• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« “One of the last places in the world where it’s still quiet” — Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve
The newspaper as entertainment: It’s all right there in black and white »

Oh, why, Big Brother, do you want to know — need to know — who I call?

June 7, 2013 by jimmycsays

Hey, Brother, I’ve got a favor to ask…a few, actually:

Would you stop lying to us about attacks on our embassies? Would you start telling us exactly who you are killing with these drone strikes? Would you stop harassing nonprofit organizations whose names you don’t like? Would you stop seizing the telephone records of reporters? Come to think of it, would  you stop scooping up records of all telephone calls made in the United States?

Holy shit! What the fuck? (Sorry, this is a situation, it seems to me, that calls for extreme language.)

In a May 23 post, I said, half facetiously that I was shocked and appalled at “the imploding presidency of Barack Obama.”

No longer is it half facetious; I’m completely shocked and thoroughly appalled.

Even though this all-inclusive phone-call sweep has been going on, incredibly, for seven years — before Obama became president — wouldn’t you think that a president who values civil liberties would look at that and say:

“Why are we doing this?”

I’m a lifelong Democrat, but this is a case in which I think it’s appropriate to ask, “What Ronnie do?” I’m talking about the late President Ronald Reagan, who, above all else, was a champion of civil liberties, of American being a nation where you should be able to live without government poking around in your private life.

I can’t help but think that if he were alive and Alzheimer’s free, he would look at the current government wasteland and say, “What the fuck?”

Yesterday, when I first heard about the general, phone-call-records sweep, I thought maybe my gut reaction of repulsion was an overreaction. I’d better wait, I thought, to see what my reliable political compass, The New York Times, had to say.

Thankfully, The Times affirmed my revulsion. The leading editorial in today’s Times is titled “President Obama’s Dragnet.” It is twice as long as the average editorial, and it is so strong that it appears to me it could signal an overall shift against the Obama administration.

Here’s how that editorial begins:

“Within hours of the disclosure that federal authorities routinely collect data on phone calls Americans make, regardless of whether they have any bearing on a counterterrorism investigation, the Obama administration issued the same platitude it has offered every time President Obama has been caught overreaching in the use of his powers: Terrorists are a real menace and you should just trust us to deal with them because we have internal mechanisms (that we are not going to tell you about) to make sure we do not violate your rights.

“Those reassurances have never been persuasive — whether on secret warrants to scoop up a news agency’s phone records or secret orders to kill an American suspected of terrorism — especially coming from a president who once promised transparency and accountability.”

The editorial goes on to finger the Patriot Act, enacted during the Bush administration, as the basis of the last two administrations’ overreach into Americans’ lives. The Times has long railed against the Patriot Act (what a misnomer, huh?), which, today’s editorial says, “was reckless in its assignment of unnecessary and overbroad surveillance powers.”
Still, it falls, as it should, at the feet of the Commander in Chief. He knows what’s going on…So why doesn’t he use some common sense? Examine some of this stuff and say, “This doesn’t add up. Why are we doing this? Isn’t it an unnecessary and unwarranted intrusion in?”
Should this nitwit know who we are calling?

Should this nitwit know who we are calling?

If we can’t rely on the President, who can we rely on? Certainly not that clown James Clapper, the national’s chief intelligence officer, who three months ago told a congressional committee that the National Security Agency was not collecting data on Americans.

Here’s how that exchange went with Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat:
Wyden: “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?”
Clapper: “No, sir.”
Wyden: “It does not?”
Clapper: “Not wittingly. There are cases where they could, inadvertently perhaps, collect—but not wittingly.” 
My first reaction to that is that anyone who uses the term “wittingly” should not be in any position of authority. That’s someone who’s overly impressed with himself and likes to slice and dice words, instead of being straightforward and telling the truth.
Second, the person is a nitwit. Unfortunately, I’m starting to think that Clapper is one of many nitwits in top government positions, perhaps including the Oval Office.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in politics | Tagged James Clapper, The Associated Press, The New York Times | 18 Comments

18 Responses

  1. on June 7, 2013 at 11:57 am Ray Gilbert

    And the rest of the story:
    Washington Post broke a story last night on the National Security Agency’s massive sweep of email server data from most major providers, in a program called PRISM.Yes, email, photos, everything that any U.S. citizen has sent via the internet in the last few years, may have been captured in the electronic files of the NSA.


    • on June 7, 2013 at 12:43 pm jimmycsays

      I saw that, Ray…Of small consolation is the fact (??) that, according to The Times, “a senior government official…said it targeted only foreigners abroad.” Of course, that could easily turn out to be a lie, too.


  2. on June 7, 2013 at 3:28 pm The Smartman

    Don’t know why you’re so shocked Fitz. I expected nothing less from a President, raised on Chicago politics, seemingly hell bent on the destruction of our Republic.

    Crazy as Glenn Beck may be, he had BHO pegged from day one. Same for Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity and so on and so on. They have been more right than wrong.

    Mitt Romney might not have been Mr. Excitement but only a fool would not notice that he has far more character, honor and integrity than the Grifter in Chief.

    Rome is burning and your brethren in the Fourth Estate are telling us it’s aromatherapy.

    Actions have consequences. I’m just waiting on instructions from Roger Ailes on when to start watering the Tree of Liberty. This country will wake up after the political and media sinners get an Old Testament Jesus ass whupping.

    Change will be invoked by pulling triggers, not voting levers.

    And for anyone at the NSA, Justice Department, CIA or FBI reading this….Kiss My Ass, and bring your Chapstick cause it’s gonna be a long day.


  3. on June 7, 2013 at 3:47 pm Dan Margolies

    Surely you jest, Fitz, when you make out Ronald Reagan to be some sort of civil liberties guy. Really, I’d hope someone as sharp as you wouldn’t buy into the mythologizing of Saint Ronnie. Off the top of my head, here are some of the anti-civil liberties stands that I remember him taking:

    * Launched the war on drugs
    * Supported anti-abortion legislation
    * Instituted global gag order on family planning
    * Opposed the Civil Rights Acts of 1964
    * Opposed the Voting Rights Act of 1965
    * Opposed the Equal Rights Amendment
    * Favored mandatory three-strikes sentencing laws
    * Supported a constitutional amendment to allow school prayer
    * Promoted government secrecy (e.g., agitated for a law that made it a crime for anyone, including journalists, to intentionally expose the U.S.’s foreign intelligence activities – the very thing that’s brought about the exposure of the NSA’s massive surveillance program, which you’re now decrying)
    * Set up Ed Meese’s crazy-ass pornography commission

    I’m not even touching here on his drastic cuts to programs to help the poor and disadvantaged – arguably the biggest civil liberties matter – or of his support for all manner of noxious tyrants – Saddaam Hussein, for example – and thugs like the Contras (whom he compared to our founding fathers) – who engaged in massive human rights violations in their own countries.


  4. on June 7, 2013 at 4:33 pm The Smartman

    No Dan, surely you jest. Here’s how a “normal person” perceives it. Less drug use is a good thing. Less abortion is a good thing. Your comments on family planning, Civil Rights, Voting Rights and the ERA are “technically” correct but each requires deep examination of Reagan’s position and reasoning to fully understand them. In the purest form of those ideals he was not against them. Intentionally misleading on your part. Typical Hegelian ploy. Three strikes is a bad thing? School prayer is a bad thing? And it wasn’t going to be “mandatory”. In most cases it would have been represented by a moment of silence. Government secrecy has been going on since Washington held the office. It’s a necessary part of the game. Ed Meese needed something to do. Presidential history is littered with relationships with tyrants. BHO isn’t squeaky clean in this area.

    Change your red doper diaper and go watch some reruns of Hardball so you can get a tingle up your leg.


    • on June 9, 2013 at 8:54 am chuck

      +1


  5. on June 7, 2013 at 4:56 pm jimmycsays

    I figured that once I brought Ronnie into the picture, the shit would start to fly…l was thinking along pretty basic lines…like, Ronnie was a rancher, and all ranchers would be against the gubment scooping up our phone records. They probably wouldn’t care, however, about government usurping the phone records of reporters. I’d like to know what New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has to say about this (couldn’t find anything in Google results). He seems like the kind of guy who could whip people into a frenzy over this…And frenzy is what I want!


  6. on June 7, 2013 at 7:16 pm The Smartman

    Christie is dead to us on the far right. He has the potential to be a cross between Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Hoffa but he’s not willing to answer the call.

    Although we have to assume that BHO has Bill Clinton’s personal phone call and Internet use file. So much for the Hillary endorsement in 2016.


  7. on June 9, 2013 at 8:18 am chuck

    American’s concern over the NSA et al. gathering cell phone info etc of all Americans is understandable. The Government abuse of information, personfied by the current IRS scandal is abysmal. All government agencies are populated by a liberal thought process and the result of that same process is the Anarcho-Tyranny we see with respect to Immigration, Gun Control and the myriad other intitiatives which are effected by Government in the face of popular opposition.

    The IRS abuse of power is easily translated in the minds of us all to a more general abuse of power from the myriad government agency acronyms that rule our lives. Fritz Lang’s “Metropolis”?

    That said, I am gonna gird myself for a storm of contempt and opprobrium from all.

    I am ok with it. Keep track of every one of my cell phone calls. Read my emails. Spy on me with drones. Put cameras on every corner, every window and turn the entire country into a Reality TV Show where the “Fourth Wall” melts under the heat of little red lights on little black cameras. Crypto-facists unite!!

    We are now as a nation, unable to control our city steets, our nation’s borders and maintain our Judeo/Christian ethos by way of a PC culture cellularly imbued in our national DNA by Hollywood, the 4th Estate and pussilanimous politicians blown by every wind and wet by every rain.

    The rule of law as we knew it, decays in a nationl ethnomasochistic paroxysm, an “American Suicide” as Pat Buchanan calls it. A brainwashed, hive minded stupidity that replaces common sense and the social contract with the elevation of identity politics and “Balkanization”.

    At this very moment, we all know, there are smart, sick fanatics out there working on weapons to destroy our cities and citizens. The coming dystopia that you all fear, is a small price to pay to keep a nuke, or the materials for a nuke coming in across our porous and by design, defensless borders, or as in Europe a de facto “Arab Spring” which destroys inherant culture under the cover of treasonous liberal feel good policies, meant to destroy the fabric of the native countries there.

    America’s dissociative fugue has weakened our national identity, left us rudderless in a sea of multiculturalistic clap trap that if seen for what it really is, on camera, can’t be denied.

    I’m ready for my close up Mr. Demille.


  8. on June 9, 2013 at 8:31 am John Altevogt

    Mr. Margolies, you’ve confused civil rights with civil liberties. Not only are they not the same, they are often at odds. Then, to make matters worse, you throw in items that are completely unrelated to any logical definition of civil liberties, or civil rights. Just because you disagree with something does not grant it civil liberty status. And, I think if you check you’ll find that civil rights legislation often had more support among Republicans than Democrats.


    • on June 9, 2013 at 8:49 am chuck

      I believe, without checking (breakfast is wating), that Nixon signed in most of the Civil Rights legislation as we know it.


  9. on June 9, 2013 at 8:42 am The Smartman

    For all the low information voters that would like an explanation of Chuck’s comment, click on or cut and paste this link….
    http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=d6qIoMjfECo&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dd6qIoMjfECo.


  10. on June 9, 2013 at 8:56 am John Altevogt

    What we’re seeing out of King Hussein’s regime is simply the continuing descent of what has come to be known as “liberalism” in America into barbarism and totalitarianism. There is a pattern throughout this administration of censorship, repression and hate-mongering that has set race relations back decades and divided us as a people more than at any time since the civil war. The rule of law has become a joke as Dear Leader trashes one element of the Bill of Rights after another.


  11. on June 10, 2013 at 8:02 am jenniferm

    I won’t get into the Reagan conversation other than to say I disagreed with everything he did as POTUS; however, he believed in what he said–he did have some inner compass (I won’t use the word moral) that told him what the government should and should not be doing and worked towards that goal. His errors were in hiring people like Ed Meese and others who went beyond the views Ronnie had of America.

    Obama, OTOH, has no such compass. (I will add I voted Dem for POTUS from 1984 until 2008, the last two I picked Green Party). The Dem party groomed someone whose first goal was himself, second, himself and third, himself. I knew early this guy was a fraud in terms of being a Dem, a liberal or a progressive. I knew early he was going to get a pass from our “free press” and the increasingly influencial bloggers (many of whom were paid in ad $$). Yes, we can go over all the flip flopping on liberal issues he has had over the years and the “he needs to do that to get elected” meme crying from people like Barb Shelly.

    When Obama leaves office the voices of liberalism and progressives will be pretty much extinguished. Because if you won’t speak up now, when will you?


  12. on June 10, 2013 at 8:39 am jimmycsays

    Among other things I learned from that comment, Jennifer, is that you read The Star…On behalf of all current and former Star employees, I thank you. The most informed people, in my experience, are those who read at least one newspaper. As a former reporter and editor, I’m a firm believer that a good newspaper gives readers what they need, not necessarily what they want. That might sound pretentious and presumptuous, but if newspapers flail around, as many have done the last decade or so, trying to satisfy people’s “tastes,” they can never satisfy. The Star fell into the “trying to satisfy” trap between about 2000 and 2010, but upper management finally saw that was like chasing a fox without a hunting dog. They’re doing better, at least on local news, but they still give short shrift to national and international news. Too bad, but I’m afraid at this point McClatchy (and similar chains) no longer has enough advertising to buy sufficient newsprint to give its readers “all the news you need to know.”


    • on June 10, 2013 at 12:24 pm jenniferm

      Yes I do read the Star–although I’m officially banned from posting comments now. (I guess you can write the most vile things about anyone, but if you criticize one “public editor” you are gone–and all I did was question his cherry picking of facts). The Star has so little of interest to read these days anyway. And I can’t think of one topic the Star is out in front of locally. Nor can I find one columnist that doesn’t insult their audience. It’s not like the reader can’t find more information, news, enlightenment and education on the web than what gets thrown on their doorstep each morning–we are going to continue to do that. Just seems like the Star staff is determined by their own actions to keep driving readers away.


  13. on June 10, 2013 at 1:51 pm John Altevogt

    Fascinating, the one thing anyone who demands honesty out of this newspaper has in common is that they’ve discovered that Derek Donovan is a complete phony and that you will be blocked in a nanosecond if you try to convey that on the pages of Der Sturmer.

    I have screen shots of him coming online in he middle of the night to berate people who criticised him, I have an mp3 of a voicemail he left me. And I have copies of his blog and emails when he demanded that I remove the mp3 from the Internet or face an an attack in his column by name. I didn’t and he did.

    Tell me Fitz, what are the ethics of using your space in The Star to try and browbeat someone into not embarrassing you? Fannin was fully aware of what was going on and did nothing.

    Donovan, Pepper and Abouhalkah are the biggest fascists The Star has.


  14. on June 10, 2013 at 1:56 pm John Altevogt

    Derek’s method is to give you a vague, quasi-supportive response if you question something, but if you’re not satisfied with the BS he twists something you’ve said and attacks you. Very unprofessional and completely unsuited for any position involving conflict. That’s why you see very few posts on his blog anymore, and certainly nothing critical of him. Heil Derek.

    Oh, and Jenniferm, Shelly is little more than a hand maiden to corruption. The ideology comes in second to kissing the establishment’s backside. And, I can back that up also.



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • April 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 567 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Join 567 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: