• Home
  • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
  • Contact

JimmyCsays: At the juncture of journalism and daily life in KC

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Peanuts! Hot dogs! Yard signs!…Yard signs? Yep, they’re in!
Rollin’, rollin’, rollin’…Keep them big bills rollin’… »

What the Civic Council of Greater Kansas City really wants

October 22, 2013 by jimmycsays

Almost every day, someone asks me: “Who’s behind this sales-tax proposal and what do they want?”

Many people seem to think that the Civic Council is involved in some sort of conspiracy designed to further enrich its individual members.

I tell people I do not believe that is the case.

In my opinion, the Civic Council’s motivation revolves around an under-the-radar aspect of this campaign:

For more than a decade, the Civic Council (consisting of the CEO’s of the biggest companies and the managing partners of the biggest law firms) has quietly nurtured the idea of making Kansas City a national center for “translational medical research.”

Furthermore, and more specifically, the Civic Council wants to make sure that the organization calling the shots is an institution of its own creation — the Kansas City Area Life Sciences Institute.

The Civic Council dreamed up the idea of the life sciences institute about 15 years ago, and the institute was formally established in the early 2000s. (You can read more about the institute’s history on its website, http://www.kclifesciences.org.)

The institute’s original business plan, finalized in 2000, called for KCALSI to “build a critical mass in life sciences research in Kansas City.” In its plan, the institute set a goal of coordinating the expenditure of $500 million a year on medical research in the Kansas City area.

The institute now has 10 “stakeholder” institutions (not including the Stowers Institute for Medical Research, which dropped out somewhere along the way). The stakeholders (including Children’s Mercy Hospital, St. Luke’s and UMKC, which would receive tens of millions of dollars a year in sales-tax proceeds) spend more than $550 million a year on medical research, according to the KCALSI website.

Despite having reached the $500-million-a-year threshold, however, the fact is that the life sciences institute has not grown and prospered as the Civic Council had envisioned.

It has not approached anything close to the “critical mass” it talked about in 2000.

With just three employees and depending exclusively on its “stakeholder” institutions to keep it relevant, KCALSI has failed to establish itself as a key player in the medical-research industry.

In my opinion, that’s what this tax proposal is all about:

The Civic Council is seeking to prop up and inflate the life sciences institute, making it the viable, prosperous hub around which most of the major medical-research institutions in the Kansas City area would revolve.

To me, it’s simply a matter of the Civic Council being determined to reach a long-sought goal — but at taxpayers’ expense, not the private sector’s.

Once again, it is clear that wealthy, influential individuals and big corporations would rather gamble with public money than their own.

The half-cent-sales-tax proposal on the Nov. 5 ballot in Jackson County is risky and extravagant, and it deserves to be voted down.

**

See this post and much more at stopabadcure.org

**

The first of three Town Hall meetings sponsored by Question 1 opponents, including Committee to Stop a Bad Cure, will be held at 6 p.m. tonight at the Mid-Continent Library in Independence. The address is 317 W. U.S. 24. Everyone is welcome. Hors d’oeuvres will be provided.

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

4 Responses

  1. on October 22, 2013 at 4:41 pm chuck

    Really solid article.


    • on October 22, 2013 at 11:28 pm jimmycsays

      Thanks, Chuck…It’s not sexy or outrageous (other than the taxpayers picking up the tab), just something that people should be aware of. I can see, in a few years, where people might be saying, “How did this life sciences institute become so important and why is it getting so much money?”

      However, I don’t think it’s going to get to that stage; I think Question 1 is going down.


  2. on October 23, 2013 at 12:26 am Mike Rice

    The story about the Kansas City Area Life Sciences Institute is the kind of enterprise story that we should be reading about in The Star. But with the paper down to only about two dozen reporters and what appears to me to be upper management’s lack of interest in local elections, I’m not going to hold my breath.


    • on October 23, 2013 at 1:36 am jimmycsays

      Thanks, Mike. I really appreciate that. When I talked about that at the Independence town hall meeting tonight (which you attended), I didn’t know if that would be too obscure to make an impact on people. But I think it did.

      Also, Mike Hendricks sent me an e-mail yesterday, saying he was working on a weekend story about the tax and did I have anything new to add.
      (How about that for keeping up with the action — “Send me an email, telling me what’s new on your front.”)

      I laid out the angle of the civic Council’s high hopes for the life sciences institute in an attachment and returned it to him. We’ll see if it makes the paper.

      …Hey, I hope you’ve gone to bed; you’ve gotta be at work pretty early!



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About me: Jim Fitzpatrick
    • Contact
  • Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 511 other followers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


%d bloggers like this: