040637

Out of the mountains and into the city — Fayetteville, that is, home to the University of Arkansas and Donald W. Reynolds Razorback Stadium. (Donald Reynolds, who died in 1993,  was a newspaper baron; his foundation also financed the Journalism Institute at the University of Missouri.)

P1040639

Dickson is the most dynamic street in Fayetteville. The university campus is at the top of the hill, at the very back of the picture.

 

I’m starting to think that a combination of voter expectations and newly agitated Clinton fatigue might end up denying Hillary Clinton her party’s presidential nomination next year.

I have no idea who can beat her, but it’s a long time between now and primary-election season. Other Democratic candidates are likely to include former U.S. Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia; former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley; and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

Clinton, of course, is the presumed Democratic presidential nominee, but I think she has slipped badly with many voters as a result of the scandal over her decision to use only a personal email account — forgoing a State Department account — when she was secretary of state…How do we know she is turning over all government-related emails? We don’t know, and I think it’s safe to say she probably won’t turn them all over.  

I don’t see the email scandal going away quickly. For one thing, it has provided the U.S. House committee investigating the attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi, Libya, with fresh meat. Using the private email account exclusively is like handing the Republican-dominated Benghazi committee a hammer and saying, “Hit me and don’t stop hitting me.”

But there’s another factor that could easily eat away at Clinton’s status as presumptive Democratic nominee.

A recent NBC-Wall Street Journal survey of 1,000 people showed that a significantly larger percentage of respondents was much more interested in a candidate who would bring about greater policy changes than a candidate who was steeped in experience.

The pollsters read two key statements to respondents and asked them if they agreed or disagreed.

The first statement was:

“This is a time when it is important to look for a more experienced and tested person even if he or she brings fewer changes to the current policies.”

Thirty-eight percent of respondents said they agreed with that statement.

The second statement was:

“This is a time when it is important to look for a person who will bring greater changes to the current policies even if he or she is less experienced and tested.”

Fifty-nine percent of respondents said they agreed with that statement.

Hillary, of course, is the epitome of “experienced and tested,” but she seems to offer virtually no hope for “greater changes.”

Doesn’t the story with Hillary boil down to “same old same old”? How could it be anything else? I wonder how she plans to convince a majority of voters in the states whose electoral votes will determine the outcome that she is a change agent. That’s exactly how President Obama beat her last time, stealing the “agent-of-change” mantle right off her shoulders.

I bet many Republicans are feeling pretty hopeful these days. And they should be, in my opinion.

On the other hand, some Democrats — maybe a lot by now — are feeling queasy about having a candidate who appears destined to be the 2016 nominee.

One such Democrat, Deval Patrick, a former Massachusetts governor and an Obama supporter in 2008, told The New York Times that Democrats might be better off if at least one other Democratic challenger emerged.

The Times quoted Patrick as saying:

“My view of the electorate is, we react badly to inevitability, because we experience it as entitlement, and that is risky, it seems to me, here in America.”

**

…A wise uncle who died a few years ago once told me, “Expect the unexpected.”

I will.

After almost nine years of McClatchy Co. ownership, each of the remaining employees at The Kansas City Star must feel like he or she is carrying a donkey, not riding one.

Since 2008 — two years after McClatchy bought The Star and the other 31 daily papers in the KnightRidder chain — the employees have seen at least one buyout and several rounds of layoffs.

Six weeks ago, The Star laid off or offered retirement to four editorial employees, including ace energy reporter Steve Everly, and art critic Alice Thorson.

fannin

Fannin

Then today, or possibly yesterday, editor Mike Fannin put out a memo saying The Star was having a round of buyouts, with those taking the package getting a maximum of six months pay.

Here’s how Fannin’s memo began:

“Regrettably, I have some difficult news to share this morning. Given the economic pressures we’re facing at the start of 2015, we have to cut costs in the newsroom. This is not a failure of our terrific journalism, just a financial reality. 

“We are all familiar with those realities. While we are seeing growth in key areas like digital revenue and digital readership — and while this will be a year of energetic change for the news division as I outlined recently — other areas are still hurting. 

“So, for the first time since 2009, The Star is offering a voluntary severance program to full­time employees in the newsroom. This plan is similar to other programs we have offered in the past and is not a reflection of the value of anyone’s work or personal contribution to the organization. We are also in the process of trimming other newsroom expenses, including freelance, travel, etc. 

“Employees who elect will be eligible for two weeks of severance for every year of service, capped at 26 weeks. They will also be eligible for company­ subsidized COBRA (continuation of health insurance) for three months after leaving the company.”

Eligible employees who wish to take advantage of the offer must announce their intentions by next Monday.

Fannin’s memo doesn’t say what the qualifications are, but I presume it turns on some “magic” number — such as 70, 75, 80, 85 — that combines age and years of employment, or maybe a minimum number of service years plus an age minimum.

This offer could take out a lot of good editorial employees, and the quality of the paper — still pretty good — could suffer dramatically.

On the other hand, this is probably a day of rejoicing for the employees who qualify for the buyout. With The Star’s plummeting fortunes, along with those of many other metropolitan dailies, a lot of long-time employees have been waiting and hoping for a buyout, and now that they’re got the opportunity, I think they will jump on it.

Besides the overall decline of daily newspapers, another big problem for The Star is that McClatchy paid way too much for the KnightRidder properties — $4.5 billion. The company’s debt still stands at $1 billion, even after reducing debt by $523 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 by selling Apartments.com, Cars.com and the Anchorage Daily News.

At random and off the top of my head, I’m going to throw out some names of staff members who may qualify for the buyout.

I’m sure I will miss some obvious people who will qualify, and, as I said, I’m just speculating on eligibility. (Feel free to suggest additions to the list of potential candidates.)

In any event…

Political reporter and columnist Dave Helling; courts reporter Mark Morris; general assignment reporters Eric Adler and Rick Montgomery; general assignment reporter and former columnist Mike Hendricks; police reporters Glenn Rice and Tony Rizzo; general assignment reporter Matt Campbell; education reporters Mara Rose Williams and Joe Robertson; assistant metro editors, Jesse Barker, Elaine Adams and Donna McGuire; feature and celebrity writer Lisa Gutierrez; features editor Sharon Hoffmann; photographers Keith Myers and John Sleezer; copy editor and “Monday morning poet” Don Munday; columnist Mary Sanchez; all three business reporters, Diane Stafford, Joyce Smith and Mark Davis; all three business editors, Greg Hack, Steve Rosen and Keith Chrostowski; and all four editorial board members, Lewis Diuguid, Yael Abouhalkah, Barb Shelly and Steve Paul. (If all editorial board members left, I guess Publisher Mi-Ai Parrish would write the editorials in addition to overseeing the entire newspaper operation…Nose to the grindstone there, Mi-Ai!)

The desk that would get off easiest would be sports, which is nicely stocked with a bunch of young reporters and relatively new columnists Vahe Gregorian and Sam Mellinger — both standouts.

**

Before I retired from The Star in 2006 — at age 60 and with almost 37 years of service — I had been hoping for a KnightRidder buyout. And then along came McClatchy. I remember vividly when then-CEO and president Gary Pruitt came into the newsroom to talk to us about his vision of The Star under McClatchy ownership.

Naturally, he saw panoramic horizons and clear blue skies. When he finished his spiel, he asked if anyone had any questions. I raised my hand.

“Mr. Pruitt,” I said, “are you planning on any buyouts?”

Many in the crowded newsroom laughed because they knew what I was thinking, and some of them were hoping for the same thing.

“Why, no,” Pruitt said, with a puzzled expression on his face. “When we buy properties, we plan on growing them…adding staff.”

Then, he smiled and said, “Why, were you hoping for something?”

…At that moment, I knew that I had to make my own plans and could not hang around and wait for money to fall out of the sky.

So, a few weeks later, I gave my notice, and three days after the McClatchy purchase closed (June 27, 2007), I walked out of The Star for the last time.

**

I worked with a lot of the editorial employees who are still at the paper. I like a great many of them, and I’m happy that some of them will get to “retire” before being shown the door.

Naturally, I worry what’s going to happen with my beloved newspaper, but whatever happens, we’ll keep getting our news somewhere. Not in the quality and quantity we used to get it…or even the current, diminished quality and quantity. But we will get it, and The Star will continue to muddle along.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 175 other followers